LOGOBORDERCANVES

                                                                                 

   02/04/2015                                                                                                                                                                                   Politics Read More By Corla Reeves Jackson  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

                                                                    

 

WELCOME TO GULF COAST TRIBUNE. COM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS IS A TECHNICAL TIPPLE KNOCK OUT BY CORLA REEVES JACKSON:  GOD TOLD JACKSON TO GO ON AND END THE WAR BY SHOWING THE WORLD THE TRUTH BY REVEALING THIS TO HER.  THE ORDERS (JUDGE MAHONEY) ISSUED AND ENTERED UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) ON (OCTOBER 1, 2009) BY THE OBJECTIONS FILED (JULY 15, 2009) STATED IN BLACK AND WHITE THAT THE ORDER BY TITLE WAS NAMED (AMENDED ORDER DISALLOWING CLAIM). 

 

The Order Further Stated" (THIS ORDER AMENDS THAT ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 2009) And Not The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006)...

The Order Further Stated (IT IS ORDERED DEBTORS OBJECTIONS IS SUSTAINED AND THE CLAIM IS REDUCED AND ALLOWED TO THE AMOUNT PAID). IT DID NOT SAY THE (FAKE CREDITORS GMAC)" IT SAID THE (DEBTORS) OBJECTIONS IS DUE TO BE (GRANTED) WHICH IS CORLA REEVES JACKSON ! 

The Orders Were Issued And Entered For Claim Number (1) And Claim Number (7)" On September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009).  This Is Recorded And Filed (ECF)" Their Is No Way For GMAC Mortgage Corporation et, al. - GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC. To Have Won This Case Guaranteed.

This Case Was And Is Recorded Under The United States Bankruptcy Federal Laws Rules And Regulations Set By Congress" That Was Violated By GMAC Lawyers By Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied" Because This Case Was Real" Its Was Facts That Was Recorded (ECF) Dated Back To (2005) !

 

 

CORLA REEVES JACKSON MORTGAGE WAS WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN NUMBER (651003367) THE SERVICERS NUMBER WAS (001347464-8).  CORLA REEVES JACKSON LOAN WAS SECURED IN A POOL OF LOANS BACKED BY SECURITY'S WITH HER POLICY'S AND MORE WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH GMAC MORTGAGE LOAN NUMBER THEY FABRICATED TO STEAL INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND JACKSON HOME FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS UNDER THEIR FABRICATED LOAN NUMBER (0835002124). OPTION ONE MORTGAGE POOL AND TRUST NEVER RECORDED A TRANSFER OR THE SALE OF CORLA REEVES JACKSON LOAN IN THEIR SEC FILINGS OR FROM (FDIC).  IN ADDITION TO THIS" GMAC NEVER RECORDED THIS LOAN IN (2004 OR 2005) IN THEIR SEC FILINGS AND THEY KNEW THIS. 

IT WAS RECORDED THAT CORLA REEVES JACKSON LENDER WAS (OPTION ONE MORTGAGE) LOAN NUMBER (651003367) WAS SECURED BY HER POLICY'S AND HER FIRST PAYMENT WAS SET UP BY OPTION ONE TO START (AUGUST 1, 2004).  HURRICANE IVAN HIT (SEPTEMBER 2004) THE HOME WAS TOTALED AFTER THE ROOF SHIFTED AND BUCKLED LEAVING SAGS AND DIPS ALL OVER SENDING CONTAMINATED RAIN WATER DEBRIS THROUGHOUT THE DWELLING" WHICH HAD TO BE GUTTED OUT TO SEE ALL THE STRUCTURAL DAMAGES AND BROUGHT UP TO HIGH WIND CODE AND PUT BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL POSITION OR BE RE-BUILT. 

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TOLD CORLA REEVES JACKSON DO NOT WORRY ABOUT ANYTHING HER LOAN WAS SECURED BY ALL HER HAZARD POLICY'S AS WELL AS HER CLOUDED AND SLANDERED TITLE POLICY'S ON WHAT THE SHOEMAKERS DID ON RE-ARRANGING (2) SUB-DIVISIONS USING (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) LOT WHICH WAS ALSO INSURED BY (2) ALTA POLICY'S FOR ($240,000) EACH A TOTAL OF ($480,000) THAT WAS DUE TO (OPTION ONE MORTGAGE AND CORLA REEVES JACKSON BY STEWART TITLE OF ALABAMA.  THIS IS WHEN GMAC CAME IN AND FAKED A NOTE FOR THE PROCEEDS ON THE POLICY'S BY FAKING A LEASEHOLD INTEREST IN CORLA REEVES JACKSON PROPERTY UNDER FALSE PRETENSE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION LAW FIRMS (SIROTE & PERMUTT) OF ALABAMA"  WENT IN AND FAKED A (LEASEHOLD INTEREST) UNDER THE PROPERTY FORCING CORLA REEVES JACKSON INTO BANKRUPTCY ON FAKE ARREARS" TO STEAL THE PROPERTY SO THEY COULD CASH IN ALL THE PROCEEDS DO FROM ALL THE POLICY'S FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS" WHICH CAUSED MASSIVE DAMAGES. 

GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION ILLEGALLY STOLE CORLA REEVES JACKSON IDENTITY TYING UP HER PROPERTY UNTIL THEY COULD STEAL IT FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS FIRST" BY AND THROUGH (CORLA REEVES JACKSON CREDIT REPORT).  THEN GMAC THEY FABRICATED A (LEASEHOLD INTEREST NOTE) UNDER THE PROPERTY IN CORLA REEVES JACKSON NAME UNDER FALSE PRETENSE IN (2005).  ONCE THEY DID THIS" GMAC ILLEGALLY REPORTED THEY FORECLOSED ON THE PROPERTY IN (APRIL 2005)" THIS ILLEGALLY TOOK AWAY (CORLA REEVES JACKSON LACK OF STANDING FROM HER AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE ON THE PROPERTY).

GMAC MORTGAGE WAS AFTER THE POLICY AND ALL THE INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND THE HOME ON ALL THE INSURED COVERED LOSSES" STATING THEY WERE LEASING (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) HER HOME WHEN THAT WAS NOT TRUE" GMAC MORTGAGE NEVER PAID FOR THE HOME TO DATE THAT THEY HAVE STOLEN HERE THEY COVERED UP!

AFTER THEY FORCED (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) INTO BANKRUPTCY ON (FAKE ARREARS FROM A FABRICATED LEASEHOLD INTEREST DOCUMENT) WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD (AGREEMENT) " THEY FILED A MOTION TO LIFT A AUTOMATIC STAY SO THEY COULD TAKE THE PROPERTY FROM (CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE) ILLEGALLY VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD.  THIS IS WHEN IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE DOCUMENTS GMAC MORTGAGE HAD USED TO DEFRAUD THE COURTS WITH ATTACHED TO (GMAC LEASEHOLD DOCUMENTS) WAS JUST A DOCUMENT (WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT) BETWEEN (CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC) IN THE ORIGINAL BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) UNDER JUDGE MAHONEY. 

THIS IS WHEN JUDGE MAHONEY (CONDITIONALLY DENIED GMAC MORTGAGE RELIEF OF AUTOMATIC STAY) BASED UPON ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS (1-4) BEFORE (5) COULD BE ENFORCED BY GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION.  THEY GOT BUSTED.  THE ORDER WAS ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006)...THAT PREVENTED GMAC FROM ROBBING AND HARASSING (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) OVER HER HOME ON HER INSURED COVERED LOSSES" BASED UPON A FAKE LEASEHOLD INTEREST WITHOUT A CONTRACT THAT GMAC PROVIDED TO THE COURTS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES.  AFTER GMAC GOT BUSTED" THEY DID NOT COMPLY TO THE JUDGE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) BASED UPON (1-4) OF THAT ORDER...

THE COURTS NEVER ISSUED A CONFIRMATION ORDER ON THE DEBTORS CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEBTOR CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC" AFTER MARCH 3, 2006 BASED UPON ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS (1-4) FIRST" WHICH NEVER HAPPENED AFTER THE ORDER WAS ISSUED AND ENTERED MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) IT WAS RECORDED (ECF)...  GMAC DID NOT FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM AFTER THE ORDER WAS ENTERED (MARCH 3, 2006) BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITION OF THAT ORDER (1-4)  THEY RAN" THEY DID NOT OWN THE NOTE AND NEITHER DID THEY HAVE A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC.  ITS TRUE GMAC GOT BUSTED MARCH 1, 2006) !

THERE WERE NO RESPONSES FILED BY GMAC IN COMPLY WITH (1-4) OF JUDGE MAHONEY ORDER ISSUED (MARCH 1, 2006) THAT WAS ENTERED AFTER (MARCH 3, 2006)" BECAUSE  IT WAS LATER DISCOVERED THAT GMAC DID NOT OWN THE NOTE OR THE ASSIGNMENT WHEN THEY FILED THEIR FAKE ARREARS ON A LEASEHOLD INTEREST UNDER CORLA REEVES JACKSON PROPERTY ON (06/15/2005) - 03/01/2006 - 03/03/2006) OR PRIOR TO (OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING ON (APRIL 30, 2008)....

OBJECTIONS WAS FILED (JULY 15, 2009) BY BARRY FRIEDMAN ON CLAIM NUMBER (7) NUMBER (2) A LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM (NO MORE ARREARS OWED) WHICH WAS GRANTED AND REDUCED TO THE AMOUNT THE DEBTOR PAID ON (SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 - OCTOBER 1, 2009).  THE (OCTOBER 1, 2009 ONLY AMENDS THE ORDER ISSUED SEPTEMBER 18, 2009) SUSTAINING THE ORDER AS ORIGINALLY ENTERED (SEPTEMBER 18, 2009) DISALLOWING GMAC MORTGAGE (2) LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM IN ITS (ENTIRETY) BY THE OBJECTIONS FILED (JULY 15, 2009) UNDER CLAIM (#7) NUMBER (2) OF THE ORDER AND THE OBJECTIONS WHICH BOTH MATCH...

GMAC MORTGAGE LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM WAS REVERSED BY OBJECTIONS REDUCED AND ALLOWED TO THE (AMOUNT PAID) AND NO MORE ARREARS OWED).  SEE OBJECTIONS FILED (JULY 15, 2009) THAT WAS GRANTED BY FEDERAL COURT ORDERS ON (SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 - OCTOBER 1, 2009) SO NO ONE CAN LIE" ITS WAS RECORDED FILED (ECF).  THE SAME APPLIED TO CLAIM NUMBER (1).  THE COURTS MERGED PURGED BOTH CLAIMS TO ($14,809.60) WHICH WAS REVERSED AND DISALLOWED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE AMOUNT PAID AS ORIGINALLY ENTERED IN THE ORDER DATED (SEPTEMBER 18, 2008)...THIS IS RECORDED IN THAT ORDER AMENDED (OCTOBER 1, 2009) SO NO ONE CAN LIE THIS IS FACTS GUARANTEED...

AFTER THE ORDERS WAS ISSUED (BANKRUPTCY CASE 05-13142) WAS CLOSED ON (OCTOBER 8, 2009) AND CLEARED THE TRUSTEE'S ON (JANUARY 20, 2009) BECAUSE CORLA REEVES JACKSON HAD TO BE REFUNDED BACK THE MONEY THE COURTS REFUSED TO GIVE TO (GMAC)  MORTGAGE" THEIR PROOF OF CLAIMS WERE REVERSED BY OBJECTIONS AND FEDERAL COURT ORDERS FILED (ECF) AND GMAC MORTGAGE AND THEIR LAWYERS AS WELL AS CORLA REEVES JACKSON LAWYER KNEW THIS" PRIOR TO DEFRAUDING JUDGE SHULMAN IN BANKRUPTCY NUMBER (3) IT WAS RECORDED. 

BANKRUPTCY NUMBER (2-3) WAS ILLEGAL NEW BANKRUPTCY NUMBERS WAS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE ISSUED UNDER THE SAME CASE ON FAKE ARREARS FROM (05-13142) BASED UPON THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) THAT WAS REVERSED IN ITS ENTIRETY BECAUSE GMAC DID NOT OWN THE NOTE OR THE ASSIGNMENT ON THE FAKE ARREARS THEY COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND FRAUD OF THE COURT WITH" WITH THE INTENT TO ROB CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND DEFRAUD  FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS" ABUSING THE LAW AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM TO CARRY OUT A ROBBERY!

GMAC ISSUED FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP A FALSE BANKRUPTCY LEASE TO DEFRAUD THE COURT TO WIN A CASE THAT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN WON AS WELL AS ON THE SHOEMAKERS CASE VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT" WHICH IS A VERY SERIOUS CRIME" AND THEY ALL KNOW THIS FRAUD OF THE COURT IS ONE OF THE WORSE CRIME ANYONE CAN COMMIT UNDER FEDERAL LAWS INVOLVING A HOME THAT WAS BACKED BY SECURITY'S THAT DID NOT BELONG TO GMAC MORTGAGE PERIOD TO DATE...THE ILLEGAL ORDERS MADE IT APPEAR AS IF CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS WRONG WHEN SHE WAS NOT SHE WAS THE VICTIMS" AND THE ILLEGAL ORDERS HELPED GMAC CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY WHICH IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED A ROBBERY HAS OCCURRED HERE AND THEY COVERED IT UP THOUGHT THEIR AFFILIATE LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS WHICH IS A EVEN BIGGER CRIME...

THE FAKE FORECLOSURE ILLEGALLY TOOK AWAY CORLA REEVES JACKSON LACK OF STANDING AND NOW THE DAMAGES ARE DONE AND ITS TIME TO GO TO TRIAL AND LET THE GRAND JURY DO THE PROSECUTING HERE.  GMAC DID FAKE A FORECLOSURE THAT CAUSED MASSIVE DAMAGES LINKED TO MORE THAN ONE CASE THAT THEY USED TO WIN CASES ON BASED UPON FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD BY GMAC LAWYERS AND THEY KNOW THIS.

THIS BANKRUPTCY CASE WAS NOT DISMISSED IT WAS DISCHARGED UNDER FEDERAL LAWS AND RECORDED (ECF) AND GMAC WENT BACK AND COMMITTED THE SAME CRIME OVER (2) MORE TIMES WITH FABRICATED DOCUMENTS THEY GENERATED AFTER (OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED ON APRIL 30, 2008).  GMAC DID IN FACT DEFRAUD THE FEDERAL COURTS AND FEDERAL JUDGES TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AT CORLA REEVES JACKSON EXPENSE IN MORE THAN ONE WAY.  GMAC ILLEGALLY VIOLATED THE ORIGINAL FEDERAL COURT ORDERS AND CONTINUED TO ROB (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) OF MONEY IN THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS THEY DEFRAUDED THE COURTS AND NEVER PAID FOR THE HOME TO DATE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES WITH ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDER VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND MORE GUARANTEED.  GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS CONTINUED TO DEFRAUD THE JUDGES ABUSING THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND FEDERAL LAWS WILLFUL" WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME!

 

THE FEDS DID NOT GET PAID FOR THE HOME BECAUSE OF THE FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD ORDERS" ISSUED MAKING IT APPEAR AS IF CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS LYING WHEN SHE WAS NOT LYING.  CORLA REEVES JACKSON NEVER HAD A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT WITH GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION WHEN THEY INITIATED THEIR FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) THAT IS WHY THEIR PROOF OF CLAIMS WERE DISALLOWED IN ITS ENTIRETY" AND WAS REDUCED AND ALLOWED TO THE AMOUNT PAID (NO MORE ARREARS OWED). 

GMAC DID NOT RESPOND TO THE COURTS FILED ECF TO THE (OBJECTIONS FILED (JULY 15, 2009 ) OR (THE ORDER GRANTED AND REDUCED AND ALLOWED TO THE AMOUNT PAID) ISSUED AND ENTERED (SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 - OCTOBER 1, 2009). 

THE ORIGINAL ORDER DENYING GMAC MORTGAGE LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM IN ITS (ENTIRETY WAS SUSTAINED IN THE ORDER THAT WAS AMENDED TO THE AMOUNT PAID) BY OBJECTIONS (NO MORE ARREARS OWED). 

GMAC MORTGAGE KNEW THIS" THAT IS WHY THEY KEPT COMMITTING FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD IN NEW YORK TO AVOID THE ROBBERY AND CRIME THEY COMMITTED IN ALABAMA" WHICH STAYED BOTH COMPLAINTS FILED BY (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) AND (BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS -JON PATTERSON) AWAITING ON A SUMMARY JUDGE UNDER DIVERSITY JURISDICTION (DEMAND BY A JURY TRAIL). 

CORLA REEVES JACKSON IS READY TO PROCEED TO TRIAL AND IS BEING BLOCKED BY THE LAW FIRMS THAT COMMITTED THIS CRIME WHICH IS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS AS WELL AS CIVIL RIGHT LAWS" HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS AND MORE...

THE LAWYERS THAT COMMITTED THIS ROBBERY KNOW THEY GOING TO JAIL AND IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTED THEY COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD (WILLFUL) CAUSING (UN-PRESIDETED) MASSIVE DAMAGES FROM (2005-2015) WHICH CANNOT BE DENIED OR IGNORED THIS IS FACTS" AND IT IS RECORDED )ECF) SO NO ONE CAN LIE GUARANTEED !

 

THIS WAS NOT A HARD CASE TO BUST  ALL WAS REQUIRED WAS THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS LISTED BELOW:
 

1.  A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL DOCKET SHEET FROM THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY COURTS. 

2.  THE (FAKE LEASEHOLD INTEREST DOCUMENT) GMAC FILED ILLEGALLY ATTACHING BITS AND PIECES  OF (CORLA REEVES JACKSON LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE) TO IT TO MAKE IT LOOK

     LIKE IT WAS A (AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC) WHEN IT WAS NOT" THE LOAN NUMBERS DID NOT EVEN MATCH (AND) GMAC MOTIONS FILED ON FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS...

3.  A COPY OF (GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION - SIROTE & PERMUTT) (LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY FILED) THAT WAS DISALLOWED..

4.  A COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) CONDITIONALLY DENYING GMAC MORTGAGE LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY AND LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIMS BASED

    UPON ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS NUMBER (1-4) BEFORE NUMBER (5) COULD BE ENFORCED BY GMAC BY APPLICABLE LAWS BETWEEN THE DEBTOR AND GMAC LEASEHOLD

    AGREEMENT THAT HAD TO BE DATED PRIOR TO (2005)...

5.  A COPY OF THE (OBJECTIONS FILED JULY 15, 2009) BY (BARRY FRIEDMAN) 

6.  A COPY OF THE (ORDERS ISSUED BY (JUDGE MAHONEY) REVERSING NUMBER (2) OF THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) IN VIOLATION OF THE ORDER (1-4) BY GMAC

     MORTGAGE LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM BY OBJECTIONS UNDER CLAIM NUMBER (7)" IN ITS (ENTIRETY) DATED (SEPTEMBER 18, 2009) AND ON (OCTOBER 1, 2009) ORDER AMENDS ORDER

    ORIGINALLY ENTERED (SEPTEMBER 18. 2009) TO REDUCING AND ALLOWING (DEBTOR'S) TO THE (AMOUNT PAID) WITH (NO MORE ARREARS OWED). THE DEBTOR WAS CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND NOT

    GMAC.  GMAC LAWYERS LIED!

7. A COPY OF (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) RECORDED DEEDS AND LOAN DOCUMENTS

8. REFUND CHECK ISSUED BY TRUSTEES BACK TO JACKSON AFTER THE JUDGE DENIED GMAC LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY AND LEAVE TO RILE A PROOF OF CLAIM IN ITS (ENTIRETY)...

9. LIST OF APPROVED CREDITORS 

10. LIST OF APPROVED CREDITORS THAT GOT BUSTED FOR FILING (FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD) USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES THAT WAS REVERSED...  

11. A LEGAL COPY OF THE ENDORSED NOTARIZED (ALLOWING) TO GMAC FROM OPTION ONE MORTGAGE AND THE ORIGINAL NOTE PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING (APRIL 30, 2008). 

12. A COPY OF THE SECURITY'S RELEASE OF THE LOAN FROM OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TO GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION WITH THE SEC FILINGS ON THIS MORTGAGE BACKED BY SECURITY'S .

13. FDIC RECORDS ON THE (ASSIGNMENT) THAT WAS FABRICATED AND (ILLEGALLY RECORDED IN ALABAMA UNDER FALSE PRETENSE) UNDER A NEW LOAN NUMBER (AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED

      APRIL 30, 2008) UNDER A PROPERTY THAT DID NOT BELONG TO GMAC MORTGAGE PERIOD PRIOR TO (2005) TO DATE.  GMAC NEVER PAID FOR THE HOME THEY STOLE PERIOD USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES..

14. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE (CA) NOTARY LAWS REQUIRED A (NOTARY STAMP AND A NOTARY SEAL) ON LEGAL DOCUMENTS (ASSIGNMENTS - ALLONGE) WHICH HAD TO BE RECORDED IN NOTARY BOOK

15. BOARD OF GOVERNORS (RULES AND REGULATIONS) FOR SERVICERS" BANKS" TO GO BY ON LOANS IN GENERAL IN ADDITION TO POOLING AND SERVICING LOANS AND LAWS BY THE SEC...

16. THE ORIGINAL NOTE AND ORIGINAL ALLONGE ENFORCED IN (2005) UNDER FEDERAL LAWS ATTACHED TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE (ORIGINAL NOTE) GMAC CLAIMED TO HAVE OWNED BY LEASEHOLD

      INTEREST IN WHEN THEY FILED THEIR FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS ON (06/15/2005 - MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 2, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING ON (APRIL 30, 2008)...

16. A COPY OF THE (AGREEMENT) BETWEEN ALLY BANK - ALLY FINANCIAL AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS ON FORECLOSURES (PENDING BETWEEN 2009 - 2010)...

17. A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENTS THAT WAS ENDORSED AND NOT COPIES SHOWING THE ORIGINAL NOTARY STAMP WITHOUT THE NOTARY SEAL WHICH WAS INVALID" NULL AND VOID. AS WELL

      AS A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ALLONGE AND NOT COPIES OF A (ORIGINAL ALLONGE ) THAT WAS NOT VALID.  IT WAS NOT ENDORSED TO GMAC OR ANYONE STAMPED AND NOTARIZED.  GMAC HAS

     FABRICATED A NOTE ON ALL COPIES OF DOCUMENTS AND NO ORIGINALS OF NOTHING WHICH IS NOT VALID AS WELL.  THEY COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD.  IF YOU

     OWNED A NOTE" YOU DID NOT NEED AN ASSIGNMENT ALL ANYONE HAD TO DO WAS (PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL NOTE DATED BACK TO (2005) WITH THE SEC RELIEF OF THE NOTE BACKED BY SECURITY'S

UNDER OPTION ONE  MORTGAGE AND ITS POOLS OF LOANS AND FDIC RECORDS IF REQUESTED.  ALSO IF YOU OWNED THE ORIGINAL NOTE THE ORIGINAL (ALLONGE)  WOULD HAVE BEEN ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL NOTES AS WELL AS ALL THE ORIGINAL HAZARD AND TITLE POLICY AND NOT COPIES TAKEN FROM (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) EVIDENCE FOR HER PROOF OF CLAIMS AGAINST GMAC THEY GOT UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN.  THAT WAS NOT ORIGINALS THOSE WERE COPIES PRESENTED TO SHOW GMAC WAS NOT CORLA REEVES JACKSON LENDER THAT GMAC FABRICATED A NOTE FROM WITH FAKE ASSIGNMENTS" WHICH WILL BE PROVEN IN COURT" CORLA REEVES JACKSON HAS THE ORIGINALS COPIES TO DATE THAT (FAXED TO HER FROM OPTION ONE MORTGAGE) AND THEIR IS MORE DOCUMENTS THAT GO WITH THOSE DOCUMENTS GMAC DID NOT GET THEIR HANDS ON GUARANTEED WHICH WILL BE RELEASED IN TRIAL. 

IT DOES NOT TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO SEE THAT GMAC NEVER HAD CORLA REEVES JACKSON (ORIGINAL LOAN DOCUMENTS) OR THE ALLONGE  ENFORCED THE SAME DAY AS THE FAKE ASSIGNMENTS FROM OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TO (GMAC) UNDER FEDERAL LAWS.  THIS IS WHY WENT AROUND THE SEC AND COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT TO DATE TO KEEP THIS CASE FROM BEING HEARD BY CONTINUING TO COMMIT FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS KNOWING THEY DID NOT OWN THE PROPERTY THEY NEVER HAVE AND THEY KNEW THIS AND WILLFUL DEFRAUDED THE (FEDERAL COURTS AND FEDERAL JUDGES) WITH THE INTENT TO CARRY OUT THIS ROBBERY THEY STARTED BACK IN (2005) UNDER FALSE PRETENSE" VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS RULES REGULATIONS AND MORE IN WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED THIS IS A CRIME THE LAWYERS FOR GMAC COMMITTED WITH GMAC FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS FROM A ROBBERY IN ALABAMA!

WHAT JON PATTERSON DID WAS HE MOVED THE CASE OVER TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF ALABAMA CASE NUMBER (00111) UNDER DIVERSITY JURISDICTION AND THEN THEY STOLE THE HOME WITHOUT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND (GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD) UNDER (JUDGE MARTIN GLENN) AND (JUDGE KOELTL) TO PREVENT A LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED TO TRIAL" BY FABRICATING ANOTHER FAKE ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS SHIPPED (4/25/96) AND THEY MADE COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE OPTION ONE MORTGAGE (FAXED TO CORLA REEVES JACKSON) TAKING OFF THE HEADER AT THE TOP OF THE DOCUMENT THAT SHOWS THAT OPTION ONE MORTGAGE FAXED ONLY A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FOR HER TO GIVE TO THE JUDGES WHEN SHE WENT TO TRIAL. 

GMAC DID NOT GET A COPY OF THOSE DOCUMENTS THEY DEFRAUDED MARTIN GLENN WITH ANOTHER FAKE ASSIGNMENT TO CLOSE THE GAP ON THE FAKE ASSIGNMENT THEY FABRICATED AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED APRIL 30, 2008) WITH THE FAKE ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS SHIPPED (4/25/96) TO WITH THE DOCUMENTS (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) FILED THEM UNDER MARTIN GLENN" TO PROVE HER PROOF OF CLAIM.  THANK GOD CORLA REEVES JACKSON DID NOT SEND ALL HER DOCUMENTS THAT GO WITH THE DOCUMENTS GMAC STOLE FROM HER TO PROVE HER PROOF OF CLAIMS THAT GMAC DID NOT OWN HER NOTE IN (2005) WHEN THEY ROBBED HER ORIGINALLY.

WHAT THEY HAVE DID WAS (GMAC) LAWYER AND ADMINISTRATOR (KCC) DEFRAUDED (JUDGE MARTIN GLENN - JUDGE KOELTL) WHICH LEAD TO (WILLFUL FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD) TO COVER UP THE TRUTH" NOW THEY ALL ARE BUSTED AND THEY KNOW THIS GUARANTEED.  GMAC DO NOT HAVE AND NEVER HAD THE ORIGINAL OF NOTHING" THE ONLY THING THEY GOT IS WHAT THEY GOT FROM CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND WHAT THEY ENTERED ORIGINALLY THAT THEY COVERED UP WHICH WAS A LEASEHOLD INTEREST WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT SAYING THEY OWNED THE NOTE IN (2005) WHEN THEY DID NOT. 

IN ADDITION TO ALL OF ALL OF THE ABOVE AND BELOW: THE DOCUMENTS GMAC HAS PROVIDED TO THE COURTS IS ALL DOCUMENTS BETWEEN (CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE) WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION -GMAC MORTGAGE LLC - RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION - RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC PERIOD IN (2005) OR PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING ON APRIL 30, 2008). 

THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT WAS (FRAUD) THAT WAS CREATED BY THE LAW FIRMS OF GMAC (8) YEARS BEFORE THE HOME WAS BUILT SHIPPED (4/25/96) WHEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON HOME WAS NOT BUILT (4/25/96) AND SHE DID NOT HAVE A LOAN WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TO SHIP AN ASSIGNMENT TO GMAC (4/25/96).  THE OTHER FAKE ASSIGNMENT THEY USED WAS CREATED (06/19/2008)" AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008)...GMAC MORTGAGE CASE WAS FRAUD AND THEY ARE BUSTED AND THEY KNEW THIS AND WILLFUL CONTINUED TO ROB (CORLA REEVES JACKSON)..

ALL THE DOCUMENTS GMAC FILED UNDER MARTIN GLENN WAS NOT FILED (ECF) IN ALABAMA BY (GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION) AND THEY COULD NOT UNDER FEDERAL LAWS ADD ANYTHING THAT WAS NOT FILED (ECF) UNDER THE ORIGINAL BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) BANKRUPTCY NUMBER (1-2) WAS BASED UPON A ORDER ON A LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM THAT WAS ISSUED AND ENTERED AND REVERSED. IF GMAC WAS NOT GUILTY WHY DON'T GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS TAKE THIS CASE TO TRIAL AND STOP COMMITTING FRAUD OF THE COURT UNDER THE JUDGES THEY KNEW AND KNOW" VERSUS GOING TO TRIAL AND LETTING THE (GRAND JURY) UNDER THE DEMAND BY A JURY TRIAL DECIDE WHO LIED AND WHO WAS TELLING THE TRUTH" BECAUSE THEY DID ROB JACKSON AND THEY LIED!

FACTS BACKED BY THE EVIDENCE TO DATE PROVED THAT: (GMAC) MORTGAGE CORPORATION AND IT'S LAWYERS DID IN FACT COMMIT FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD CARRYING OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY VIOLATING THE (ORIGINAL FEDERAL COURT ORDERS UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WHICH LEAD TO A CHAIN RE-ACTION VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD BEING COMMITTED BY GMAC USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AFTER CORLA REEVES JACKSON BANKRUPTCY CLOSED AND WAS RELEASED FROM THE TRUSTEES ON (OCTOBER 8, 2009 - JANUARY 20, 2009). 

IT APPEARS THAT GMAC WENT BACK AND FABRICATED DOCUMENTS AND CARRIED OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY BASED UPON A ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) THAT WAS (REVERSED) BY OBJECTIONS FILED (JULY 15, 2009) THAT WAS GRANTED TO THE AMOUNT PAID (NO MORE ARREARS OWED AS ORIGINALLY ENTERED IN THE ORDER DATED (SEPTEMBER 18, 2009) ON (OCTOBER 1, 2009).  THIS IS RECORDED (ECF).

 IT APPEARS THAT GMAC MORTGAGE COMMITTED THE SAME CRIME (2) TIMES UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD TRYING TO GET HIM TO GIVE THEM THE RELIEF IN ANOTHER FORM VERSUS ON THE  (RELIEF THAT WAS (REVERSED) AND DISALLOWED) IN ITS (ENTIRETY) BY JUDGE MAHONEY" AND NOW THEY ARE BUSTED AGAIN FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE GUARANTEED !

LUTHER STRANGE KNEW WHAT HIS LAW FIRM HAS DID" AS WELL AS THE LAWYERS THAT COMMITTED THIS CRIME HE COVERED IT UP" WHICH IS A EVEN BIGGER CRIME THEY ALL VIOLATED FEDERAL LAWS AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALLY AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS AND IT WAS COVERED UP AFTER LUTHER STRANGE TOOK OFFICE GUARANTEED!

CORLA REEVES JACKSON NEVER HAD A PROBLEM WITH HER LENDER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE" AND SHE WAS ROBBED BY GMAC MORTGAGE LAW FIRM PRIOR TO AND AFTER LUTHER STRANGE TOOK OFFICE.  WHEN LUTHER STRANGE TOOK OFFICE HE COVERED UP THE WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HIS LAW FIRM AND AFFILIATES COMMITTED IN STEALING THIS STOLEN MORTGAGE BACKED BY SECURITY'S AND MORE GUARANTEED THAT HE DID NOT WANT ANYONE TO FIND THE TRUTH OUT ABOUT. 

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS (JON PATTERSON AND BLAKE B. GOODSELL) HAS COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD TO FEDERAL JUDGES IN NEW YORK AS WELL AS JON PATTERS COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT TO (THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF ALABAMA UNDER CASE NUMBER (12-00111) UNDER JUDGE DUBOSE WHERE THE CASE WAS STAYED PENDING TRIAL" AWAITING ON THE LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY FROM MARTIN GLENN THAT THEY DEFRAUDED TO BLOCK THE LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED TO TRIAL BY COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD UNDER CASE (12--12020 MG) DOC 5100-1 ENTERED 09/18/13) THAT LEAD TO FRAUD OF THE COURT IN NEW YORK WHICH SHOULD HAVE NEVER OCCURRED.  JUDGE MARTIN GLENN SHOULD  HAVE NEVER TRUSTED THE CROOKS THAT ROBBED VICTIMS AND THE UNITED STATES!

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS - GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION et, al. - GMAC MORTGAGE LLC AND MORRISON & FOERSTER -RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC BOTH (WILLFUL) KNEW THAT (CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE - OPTION ONE MORTGAGE AND POOL OF INVESTORS WAS ILLEGALLY BEING ROBBED BY GMAC AND THEIR LAWYERS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS" WITH THE INTENT TO CARRY OUT THE ROBBERY THEY STARTED IN (2005) THAT THEY ALL COVERED UP VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD.  THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED ITS RECORDED AND FILED (ECF) SHOWING WHAT THEY ALL DID NOT DATE.  LUTHER STRANGE KNEW CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS BEING ROBBED BY HIS AFFILIATES AND LAW FIRM FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS THAT HE HELPED COVER UP DATED BACK TO (2005).   THIS CASE WAS RECORDED (ECF) SO NO ONE CAN LIE. 

GMAC LAW FIRMS VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS AND ALLY FINANCIAL- ALLY BANK AND THEY CONTINUED TO ROB VICTIMS COVERING IT UP BY FRAUD OF THE COURT!

 

Sep 20, 2010 · Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit told brokers and agents to Halt Foreclosures

Victims Loans Was Serviced From The Following States Listed Below That Was Affected.  Victims Need To Look On Their Statements And See Where Their Loans Was Serviced From...

ALL FORECLOSURES (PENDING BETWEEN 2009 - 2010) WAS HALTED BY ALLY FINANCIAL INC.'S GMAC UNITS

THIS IS WHEN ALABAMA STARTED ROBBING PEOPLE BIG TO COVER UP THE CRIMES THEY COMMITTED IN ALABAMA UNDER (JUDGE SHULMAN)!

 

 

 

Section 6-6-227: Persons to be made parties; rights of persons not parties.  All persons shall be made parties who have, or claim, any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance, or franchise, such municipality shall be made a party and shall be entitled to be heard; and if the statute, ordinance, or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard. (Acts 1935, No. 355, p. 777; Code 1940, T. 7, §166.). 

 

 

THIS IS HARDCORE EVIDENCE GUARANTEED !

YOU DO NOT SEE A SECURED CREDITOR FOR ($235,946.35 OR $14,809.60) LISTED ABOVE PRIOR TO (CORLA REEVES JACKSON)

BEING Refunded BACK THE MONEY THE COURTS REFUSED TO GIVE TO GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION et, al. - GMAC MORTGAGE LLC et, al.!

 

The (October 1, 2009 Order Only Amends) The Order Issued And Entered (September 18, 2009) But (Still Sustaining The Order

As Originally Entered September 18, 2009). This Is Recorded In The Orders Issued By Judge Mahoney" As Well As (There Were No

Responses Filed By (GMAC) Filed Through The Courts Based Upon The Order Issued And Entered (1-5) Before (5) Could Be

Enforced By GMAC.  GMAC Violated All Judge Mahoney Orders Issued (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006 - September 18, 2009 -

October 1, 2009) By Objections Filed" (July 15, 2009).  GMAC Did Not Comply To Judge Mahoney Orders Period Filed (ECF)

Violating Federal Laws" Bankruptcy Laws And The Law In General And They Carried Out This White Collar Crime Robbery By Fraud..!

 

The Courts Never Issued An Order Confirming The Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Based Upon The Order Issued And Entered (March 1,

2006 - March 3, 2006) With Strict Details (1-4) On Confirming The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor

And GMAC Filed (ECF) After The Order Was Entered March 3, 2006. Their Were No Responses Filed By GMAC Filed (ECF) Period!

 

Judge Mahoney Did Not Issue Any Orders In Favor Of GMAC Mortgage Period" Because GMAC Did Not Own The Note When

They Filed Their Fake Proof Of Claims (Via Fraud Of The Court Committing Bankruptcy Fraud) Dated Back To (2005) On Fake Arrears

Without An Agreement Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC Mortgage. 

 

Corla Reeves Jackson Never Had A Loan With GMAC Mortgage And They Knew This Is Why The Ran And Did Not Comply To The Order Issued By

Judge Mahoney That Was Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Based Upon All The Following Terms And Conditions (1-4) Before (5)

Could Be Enforced By GMAC Under Applicable Laws And The Agreement Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC Prior To (2005)...

This Is Why GMAC Mortgage And Its Lawyers Does Not Want To Go To Trial They Committed  Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Over And Over Again

Causing Massive Damages To Date They Covered Up Dated Back To (2005)" Which Caused Massive Damages In More Than One Way" That Lead To Personal Injury's

And More Guaranteed!  GMAC Mortgage Lawyers That Committed This Crime Knew They Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud For Illegal Profits!

 

The Fake Arrears Dated Back To (2005) Was Fraud And Was (Reversed) By Federal Court Orders Issued And Entered With Objections

Filed (ECF) March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006 - July 15, 2009 - September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009)" This Was Recorded Filed (ECF) !

 

Judge Mahoney Reduced And Allowed The Debtors Objections Filed (July 15, 2009) Down To The (Amount Paid) To"

(No More Arrears Owed) By A Federal Court Order Issued And Entered (09/18/2009 - 10/01/2009) That GMAC Violated!

 

Judge Mahoney Disallowed GMAC Mortgage( Leave To File A Proof Of Claim Under #2) In Its (Entirety) That Is Listed In The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) By Objections Filed (July 15, 2009) By Barry Friedman.  The Objections Requested No More Arrears Owed" Which Was Granted On (10/01/2009) To The Amount Paid.  Right After The Order Was Entered (Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy Case 05-13142) Was Closed On (10/08/2009) And Cleared The Trustee Because She Had To Be Refunded The Funds The Courts Refused To Give GMAC.  After This Was Done" Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged On (January 20, 2010) And This Was Recorded And Filed (ECF) So No One Could Lie...

GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS AND BARRY FRIEDMAN BOTH  BETTER GET TO TALKING BECAUSE" CORLA REEVES JACKSON DID NOT HAVE ANY SECURED CREDITORS FOR THEIR PROOF OF CLAIM APPROVED BY JUDGE MAHONEY OR THE COURTS" AFTER HER ORDER WAS ISSUED AND ENTERED AFTER MARCH 3, 2006).  THE ORDER WAS REVERSED AND DISALLOWED (#2) OF THE ORDER BY OBJECTIONS FILED IN CLAIM (#7) IN THE AMOUNT OF ($14,809.60).  WHICH WAS MERGED PURGED WITH CLAIM NUMBER (#1).  NO MORE ARREARS OWED. 

THE BANKRUPTCY COURTS RECORDS THAT IS RECORDED (ECF) FROM (2005) TO DATE" PROVED THAT (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) WAS REFUNDED BACK SOME OF HER MONEY THAT THE COURTS REFUSED TO GIVE TO (GMAC) THEY DID NOT OWN THE NOTE OR THE ASSIGNMENT ON A LEASEHOLD NOTE THEY FILED WITH THE COURTS VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT PRIOR TO FILING THE FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS.

THE OTHER FUNDS GMAC GOT PRIOR TO GETTING BUSTED MARCH 1, 2006) WAS NEVER RETUNED BY GMAC TO CORLA REEVES JACKSON TO DATE" THEY KEPT THOSE FUNDS WHEN THEY WERE NOT SUPPOSE TO AND THEY KNEW THIS" THE CASE IS PENDING TRIAL THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO AVOID IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF ALABAMA UNDER (DIVERSITY JURISDICTION).  GMAC HAS STOLEN A HOME OUTSIDE THEIR JURISDICTION IN VIOLATION OF THE ORDER THAT STAYED BOTH COMPLAINTS BY JUDGE DUBOSE CASE NUMBER (12-00111) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF ALABAMA" THAT DID NOT GIVE THEM LACK OF STANDING TO DO WHAT THEY DID TO CORLA REEVES JACKSON (WITHOUT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT ISSUED TO THEM UNDER DIVERSITY JURISDICTION  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF ALABAMA ON CASE NUMBER (12-00111)

GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION - GMAC MORTGAGE LLC (NEVER REFUNDED HER BACK ALL HER MONEY THEY ROBBED HER OF OR HER HOME TO DATE) THAT THEY GOT WITHOUT A SUMMARY JUDGMENT FROM (THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE SOUTHERN DIVISION OF ALABAMA UNDER CASE NUMBER 12-00111) WAS STAYED PENDING A DEMAND BY A JURY TRIAL...

WHAT HAS OCCURRED HERE IS GMAC GOT AN ILLEGAL RELIEF UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN (VIA FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD) USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND CORLA REEVES JACKSON LAWYER AFTER HER BANKRUPTCY CLOSED AND WAS DISCHARGED UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) AND NOW THEY ALL ARE BUSTED.

A NEW BANKRUPTCY CASE NUMBER UNDER BANKRUPTCY NUMBER (2 AND 3 UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN) ON THE DISPUTE OF (JUDGE MAHONEY ORDERS) COULD NOT BE ASSIGNED A NEW BANKRUPTCY NUMBER BECAUSE CORLA REEVES JACKSON NEVER HAD A LOAN WITH GMAC AND THE FAKE ARREARS THEY USED BASED UPON THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (ECF) BY JUDGE MAHONEY WAS REVERSED AND DISALLOWED BY OBJECTION FILED JULY 15, 2009) BY BARRY FRIEDMAN.  GMAC DID NOT OWN THE NOTE WHEN THEY INITIATED THEIR FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2005)" WHICH IS A CRIME !

BARRY FRIEDMAN IS GOING TO HAVE A HARD TIME EXPLAIN  CORRUPTION AND THIS CONSPIRACY ON THE THEFT OF A HOME ON FAKE ARREARS HE FILED OBJECTIONS ON THAT WAS GRANTED KNOWING HIS CLIENT (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) WAS BEING ROBBED BY GMAC MORTGAGE...IT WAS RECORDED AND FILED (ECF) THAT HE KNEW THIS.  BARRY FRIEDMAN WAS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE PAID (2) TIMES FOR THE SAME THING THIS IS A (ETHIC LAW VIOLATION AND MORE) IN THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES WITH THE CROOKS AFTER LUTHER STRANGE TOOK OFFICE" IT WAS HIS LAW FIRM AND AFFILIATE FIRM THAT DID THIS!

GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS KNEW THEY COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF JUDGE MAHONEY ORDERS" THIS IS THE CASE PENDING TRIAL THEY ARE TRYING TO BLOCK UNDER JUDGE DUBOSE FROM PROCEEDING TO TRAIL BY COMMITTING FRAUD UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN AND JUDGE KOELTL" ON A LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY TO PROCEED TO TRIAL FOR THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME THAT WAS COMMITTED HERE THEY COVERED UP VIAL FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD GOING AROUND JUDGE MAHONEY UNDER ON  BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED THIS IS FACTS GUARANTEED!

CORA REEVES JACKSON WAS REFUNDED BACK HER MONEY THAT WAS RESERVED FOR GMAC BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS (1-4) OF THE ORDER ISSUED ENTERED AND GRANTED BY OBJECTIONS BY JUDGE MAHONEY (JULY 15, 2009 - SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 - OCTOBER 1, 2009) THAT GMAC DID NOT COMPLY WITH BY RULES AND REGULATIONS OF FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY LAWS" TIME FRAMS AND MORE THEY DID  NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF THE ORDERS BECAUSE THEY DID NOT OWN THE NOTE WHEN THEY FILED THEIR (FAKE LEASEHOLD INTEREST) UNDER CORLA REEVES JACKSON PROPERTY WITHOUT OWING IT AND (GMAC DID NOT HAVE A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC).

CORLA REEVES JACKSON NEVER HAD A LOAN WITH GMAC AND THEY KNEW THIS.  WHAT THEY FILED UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) PRIOR TO THE CASE BEING DISCHARGED (JANUARY 20, 2009)" IS THAT THEY OWNED A LEASEHOLD INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY WITHOUT OWING THE NOTE OR AN ASSIGNMENT PRIOR TO OPTION ON MORTGAGE CLOSING (APRIL 30, 2008).

IF GMAC MORTGAGE OWNED THE NOTE THEY DID NOT NEED A ASSIGNMENT AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008) OR (8) YEARS IN ADVANCE BEFORE THE HOME WAS BUILT THAT WAS SHIPPED OUT (4/25/96) NO ONE IS STUCK ON STUPID.  THE FAKE ALLONGE THEY FABRICATED DID NOT MATCH THE FABRICATED NOTE THEY CREATED IN CORLA REEVES JACKSON NAME WITH THE INTENT TO ROB HER OF HER HOME" OF HER POLICY'S ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND OF THE HOME" FOR MORE ILLEGAL PROFITS AT CORLA REEVES JACKSON EXPENSE IN MORE THAN ONE WAY.  THEY STOLE CORLA REEVES JACKSON IDENTITY AND FABRICATED A NOTE IN HER NAME AND THEY KNOW WHO DID THIS" THEY WERE THE LAWYERS THAT CARRIED OUT THE CRIME THEY COVERER UP!

THEIR WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING ON (APRIL 30, 2008) OR PRIOR TO HER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) CLOSING ON (OCTOBER 8, 2009) THAT CLEARED THE TRUSTEES ON (JANUARY 20, 2010) BECAUSE" (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) HAD TO BE REFUNDED BACK THE REST OF HER MONEY THAT GMAC DID NOT GET" AFTER THEY GOT BUSTED BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (ECF) ON MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006)....

 ALL THE EVIDENCE IS RECORDED (ECF) TO DATE SO NO ONE CAN LIE... 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORLA REEVES JACKSON FANS WANT TO KNOW WHAT TOOK HER SO LONG...?

THE ANSWER IS SHE HAD TO DO HE RESEARCH FIRST BECAUSE SHE WAS DEALING WITH BIG CROOKS IN LINKED TO THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY AND SHE HAD TO HAVE SOLID PROOF BACKED BY THE EVIDENCE TO DATE FORCING (GMAC AND ITS CROOKED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS ) TO LEAVE THE PAPER TRIAL THROUGH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM ON WHAT THEY DID TO CORLA REEVES JACKSON IN THEIR OWN WORDS SO NO ONE COULD LIE" THE EVIDENCE IS IN THEIR OWN WORDS FILED IN MOTIONS AND FALSE AFFIDAVITS THAT WILL BE NEEDED IN TRIAL" THAT THEY CANNOT LIE OUT OF.  THIS IS WHAT TOOK SO LONG.  THERE WERE CROOKED JUDGES AND CROOKED LAWYERS INVOLVED LINKED TO THIS ROBBERY RING ON STOLEN REAL ESTATE THAT USE TO BE LAWYERS BEFORE BECOMING A JUDGE OR A ELECTED OFFICIAL.  CORLA REEVES JACKSON SAYS SHE KNOW PEOPLE THOUGHT SHE WAS CRAZY OR INSANE BUT SHE POSTED THE EVIDENCE WHILE HER WEBSITES WAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION SO YOU COULD FOLLOW THIS STORY TO THE END TO SEE THAT CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS NOT INSANE" AND YES IT TOOK A LONG TIME TO BUST THEM THE JUDGES CORRUPTED THE CASES AND COMPLAINT LINKED TO THIS WHITE COLLAR ROBBERY RING IN EXCHANGE FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR VERSUS UP HOLDING FEDERAL LAWS" IN WHICH THEY HAVE TO ANSWER TO NOW GUARANTEED...

 

A Fan Of Jackson Thought She Was Insane Now They Know She Was Telling The Truth All Alone And More And Want To Know That Took so Long For Her To Post All The Evidence And More....

 

 

 

NEW DISCOVERY UPDATE.....

 

 

 

This Explains Why The Bankruptcy Courts Trustees (Refunded ($7.700.28) Back To (Corla Reeves Jackson) And She Overpaid Her Bankruptcy Paying GMAC Mortgage Each Month Through The Courts And Outside The Courts.  GMAC Mortgage Could Take Any Money From Corla Reeves Jackson Or The Trustees After The Order Was Issued And Entered March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Based Upon The Following Terms And Conditions (1-4) Before (5) Could Be Enforced Under Applicable Laws.  GMAC Mortgage Never Had A (Leasehold Interest In Corla Reeves Jackson Home) This Is Why Their Was No Agreement Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC...Corla Reeves Jackson Was Not Leasing Her Home And Her Lender Was (Option One Mortgage) Which Had Nothing To Do With GMAC Mortgage And It Was Recorded...

 

 

GMAC Mortgage Could Not Foreclose On Corla Reeves Jackson Home In (April 2005) As They Illegally Reported On Corla Reeves Jackson Credit Report Tying Up Her Assets Illegally Via Identity Theft. Corla Reeves Jackson Was Never Late With Her Lender Option One Mortgage Period And GMAC Illegally Fabricated A Fake Leasehold Interest Violating Non Judicial And Federal Laws Between (July 2005 - August 2005) When No One Mortgage Can Be Delinquent From July 2005 To August 2005).  GMAC Said They Owned Corla Reeves Jackson Home In (2005) When They Did Not Own Corla Reeves Jackson Home In (2005) They Lied And Has Caused Massive Damages To Date They Keep Trying To Cover Up To Avoid Trial For This Robbery!

The United States Bankruptcy Courts Refunded Corla Reeves Jackson Back Her Money That Was Held By The Trustee's And The (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION EMBEZZLED) From Corla Reeves Jackson Going Around The Courts Outside The Courts Under Claim Number (#1) She Never Was Refunded Those Funds Back.  This Also Explains Why The Trustees That Was Not Involved In This Corruption And Conspiracy Ask Jackson Did Her Attorney Tell Her Everything" Jackson Said No He Did Not Explain The Order To Her That Judge Mahoney Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) That She Was Not Suppose To Be Paying GMAC Mortgage Anything Outside Of Court And The Funds That She Over Paid Was Refunded Back To Her That Was Being Held For GMAC Based Upon The Following Terms And Conditions Of The Order That Was Entered (March 3, 2006) That GMAC Did Not Comply With" This Is Why The Judge Granted Barry Friedman (Objections Filed July 15, 2009) That He Did Not Tell Corla Reeves Jackson About...

The Trustee Ask (Corla Reeves Jackson) Did (GMAC) Refund Her Back All The Funds They Embezzled From Her Through The Courts And Outside The Courts Under Claim Number (1) And Claim Number (7) And Corla Reeves Jackson Said No" The Trustee Said (Muumuu .... Muumuu .... Muumuu .... Muumuu) .  The Trustee Said Your Lawyer Or GMAC Did Not Tell You Anything Jackson Said No They Did Not That Is Why She Kept Paying Them" She Was Being Defrauded And Robbed Using Deceptive Practices Not Knowing The Truth About What The Order Said" She Trusted Her Lawyer And That Turned Out To Be A Big Mistake" She Was Robbed Using Deceptive Practices...

She Ask How Much Money Did You Give Them Each Month Jackson Said She Empted Her Bank Accounts Each Month In The (Thousands Of Dollars) And She Has The Receipts And Her Bank Statements And More" On What Ever They Requested From Her Because" They Were Illegally Threatening To Take Her Home (Not Telling Her The Truth) About Anything Or About The Judge Order Prevented Them From Getting Funds From Her Without A Courts Order Confirming The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor And GMAC Based Upon (1-4) Before (5) Could Be Enforced By GMAC Under Applicable Laws.  Corla Reeves Jackson Never Had A Loan With GMAC Her Mortgage Was With Option One Mortgage And The Judges Orders Were Entered (March 3, 2006) To Protect Her But Her Lawyer Did Not Tell Her The Truth Either" He Said He Did Not Know Anything About This And The Courts Trustee Said He Did" Because They Sent Him Out A Certificate And He Knew Corla Reeves Jackson Was Being Robbed He Had The Courts Orders Issued And Entered Mach 1, 2006 And March 3, 2006...

This Is When She Then Ask Did Her Lawyer Tell Her About What Was Going On And She Said No" That Is When The Federal Bankruptcy Trustee Provided Corla Reeves Jackson With A Copy Of The Judges Order That She Was Not Suppose To Pay GMAC Nothing Without A The Courts Order Confirming The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor And GMAC) After The Order Was Entered" And Not The Order Of Her Plan Prior To GMAC Getting Busted On March 1, 2006).  The Courts And Judge Mahoney Never Issued A Confirmation Order Based Upon The Following Terms And Conditions Of The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) And Its Recorded (ECF) That Their Were No Responses Filed By GMAC After The Order Was Entered (March 3, 2006) By Judge Mahoney...

Barry Friedman Told Corla Reeves Jackson He Was Not Paid Under Bankruptcy Case ($05-13142) The Trustees Said That Was Not True Barry Friedman Was Paid ($1,800.00) And He Lied To Her And Did Not Tell Her That The Objections He Filed Was Granted By The Courts On (September 18, 2009) And Was Amended To The Amount Paid In The Order That Was Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006). This Case Is A Case Of A White Collar Crime Robbery In Exchange Fore Personal Gain Favor And Illegal Profits By GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC.  Corla Reeves Jackson Says She Do Not Trust Her Lawyers Anymore And You Can See Why!

A New Bankruptcy Number Was Not Suppose To Be Issued Under Bankruptcy Number (2 Or 3) Under Federal Laws" A Motion To Confirm Judge Mahoney Order Was All That Was Needed And Required Under Federal Laws On The Same Fake Arrears And Note GMAC Defrauded The Courts With....Barry Friedman Got Paid Another ($3,000.00) To Rob Corla Reeves Jackson With GMAC Using Deceptive Practices Is What Has Occurred Here According To The Evidence.  GMAC Mortgage Lawyers And Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer Has Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud With The Intent To Rob Her Violating Judge Mahoney Orders On Arrears Dated Back To (2005) And This Is Recorded Guaranteed.  In Addition To The Above (GMAC) Did Not Own Corla Reeves Jackson Mortgage When They Filed Their Proof Of Claims (06/15/2005 - 03/01/2006 - 03/03/2006) And They Did Not Have A Federal Court Order Issued By Judge Mahoney Confirming The Leasehold Agreement Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC Because" Corla Reeves Jackson Was Not Leasing Her Home" And The Fake Assignment Did Not Exist" If They Owned The Home They Did Not Need To Assign Themselves Over An Assignment Because (Option One Mortgage Was Closed April 30, 2008) Which Made It Impossible For Them To Assign GMAC Mortgage Corporation Over Their Own Loan Number That Had Nothing To Do With Corla Reeves Jackson Or Option One Mortgage" Option One Mortgage Loans Were Secured I A Pool Of Loans Backed By Security's With All Jackson Policy's As Well As By Wall Street Investors....Also They (Violated Ally Bank - Ally Financial Agreement) With The (Board Of Governors On All Pending Foreclosures Between 2009 - 2010) By GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC....

Corla Reeves Jackson Says This Explains Why They Had Her Bankruptcy Discharged And Then They Went Back In And Robbed Her All Over Again Going Around (Judge Mahoney Orders Issued And Entered March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) And GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC Went Back Again Causing Massive Damages Committing Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Under A New Bankruptcy Under (Judge Shulman) Trying To Be Slick On Arrears That Was Reversed And Disallowed On (#2) Of That Order By Objections Field (July 15, 2009) That Ws (Granted  And To The Amount Paid) September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009) With No More Arrears Owed" Both Claim Number (1 And 2) Was Merged Purged And Into The ($14,809.60) That Was Reversed And Disallowed In Its Entirety To The Amount Paid.  See Order Entered (September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009) As Evidence Filed (ECF)....That No One Can Deny....

The Evidence And Records Recorded To Date Shows That (GMAC) Lawyers Did In Fact Defraud The Courts And Commit Bankruptcy Fraud By (Fabricating (2) A Assignment After Option One Mortgage Closed April 30, 2008).

The Fabricated Assignment And Fake Allonge GMAC Generated To Go With The (Fake Loan Number) They Fabricated In Corla Reeves Jackson Name Was Created After (Option One Mortgage Closed April 30, 2008).  GMAC Stole A Home And The Lawyers Fabricated An Assignment And Made It Out To Themselves" To Carry Out A White Collar Crime Robbery For Illegal Profits At Corla Reeves Jackson Expense In More Than One Way.  In Addition To All Of The Above If GMAC Owned Corla Reeves Jackson Property They Did Not Need An Assignment They Fabricated (3) Times" That Was The Red Flag Right Their.  The Allonge Did Not Match GMAC Mortgage Fabricated Loan Number And Neither Was It Endorsed By Option One Mortgage Under Federal Lending Laws And Terms And Conditions.  It Was Not Notarized Or Made Out To No One It Was In Blank" No Endorsement Period To No One Guaranteed...!

The Evidence Proved The Fabricated Loan Number And Fake Assignment GMAC Mortgage Law Firms Fabricated To Defraud The Court With" Had Nothing To Do With (Option One Mortgage) Loan Period.  The Loan Number GMAC Fabricated In Corla Reeves Jackson Name Under A New Loan Did Not Match Her Recorded Deed Or Any Of (Corla Reeves Jackson Loan Documents Between Corla Reeves Jackson And Option One Mortgage) Period.  The Loan Number Were Entirely Different And It Was Recorded.  GMAC Did Not Own Corla Reeves Jackson Home When GMAC Fabricated Their Fake Leasehold Interest Under (Corla Reeves Jackson Home) With The Intent To Rob Her Of Her Home And Policy's On Insured Covered Losses And More Guaranteed.  GMAC Mortgage Corporation et, al. - GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation et, al. - Residential Capital LLC Did Not Have Lack Of Standing To Do What They Did To Corla Reeves Jackson Or No One Else!  (GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS COMMITTED AND CARRIED OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS KNOWING THEY WERE COMMITTING THIS CRIME)...

The Fake Allonge GMAC Fabricated Was In (Blank That Was Not Endorsed To GMAC) Period.  In Addition To This The Fake Allonge Was Not Notarized Or Dated The Same Day As The Assignment.  No One Was Stuck On Stupid Here" GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC" Their Lawyers And Administrators.   Now They All Are Busted They Committed Perjury" Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud To Cover Up This White Collar Crime Robbery That GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC _ Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC Has Committed Here.

What GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Are Doing They Keep Committing (Fraud Of The Court - And Bankruptcy Fraud) To Try And Prevent From Going To Trial For This White Collar Crime Robbery They Committed And Covered Up (Since 2005)" Which Caused Massive Damages To Date On A Fake Foreclosure In More Than One Way Guaranteed.  It Is True That The Lawyers For GMAC Knew They Liable For (Tipple Un-Presidential Damages) They Caused And Covered Up To Date" Which Is  Massive Damages And Abuse Of The Judicial System And Federal Laws and More.  They Illegally Carried This (White Collar Crime Robbery) Dated Back To (2005) Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied.  They Stole A Home For Illegal Profits And They Got Busted In Violation Of The (United States Constitutional Laws Or Ethic Laws And The Law) In Addition To Stealing Corla Reeves Jackson (Identity" Credit" Policy's" Home" Land) And More In More Than One Way Guaranteed...

The Facts Is Crystal Clear Backed By The Evidence To Date: GMAC Mortgage Corporation et, al. And Their Law Firms And Lawyers Did In Fact Cover Up Their White Collar Crime Robbery For Illegal Profits.  GMAC Robbed (Corla Reeves Jackson) In More Than One Way On Cash And On Insured Covered Losses And Of Her Credit Home And Assets" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied This Is Facts" And This Is Why They Committed Fraud To Dodge Going To Trial For This Robbery Using Her Lawyer In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Which Is Not Going To Work" Corla Reeves Jackson Want Them All Prosecuted To The Fullest Extent Of Federal Laws Now" Let The Grand Jury Decide Who Did What And When And Who Owned Corla Reeves Jackson Home At The Time GMAC Initiated Their Fake Proof Of Claims To Date And We Know GMAC Did Not And Do Not Own Corla Reeves Jackson Home They Stole It Using Deceptive Practices Via Committing Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Under Judge Shulman Which Case Is Pending The Demand By A Jury Trial" Awaiting On The Relief To Proceed To Trial From New York Guaranteed.....

In Bulloch v. United States,[7] the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.  It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function—thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Martin Glenn Had Has To Explain His Actions The Orders He Signed Was Un-Constitutional Jackson Says Before A Grand Jury !

State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)” Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.   If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821).

FRAUD UPON COURT : In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the  act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.

Fraud Upon The Court: has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".[6]

 

Section 6-6-227: Persons to be made parties; rights of persons not parties.  All persons shall be made parties who have, or claim, any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance, or franchise, such municipality shall be made a party and shall be entitled to be heard; and if the statute, ordinance, or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard. (Acts 1935, No. 355, p. 777; Code 1940, T. 7, §166.). 

The most often cited new York state Court decision regarding Assignments
signed by Elpiniki Bechakas from The Baum Firm was written by the Honorable Judge Arthur M. Schack, Kings County, New York: U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for SG Mortgage Securities Asset backed Certificates, Series 2006-FRE2 v.Emmanuel, 27 Misc.3d 1220(A), 2010 WL 1856016 (N.Y.Sup.).

In re Foreclosure Cases, 2007 WL 3232420 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 31, 2007). On October 10, 2007, Judge Boyko issued an order to Deutsche Bank to show cause for their filed complaint, demanding that Deutsche Bank file copies of the Assignments showing that they were the holder and owner of the Notes and Mortgages, as of the date the complaint was filed, which was July 27, 2007.

To the Court, this revealed that Deutsche Bank did not have the particular assignment at the date of the complaint, and created Assignments for trial. U.S. District Judge Christopher Boyko, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, rendered a decision dismissing 14 of the foreclosure cases in In re Foreclosure Cases without prejudice, due to the filing of executed Assignments after the date of the filed complaint for 10 of the cases, and the lack of Assignments for four of the cases.

 

On appeal, the Pattersons assert, among other things, that the trial court erred in determining that the foreclosure was valid. While the Pattersons’ appeal was pending, this court delivered its decision in Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] ___ So. 3d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP (“BAC”), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant’s house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC. BAC then held a foreclosure sale at which it purchased Sturdivant’s house, and the auctioneer executed a foreclosure deed purporting to convey title to Sturdivant’s house to BAC. BAC was assigned the mortgage the same day as the foreclosure sale. Thereafter, BAC brought an ejectment action against Sturdivant, claiming that it owned title to her house by virtue of the foreclosure deed. After the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of BAC, Sturdivant appealed to the supreme court, which transferred her appeal to this court.

We held that BAC lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage because it had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings and that, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid. We further held that, because the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid, BAC did not acquire legal title to Sturdivant’s house through the foreclosure deed and thus BAC did not own an interest in the house when it commenced its ejectment action.

We further held that, because BAC did not own any interest in Sturdivant’s house when it commenced its ejectment action, BAC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action. Because BAC did not have standing to bring its ejectment action and the trial court never acquired jurisdiction over the ejectment action, we held that the judgment of the trial court was void, and we vacated that judgment. Moreover, because a void judgment will not support an appeal, we dismissed the appeal.  In the case now before us, GMAC Mortgage, like BAC in Sturdivant, had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings. Consequently, under our holding in Sturdivant, GMAC Mortgage lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage when it initiated the foreclosure proceedings, and, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed upon which GMAC based it ejectment claim are invalid. Moreover, under our holding in Sturdivant, because GMAC Mortgage did not own any interest in the house, it lacked standing to bring its ejectment action against the Pattersons. Because GMAC Mortgage lacked standing to bring the ejectment action, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is void and is hereby vacated. Moreover, because a void judgment." Click Here & Click Here

 

 

THIS IS THE TRUSTEES REFUND CHECK BACK TO (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) AFTER GMAC GOT BUSTED...

GMAC Mortgage Corporation Was Not (Corla Reeves Jackson) Secured Creditor On Her Home For ($235, 946.35 Or (14,809.60) GMAC (Fake Proof Of Claim Was Disallowed And Reversed) On September 18, 2009 Amended To The Debtor (Amount Paid) Based Upon All The Following Terms And Conditions Of The Order (1-4) That GMAC Did Not Comply With" They Did Not Own A Leasehold Agreement" The Note Or An Assignment..

Judge Mahoney Reduced And Allowed The Debtors Objections Filed (July 15, 2009) Down To The (Amount Paid) To

(No More Arrears Owed) By A Federal Court Order Issued And Entered (09/18/2009 - 10/01/2009) That GMAC Violated!

 

GMAC Mortgage Corporation And Its Lawyers Did Not Comply To All The Terms In The Order (1-4) That Was Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006).  The Order Was Reversed And Disallowed In Its Entirety To The Amount Paid On September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009).  Bankruptcy (05-13142) Was Closed On (October 8, 2008) And Cleared Trustee's On (January 20, 2010)...

The Trustees Refunded Back (Corla Reeves Jackson) Some Of The Money GMAC Did Not Get A Chance To Get" Prior To Their (Fake Proof OF Claims Arrears) Were Reversed And Disallowed Based Upon All The Following Terms Of The Order Issued And Entered March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) (1-4) Before (5) Could Be Enforced By GMAC.  GMAC Violated The Original Automatic Stay Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142)" That GMAC Did Not Comply With.  GMAC Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud With The Intent To Rob Corla Reeves Jackson Under False Pretense For Illegal Profits They Covered Up" Knowing They Did Not Own The Note To Collect Leasehold Arrears On A Home They Did Not Own Which Is A Federal Crime....

GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Knew GMAC Did Own The Home When They (Filed Their Fake Proof Of Claims Or Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing On April 30, 2008)" They Fabricated Their Documents After Option One Mortgage Closed On (April 30, 2008) With The Intent To Go Back And Commit Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Again Over And Over Again In Violation Of The Original Orders That Issued And Entered That They Did Not Comply With Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing On April 30, 2008) Because They Did Not Own The Note To Collect Lease Arrears On A Home They Did Not Own" And They Did Not Have A Leasehold Agreement Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC" Confirmed By The Courts With A Court Order Issued After The Order Was Entered (March 3, 2006) And GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Knew This" Because They Never Responded Through The Courts After The Order Was Entered March 3, 2006" Because It Was Recorded They Did Not Own The Note And Corla Reeves Jackson Was Not Leasing Her Home She Purchased It From (Option One Mortgage) Which Was Her Lender" Which Had Nothing To Do With GMAC Leasehold Interest In Her Property Without A Leasehold (Agreement) GMAC Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud And Got Busted...That Is Why They Did Not Respond To The Order After (March 3, 2006) They Were Busted And Had Committed A Crime...The Courts Never Approved The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor (Corla Reeves Jackson) And GMAC" By A Courts Order Issued Or Entered After (March 3, 2006) And It Was Recorded ECF That Their Were No More Responses From GMAC Period Filed (ECF) Through The Courts....

This Case Was Closed On (10/08/2009) And It Cleared The Trustees (01/20/2010).  This Case Was Pending Trial When The Lawyers Of (Sirote & Permutt) Corrupted This Case With The Use Of A Fake Foreclosure Using Deceptive Practices To Get Illegal Judge Order Which Lead To Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud All Over Again Which Could Not Be Done Under Federal Bankruptcy Laws Or The Law In General.  This Crime Was Committed In (2005) And Is Still Pending Trail In The United States District Courts For The Southern Division Of Alabama" Case Number (12-00111) Under Judge Dubose For A Summary Judgment" In Violation Of The Original Federal Court Orders" As Well As Forcing Corla Reeves Jackson Into (2) Illegal Fake Foreclosures Under Judge Shulman Getting A Illegal Relief Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud" Using Deceptive Practices Saying That Their Proof Of Claims Were Allowed By Judge Mahoney When They Were Not" GMAC Mortgage Proof Of Claims Were (Reversed And Disallowed).

GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Knew hey Were Committed A White Collar Crime Robbery On Fake Arrears Using Deceptive Practices Prior To (Defrauded Judge Shulman) As Well As The Lawyers Involved" It Was Recorded (ECF) So No One Can Deny Guaranteed.  GMAC Mortgage Defrauded (Judges Shulman) Based Upon The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 -March 3, 2006) That They Did Not Comply With Under The Following Terms And Conditions Of Federal Bankruptcy Laws And Time Frames And More Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing On (April 30, 2008).  The Fabricated Assignment GMAC Fabricated Was Not A Option One Mortgage Loan And The Fake Assignments Were Fabricated (8) Years Prior To The Home Being Built That Was Shipped (4/25/96) And The Other Fake Assignment Was Fabricated (06/19/2008)" After Option One Mortgage Closed (April 30, 2008)....

It Is Crystal Clear That (GMAC) Lawyers Committed Bankruptcy Fraud And Fraud Of The Court For Illegal Profits And Their Proof Of Claims Were Reversed And Disallowed.  The Evidence Speaks For Itself With The Judges Orders Issued Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) That (Corla Reeves Jackson) Was (Refunded) Back Some Of Her Money.  The Case Was Supposed To Go To Trial Under Diversity Jurisdiction For A Summary Judgment On All Damages They Caused And The Crime They Committed And GMAC Lawyers Corrupted The Case And Covered Up The Truth.  The Lies Is Over The Evidence Speaks For Itself...

 

 

Sep 20, 2010 · Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit told brokers and agents to Halt Foreclosures

Victims Loans Was Serviced From The Following States Listed Below That Was Affected.  Victims Need To Look On Their Statements And See Where Their Loans Was Serviced From...

 

 

THE LIES IS OVER GUARANTEED..!

Sep 20, 2010 · Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit told brokers and agents to

Halt Foreclosures Pending Between (2009-2010)...

 

GMAC Mortgage Proof Of Claims Were Disallowed In Its Entirety On September 18, 2009) Based Upon The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 March 3, 2006) That They Refused To Comply With Based Upon The Following Terms And Conditions (1-4).  The Order On The Payment Made Under (#1) Was Reduced To The Amount (Corla Reeves Jackson) Paid In Open Courts. The Order Was Reduced And Allowed  To The Amount Paid Of ($1, 920.64) Cents Which Is Under Number (1) Of That Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) That Is Recorded And Filed (ECF)....

The Order Was Reversed By Objections Filed By Barry Friedman Under Federal Laws That Their Were (No More Arrears Owned) On Number (2) Of The Order" Which Was Merged Purged Both Claims Number (1 And 2) Together Totaling ($14, 809.60)" Which Was Reversed By Objections Filed By Barry Friedman On (July 15, 2009) That Was Granted On (September 18, 2009) And Reduced To The Amount Paid In The Order Issued And Entered March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Under Number (1) Of That Order On Funds That Was Paid In Open Courts And Outside The Courts" Because Both Claims Were Merged Purged And Reversed In Its Entered To The Amount Paid In The Order....

GMAC Mortgage Corporation -GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC Lawyers (Sirote & Permutt) And Barry Friedman Knew This" And They Went Back In And Committed Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman Using Deceptive Practices And Robbed Corla Reeves Jackson Is What Has Occurred Her Going Around Judge Mahoney And They Did Not Report Any Of This To Judge Shulman  On The Entire Truth Of This Matter.  Jackson Says She Do Not Know How Her Lawyer God Tied Up With These Crooks After Luther Strange Took Office But He Did" And It Is Illegal!

This Is The Complaint Pending Trial They Are Trying To Block By Committing Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Martin Glenn And Judge Koeltl In New York" The Case Is Under A New Judge Now Awaiting On A Relief To Proceed To A (Jury Trial) That GMAC And Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer Has To Go Before As Well As (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Jon Patterson) They Committed Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman Which Lead To Illegal Orders In New York By Judge Martin Glenn And Judge Koeltl Causing Massive Damages And More That They Did Not Want Anyone To Find The Truth Out About Guaranteed...The Evidence Is Filed (ECF) Showing To Date What They All Did And Did Not Do To Protect Corla Reeves Jackson And Federal And State Laws That They Violated Under The United States Constitution" As Well As Ethic Law Violations And More.  Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman Caused Massive Damages And It Lead To Illegal Orders Being Issued In New York Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied Because GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Lied!

GMAC Mortgage Lawyers And Barry Friedman All Knew Corla Reeves Jackson Had Been Illegally Robbed Under Judge Shulman And They Committed Fraud Of the Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Knowing That GMAC Violated Judge Mahoney Orders Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006 - September 19, 2006 - October 1, 2006) By The Objections Barry Friedman Filed July 15, 2009)" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied This Is Facts" Its Recorded And Filed (ECF) So No One Can Lie Guaranteed.  All Judge Mahoney Orders Issued To GMAC Was Violated Under Bankruptcy Case (05-14142)" As Well As (Judge Dubose) In The United States District Courts Under Diversity Jurisdiction On Case (12-00111)" GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Continued To Rob Corla Reeves Jackson In Violation Of Her Orders Issued (May 31, 2012 Order That Stayed Both Complaint) And GMAC Took Jackson Name Off He Home Via A (Illegal Foreclosure Without A Summary Judgment Under Diversity Jurisdiction) By The Order Issued And Entered (ECF) On May 31, 2012...This Case Was Not Just Stayed Because GMAC Filed Bankruptcy Under Judge Martin Glenn" This Is A Crime That Was Committed That Is Pending A Demand By A Jury Trial By Both Parties Which Is Un-Usual For Judge Martin Glenn To Not Have Seen This" As Well As GMAC Mortgage Administrators (KCC)...

 

 ILLEGAL TRANSFER OF TITLE TO PROPERTY FALLS UNDER" 406 So.2d 834, 841-42

or either the Alabama Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act or the prior fraudulent-transfer law..

 

GMAC VIOLATED THE DEED OF TRUST ACT (DTA) AND THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

Estoppel is essentially a rule of evidence[3] whereby a person is barred from denying the truth of a fact that has already been settled….. 

GMAC MORTGAGE COULD NOT EVEN USED DIVERSITY JURISDICTION" THE CASE WERE NOT HEARD AND THEY WERE NOT THE CREDITORS" CLICK HERE & CLICK HERE 

 

 

 

GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage  LLC Never Was Issued A (Motion For A Summary Judgment) From The (United States District Courts For The Southern Division Of Alabama) To Do What They Did To Corla Reeves Jackson In New York Under Judge Martin Glenn" That Was Illegal.  Not Only Did Corla Reeves Jackson File A Complaint But GMAC Mortgage Filed A Complaint As Well That Is Still Pending Trial" Awaiting On The Lift Of Automatic Stay On A Summary Judgment Under Diversity Jurisdiction Under Federal Laws That Has Been Violated...

Corla Reeves Jackson Filed A Complaint And Then GMAC Filed A Complaint Both Complaints Were Stayed (Not Just Because GMAC Filed Bankruptcy) And They Knew This.  GMAC Had Filed A Complaint Under Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Jon Patterson To Get The Case Dismissed And He Was Denied.  Jon Patterson - Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Has Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Under Martin Glenn And Judge Dubose This Is Why Luther Strange Lied To Everyone About This Case He Covered It Up" Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed By His Affiliates More Than One Time Prior To And After He Was Elected" And After He Was Elected He Allowed Her To Be Robbed To Cover Up The White Collar Crime Robbery!

Martin Glenn Orders Were All Based Upon Fraud Without A Motion For A Summary Judgment" And This Is What GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Covered Up As Well As Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer Barry Friedman" He Said Judge Shulman Did This When He Did This With GMAC Mortgage Lawyer Under Judge Shulman  Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud With The Intent To Carry Reverse Judge Mahoney Orders Under Another Judge Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud" GMAC Did Not Own Corla Reeves Jackson Home Or An Assignment Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing (April 30, 2008) Period On The Arrears They Got The Illegal Relief On Under Judge Shulman And They All Knew This.  Judge Mahoney Orders Were All Violated Guaranteed!

 

The filing of a bankruptcy petition triggers the automatic stay that halts most pre-petition litigation against a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. §362(a)(1). The stay does not, however, suspend the commencement or continuation of criminal proceedings against a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. §362(b)(1).  Generally, actions for civil contempt are considered private collection devices 8 The Court subsequently granted (Corla Jackson) Automatic Stay. See Order Issued And Entered By Judge Mahoney (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006 - September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009) .

 

Judge Mahoney Granted (Corla Reeves Jackson) A Relief Of Automatic Stay And GMAC Mortgage Corporation Violated Corla Reeves Jackson Automatic Stay) Triggering A Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Orders Under Judges That Did Not Know The Entire Facts About This Case And Complaint On The Crime Committed By GMAC.

Judge Mahoney Conditionally Denied GMAC Mortgage (Relief Of Automatic Stay) Based Upon The Following Terms And Conditions Of Her Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Based Upon All The Following Terms And Conditions (1-4) Before (5) Of That Order Could Be Enforced By GMAC And They Knew This.  GMAC And Its Lawyers Violated )Corla Reeves Jackson Original Automatic Stay) And This Has Caused Her Massive Damages They Covered Up" Via Going Around Judge Mahoney Using Deceptive Practices Under Judge Shulman Which Is Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud On Fake Documents That Did Not Exist Prior To Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy Closing October 8, 2009 - January 20, 2012) Filed ECF) or Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing On (April 30, 2008) Because They Robbed Corla Reeves Jackson In (2005) Which Was A Crime" They Covered Up....

It Was Recorded And Filed (ECF) Through The Courts That (Judge Mahoney) Disallowed And Reversed Her Order By Objections Filed By Barry Friedman On July 15, 2009) Against GMAC  For A Crime They Committed Before Her Dated Back To (2005)" Because At Time GMAC Initiated Their Fake Arrears Dated Back To (2005) (GMAC Mortgage Corporation et, al.) Was Not Corla Reeves Jackson Creditor) period" And Option One Mortgage Loans Were Secured In A Pool Of Loans Backed By Security's With All Jackson Policy's And Under Her Property Which Had Nothing To Do With GMAC Mortgage Corporation Period) And They Knew This" Their Proof Of Claims On Fake Arrears Dated Back To (2005) Was Disallowed And Reversed By Federal Court Orders That They Violated Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) As Well As The Stay Order On This Complaint Under Judge Dubose In The United States District Courts For The Southern Division Of Alabama (Case Number 12-00111).  All Judge Mahoney Federal Court Orders Was Violated By (Judge Mahoney) After Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy Case Was Closed (October 8, 2009  And Discharged On January 20, 2009) Against Federal Bankruptcy Laws Guaranteed...(Management’s Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. §2004,Under Bankruptcy Case #: (05_13142 MAM 13).    

Corla Reeves Jackson Was Illegally Robbed By GMAC And Her Lawyer After She Was Discharged In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Which Is Not Of Any Law.  They Objections And The Orders Were Not Filed Under Bankruptcy Number (1) Because Barry Friedman Did Not Tell Corla Reeves Jackson Anything" The Trustee Told Her After She Started Searching For Answers After Her Bankruptcy Was Being Stalled Under Barry Friedman In (3). 

Corla Reeves Jackson Confronted Barry Friedman On More Than One Occasion And Each Time He Stalled Her Lying And Finally She Confronted Him Again And He Said He Did Not Know Anything About What She Was Talking About" When The Trustee Said He Did" They Sent Him Documents Versus Corla Reeves Jackson Because He Was Her Lawyer" and She Never Got The Documents To See What Barry Friedman Filed Or Was Granted" All She Know Is That He Played A Good Game With Her And Now She Busted Him With GMAC" They Committed Fraud Of The Court Before Judge Shulman Knowing That Judge Mahoney Orders Was Being Violated That Protected Corla Reeves Jackson And Her Property Because GMAC Was Not Corla Reeves Jackson Creditor And Her Home Was Insured On All Her Insured Covered Losses Form (2) Slandered And Clouded Titles By The (Shoemakers And Gunter's) As Well As GMAC" In Addition To (2) Hurricanes (Hurricane Ivan And Hurricane Katrina) That GMAC Had Her Case Dismissed On To Defraud Judge Graddick With By Fraud Of The Court With A (Fake Dismissal) Provided To Farmers Insurance Group - Fire Exchange By (GMAC) That Also Lead To Fraud Of The Court Causing Massive Damages In More Than One Way More Than You Can Imagine With That Fake Dismissal Which Had To Be Re-Instated By Judge Mahoney Prior To Judge Graddick Issuing His Illegal Order To Farmers Based Upon That Fake Foreclosure On The Dismissal...GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Has Caused Massive Damages More Than You Can Imagine.  What Ever They Did For Barry Friedman To Get Him To Go Back And Commit Fraud Of The Court With Them Is A Called A White Collar Crime Robbery And More Guaranteed...

 

GMAC Mortgage And Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer Both Has (Committed Fraud Under Judge Shulman ) In Violation Of All Judge Mahoney Orders Using Deceptive Practices" Now They Are Busted.  Then After They Got Busted They Defrauded Martin Glenn To Block The Case For Them From Proceeding To Trial By Fraud Of The Court And That To Is Recorded (ECF)...

An affirmative defense to a civil lawsuit or criminal charge is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff or prosecutor which, if proven by the defendant, defeats or mitigates the legal consequences of the defendant's otherwise unlawful conduct.  In civil lawsuits, affirmative defenses include the statute of limitations, the statute of frauds, and waiver. In criminal prosecutions, examples of affirmative defenses are self defense,[1] insanity, and the statute of limitations.

 

Governing rules

 

Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the assertion of affirmative defenses in civil cases that are filed in the United States district courts. Rule 8(c) specifically enumerates the following defenses: "accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense." 

 Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that affirmative defenses be based on "knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances.

It Is Crystal Clear GMAC Did In Fact Violate (All Judge Mahoney Order Issued And Orders Entered By Objections) Dated (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006 - July 15, 2009 - September 19, 2009 - October 1, 2009)The Evidence Speaks For Itself And It's Recorded ECF So No One Can Lie Guaranteed!

 

 

 

Judge Mahoney Reduced And Allowed The Debtors Objections Filed (July 15, 2009) Down To The (Amount Paid) To

(No More Arrears Owed) By A Federal Court Order Issued And Entered (09/18/2009 - 10/01/2009) That GMAC Violated!

 

What Has Occurred Was (GMAC Mortgage Lawyers) Defraud The Courts And Judges After (Corla Reeves Jackson) Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Was Closed And Discharged On (October 8, 2009 - January 20, 2009).  What They Did Was They Used (Deceptive Practices Committing Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud)  Forcing Corla Reeves Jackson Back Into Bankruptcy (2 And 3) Based Upon Arrears Dated Back To (2005) On A Leasehold Interest In Her Property That Had Been (Reversed And Disallowed) By (Judge Mahoney And The Bankruptcy Trustees - Courts) Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).  Their Was Never A (Leasehold Agreement) Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC Mortgage)" Because Corla Reeves Jackson Was Not Leasing Her Home" Her Lender Was (Option One Mortgage) And Not GMAC Mortgage Corporation" This Was Recorded Through The Courts And Listed On Each Page Of (Corla Reeves Jackson Loan Documents As Well As On Her Deed) Proving That The Loan GMAC Fabricated In Her Name Was Not Her Option One Mortgage Loan Number. 

After The Order Was Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) There Were No More Responses Filed By GMAC Mortgage Corporation Based Upon All The Following Terms And Conditions Of The Order Issued March 1, 2006 (1-4) Before Number (5) Could Be Enforced By (GMAC) With Required The (Court's Order Confirming The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor (Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC). 

It Is Listed In The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) That The Courts Had To Issue (A Court's Order Confirmation Of The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC" Which Had To Be Issued And Entered (ECF) After The Order Was Entered (March 3, 2006)" Which Did Not Occur Because (Corla Reeves Jackson) Was Not Leasing Her Home And Her Lender Was Option One Mortgage And It Was Recorded Through The Courts And Each Page Of (Corla Reeves Jackson) Loan Documents.

The Loan Number GMAC Filed Their (Fake Arrears) Arrears Under A Leasehold Interest Through The Courts" Was Not An (Option One Mortgage Loan Number).  This Is Why GMAC Mortgage Fake Proof Of Claim Under Claim (#1) And Claim #7) Was Conditionally Denied Based Upon All The Following Terms And Conditions (1-4) Before (#2) And (#5) Could Be Legally Enforced By GMAC Under Applicable Law.  GMAC Fabricated A (3) Fake Assignments After The Order Was Entered And After Option One Mortgage Closed (April 30, 2008).  One Of The Fake Assignment Was Altered Using The Same Documents With And Without A Loan Number On It" And The Other Fake Assignment Was Generated And Shopped (8) Years In Advance Prior To The Home Being Built And Prior To Corla Reeves Jackson Having A Loan With Option One Mortgage. 

The Fake Allonge GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Used To Defraud The Courts With Was In (Black) Not Endorsed To (GMAC)  That Was  Fabricated And Detached From The Original Note.  The Documents GMAC Had Defrauded Judge Martin Glenn With Is Copies Of Documents Corla Reeves Jackson Filed With The Courts For Her Proof Of Claim" That GMAC Did Not Have Prior To Filing Bankruptcy Or With The Courts They Defrauded The Courts With" And They Altered Those Documents They Made Copies Of Taking Off The Fax Number At The Top Of The Pages That Proved They Were Sent To Corla Reeves Jackson By (Option One Mortgage) To Give To The Judges And Courts.  After GMAC Defrauded The Courts And Judges With Copies Of Fabricated Altered Documents They Got The Illegal Orders Based Upon" They Found Out Their Were More Documents And They Kept Defrauding The Courts Alone The Way As Jackson Provided More Evidence In Her Proof Of Claims That They Got Their Hands On Under Judge Martin Glenn" Which Did Not Help Them Because They Are Not The Original Documents Or The Original Note" Its Only Copies Of What (Option One Mortgage Faxed) Corla Reeves Jackson Of To Give To The Judges And Courts Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142). 

THE LAW FIRMS OF GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION -GMAC MORTGAGE LLC- RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION - GMAC MORTGAGE LLC Do Not Want To Go To Court" They Have To (Explain Where They Got The Documents From And The Dates They Filed The Documents) They Defrauded The Courts With" In Which They Will Be Busted Again...What Has Occurred Here Is That GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Has Altered Faxed Documents Of A Original Note) That Was Sent To (Corla Reeves Jackson) By Option One Mortgage  To Give To The Judges" Which Is Only A Copy Of Option One Mortgage Note Backed By Security's With The (Little Tin Man) Stamped On It" Alone With A Copy Of Her Original (ALTA) Title Policy's" Which Had Nothing To Do With (GMAC).  Option One Mortgage Said They Never Assigned (GMAC) Over Corla Reeves Jackson Note Or An Assignment" And The Documents They Sent Jackson Was To Give To The Judges In Her Case That Was Pending Trial.  GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Illegally Had Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy Dismissed And It Had To Be Re-Instated Under Judge Mahoney That They Defrauded Judge Graddick With" Which Lead To Massive Illegal Orders To Cover Up The Crime GMAC Lawyers Committed With The Intent To Cover Up And Carry Out The Robbery Using Deceptive Practices" Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud (3) Times On A Fake Note And Fake Arrears For Illegal Profits...

GMAC Lawyers Has (Defrauded The Courts And Judges With Fake Documents) With The Intent To Carry Out The White Collar Crime Robbery They Started For Massive Illegal Profits In More Than One Way"  After (Corla Reeves Jackson) Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Was Closed And Cleared The Trustees On (October 8, 2009 - January 20, 2010).  The Fake Assignment That GMAC Mortgage Fabricated Was Fabricated And Backed Dated To After (Option One Mortgage Closed On (April 30, 2008).  The Evidence Proved That GMAC Did Not Have A Assignment Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing On (April 30, 2008) When They Filed Their Fake Arrears On A Leasehold Interest In The Property Without Owing The Property Which Is A Crime.  GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Illegally Initiated Their Fake Arrears Proof Of Claim Dated Back To (2005) With A Leasehold Interest In The Property Without A Leasehold Agreement (Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC) Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Under Judge Mahoney.  If GMAC Mortgage Owned The Note They Did Not Need A Assignment" They Needed A Leasehold Agreement Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC.  It Is True That (GMAC Mortgage Corporation -GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC Lawyers Did In Fact Violate The Board Of Governors Agreement On  A Fake Note And Fake Foreclosure Between (2009-2010)" After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged And After Option One Mortgage Closed (April 30, 2008).  This Is Recorded So No One Can Deny This Is Facts...

FACTS: What Has Occurred Here Is" GMAC Got Busted Under The (Fake Leasehold Interest) Under Corla Reeves Jackson Property  Without A (Leasehold Agreement) Between Corla Reeves Jackson And GMAC" And They Waited Until After Bankruptcy Case (05013142) Was Closed And Discharged (January 20, 2008) And They Went Back And Fabricated A Fake Assignment After Option One Mortgage Closed April 30, 2008) Under (Judge Shulman) Using Deceptive Practices.  What Happed Was GMAC Mortgage Lawyers That Committed This White Collar Crime Robbery" Illegally Forced (Corla Reeves Jackson) Into Two More Bankruptcy's (Via Fraud Of The Court) Using Deceptive Practices In (Bankruptcy Number 2 And Number 3)" Saying That (Judge Mahoney) Granted (GMAC) A Leave To File A Proof Of Claim In The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Under The Terms And Conditions Of (2) In That Order"  Without Telling The (Courts And Judges) After (Corla Reeves Jackson) Bankruptcy Closed On (October 8, 2009) That Cleared The Trustees On January 20, 2010)" Had Been (Reversed) By Objections Filed (July 15, 2009) That Was Granted And Amended To The Amount Paid In That Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006). 

GMAC Mortgage Corporation Did Not Own (Corla Reeves Jackson) Property When They Filed Fake Arrears On (06/15/2005 - 03/01/2006 - 03/03/2006) Or Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing On (April 30, 2008).  Option One Mortgage Loans Were Secured In A Pool Of Mortgages Backed By Security's With All Corla Reeves Jackson Policy's Under Her Property Which Prevented A Foreclosure In More Than One Way" Not To Mention The Loan Number GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Fabricated Was Not A Option One Mortgage Loan Number" Option One Mortgage Could Not Assign GMAC Mortgage Over Their Own Loan Number After They Closed On April 30, 2008) To Defraud The Courts On A Case That Was Pending Trial For The Theft Of The Home Which Caused Corla Reeves Jackson Massive Damages Based Upon A Fake Foreclosure On A Loan She Did Not Have With GMAC Mortgage Under Her Property Period...

GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION -GMAC MORTGAGE LLC - RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION - RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC HAS COVERED UP A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY KNOWING THEIR LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM UNDER THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) WAS CONDITIONALLY DENIED BASED UPON ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THAT ORDER NUMBER (1-4) BEFORE (5) COULD BE ENFORCED BY GMAC ON A FAKE NOTE AND FAKE ARREARS.

GMAC MORTGAGE WILLFUL WENT BACK AND FILED (2) MORE FAKE PROOF OF CLAIMS BASED UPON THE ORDER ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) UNDER (JUDGE SHULMAN) COMMITTING (FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD) AGAIN (2) TIMES WITH THE INTENT TO CARRY OUT THE WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THEY STARTED DATED BACK TO (2005)" IN VIOLATION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN (ALLY AND THE GOVERNORS ON (FAKE FORECLOSURE PENDING BETWEEN (2009-2010).  GMAC LAWYERS WENT BACK AND ROBBED CORLA REEVES JACKSON AFTER SHE WAS DISCHARGED ON JANUARY 30, 2010) VIA COMMITTING FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN  USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES...

 

The Supreme Court ruling law suit states that every American would benefit to know about the sheer fact that exposes corruption and hypocrisy we uphold ignorantly and agree to civil action no. 00-CV-12485-RCL. Option One Mortgage Was Closed When GMAC Mortgage Corporation/GMAC Mortgage Fabricated Their Fake Assignment.  Claim Number (1) And Claim Number (7) Both Were (Reversed) On Order Issued (September 18, 2009)" And Another Order Amends The Order Issued (September 18, 2009) Prior To Bankruptcy Being Closed (To the Amount Paid) In The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Under Number (1).

 

It Was Recorded And Crystal Clear That The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Was Filed (ECF) And Was (Reversed) On (September 18, 2009) By Federal Court Orders In Its (Entirety) Under (2) And By The Objections Filed (July 15, 2009) Number (2).  No More Arrears Owed.

The Courts Merged Purged Claim (#1 And Claim #7) Arrears Of ($14, 809. 60) Which Was (Reversed) In It's Entirety On (September 18, 2009) And Reduced To The Amount Paid In The Order Under Number (1)"  Prior To Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy Being Closed On (October 8, 2008) That Cleared The Trustees On (January 20, 2009). 

 

Option One Mortgage Was Closed When GMAC Mortgage Fabricated Their Fake Assignment And One Fake Assignment Is Dated (8) Years Before The Home Was Built That Was Shipped (4/25/96).  Corla Reeves Jackson Did Not Have A Loan With Option One Mortgage To Ship A Assignment Out To GMAC (4/25/96).  GMAC Mortgage And Its Lawyers Has Caused Massive Damages Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied They Abused The Judicial System And Federal Laws Carrying Out A White Collar Crime Robbery And They Covered It Up Via Fraud OF The Court Which Is A Very Serious Crime.

 

FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so

that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe

and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

 

Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law. If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire

case is voided or cancelled and" Any ruling or judgment that the court has issued will be void...  The case will usually need to be retried with

different court officials, often in an entirely different venue..

 

It Is Crystal Clear They Violated All Judge Mahoney Order Issued And Entered By Objections Dated (March 1, 2006)" (March 3, 2006) " (July 15, 2009)

(September 19, 2009) " (October 1, 2009).  The Evidence Speaks For Itself And It's Recorded ECF So No One Can Lie Guaranteed!

 

 

 

 

The Order Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006)...

Corla Reeves Jackson Did Not Have To Pay GMAC Anymore Money After Number (1) Of This Order And GMAC Knew This" Number (2) Was Reversed!

 

Review Judge Mahoney Orders In Case (05-13142) And More. It Is Recorded And Filed (ECF) That (Corla Reeves Jackson) Was Being Robbed By GMAC The Fake Arrears GMAC Illegally Got Their Proof Of Claims On Under (Judge Shulman) After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged (January 20, 2010) Did Not Exist!

 

READ MORE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW MANY PEOPLE STUCK ON STUPID LOOK BELOW AT THE OBJECTIONS SEE (#2) ON THE ORDER DATED (MARCH 1, 2006 THAT WAS ENTERED MARCH 3, 2006) IS LISTED BELOW IN THE OBJECTIONS THAT REVERSED GMAC MORTGAGE LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM IT IS IN BLACK & WHITE THAT WAS FILED (ECF) UNDER THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL LAWS.

THE FAKE ARREARS GMAC FILED WAS REDUCED AND DISALLOWED BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING TERMS OF THE ORDER ISSUED" ENTERED" DISALLOWED BY OBJECTIONS (NO MORE ARREARS OWED) AND AMENDED TO THE AMOUNT SHE PAID IN OPEN COURT OF THE ORDER THAT WAS ISSUED AND ENTERED (MARCH 1, 2006 - MARCH 3, 2006) GUARANTEED...

CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS ROBBED BY GMAC...HOW DID GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS GET AWAY WITH A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY" VIOLATING FEDERAL COURT ORDERS ON ARREARS NO LONGER OWED BY CORLA REEVES JACKSON...?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORLA REEVES JACKSON WENT BY FEDERAL COURT ORDERS AS SHOWN LISTED BELOW.  IT WAS GMAC THAT VIOLATED THESE ORDERS AND COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT TO KEEP THE TRUTH COVERED UP WHICH IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE AND CRIME.  THEY KNEW THEY WERE ILLEGALLY ROBBING JACKSON!

 

 

 

GMAC LAWYERS DID VIOLATED FEDERAL LAWS AND THEY WENT BACK AND ILLEGALLY WILLFUL ROBBED (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) AFTER SHE WAS DISCHARGED OF HER DEBTS WHICH WAS NOT DISMISS THE CASE UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) UNDER JUDGE MAHONEY.

THE ORDERS JUDGE MAHONEY ISSUED PREVENTED (GMAC AND ITS LAWYERS) FROM ROBBING CORLA REEVES JACKSON UNDER THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY LAWS" IN WHICH SHE DID NOT VIOLATE.  CORLA REEVES  JACKSON DEBTS WERE DISCHARGED" BUT THE CASE WAS NOT DISMISSED.

GMAC COULD NOT FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM UNDER BANKRUPTCY NUMBER (2-3) BECAUSE CORLA REEVES JACKSON NEVER TOOK A LOAN WITH THEM AFTER SHE WAS DISCHARGED BY THE COURTS ON (1/20/2010) UNDER FEDERAL LAWS.  GMAC MORTGAGE PROOF OF CLAIMS WERE ALL DISALLOWED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY OBJECTIONS FILED AND GRANTED ON (07/15/2009 - 09/18/2009).  ALL CORLA REEVES  JACKSON DEBTS WERE REDUCED TO THE AMOUNT PAID AND HER BANKRUPTCY WAS CLOSED (10/01/2009 -10/08/2010). 

NOW WHAT EVER GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS HAS DID TO CARRY OUT THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAWS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES IS A CRIME AND THEY KNEW THIS" PRIOR TO DEFRAUDING (JUDGE SHULMAN) WILLFUL..

GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS COVERED UP A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES GOING AROUND JUDGE MAHONEY IS WHAT HAS OCCURRED HERE.  A NEW BANKRUPTCY CASE NUMBER COULD NOT APPLY ON BANKRUPTCY NUMBER (2-3) FOR GMAC TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM UNDER PERIOD" BECAUSE (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) NEVER TOOK A LOAN WITH GMAC AFTER SHE WAS DISCHARGED" PRIOR TO OR AFTER SHE WAS DISCHARGED AND BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WAS NOT DISMISSED ONLY THE DEBTS WERE DISCHARGED...

THE EVIDENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF" THE LAWYERS FOR (GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION et, al. - GMAC MORTGAGE LLC UNDER RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC) HAS VIOLATED FEDERAL LAWS AND THEY DID IN FACT COVER UP A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THEY COMMITTED AND THEY COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURTS AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD PRIOR TO AND AFTER CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS DISCHARGED WITH THE INTENT TO CORRUPT HER CASE AND COMPLAINT AGAINST THEM.  THE MOTIONS GMAC LAWYERS FILED THROUGH THE COURTS (ECF) WAS FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD" WITH THE INTENT TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES" VIOLATING FEDERAL COURT ORDERS ISSUED BY JUDGE MAHONEY AND JUDGE DUBOSE!

GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS AND ITS AFFILIATES  ALL KNEW WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN IF THE (FEDS AND FBI) FOUND OUT THE TRUTH" ON WHAT REALLY OCCURRED HERE AND WHAT HAPPENED ON WHAT THEY ALL DID TO DATE" THEY WERE GOING TO BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF FEDERAL LAWS.  THIS IS WHY THEY (DESPERATELY COVERED THE TRUTH VIA COMMITTING FRAUD OF THE COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD OVER AND OVER AGAIN). 

GMAC MORTGAGE LAWYERS ALL KNEW THIS (CASE-COMPLAINT WAS PENDING A DEMAND BY A JURY TRIAL) UNDER FEDERAL JURISDICTION (IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS CASE NUMBER (00111) UNDER JUDGE DUBOSE)" IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL COURT ORDERS ISSUED AND ENTERED BY JUDGE MAHONEY THAT WAS VIOLATED LEADING TO THE  THEFT OF THE HOME" POLICY" MONEY" CREDIT BEING DESTROYED BY A FAKE FORECLOSURES" PERSONAL INJURY'S DIRECT AND IN DIRECT" AND MORE VIA FRAUD OF THE  COURT AND BANKRUPTCY FRAUD COMMITTED BY GMAC LAWYERS WITH THE INTENT TO CARRY OUT THIS (WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS)  AGAINST FEDERAL LAWS AND STATE LAWS.  GMAC MORTGAGE ABUSED THE LAW" AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME NOW!

WHAT THE LAWYERS FOR GMAC DID WAS THEY COMMITTED A ROBBERY USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES ABUSING THE JUSTICE SYSTEM AND VIOLATION FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS" AS WELL AS VIOLATING CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS" ETHIC LAWS AND MORE" WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED.  ALL THE LAWYERS FOR GMAC LINKED TO THIS CRIME COMMITTED HERE KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING THE EVIDENCE PROVES IT FILED (ECF) AND MORE  GUARANTEED...GMAC AND ITS LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS CAUSED MASSIVE DAMAGES WHICH IS UN-PRESIDENTIAL LIKE NEVER BEFORE IN AMERICAN HISTORY" TO COVER UP A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THEY COMMITTED IN ALABAMA!

CORLA REEVES JACKSON DID NOT TAKE OUT A LOAN WITH GMAC AFTER SHE WAS DISCHARGED OR PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING ON (APRIL 30, 2008) THE FAKE ASSIGNMENTS GMAC DEFRAUDED THE COURTS WITH WAS FIRST A LEASEHOLD WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT IN (2005)" KNOWING CORLA REEVES JACKSON WAS NOT LEASING HER HOME AND HER LOAN WAS WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE AND GMAC GOT BUSTED ON (MARCH 1, 2006) BY JUDGE MAHONEY.  CORLA REEVES JACKSON CASE AND COMPLAINTS WAS THE VERY FIRST CASE UNDER (05-13142)" WHICH LEAD TO BE MORTGAGE FRAUD RING BUST NATIONWIDE.  LAWYERS AND SERVICERS WERE ROBBING VICTIMS ILLEGALLY UNDER BANKS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS" WHERE THEY BOTH WERE BENEFITING FROM STOLEN IDENTITY'S STOLEN HOMES" LAND" MONEY" VICTIMS CREDIT AND MORE" WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME.  THE BANKS" THEIR SERVICERS AND LAWYER VIOLATED BANKING RULES AND REGULATIONS AND MORE. 

IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THEY VIOLATED CONSTITUTIONAL  LAWS ETHIC LAWS" AS WELL AS ( FDIC" CONSUMER" AND SEC) LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES BY COMMITTING FRAUD FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS WHICH IS A CRIME. THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING FABRICATING LOANS IN VICTIMS NAME FOR PROFITS WAS A CRIME" IT WAS ILLEGAL.  VICTIMS DID NOT HAVE A LOAN WITH THE CROOKS THAT ROBBED THEM" THEIR IDENTITY WAS STOLEN WITH THE MORTGAGES THEY STOLE FROM POOLS OF LOANS THAT WAS ALREADY BACKED BY SECURITY'S BY THE VICTIMS REAL LENDERS WHICH WAS RECORDED. 

JUDGE MAHONEY (CONDITIONALLY DENIED GMAC MORTGAGE LIFT OF AUTOMATIC STAY AND LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM ON (MARCH 1, 2006) BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HER ORDERS ISSUED AND ENTERED ON (MARCH 1, 2006-MARCH 3, 2006) THAT GMAC VIOLATED.  JUDGE MAHONEY (REVERSED) HER ORDERS DATED (MARCH 1, 2006) GRANTING GMAC A LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM BY OBJECTIONS THAT WAS FILED ON (07/15/2009) THAT WAS GRANTED IN CORLA REEVES JACKSON FAVOR ON (09/18/2009)) BECAUSE GMAC DID NOT OWN THE NOTE OR THE ASSIGNMENT IN (2005) AND NEITHER DID THEY HAVE A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEBTOR CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC. 

AFTER GMAC GOT BUSTED ON (MARCH 1, 2006) WITH THAT FAKE LEASEHOLD INTEREST IN (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) PROPERTY WITH THE INTENT TO ROB HER FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS.  GMAC LAWYERS ILLEGALLY WILLFUL WENT BACK AND FABRICATED (3) FAKE ASSIGNMENTS' WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD JUDGES" AFTER (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) DEBTS WERE DISCHARGED (1/20/2010)...

ONE ASSIGNMENT WAS DATED (8) YEARS BEFORE THE HOME WAS BUILT ON AN ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS SHIPPED (4/25/96) WHEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON DID NOT HAVE A LOAN WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE (4/25/96) TO SHIP TO GMAC" THEY GOT BUSTED ON THAT FAKE ASSIGNMENT.  THE LAW FIRMS AND THE LAWYERS THAT COMMITTED THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THEY GOT COVERED UP HERE WILLFUL COMMITTED THIS CRIME!

THE OTHER (2) FAKE ASSIGNMENT WERE GENERATED AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008).  THE FAKE ALLONGE WAS NOT ENDORSED TO GMAC AND IT WAS IN BLANK" DETACHED FROM ITS ORIGINAL RECORDED DEED" THAT DID NOT MATCH THE LOAN GMAC FABRICATED IN (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) NAME WITH THE INTENT TO ROB HER ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND OF HER HOME MONEY LAND POLICY'S AND MORE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AT HER EXPENSE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES" THIS IS ALL RECORDED THROUGH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM SO NO ONE CAN LIE...

GMAC AND ITS LAWYERS DID IN FACT COMMIT A ROBBERY PRIOR TO THE MORTGAGE CRISIS" AND THEN THEY TOOK THE (STOLEN HOME THEY STOLE) USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND JACKSON IDENTITY AND THEY USED HER POLICY'S AND MORE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS IN MORE THAN ONE WAY" THIS IS WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO COVER UP.  THIS WAS A CRIME GMAC LAWYERS COMMITTED HERE AND COVERED UP" VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS STATE LAWS ETHIC LAWS AND MORE" WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED THIS IS A CRIME (GMAC) LAWYERS COMMITTED. 

THE CRIME THE BANKS AND THEIR SERVICERS WERE DOING WAS FORCING VICTIMS INTO BANKRUPTCY CAUSING MASSIVE DAMAGES AND MORE WHICH LEAD TO MASSIVE DAMAGES FOR VICTIMS NATIONWIDE IN MORE THAN ONE WAY WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED" THIS IS FACTS GUARANTEED...!

 

(LUTHER STRANGE (LIED TO CONGRESS) GUARANTEED)...THIS IS A (ETHIC LAW VIOLATION) AND MORE.  THIS WAS A CONSPIRACY THAT CORRUPTED (CORLA REEVES JACKSON) CASES (IN EXCHANGE FOR PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR) WITH THE INTENT TO CORRUPT HER CASES AND  PROOF OF CLAIMS THAT LUTHER STRANGE LAW FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS AND LAWYER FRIENDS HAD HIM" HELP THEM COVER UP AFTER HE GOT ELECTED IN THIS (WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY)...  

THE EVIDENCE ABOVE WAS RECORDED (ECF) SO NO ONE CAN LIE FROM DAY ONE GUARANTEED...!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corla Reeves Jackson Signed The (Affidavit For The Courts To Proceed To Trial Dated (1/29/2015) Residential Capital Corporation Law Firms Has Changed Name From (Morrison And Foerster LLC) To (Morrison And Foerster LLP) Which Is Not Going To Help Them" They Committed The Crime With Under Judge Martin Glenn Under (Morrison And Foerster LLC) Knowing They (Willful) Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud With The Intent To Defrauded The Courts" Martin Glenn" And Judge Koeltl)

The Complaint Still Pending Trial In The (United States District Courts Of The Southern Division Of Alabama) Awaiting On The Leave To Proceed To Trial Under Federal Laws" Out Of The Court Of Appeals Under A New Judge Now.  The Case Will More Than Likely Make It To The United States Supreme Courts Because Elected Officials Covered Up This Crime Out Of Alabama Which Lead To Massive Fraud OF The Court Under New York Jurisdiction" That Illegally Lead To Defrauding Federal Courts And Federal Judges" Live On Camera And Live Audio The Case Were All Recorded And More In Court Proving GMAC Committed Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Martin Glenn From The Very Beginning" Which Lead To Illegal Orders Fraud OF The Court And Much More Which Cannot Be Ignored OR Denied" The Justice System And Courts Was Abused By The Lawyers That Covered Up And Committed This White Collar Crime Robbery Out Of Alabama For Illegal Profits Under GMAC Umbrella.

GMAC Instinctually Used The Orders Issued By Judge Mahoney Entered March 3, 2006) Using Deceptive Practices Defrauding The Courts With The Debtors Objection Orders To Act As Orders Issued For Them" Versus Corla Reeves Jackson.  This Is Recorded In Courts Of New York Under Martin Glenn.  The Orders GMAC Used Using Deceptive Practices Under Martin Glenn Was Not GMAC Mortgage Orders Dated September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009).  GMAC Mortgage Leave To File A Proof Of Claim They Got Their Illegal Relief On Under Judge Shulman Was Fraud Of The Court" And Bankruptcy Fraud" Corla Reeves Jackson Did No Owe Any Arrears To GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC And They Knew This" She Never Had A Lease Hold Agreement With GMAC And Neither Has She Ever Had A Mortgage With GMAC Mortgage.  The Loan GMAC Mortgage Fabricated Is Fraud" And They Knew This. 

This Is How (GMAC Mortgage Lawyers) Committed This White Collar Crime Robbery For Illegal Profits Using Deceptive Practices On Insured Covered Losses And The Theft Of The Home For Additional Illegal Profits.  They Fabricated A Note In Corla Reeves Jackson Name And Attached Her Loan Documents She Had With (Option One Mortgage) To Their Fake Note Which Had Nothing To Do With GMAC Mortgage And They Got Busted On March 1, 2006) Under Judge Mahoney Bankruptcy Case (05-13142)" Thinking They Would Never Get Busted.  After They Got Busted From That Point They Been Committing Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud To Avoid Going To Trial Because The Lawyer Is  Going To Jail For A White Collar Crime Robbery And Much More Guaranteed And They Knew This" That Is Why They Kept Defrauding The Courts And Judges To Date Which Is Not Going To Work This Time. 

This Robbery Occurred Prior To The Mortgage Fraud Crisis Committed By Banks" This Robbery Occurred In (2005) And When The Law Firms Got Busted They Had GMAC Fabricate Documents To Cover Up The Crime Which Lead To A Illegal Foreclosure And A Note Being Backed By Security's Being Stolen By GMAC For Illegal Profits That Did Not Belong To Them Period. 

GMAC Mortgage Law Firms Were (Using Corla Reeves Jackson Identity And Her Assets On Insured Covered Losses And More In More Than One Way Illegally Cashing In On Profits Using Deceptive Practices Big Time).  It Is True They Did Carry Out This Crime (Based Upon A Fake Note And Fake Arrears On A Fake Leasehold Interest Under (Corla Reeves Jackson) Property Using Her Credit And Assets Which Was Disallowed And GMAC Mortgage Leave To File A Proof Of Claim (#2) Of The Order Issued And Entered March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Was Disallowed And (Reversed) Under Federal Laws.

GMAC Continued To Commit Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Using Deceptive Practices" Covering Up The Crime They Were Committed While They Continued To Carry Out The Robbery Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud On Fake Arrears Dated Back To (2005) That Was Disallowed.  GMAC Willful Continued To Carry Out The White Collar Crime Robbery On Fake Arrears And (2) More Fake Proof Of Claims After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged.  This Is Recorded (ECF) So NO One Can Deny" This Is Facts.  It Was Bradley Arant Boult Cummings And Their Affiliate Firms (Sirote & Permutt - Morrison & Foerster) That Committed This White Collar Crime Robbery And They Know They Are Busted Now.  The Truth Is Out Backed By The Evidence And More Guaranteed!

The Stole (Corla Reeves Jackson) Identity" Property" Policy" And Credit Using Her Credit Tying Up Her Assets Illegally By Identity Theft Going Around The Courts Using Deceptive Practices" Knowing That Federal Court Orders Was Issued Originally To Protected Jackson That GMAC And Its Lawyers Willful Violated Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud With The Intent To Carry Out This White Collar Crime Robbery That Was Committed In Alabama After Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy Was Closed (October 8, 2008) That Cleared The Trustees On Her (Discharge January 20, 2009).  This Crime Was Committed By Alabama Lawyers And Their Affiliate Law Firms That They Tried To Cover Up Here" Which Is Not Going To Work Anymore" Its A Big Federal Crime The Lawyers Covered Up And Committed Thinking They Could Get Away With This Crime To Date" Which Is Not Going To Work.  We Are Seeing Who All Is Involved Now Linked To All The Illegal Orders And More Guaranteed" Corla Reeves Jackson Signed The Affidavits To Proceed To Trial On (1/28/2008) Awaiting On Relieve Out Of New York Now Guaranteed...

The Case Was Moved On Appeal To The United States Court Of Appeals Under A New Judge" And WE Are One Step From The United States Supreme Courts In This White Collar Crime Robbery That Took Place In Alabama Violating (Ethic Laws" Federal Laws" Pooling" Consumer Laws" FDIC" Laws" Servicing Laws) And More" As Well As Federal And State Laws" GMAC Did Not Own Corla Reeves Jackson Mortgage And A Motion For Summary Judgment Was Not Issued From The United States District Courts Under Diversity Jurisdiction" Prior To (Martin Glenn) Issuing His Denial Without The Summary Judgment On Case (12-00111) From Judge Dubose) In Reference To Massive Damages And The Theft Of The Home And More To Date GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Covered Up (Via Fraud Of The Court) Under Martin Glenn.  It Was True That GMAC Robbed Corla Reeves Jackson Violating Her Original Automatic Stay Under Judge Mahoney.

GMAC Did Got Back And Commit Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman Getting A Relief On A Fake Leasehold Interest For Illegal Profits" Knowing They Were Carrying Out The A Robbery Under (GMAC) Through The Lawyers That Committed This Crime From The Very Beginning Using Deceptive Practices.  GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Linked To This Case Knew They Had Committed (Fraud Of The Court - Bankruptcy Fraud) To Obtain Illegal Orders To Carry Out This Robbery In Alabama!

Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer Knew She Had Been Robbed He Said (Judge Shulman) Did This' When She Seen Him At The Courts Trying To Get A (Contract Back or Some Business Back) Linked To These Crooks" Under (Judge Johnston).  It Looked As If He Was Their To Help Reverse A Federal Court Order In State Court Illegally To Help (GMAC Mortgage Lawyers A Motion For Summary Judgment Outside The Law) Because The Crooked Alabama Judges And Lawyers had (Defraud Martin Glenn).  GMAC Lawyers Did This After Corla Reeves Jackson Busted (Martin Glenn) On All Those Illegal Orders Issued To GMAC Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud (Without A Summary Judgment Under Diversity Jurisdiction) Under Judge Dubose In The United States District Courts For The Southern Division Of Alabama Case Number (12-00111).  This Case Under Federal Laws Was Suppose To Proceed To Trial...

 

 

 

 

·  Diversity jurisdiction legal definition of Diversity ... Diversity of Citizenship. A phrase used with reference to the jurisdiction of the federal courts which, under the U.S. Constitution, Art. III, § 2, extends to cases.  (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions and matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusively" which included motions to dismiss" ejectments" unlawful detainers " violations of a prior judge orders" which is all part of the plaintiffs or defendants defense. 

·  Lower courts cannot make these decisions" in  reference to the jurisdiction of the federal courts which, under the U.S. Constitution, Art. III, § 2, extends to cases.  (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions and matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusively" which included motions to dismiss" ejectments" unlawful detainers " violations of a prior judge orders" which is all part of the plaintiffs or defendants defense on cases that is stayed pending federal damages and trial; on criminal offenses" such as identity theft and theft of property under federal laws.

 

The distinction between civil and criminal contempt lies in the rights that are being vindicated and the level of willfulness of the conduct: Civil contempt has as its aim the vindication of a private right of a party to litigation and any penalty imposed upon the contemnor is designed to compensate the injured private party for the loss of or interference with that right ( State of New York v. Unique Ideas, 44 N.Y.2d 345, 405 N.Y.S.2d 656, 376 N.E.2d 1301). Criminal contempt, on the other hand, involves vindication of an offense against public justice and is utilized to protect the dignity of the judicial system and to compel respect for its mandates (King v. Barnes, 113 N.Y. 476, 21 N.E. 182).  Inasmuch as the objective is deterrence of disobedience of judicial mandates, the penalty imposed is punitive in nature (State of New York v. Unique Ideas, supra). Although the line between the two types of contempt may be difficult to draw in a given case, and the same act may be punishable as both a civil and a criminal contempt, the element which serves to elevate a contempt from civil to criminal is the level of willfulness with which the conduct is carried out (compare Judiciary Law, § 753, subd. A, par. 3 [civil contempt], with id., § 750, subd. A, par. 3 [criminal contempt]; see, e.g., Sentry ArmoredCourier Corp. v. New York City Off-Track Betting Corp., 75 A.D.2d 344, 429 N.Y.S.2d 902). McCormick v. Axelrod, 453 N.E.2d 508, 512 (N.Y.), amended by, 454 N.E.2d 1314 (N.Y. 1983); accord McCain v. Dinkins, 639 N.E.2d 1132, 1137 (N.Y. 1994).

GMAC Mortgage Had Been Sold When (Judge Johnston) Issued His Illegal (Summary Judgment) In State Court Which Could Not Be (Reversed) After The Deadline To Reverse That Case Back To State Court) And They Knew This Because The Case Was Moved Over To The United States District Courts For The Southern Division Of Alabama  By" (Bradley Arant Boult Cummins- Jon Patterson). Case Number (12-00111) Under Judge Dubose.  After (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Jon Patterson) Moved The Complaint Against (Sirote Permutt For The Illegal Relief They Got By Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman) Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Jon Patterson Committed Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Under Judge Dubose And Judge Martin Glenn With The Intent To Abuse His Power Under Luther Strange And Corrupt This Case To Have It Dismissed Illegally Using Deceptive Practices With Their Affiliate Firm (Sirote & Permutt And Morrison & Foerster).  They Told Martin Glenn That Corla Reeves Jackson Bankruptcy's And Case Were All Dismissed And They Were Not" They Were Pending Trial For Fraud Of The Court On What They All Did" That They Covered Up Using Deceptive Practices...

Bradley Arant Boult Cumming Illegally Tried To Have The Complaint Dismissed Under Judge Dubose After He Moved The Case Over To The Federal Courts Under Diversity Jurisdiction" He Did Not Want To Answer The Complaint And Judge Dubose Said He Had To Answer The (Complaint) This Is When GMAC Ran And Filed Bankruptcy Under Judge Martin Glenn To Block The Case From Proceeding To Trial Via Fraud Of The Court Over And Over Again" Each Time Corla Reeves Jackson Filed He Motions Under Martin Glenn Telling Him What GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Were Doing Under Him And Prior To Filing Bankruptcy Under Martin Glenn Which Could Not Be Ignored Or Denied.  Martin Glenn Did Not Have A Legal Motion For Summary Judgment Issued By The United States District Courts Under Case (12-00111) Under Judge Dubose.  And They All Knew This And Now They Have To Answer This In Trial And More Guaranteed....

 

All GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Did In Fact Lie And Corrupted The Case" Corla Reeves Jackson Proof Of Claims And More" This Is What They Were Covering Up Was A Crime They Committed In Alabama" In Exchange For Personal Gain Favor And Illegal Profits In More Than One Way" Which Is Not Of The Law.  More Than Ethic Laws Has Been Violated Here (CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS HAS BEEN VIOLATED HERE BIT TIME AS WELL AS CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND MORE.  GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Intent Was To   Corrupt This Case And Covered This Crime They All Committed In Alabama Under Their (Alabama Lawyers Law Firms) Which Is A Even Bigger Federal Crime" On A Mortgage Backed By Security's That Did Not Belong To GMAC Mortgage Period...

Their Are Deadlines That Was Violated To Remove And Reverse Cases That Has Been Also Violated As Well As Ethic Laws" Federal Laws" Lending And Pooling Laws" Constitutional Laws" Civil Rights Laws And More Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied The Justice System And Courts Was Abused By GMAC Lawyers For A Crime!

 

The Mobile County Circuit Courts Did Not Have Jurisdiction Over Jackson Original Complaint Anymore" Involving Any Issues Between (Corla Jackson And GMAC Mortgage) And Its Subsidiary's Linked To This Case Period Because" a notice of removal was signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Laws" Which Act As An Original Complaint Under" 72 of title 28, U.S.C.

 

 

 

(11 U.S.C. § 362 : US Code)

(d)(4) as to such real property in any prior case under this title, for a period of 2 years after the date of the entry of such an order, except that the debtor, in a subsequent case under this title, may move for relief from such order based upon changed circumstances or for other good cause shown, after notice and a hearing; (21) under subsection (a), of any act to enforce any lien against or security interest in real property - (A) if the debtor is ineligible under section 109(g) to be a debtor in a case under this title; or (B) if the case under this title was filed in violation of a bankruptcy court order in a prior case under this title prohibiting the debtor from being a debtor in another case under this title; (22) subject to subsection (l), under subsection (a)(3), of the continuation of any eviction, unlawful detainer action, or similar proceeding by a lessor against a debtor involving residential property in which the debtor resides as a tenant under a lease or rental agreement and with respect to which the lessor has obtained before the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition....CLICK HERE

Corla Jackson Mortgage Was Backed By Security's As Well As Her Insurance Policy's That Allowed The Life Of Automatic Stay To Be Lifted To Proceeded To Trial Automatically:  a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of - (1) the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; (2) the enforcement, against the debtor or against property of the estate, of a judgment obtained before the commencement of the case under this title; (3) any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate or to exercise control over property of the estate; (4) any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate; (5) any act to create, perfect, or enforce against property of the debtor any lien to the extent that such lien secures a claim that arose before the commencement of the case under this title; (6) any act to collect, assess, or recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title.

 

CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND VICTIMS WAS ROBBED IN AMERICA ILLEGALLY" 

 

IN VIOLATION OF THE DEED OF TRUST ACT (DTA) AND THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT !

 

The filing of a bankruptcy petition triggers the automatic stay that halts most pre-petition litigation against a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. §362(a)(1). The stay does not, however, suspend the commencement or continuation of criminal proceedings against a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. §362(b)(1).  Generally, actions for civil contempt are considered private collection devices 8 The Court subsequently granted (Corla Jackson) Automatic Stay. See Order (March 1, 2006) And After (March 1, 2006) Granting Corla Jackson Relief Of Automatic Stay” and Denying GMAC Mortgage Corporation et, al.) Of being a Creditor) period.  (Management’s Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. §2004,Under Bankruptcy Case #: (05_13142 MAM 13).    

An affirmative defense to a civil lawsuit or criminal charge is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff or prosecutor which, if proven by the defendant, defeats or mitigates the legal consequences of the defendant's otherwise unlawful conduct.  In civil lawsuits, affirmative defenses include the statute of limitations, the statute of frauds, and waiver. In criminal prosecutions, examples of affirmative defenses are self defense,[1] insanity, and the statute of limitations.

Governing rules

Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the assertion of affirmative defenses in civil cases that are filed in the United States district courts. Rule 8(c) specifically enumerates the following defenses: "accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense." 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that affirmative defenses be based on "knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances.

 

The most often cited new York state Court decision regarding Assignments
signed by Elpiniki Bechakas from The Baum Firm was written by the Honorable Judge Arthur M. Schack, Kings County, New York: U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for SG Mortgage Securities Asset backed Certificates, Series 2006-FRE2 v.Emmanuel, 27 Misc.3d 1220(A), 2010 WL 1856016 (N.Y.Sup.).

In re Foreclosure Cases, 2007 WL 3232420 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 31, 2007). On October 10, 2007, Judge Boyko issued an order to Deutsche Bank to show cause for their filed complaint, demanding that Deutsche Bank file copies of the Assignments showing that they were the holder and owner of the Notes and Mortgages, as of the date the complaint was filed, which was July 27, 2007.

To the Court, this revealed that Deutsche Bank did not have the particular assignment at the date of the complaint, and created Assignments for trial. U.S. District Judge Christopher Boyko, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, rendered a decision dismissing 14 of the foreclosure cases in In re Foreclosure Cases without prejudice, due to the filing of executed Assignments after the date of the filed complaint for 10 of the cases, and the lack of Assignments for four of the cases.

 

 Option One Mortgage Corporate Office Was In Irvine California:  Here Is A Few Pointers That Foreclosure Victims Should Look For:  The California Secretary of State, Notary Public & Special Filings Section, is responsible for appointing and commissioning qualified persons as notaries public for four-year termsA finger print (typically the right thumb) may be required in the notary journal based on the transaction in question (e.g., deed, quitclaim deed, deed of trust affecting real property, power of attorney document, et cetera). Documents with blank spaces cannot be notarized (a further anti-fraud measure). California explicitly prohibits notaries public from using literal foreign language translation of their title The use of a notary seal is required.   A notary would indicate the street address at which the ceremony was performed, and this practice.  Documents with blank spaces cannot be notarized (a further anti-fraud measure). California explicitly prohibits notaries public from using literal foreign language translation of their title.  This is facts" read the evidence" Click Here  

 

 

On March 8, 2012, Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. (FGIC) sued Ally Financial (Ally) and two subsidiaries, including Residential Funding Company LLC, alleging that the defendants fraudulently induced FGIC to insure $693 million in residential mortgage-backed securities. FGIC alleges that Ally misrepresented the quality of the loans backing the RMBS, the manner in which the loans could not be insured" on stolen property and hurricane damaged homes" clouded titles and more. 

On November 30, 2011, Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. (FGIC) filed three lawsuits in New York State court against Ally Financial Inc.’s mortgage units. The complaints allege that the defendants committed fraud in order to obtain bond insurance, and committed other breaches of their insurance contracts, related to the sale of $3.8 billion in mortgage.

 

 

 

 

THIS IS GMAC MORTGAGE ORIGINAL (FAKE LEASEHOLD INTEREST)

WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA REEVES JACKSON AND GMAC...

DOES THIS LOOK LIKE AN ASSIGNMENT TO YOU THIS IS A LEASEHOLD INTEREST WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT AND IF GMAC OWNED CORLA REEVES JACKSON NOTE THEY DID NOT NEED AN ASSIGNMENT AND THE ALLONGE WOULD HAVE MATCHED THE ASSIGNMENT OR THE NOTE IF IT HAD BEEN SOLD.  GMAC COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT OVER AND OVER AGAIN THE EVIDENCES SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.  GMAC GOT BUSTED ON A FAKE LEASEHOLD INTEREST ON JACKSON PROPERTY AND THEY WAITED UNTIL AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED ON (APRIL 30, 2008) AND THEY WENT BACK AND ROBBED CORLA REEVES JACKSON AGAIN ILLEGALLY WHEN THEY COMMITTED FRAUD OF THE COURT WITH THIS LEASEHOLD INTEREST WITHOUT A LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT DATED BACK TO (2005)..

 

 

NO ONE IS DELINQUENT BETWEEN (JULY 2005 -AUGUST 2005)

THIS WAS FRAUD OF THE COURT AND A RED FLAG !

GMAC MORTGAGE ILLEGALLY ROBBED JACKSON OF HER CREDIT AND REPORT THEY FORECLOSED ON HER HOME IN APRIL (2005)...

 

Estoppel is essentially a rule of evidence[3] whereby a person is barred from denying the truth of a fact that has already been settled….. 

GMAC MORTGAGE COULD NOT EVEN USED DIVERSITY JURISDICTION WHEN THE DEFRAUDED THE COURTS

THE FIRST TIME.  THE CASE WAS NEVER HEARD LEGALLY AT ALL THIS IS WHAT THEY COVERED UP... 

GMAC WAS NOT CORLA REEVES JACKSON CREDITOR. 

GMAC VIOLATED FEDERAL LAWS AND MORE CLICK HERE & CLICK HERE 

 

 

PATTERSON v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

Reginald A. Patterson and Diana V. Patterson, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC.

 

No. 2100490.

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals.

Decided January 20, 2012.

 

On appeal, the Pattersons assert, among other things, that the trial court erred in determining that the foreclosure was valid. While the Pattersons’ appeal was pending, this court delivered its decision in Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] ___ So. 3d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP (“BAC”), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant’s house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC. BAC then held a foreclosure sale at which it purchased Sturdivant’s house, and the auctioneer executed a foreclosure deed purporting to convey title to Sturdivant’s house to BAC. BAC was assigned the mortgage the same day as the foreclosure sale. Thereafter, BAC brought an ejectment action against Sturdivant, claiming that it owned title to her house by virtue of the foreclosure deed. After the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of BAC, Sturdivant appealed to the supreme court, which transferred her appeal to this court.

We held that BAC lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage because it had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings and that, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid. We further held that, because the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid, BAC did not acquire legal title to Sturdivant’s house through the foreclosure deed and thus BAC did not own an interest in the house when it commenced its ejectment action.

We further held that, because BAC did not own any interest in Sturdivant’s house when it commenced its ejectment action, BAC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action. Because BAC did not have standing to bring its ejectment action and the trial court never acquired jurisdiction over the ejectment action, we held that the judgment of the trial court was void, and we vacated that judgment. Moreover, because a void judgment will not support an appeal, we dismissed the appeal.  In the case now before us, GMAC Mortgage, like BAC in Sturdivant, had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings. Consequently, under our holding in Sturdivant, GMAC Mortgage lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage when it initiated the foreclosure proceedings, and, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed upon which GMAC based it ejectment claim are invalid. Moreover, under our holding in Sturdivant, because GMAC Mortgage did not own any interest in the house, it lacked standing to bring its ejectment action against the Pattersons. Because GMAC Mortgage lacked standing to bring the ejectment action, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is void and is hereby vacated. Moreover, because a void judgment." Click Here & Click Here

 

Judge George N. Bowden of the Superior Court in Washington State ruled against Bank of America (BoA) in a foreclosure battle that ended with

the nonjudicial foreclosure sale under the Deed of Trust Act (DTA). The sale was deemed void, and the court is setting the foreclosure aside.

 

Section 6-6-227: Persons to be made parties; rights of persons not parties.  All persons shall be made parties who have, or claim, any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance, or franchise, such municipality shall be made a party and shall be entitled to be heard; and if the statute, ordinance, or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard. (Acts 1935, No. 355, p. 777; Code 1940, T. 7, §166.). 

 

 

FRAUD UPON COURT : In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.

Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".[6] In Bulloch v. United States,[7] the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function—thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted. 

If a court official is found to be biased or  prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed.  In some jurisdictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be reopened” at a later date. Fraud on the court can be  devastating, especially for a party that may be waiting to receive relief from the court..

Section 6-6-227: Persons to be made parties; rights of persons not parties.  All persons shall be made parties who have, or claim, any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance, or franchise, such municipality shall be made a party and shall be entitled to be heard; and if the statute, ordinance, or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard. (Acts 1935, No. 355, p. 777; Code 1940, T. 7, §166.). 

 

 

 

SPECIAL NOTE....

 

Corla Reeves Jackson Says She Forced Them All Thorough The Judicial System So They Could Tell In Their Own Words What They Did In Their Motions So No One Can Lie" This Is Facts Guaranteed!

Jackson Says People Wanted To Know Why She Was (Represented Herself) And This Is Why:  After Luther Strange Took Office Victims Cases Were Being Held Up Tied Up Corrupted And Blocked From Proceeding To Trail After He Joined The Mortgage Fraud Task Force For The State Of Alabama Knowing That Was Just A Front.  It Was His Law Firms And Affiliate Firms That Committed The Crimes And This White Collar Crime Robbery.  Victims Did Not Receive The Funds The Federal Government Issued Out To Go To Victims To Obtain Lawyers And Seek Relief While Their Cases Were Pending Trial.  The State Of Alabama Under Luther Strange Took That Money And They Had Picked Their Affiliate Law Firms That Was Linked To The White Collar Crime Robbery" That Victims Were Being Referred To" Under False Pretense. 

Those Lawyers Linked To The Ring Had No Intentions On Helping The Victims Because The FEDS Would Find Out How Many Homes The Law Firms Stole For Illegal Profits Using Deceptive Practices.  Victims Was Being Forced To Lawyers Not Of Their Choice Where Their Cases Became Corrupted And Held Up Blocked From Being Heard" After Being Referred To The Crooks Only For The Victims To Show And Give Them A Copy Of Their Original Loan Documents Where The Crooks Fabricated Notes From With The Intent To Defraud Courts And The FEDS" Carrying Out Robbery On Theft Of Homes That Has Been Covered Up To Date That They Did Not Want Anyone To Find The Truth Out About.  The Law Firms In Alabama Linked To This Case And Other Victims Cases In Alabama Has An (Illegal Real Estate Profiting Ring Going On) Robbing The FEDERAL RESERVE And VICTIMS Using Deceptive Practices" To Date And They Keep Trying To Cover It Up Guaranteed.  All Victims Foreclosure In Alabama Should Be Investigated By The FBI And Federal Reserve As Well As The SEC And FDIC...The Foreclosures In Alabama Should Be At A Complete Halt !

Corla Reeves Jackson Knew What Was Going On After They Robbed Her And Lied About It" And This Is Why She Did Not Trust Anyone And Had To (Represent Herself) Because The Lawyers Linked To This Ring In Alabama" Was Out To Carrying Out The White Collar Crime Robbery In Exchange For Personal Gain" Favor And Illegal Profits Using Deceptive Practices.  Their Motive Was To Get All The Victims Information And Illegally Corrupt Their Cases And Complaints Then Block The Case From Being Heard Via Fraud Of The Court" Keeping The Crimes Covered Up From The FEDS" FDIC" SEC And Wall Street Investors.  The Victims Of Alabama Did Not Get The Mortgage Funds To Hire Lawyers Or For Any Relief As Directed By The United States Federal Government And The Board Of Governors.  The Funds That Was Issued To The State Of Alabama Victims Did Not Get Luther Strange And Then To His Affiliates Used Deceptive Practices" To Get The Funds Knowing That The Victims Did Not Get Paid" It Went To Their Law Firms And Where They Wanted The Funds To Go Versus Giving The Funds To The Victims To Go After The Law Firms And Crooks That Robbed Them Through A Lawyer Of Their Choice So Their Case Would Not Be Blocked By Luther Strange And His Affiliates " Lying To The FEDS And Congress About All The Homes That Was Stolen Illegally By The Law Firms Linked To The Alabama Attorney General To Date They Covered Up Guaranteed...The United States Federal Government Did Not Tell Them That Victims Was Not Suppose To Receive The Money Or They Had To Go Through A Particular Set Of Lawyers That Were Affiliates  Law Firms Linked To The Mortgage Fraud Ring" And Luther Strange Knew This Because They Were Linked To His Law Firms And Partner Law Firms...

Corla Reeves Jackson Says She Was Robbed More Than One Time In Different Ways Prior To The Mortgage Fraud Bust And After The Mortgage Fraud Busted In (2008)...The Mortgage Fraud Victims Were Robbed In (2008-2015).  Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed In (2005) Prior To And After The Mortgage Fraud Bust (3) Times.  The Crooks Used Deceptive Practices In More Than One Way To Carry Out And Cover Up The Robbery They Committed Against (Corla Reeves Jackson) And She Never Had A Loan With GMAC Their Client" And They Knew This...GMAC Did Not Get The Actually Note Until After The Law Firm Got Busted On (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Under Judge Mahoney...

Corla Reeves Jackson Says After Luther Strange Took Office" Her Lawyer Got Himself Tied In With The Crooks In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Violating Federal Laws" Ethic Laws And More.  He Said He Did Not Want To Risk Losing Any Of His Contracts On Loans From Them" And Committed Fraud Of The Court With Them Under Judge Shulman And Said It Was Judge Shulman" When She Know It Was Him.  Jackson Says Her Lawyer Knew Better He Sold Out In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor To Keep From Losing His Contract With Them" Because After Court When Judge Shulman Issued The Illegal Relief" He Called One Of The Crooks On The Phone And Said" You Know We Got Some Of Those Arrears Caught Up In Their Dated Back To (2005) That Should Not Be Their" Who Ever He Was Talking On The Other End Of The Phone Must Have Said Never Mine" Their Deal-Job In This White Collar Crime Robbery Was Done.  Jackson Says They Are In For A Rude Awakening" Because The Crime They Conspired In And Corrupted (Via Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Is Called A White Collar Crime Robbery And Identity Theft" Which Is A Federal Crime...

Jackson Said Her Lawyer Knew Better" He Let The Crooks Get In In Trouble That Is His Problem He Never Should Have Did It. They All Going To Trial Let The Grand Jury Decide Who Did What And When They Did It And More Because This Was A White Collar Crime Robbery Carried Out Through the Courts So No One Can Lie" This Is Facts Guaranteed.  I Know The Grand Jury Is Going To Ask Barry Friedman If He Filed The Objections And The Answer Is Yes" They Are Going To Ask Him Did He File A New Bankruptcy Case Number Versus Filing A Confirmation Of Judge Mahoney Orders On The Same Fake Arrears That Was Disallowed And Reversed Under Him And He Knew This" Their Were No More Arrears Owed And GMAC Mortgage Fabricated Their Fake Assignment After (Option One Mortgage Closed And (8) Years In Advance Prior To The Home Being Built" Making A Note Out To Themselves In Corla Reeves Jackson Name Using Her Identity And Assets On Insured Covered Losses And More For Illegal Profits At Her Expense" They All Knew Better. 

Jackson Says It Sad After Luther Strange Took Office His Law Firms And Affiliate Firms Violated State And Federal Laws And They Lied To Congress Corrupting This Case And More And He Covered It Up With His Affiliates And Some How They Got The Jackson Lawyers And Now He Has Committed A Big Crime" GMAC Mortgage Lawyers Said Barry Friedman Was Satisfied" Well Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed And They All Covered It Up...

Barry Friedman Do Not Make Federal Laws" Constitutional Laws" Civil Right Laws" Bankruptcy Laws" Changing Judge Mahoney Orders Via Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman" This Is A Crime They Covered Up In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor After Luther Strange Took Office And It Is Recorded Through The Courts Showing The Dates And Every Motion Filed" Jackson Says She Was Shocked To Find Out Barry Friedman Had Turned Crooked In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Versus Up Holding Judge Mahoney Orders By His Objections He Covered Up That Was Not Filed In Any Of The Motions Or The (Leasehold Interest) Under Corla Reeves Jackson Property With A (Leasehold Agreement) That Was Conditionally Denied And Reversed By His Objections That Was Granted And Reduced To The Amount Paid (September 18, 2009 - October 1, 2009) In Violation Of The Order That Was Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006)" No One Is Stuck On Stupid They Can See Barry Friedman Got Paid And Committed A Crime In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor He Knew Corla Reeves Jackson Was Being Robbed And He Should Have Reported The Crooks To The (FBI) Outside Of Alabama After Luther Strange Took Office Knowing That It Was His Law Firms And Affiliate Firms That Committed This Crime Via Fraud Of The Court Under Federal Judges Corrupting This Case And Complaint Illegally In Violation Of The Original Federal Court Orders Issued By Judge Mahoney And He Knew This" It Was Recorded And Filed (ECF). 

Barry Friedman Is Going To Have A Hard Time Explaining What He Did After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged January 20, 2009) To Date Guaranteed That Lead To Massive Damages And Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Martin Glenn And Judge Koeltl In New York They All Are Saying Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer Did This" And The Lawyer Is Saying The Judge Did This" Jackson Says Let The Grand Jury Decide Who Did What And When They Did It And How" She Is Fed Up With All The Lies And What They Did To Her Illegally.  She Want Them All Arrested For The Crime They Covered Up And Committed To Date Guaranteed....

A Trustee Said Barry Friedman Knew What He Was Doing When He Went Back After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged And Sold Her Out In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Saying It Was Judge Shulman When It Was Him" He Never Filed The Objections And The Orders Judge Mahoney Issued Through The Courts Filed (ECF) Under Judge Shulman To Prevent Fraud Of The Court" In Bankruptcy Number (3) And Bankruptcy Number (2 And 3) Should Have Never Occurred  Under New Bankruptcy Numbers" Because A Motion Had To Be Filed Under Judge Mahoney To Confirm Her Orders Before Bankruptcy Number (2 And #) Could Have A New Bankruptcy Number.  Corla Reeves Jackson Did Not Have A New Loan With GMAC Mortgage After Her Bankruptcy Closed (October 8, 2009) That Cleared The Trustees On (January 20, 2009)...

Barry Friedman Never Told Corla Reeves Jackson That The Objections Was Granted By Judge Mahoney Period On (September 18, 2009) And Granted To The Amount Paid On (October 1, 2009) Someone Had Him Turned That Case Around Illegally And They Kept This Covered Up Until They Could Go Back And Commit Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Under Judge Shulman...

This Is Why Corla Reeves Jackson Did Not Trust Any Lawyer In Alabama After Luther Strange Took Office They Were Being Threaten And Harassed On Not Getting Any More Business From Their Affiliates And If She Was Going To Get The Word Out She Had To Do This On Her Own" Until She Could Trust Someone Other Than Anyone Linked To Luther Strange And His Law Firm And Affiliate Law Firms And Lawyers" They Robbed The Federal Reserve As Well As Victims" FDIC" Wall Street Investors" Victims Original Lenders Going Around The SEC And Consumer Affairs For Illegal Profits Off Stolen Homes And Stolen Identity's Victims Never Had Loans With The Crooks That Robbed Them" Their Identity's And Loans Were Stolen Which Were Insured Covered Losses That The Crooks Cashed In On In On In More Than One Way That They Covered Up" Thinking They Would Never Get Busted...After Luther Strange Lied To Congress About All The Stolen Mortgages In Alabama His Law Firm And Affiliate Firms Stole For Illegal Profits Jackson Says She Did Not Trust Anyone Of Them" They Were Crooks And It Is Just A Matter Of Time Before The (FBI) And FED Outside Of Alabama Bust Them Guaranteed...

Jackson Says It Is Sad That The Alabama Lawyers And Judges Got Martin Glenn And Judge Koeltl In Trouble" Knowing They Committed Fraud Of The Court To Cover Up And Carry Out A White Collar Crime Robbery I Alabama Using Deceptive Practices.  Jackson Says She Is Going To Tell The Truth To The Grand Jury It Was The Alabama Law Firms And GMAC Mortgage Law Firm In New York And KCC That Got Judge Martin Glenn In Trouble From The Very Beginning To Date" Its Recorded And Filed (ECF) Showing What They All Did Deny.  Every Motion Filed By (Each Lawyer) Linked To This White Collar Crime Robbery" Tell And Show What They All Did And Did Not Do To Date" In Corrupting And Covering Up This White Collar Crime Robbery Which Has Caused Massive Damages In More Than One Way Guaranteed....If Barry Friedman Filed His Objections And The Orders Judge Mahoney Granted And Issued Under Bankruptcy Number (3) It Would Have Been Impossible For Judge Shulman To Issue GMAC A Illegal Relief Based Upon Arrears No Longer Owed Under Federal Laws...

Jackson Has Been Told That Her Lawyer (Barry Friedman) Did Not File The Motions And Orders Issued By Judge Mahoney Under (Judge Shulman) And He Was Not Suppose To Allow GMAC Mortgage To Filed The Same Fake Arrears Under A New Bankruptcy Number Period" Corla Reeves Jackson Did Not Have A Loan With GMAC Mortgage" Prior To Or After She Was Discharged And He Knew This...

What They All Did Was In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Was They Committed Fraud Of The Court Under Judge Shulman With The Intent To Illegally (Reverse A Federal Judge Orders) Based Upon Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Under (Judge Shulman ) And They Did Using Deceptive Practices" Now They All Have To Answer To The Crime They Committed.

Facts They Committed Bankruptcy Fraud And Fraud Of The Court Under (Judge Shulman) And Then They Tried To Cover It Up Using Deceptive Practices By Corrupting Corla Reeves Jackson Complaint And Proof Of Claims" And She Do Not Have Any Sympathy For Any Of Them" When The Grand Jury Get Through With Them Because They All Deserve To Get What They Got Coming For Conspiring To Turn Around Judge Mahoney Orders Via Committing Bankruptcy Fraud And Fraud Of The Court Under (Judge Shulman) And Then They Say Judge Shulman Did It" When They Defrauded Judge Shulman Using Deceptive Practices Guaranteed...

Jackson Said She Did Not Pay Barry Friedman To Go Back And Rob Her Or To Commit Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud With GMAC Mortgage Lawyers After Luther Strange Took Office In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor Versus Up Holding The Law Linked To Her Being Robbed And He Knew This.  Jackson Said She Trusted Barry Friedman And He Was Sending Her To The Crooks To Give Them Copies Of Her Documents Lined To (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings) Sirote & Permutt And They Fabricated Documents From Her Documents And More And She Cannot Wait Until They All Be Brought Before The Grand Jury To Be Prosecuted To The Fullest Extent Of Federal Laws And More Guaranteed...

In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor To Cover Up A White Collar Crime Robbery Is A Big Crime Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied This Is Facts.  Jackson Says She Pray The Grand Jury And The FBI Bust Them All Because What They Did Was Commit A Crime And Their May Be Other Victims We Know Nothing About Yet" Linked To These Crooks. The Should Be Prosecuted To The Fullest Extent Of Federal Laws For Abusing Federal Laws" Violating Ethic Laws" Constitutional Laws" Civil Right Laws" Pooling And Servicing Laws" Abusing The Courts And Federal Laws And More To Carry Out Crimes Which Is Not Of Any Law.  They Did Not Think This Case Was Going To Go This Far" Thinking They Could Get Away With This Crime" But They Are Not.  Jackson Says She Do Not Give A Dam About None Of Them For What They Did To Her" And Everyone Can See And Understand Why. 

Jackson Said Had She Not Kept On Fighting The Truth Would Have Been Still Covered Up In Alabama Because They Conspired To Keep This Case From Being Heard Prior To And After She Was Discharged January 20, 2010 Under Bankruptcy Case (05013142).  GMAC Mortgage Fake Foreclosure Caused Massive Damages In More Than One Way Via Fraud Of The Court Linked To Other Cases And More" They Stole Her Identity" Credit" Policy's Home And More  Via Her Credit While They Conspired To Carry Out The White Collar Crime Robbery And Covered It Up To Date Guaranteed!

Corla Reeves Jackson Says She Know What She Is Talking About Because They Robbed Her (3) Times And Covered It Up And They Illegally Profited From Her And Her Assets And Credit In More Than One Way.  GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC Actually Took Out A Loan In (Corla Reeves Jackson) Name Making A Note Out To Themselves For Illegal Profits Using Deceptive Practices And They Covered It Up And Lied About It And God Only Know Who Else They Did This To That We Know Nothing About Yet" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied This Is Facts Backed By The Evidence To Date So No One can Lie Guaranteed!

GMAC And Their Lawyer Did Rob Corla Reeves Jackson" Option One Mortgage Pool Of Mortgages - Federal Reserve - FDIC Going Around The SEC and Consumer Affairs And The Department Of Justice Using Deceptive Practices" Without Owing Corla Reeves Jackson Note Or The Assignment.  In Addition To This" GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC" Never Had A Leasehold Mortgage Interest In (Corla Reeves Jackson) Property Or A Leasehold Agreement" They Lied To Judge Mahoney And They Got Busted On (March 1, 2006) And The Order Was Conditionally Denied On (GMAC) Fake Illegal Proof Of Claims That Was Entered  And Filed (ECF) On March 3, 2006)...

Judge Mahoney Never Issued A Courts Order Confirming The Debtors Chapter 13 Plan And The Agreement Between The Debtor And GMAC After Her Order Was Issued And Entered (March 1, 2006 - March 3, 2006) Through The Courts Filed ECF" As Per The Order States In Black And White Dated March 1, 2006)" Based Upon All The Following Terms And Conditions (1-4) Before (2 And 5) Could Be Enforced By GMAC Mortgage Corporation And Their Lawyers Knew This Prior To Robbing Corla Reeves Jackson .  Barry Friedman Is Going To Have A Hard Time Explaining To The FEDS And FBI On What He Did Prior To And After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged" He Went Back And Corrupted Her Case In Exchange For Personal Gain And Favor With GMAC Mortgage Lawyers After Luther Strange Took Office Which Was After Corla Reeves Jackson Was Discharged On (January 20, 2009)" He Cannot Say He Did Not Do This Because Its All Recorded And Filed (ECF)...

The Crooks Automatically Going To Say The Judges And Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyers Did This" Because That Is The Way They Set Up People To Make It Look Like Someone Else Committed The Crime" Versus Them And They Did A Good Job On Setting Up Corla Reeves Jackson Lawyer And The Judges That Issued All The Illegal Orders Making Them Come Out Smelling Like A Rose When Everyone Know That GMAC Mortgage Corporation - GMAC Mortgage LLC - Residential Capital Corporation - Residential Capital LLC - Ally Financial - Ally Bank And Their Lawyers Committed This Crime Guaranteed" In Violation Of The Agreement Between Ally And The Board Of Governors On Foreclosures Pending Between (2009 - 2010)...

FRAUD UPON COURT : In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.

Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".[6] In Bulloch v. United States,[7] the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function—thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted. 

If a court official is found to be biased or  prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed.  In some jurisdictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be reopened” at a later date. Fraud on the court can be  devastating, especially for a party that may be waiting to receive relief from the court..

Section 6-6-227: Persons to be made parties; rights of persons not parties.  All persons shall be made parties who have, or claim, any interest which would be affected by the declaration, and no declaration shall prejudice the rights of persons not parties to the proceeding. In any proceeding which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance, or franchise, such municipality shall be made a party and shall be entitled to be heard; and if the statute, ordinance, or franchise is alleged to be unconstitutional, the Attorney General of the state shall also be served with a copy of the proceeding and be entitled to be heard. (Acts 1935, No. 355, p. 777; Code 1940, T. 7, §166.). 

Corla Reeves Jackson Says When The (Lift Of Automatic Stay Is Issued To Proceed To Trial) She Will Hire An Lawyer Outside Of Alabama To Come In And Represent Her On This Case" That Is Not Linked To The Monopoly Law Firm That Committed This Crime.

The Law Firms Linked To This Robbery Violated More Than ( Ethic Law Violations) They Violated Constitutional Laws (Civil Rights Laws ) And More And They Covered It Up ...

Luther Strange Knew (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Jon Patterson) Committed Fraud Of The Courts And Bankruptcy Fraud Under (Judge Martin Glenn) As Well As They Committed Fraud Of the Courts Before The Federal Courts Under (Judge Dubose) In The United States District Courts For The Southern Division Of Alabama Case Number (00111) O A Case That Was Pending Trial" And Its Recorded And Filed (ECF) So No One Can Lie This Is Facts.  Luther Strange And His Law Firms Did Not Want Anyone To Find Out What They Covered Up And Did Lying To Congress Elected Officials And More About This White Collar Crime Robbery That They Did Not Want Anyone To Find the Truth Out About" Especially Congress Because Luther Strange Lied To Congress About Victims Of Alabama Complaints" Case And More Linked To Stolen Mortgages And More Guaranteed. 

 

Victims And Their Lawyers All Knew (Luther Strange) Had Lied To Congress" Click Here

 

PATTERSON v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

Reginald A. Patterson and Diana V. Patterson, v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC.

 

No. 2100490.

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals.

Decided January 20, 2012.

 

On appeal, the Pattersons assert, among other things, that the trial court erred in determining that the foreclosure was valid. While the Pattersons’ appeal was pending, this court delivered its decision in Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] ___ So. 3d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP (“BAC”), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant’s house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC. BAC then held a foreclosure sale at which it purchased Sturdivant’s house, and the auctioneer executed a foreclosure deed purporting to convey title to Sturdivant’s house to BAC. BAC was assigned the mortgage the same day as the foreclosure sale. Thereafter, BAC brought an ejectment action against Sturdivant, claiming that it owned title to her house by virtue of the foreclosure deed. After the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of BAC, Sturdivant appealed to the supreme court, which transferred her appeal to this court.

We held that BAC lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage because it had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings and that, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid. We further held that, because the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed were invalid, BAC did not acquire legal title to Sturdivant’s house through the foreclosure deed and thus BAC did not own an interest in the house when it commenced its ejectment action.

We further held that, because BAC did not own any interest in Sturdivant’s house when it commenced its ejectment action, BAC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action. Because BAC did not have standing to bring its ejectment action and the trial court never acquired jurisdiction over the ejectment action, we held that the judgment of the trial court was void, and we vacated that judgment. Moreover, because a void judgment will not support an appeal, we dismissed the appeal.  In the case now before us, GMAC Mortgage, like BAC in Sturdivant, had not been assigned the mortgage before it initiated foreclosure proceedings. Consequently, under our holding in Sturdivant, GMAC Mortgage lacked authority to foreclose the mortgage when it initiated the foreclosure proceedings, and, therefore, the foreclosure and the foreclosure deed upon which GMAC based it ejectment claim are invalid. Moreover, under our holding in Sturdivant, because GMAC Mortgage did not own any interest in the house, it lacked standing to bring its ejectment action against the Pattersons. Because GMAC Mortgage lacked standing to bring the ejectment action, the trial court never acquired subject-matter jurisdiction over the ejectment action. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is void and is hereby vacated. Moreover, because a void judgment." Click Here & Click Here & Click Here

 

Sep 20, 2010 · Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit told brokers and agents to halt foreclosures

Victims Loans Was Serviced From The Following States Listed Below That Was Affected.  Victims Need To Look On Their Statements And See Where Their Loans Was Serviced From...

 

 

 

Posted (2.24.15) 

 

Regardless Of What The Situation Was It Did Not Give Bank Permission To Steal Victims Identity's To Rob The Federal Reserve FDIC Going Around The SEC For Illegal Profits To Date Period.  Victims Never Had A Loan With The Banks And Their Servicers That Robbed Them Their Identity's And Their Loans Were Stolen In Violation Of Consumer Laws As Well As Federal Pooling And Servicing Laws Rules And Regulations Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied.  The Banks And Their Services Did Not Stop Robbing Victims And The Federal Reserve The Got Worse Using More Deceptive Practices Like Never Before In History With The Intent To Continue Robbing The Federal Reserve And Victims Going Around (FDIC) And SEC. Predatory Lending Is When A Victims Take A Loan From A Bank And The Bank Assign Their Servicer To Service Their Loans Under Federal Laws.  Predatory Lending Is Not The Correct Word To Use In The Mortgage Fraud Cases Committed By Banks And Their Servicers For Illegal Profits.

The Victims Never Had A Loan With The Banks And Their Servicers That Robbed Them Of Their Identity And Of Their Mortgage They Had With Their Real Lenders" The Victims Identity's Were Stolen As Well As Their Mortgage For Illegal Profits Which Is A Federal Crime Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied This Is Facts.  To Date The Banks And Their Servicers Continue To Rob Victims And The Federal Reserve (FDIC) Going Around The (SEC) In Another Format Using Deceptive Practices Through Their Affiliate Judges Who Use To Be Lawyers For Their Law Firms And They Use Their Network Monopoly Law Firms With A Network Of Crooked Lawyers" Who Commit Crimes For Personal Gain Favor And Illegal Profits Using Deceptive Practices Which Is A Federal Crime" Because They Are Violating Federal Laws Under The United States Constitutional Laws As Well As Ethic Laws And More Guaranteed!

The New Tactic They Are Using Today Is Much Worse Than Before" They Got Worse And Now They Are Flat Out Committing Fraud Of The Court And Bankruptcy Fraud Willful After Getting Busted By The FEDS" They Are Much Worse Now They Expanded Into Groups With Affiliates Continuing Where They Left Off At" Using More Deceptive Practices Like Never Before In History.  This Is Why Corla Reeves Jackson Continues To Date To Stay On Top Of All Their Latest Tactics They Are Using Deceptive Practices And More Backed By The Evidence To Date So No One Can Lie This Is Facts Guaranteed. 

The Website Links Are Under Construction While Being Updated In (2015) Like Never Before In History Its The Crooks Got Worse.  Corla Reeves Jackson Says The New Tactic They Are Using Robbing The Victims And The Feds Is Far Worse Than Before Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied This Is Facts" They Continued Where They Left Off At And They Only Expanded With Their Affiliates Using More Deceptive Practices Guaranteed.  Read More...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jackson Says You All Be Careful With That Flu Out Their;  Jackson Came Down With Pneumonia And Influenza And It Looks And Feels Like She Got Up To Soon And Has To Go Back To The Doctor That Medicine They Got Her Own (TAMA FLU) Did Not Work On Her" But Maybe It Was Because Her Lungs Were Filled With Fluid From Pneumonia.  Jackson Says She Need A Copy Of Those (X-rays) To See For Herself How Bad It Was Because It Keeps Trying To Come Back...But She Is Not Going To Try And Cure It At Home" She Going Back To The Doctor.  This Has Been Going On Since Christmas And This Is January 2015).  It Left A Little Bit And Came Back When The Medicine Ran Out.  Jackson Was Not All The Way Cured Yet It Appears.  Jackson Says It Really Never Left" It Lifted A Little Bit And She Started Moving Around To Soon And Its Back.  Jackson Says She Is Not Stuck On Stupid She Is Not Going To Try And Fight This Flu That Is Going On Out Their Now" You Can Fell It Jump In Your Body Its Bad.

 

 

Continue Where You Left Off At Click Here & Click Here

 

 

All Rights Reserved Copyright By Corla Reeves Jackson© Original Spiritual Images©