09/16/2017                                                                                                                                                                                             

 

 

                                                                               Copyright All Rights Reserved By Corla Reeves Jackson                                    Subscribe    Log In                                                                                                                                                                                                              Quick Update

                                             

  LINK

 

 

THIS WEBSITE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED WITH HOT NEWS AND MORE!

 

 

 LINK

 

 

 

 

GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC

WASN'T OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION SERVICER PRIOR TO 2005

 

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS OWNED BY H&R BLOCK

 

 

 

 

11/8/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... – e22764_424b5   240
10/4/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – e22553_424b5   243
7/14/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Definitive Materials – file001   HTML
5/3/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d328276   242
1/12/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – b403648_424b5   239
1/11/05     424B5         1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – b403648_424b5   239
10/5/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d267762   213
4/12/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Acceptance Loan Trust 2004-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d222686   213
1/21/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d201380   205
10/16/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accep Corp Asset Backed Cert Ser 2003-6 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d178424   209
7/23/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Asset Back Certs Ser 2003 5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d159369   206
6/13/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Asset Back Certs Ser 2003-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d149222   202
4/18/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Ast Back Certs Ser 2003-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d136512   207
3/14/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Acceptance Corp Asset Back Cert Ser 2003 2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d127726   201
1/15/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accept Corp Asset Backed Certs Ser 2003 1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d116286   204
10/29/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accept Corp Asset-Backed Cert Se 2002-6 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d99666   201
7/30/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Tr Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d80413   199
6/7/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accept Corp Asset Backed Cer Ser 2002-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d70482   250
4/25/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accept Corp Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d59914   202
3/13/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Tr Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d50504   184

 

CORLA JACKSON NEVER HAD A LOAN WITH GMAC.  THE LOAN-MORTGAGE UNDER CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY PRIOR TO (APRIL 30, 2008) WAS BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LAW FIRMS AND THEIR CLIENTS FABRICATED NEW LOANS AND PLACED VICTIMS PAYMENTS UNDER FABRICATED NOTES IS HOW THEY SWITCHED OUT THE LOANS ILLEGALLY, THEN THEY ILLEGALLY ATTACHED ARREARS TO THE FABRICATED NOTES AND DID AN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE TO OBTAIN AN FORECLOSURE DEED TO ROB THE FEDERAL RESERVE, WALL STREET INVENTORS TRUST AND MORE AROUND SEC, FDIC, AND MORE...

 

THE FABRICATED NOTES WITH VICTIMS ORIGINAL PAYMENTS BEING APPLIED TO THE FABRICATE NOTES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING IS WHAT SWITCHED OUT THE ORIGINAL NOTE LOAN NUMBERS AND SERVICING NUMBER, WITH CORRUPTED JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING.  THE JUDGES KNEW THE VICTIMS ORIGINAL NOTES WERE BEING STOLEN, BECAUSE LAWS AND RULES THEY VIOLATED WITH ILLEGAL  ORDERS WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED-THE FEDS HAS BEEN ROBBED AS WELL AS VICTIMS AND MORE.  HAD THE JUDGES DID THEIR JOB CORRECTLY NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE OCCURRED...

 

 

 

Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed In (2005): Sirote & Permutt P.C. Filed A False Claim Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Stating They

Owned Corla Jackson Property And She Took Out A Loan With Them Under Loan Number (0835002124) When This Was Fraud-It Was Not True.  There Was Never A

Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Prior To The Illegal Foreclosure June 1, 2012.  Corla Jackson Never Had A Loan With GMAC Mortgage Corporation

AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC She Was Robbed And So Was The FEDS Under False Pretense and More Pursuant to the Adjustable Rate Note terms and conditions (May 26,

2004) between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation is under loan number 651003367 servicing 001347464.  This was covered up by Bradley Arant

Boult Cummings and the State Of Alabama Affiliate Firms and Corrupted Judges By Influence and More violating Governed-State Laws-More..

 

 

The State Of Alabama's Corrupted Judges Willfully Violated California Notary Laws-Rules-Regulations and More" With The

Intent To Help Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C. Posing MERS, Banks and Servicers Based Upon

Fraud!  The Assignment Sirote & Permutt P.C. Prepared (June 19, 2008) Is Not Valid It Violates Federal Governed Notary

Laws Rules Regulations and More After (January 1, 2008) Its - Null and Void  - Multiple Ways - Guaranteed...

 

 

FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

 

 

 

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

 

 

 

CIVIL CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

 

 

 

 

Corla Jackson Mortgage Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed" and She Didn't Breech The Terms and Conditions Of Her Mortgage Contract Agreement Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation.  The Lies Is Over and More Guaranteed...

 

 

 

 

 

THIS ASSIGNMENT PRESENTED IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WAS NOT ACCEPTED-IT WAS FRAUD.  THEY LOAN WASN'T CREATED TO SHIP THIS ASSIGNMENT (4/25/96) IN ADDITION TO THIS THE HOME WAS BUILT YET TO SHIP THIS ASSIGNMENT (4/25/96). 

 

NOTARY GOVERNED LAW VOIDED THIS ASSIGNMENT UNDER THE INITIAL BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142). IT WAS NOT  ACCEPTED BY THE RULE OF LAW-AND MORE...

 

 

IN ADDITION TO THIS" NO JOURNAL WAS FOUND OR RECORDED-THE ASSIGNMENT IS VOID..

THIS DOCUMENT COULD NOT BE NOTARIZED I BLANK AND WITHOUT THE VALUE AND RELEASE OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE AND TRUSTEES DEED OF SALE UNDER THE ORIGINAL NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION...

THERE WAS NEVER A RELEASE OF MORTGAGE-CANCELLATION OF MORTGAGE-TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE RECORDED THROUGH THE SEC ON THIS MORTGAGE BACKED BY SECURITY'S IN POOLS OF MORTGAGES-MORE, PRIOR TO GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESCAP-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC CREATING THEIR NEW LOAN (0835002124) PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) AND JUNE 19, 2008) THIS IS RECORDED...

IN ADDITION TO THIS" THERE WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC PRIOR TO THE ILLEGAL RELIEF UNDER BANKRUPTCY CASE (11-01545) ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING.  HOW DID SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. GET AN ILLEGAL RELIEF BASED UPON FRAUD AROUND THE FEDS-FBI THAT IS THE BIG QUESTION HERE.  THIS IS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS ELECTED OFFICIALS COVERED UP WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS, WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED-ITS CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND MORE GUARANTEED...

 

 

FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the

court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and

fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

 

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

 

 

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

(08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter

jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

 

 

ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

 

 

 

See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

 

See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

 

See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

 

 

 

Corla Jackson Grounds Under The Federal Rule: Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters | Federal Rules of Civil ...

 

 

 

 

 

 LINK

 

 

OPTION MORTGAGE CORPORATION DIDN'T FORCE CORLA JACKSON INTO BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) PRIOR TO (APRIL 30, 2008) STATING SHE WAS BEHIND ON HER MORTGAGE BECAUSE SHE WAS NOT BEHIND ON ANY PAYMENTS AND HER MORTGAGE WAS SECURED BY ALL HER POLICY'S LINKED TO THE PROPERTY WHICH PREVENTED A FORECLOSURE MULTIPLE WAYS.  GMAC COULD NOT PROCESS ANY CLAIMS UNDER THE PROPERTY FOR ANYONE OR CREATE A NEW LOAN TO STEAL THE PROPERTY LINKED TO THE INSURED COVERED LOSSES USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES IN EXCHANGE FOR PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR. 

 

THIS WAS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY AROUND THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE-WALL STREET INVENTORS TRUST AND MORE.  CORLA JACKSON WAS ROBBED ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES IS WHAT HAS BEEN COVERED UP HERE BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA WHOM ISSUED THE ILLEGAL ORDERS TO CORRUPT THE CASE AND COMPLAINTS INITIALLY.  THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED GMAC-RESCAP WILLFULLY VIOLATED THE CONSENT ORDERS UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN" THIS IS RECORDED FACTS. 

IT WAS ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS THAT WAS ISSUED BY CORRUPTED JUDGES" IS WHAT STOLE CORLA JACKSON HOME AND LAND AT CORLA JACKSON EXPENSE  ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND PAYMENTS THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO GO TOWARDS THE ORIGINAL-NOTE LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8, WHICH WAS STOLEN WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES IN (2005).

THE ORIGINAL NOTE WAS NEVER TRANSFERRED LEGALLY TO CREATE GMAC LOAN (0835002124) BY ANY RULE OF LAW PRIOR TO (2005), WHICH IS NULL AND VOID PRIOR TO (JUNE 19, 2008).   GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION RESCAP-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) WAS ILLEGALLY CREATED BY GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-RESCAP AND GMAC MORTGAGE LLC IN (2005) OPTION ONE MORTGAGE WAS CLOSED (JUNE 19, 2008) AND THE HOME WASN'T BUILT TO CREATE AND SHIP AN ASSIGNMENT (4/25/96) THE ASSIGNMENT IS FRAUD.

THE LAW FIRMS FOR SIROTE & PERMUTT (BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS) WILLFULLY USED (2) ILLEGAL ASSIGNMENTS BASED UPON FRAUD AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008) WHICH IS NOT VALID-AND IS NULL AND VOID BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED LAWS-MORE...

 

 

 

THIS COMPLAINT WAS ILLEGALLY COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA ITS FIRMS LAWYERS AND JUDGES BASED UPON FRAUD WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS LIKE THIS.  THE JUDGES HAD TO SEE THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS WILLFULLY COMMITTED A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY AND INTENDED TO COVERED UP A WHITE COLLAR CRIME THEY COMMITTED TO DATE.  THE ILLEGAL ORDERS HELPED CARRY IT OUT THE WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY BASED UPON FRAUD WITH THE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS.  THEY ALL INTENDED FOR THIS COMPLAINT TO BE COVERED UP AROUND THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE BECAUSE IT EXPOSED WHAT THEY WERE DOING FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AND HOW THEY WERE DOING IT AND MORE. 

CORLA JACKSON CONTINUED TO FIGHT FOR LEGAL JUSTICE AND HER CIVIL RIGHTS AND MORE TO DATE, WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED THE CRIME IS RECORDED THROUGH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM SO NO ONE CAN LIE.

THE PAYMENTS AND INSURED COVERED LOSSES UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8 WAS ILLEGALLY SWITCHED OUT USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS UNDER A FABRICATED LOAN-NOTE UNDER THE NAME GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING IN (2005) AND PRIOR TO (APRIL 30, 2008) FOR BIG ILLEGAL PROFITS THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS LAW FIRMS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES WERE BENEFITING OR PROFITING ON IN EXCHANGE OR PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME" THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE COVERING UP. 

 

 

 

THE LAW FIRMS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES THAT IS LINKED TO THIS CRIME WILLFULLY COVERED UP AND ALLOWED CORLA JACKSON TO BE ROBBED OF PAYMENTS, POLICY'S, SETTLEMENTS, STOLEN LAND, ON A MORTGAGE THAT WAS SECURED IN A POOL OF LOANS BACKED BY SECURITY'S AND MORE. 

THE STATE OF ALABAMA ITS LAWYERS AND JUDGES KNEW CORLA JACKSON WAS SECURED BY ALL HER COMPLAINTS IN INSURED COVERED LOSSES, AND THEY STOLE THE MONEY, THE HOME, THE LAND, THE PAYMENTS AND MORE THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO BE RECORDED UNDER THE ORIGINAL NOTE LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8. 

IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THE LAW FIRMS SET UP A STOLEN PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS WITH ITS AFFILIATES-CLIENTS WITH THE INTENT TO ROB CORLA JACKSON ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND PAYMENTS THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO GO TOWARDS HER ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORE.  THEY ILLEGALLY AND WILLFULLY WENT AROUND THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE-WALL STREET INVESTORS-MORE-TO DATE, WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS FROM ALABAMA'S CORRUPTED JUDGES LINKED TO THE COMPLAINTS INITIALLY, WHICH HAS LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD UPON COURTS.  THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED" ITS RECORDED FACTS THROUGH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, WHICH NO ONE CAN DENY.

 

 

CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS IN (2005) WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED BY THE ALABAMA LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS PRIOR TO (APRIL 30, 2008). 

HARP-TARP REQUIRED PENDING FORECLOSURES TO BE SUSPENDED UNDER THE FABRICATED NOTES AND MORE.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION ET, AL., DIDN'T OWN THE MORTGAGES THEY STOLE AND FABRICATED NEW LOANS UNDER FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS ROBBING THE FEDERAL RESERVE-AROUND THE SEC-MORE.  THE LAW FIRMS AND JUDGES LINKED TO THIS CRIME KNEW THIS, AND COVERED UP THE CRIME BY CORRUPTION THE CASE WITH ALABAMA ILLEGAL ORDERS WHICH LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD INTO NEW YORK, UNDER JUDGE MARTIN. 

 

THERE WAS NO INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEWS BY THE RULES AND CONSENT ORDERS UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN AND HE KNEW THIS" IT WAS RECORDED-HE WENT BY WHAT BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS SAID, VERSUS WHAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE TOLD THEM TO DO, BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORDERS TO DATE WHICH WAS VIOLATED" THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE COVERING UP AND MORE...

 

THERE WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC.  THEY ILLEGALLY STOLE THE PROPERTY UNDER GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC., AND FLIPPED IT WITH THEIR SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC AFTER THEY GOT BUSTED.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS THE LAW FIRM FOR GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC.,

 

THE LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COMMITTED FRAUD AND STOLE CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY WITH (2) FABRICATED ASSIGNMENTS WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS.  THEY ALL KNEW INCLUDING THE JUDGES LINKED TO THIS CRIME THAT OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008) AND CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS IN (2005) AND THE ORIGINAL NOTE WAS NOT TRANSFERRED BY ANY RULE OF LAWS" THIS WAS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THAT THE STATE OF ALABAMA JUDGES WILLFULLY COVERED UP WITH AND FOR SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS PRIOR TO (APRIL 30, 2008) TO DATE. 

 

OCWEN DIDN'T PAY CORLA JACKSON BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONSENT ORDERS AND NEITHER DID RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, THEY HAD THEIR LAW FIRMS COVER UP THE MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGE THAT WAS SOLD TO THE FEDS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS

 

VICTIMS WERE NOT PAID" INSTEAD THEY USED CORRUPTED JUDGES LINKED TO THE LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS TO ISSUE ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON THEIR FRAUD UPON THE COURTS" PRIOR TO AND AFTER (JUNE 19, 2008) AND AFTER (JUNE 19, 2008) TO DATE GUARANTEED. 

 

 

GMAC AFFILIATES AND LAW FIRMS ILLEGALLY CREATED NEW LOANS-MORTGAGES WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING AND AFTER THEY GOT BUSTED THEY PURCHASED OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION THROUGH WILBUR ROSS AND THEN BACKED DATED ASSIGNMENTS AND HAD SAND CANYON MORTGAGE CORPORATION ASSIGN THE BACKED ASSIGNMENTS OVER TO THEM AROUND THE FEDS AND SEC" THAT IS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS AND MORE ON CRIMES THAT OCCURRED IN (2005) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING PRIOR TO (94/30/2008) AND (6/19/2008).  IN ADDITION TO THIS MANY VICTIMS WERE NOT BEHIND IN PAYMENTS BETWEEN (02/2005-06/2005) AND (7/2005-1/2006) IN THE AMOUNT OF ($14,809.60).  

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: THIS IS CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND MORE-THIS IS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY COMMITTED BY LAW FIRMS LAWYERS AND JUDGES WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED ITS RECORDED...

THE ($14,809.60) LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM BY GMAC WAS REVERSED BY OBJECTIONS RECORDED (7/16/2009) THAT WAS REVERSED (OCTOBER 1, 2009) AMENDED TO THE AMOUNT THE DEBTOR CORLA JACKSON AND THE TRUSTEE’S PAID OUT TO GMAC BEFORE THEY GOT BUSTED AND STOPPED FROM ROBBING CORLA JACKSON AND TRUSTEE’S AROUND JUDGE MAHONEY ORDER ISSUED (MARCH 1, 2006) BASED UPON ALL THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHICH WAS VIOLATED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC.  THIS IS RECORDED...

GMAC CREATED A NEW LOAN-MORTGAGE (0835002124) ILLEGALLY IN (2005). THEY STOLE VICTIMS IDENTITIES TO CREATE NEW LOANS TO SALE TO ALLY TO CREATE ALLY BANK AND MORE BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS.  THE CRIMES THEY COMMITTED IS RECORDED IN CORLA JACKSON INITIAL BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WHICH PREVENTED THEM FROM DOING THEM FROM COMMITTED FRAUD AGAIN UNDER THE SAME LOAN-SAME COMPLAINT-ORDER WERE ISSUED TO STOP GMAC MORTGAGE LAW FIRMS SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEY COMMITTED FRAUD" WITH THE INTENT TO COVER UP THE TRUTH WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS FROM ALABAMA CORRUPTED JUDGES GUARANTEED.  WHAT THEY COVERING UP IS A BIG ILLEGAL PROFITING RING THAT IS LARGER THAN THE UNITED STATES GUARANTEED...

 

THE ALABAMA FIRMS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS ARE ILLEGALLY ROBBING THE FEDERAL RESERVE AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE-FDIC-CONGRESS-BOTH PARTIES AND MORE WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS AND MORE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR VIOLATION GOVERNED LAWS TO DATE GUARANTEED....

ESTOPPEL AND JUDICIAL ESTOPPEL LAWS PREVENTED THIS CRIME AND IT WAS IGNORED...

 

 

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON AND THEY COVERED UP THE CRIMES WILLFULLY" THINKING THE WOULD NEVER GET BUSTED FOR THEIR INITIAL CRIMES, AND THE CRIMES ON HELPING OCWEN PREVENT FROM PAYING VICTIMS CLAIMS UNDER BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND MORE WHO WAS OVER THE INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEW ON CRIMES THEY COMMITTED.

 

 

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND ITS CLIENTS HAD NO INTENTIONS ON REPORTING THE CRIME THEY COMMITTED PRIOR TO (APRIL 30, 2008 AND JUNE 19, 2008) TO DATE (2017) LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES THEY BENEFITED AND PROFITED FROM WITH THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND MORE.  THEY EVEN ROBBED VICTIMS OF SETTLEMENT FUNDS, INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND MORE TO DATE THEY COVERED UP WILLFULLY...

 

IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THE STATE OF ALABAMA HAD-HAS AN ILLEGAL PROFITING RING-SCAM GOING ON AROUND THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE THEY COVERED UP BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS WHICH LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD INTO NEW YORK UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN, THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED. 

 

THE CONSENT ORDERS WERE VIOLATED BY GMAC AND THE JUDGES LINKED TO THIS CRIME THAT ISSUED THE ILLEGAL ORDERS TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT WILLFULLY AND ILLEGALLY.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS THE LAW FIRM FOR RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, THEY FLIPPED THE STOLEN MORTGAGE BETWEEN, FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR" WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME.  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS THE LAW FIRM FOR SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AS WELL AS GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, THEY COVERED UP THE CRIME BASED UPON FRAUD ON A LOAN THAT WAS STOLEN BY GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENT CAPITAL LLC.

 

 

 

OCWEN DIDN'T PAY THE CLAIMS TO VICTIMS IT WAS COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS ON ASSIGNMENTS THAT WERE NOT VALID BY GOVERNED LAWS PERIOD!

 

 

 

THE LIES IS OVER AND MORE GUARANTEED...

 

I KNOW THE GOVERNMENT IS SHOCKED AT WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA JEFF SESSIONS IS COVERING UP ITS REAL BAD....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORLA JACKSON KNOW WHAT HAPPEN NOW!

 

 

IT HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN CONFIRMED BOTH ASSIGNMENTS IN UNDER CORLA JACKSON'S PROPERTY IN HER NAME UNDER HER CREDIT WAS NOT VALID BY ANY RULE OF LAW.   IT IS TRUE CORLA JACKSON WAS ILLEGALLY ROBBED AND IT WAS COVERED UP BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, MORRISON & FOERSTER , JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, RCO, PRINCE, MCKENNA & BROUGHTON, LLC, CORRUPTED JUDGES AND MORE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES WITH ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDERS TO DATE GUARANTEED!

 

 

STATEMENT BY CORLA JACKSON: LET THE SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, CFPB, CONGRESS AND MEMBERS OF BOTH PARTY REVIEW AND VERIFY THE EVIDENCE BELOW AND MORE ON HOW THEY DID IT WITH THE INTENT TO COVER UP THE TRUE FACTS GUARANTEED.

CORLA JACKSON SAYS SHE IS HAPPY TO NOW ALL THE FACTS LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES AND HOW THEY DID IT TO DATE WITH THE INTENT TO GO AROUND THE SEC FEDERAL RESERVE AND CFPB AND MORE...

 

 

THE LIES IS OVER FINALLY: SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. DIDN'T HAVE LACK OF STANDING TO COLLECT A DEBT ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES OR PAYMENTS FROM CORLA JACKSON UNDER THIS PROPERTY PERIOD IN (2005).

 

GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION aka RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC, AND ITS SUBSIDIARY GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, DIDN'T HAVE LACK OF STANDING TO CREATE LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) IN (2005) PERIOD.  THEY USED (2) ILLEGAL ASSIGNMENTS WHICH IS NOT VALID AND THEY WERE FRAUD! 

 

GOVERNED NOTARY LAWS IS WHAT VALIDATE ASSIGNMENTS BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED LAWS, WHICH HAS BEEN IGNORED AND VIOLATED BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA ITS FIRMS AND LAWYERS WITH THE INTENT TO USE THE ASSIGNMENTS TO COVER UP THE CRIME THEY COMMITTED FROM (2005-2017).  READ MORE...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judicial Estoppel

 

In the practice of law, judicial estoppel (also known as estoppel by inconsistent positions) is an estoppel that precludes a party from taking a position in a case that is contrary to a position it has taken in earlier legal proceedings. Although, in the United States, it is only a part of common law and therefore not sharply defined, it is generally agreed that it can only be cited if the party in question successfully maintained its position in the earlier proceedings and benefited from it.

 

Sirote & Permutt P.C., GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC Didn't Disclose They Didn't Own The Mortgage Prior To Initiating Their Proof Of Claims In Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) And They Never Put In The Schedules That Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When They Illegally Forced Her Into Her Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) In (2005).  This Is Recorded. 

 

 

Judicial estoppel is a doctrine that may apply in matters involving closed bankruptcies, wherein the former debtor attempts to lay claim to an asset that was not disclosed on the bankruptcy schedules. In an early U.S. articulation of the doctrine, the United States Supreme Court, in First National Bank of Jacksboro v. Lasater, 196 U.S. 115 (1905), held at 119: Sirote & Permutt P.C. Didn't Disclose They Prepared The Assignment Of Mortgage Dated (June 19, 2008) That Was Not Valid By The Rule Of Governed Laws After Option One Mortgage Closed (4/30/2008).  Sirote & Permutt P.C. Fabricated (2) Assignments And Neither One Of Them Were Valid By The Rule Of Governed Notary Laws.  1   2

 

SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., DIDN'T PUT IN THEIR SCHEDULES THEY COULD NOT COLLECT A DEBT UNDER THEIR NEW LOAN WITHOUT A RELEASE AND CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE OR A TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE UNDER THEIR NEW LOAN (0835002124) THEY CREATED IN (2005) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING... THIS IS RECORDED 

 

WHEN A CUSTOMER TAKE OUT A LOAN-MORE THEY ARE GIVEN A RECORDED DEED TO THEIR PROPERTY BETWEEN THE LENDER AND THE OWNER-THIS DIDN'T HAPPEN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC-BECAUSE THE LOAN OR LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC. 

SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND KNEW THIS' AND CONTINUED TO COMMIT CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING UNDER THE NAME GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION ET, AL. AKA GMAC  MORTGAGE LLC, ET, AL.  SIROTE & PERMUTT NEVER PROVIDED THE COURTS WITH A COPY OF A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC PRIOR TO (JANUARY 20, 2010) INSIDE THEIR SCHEDULES.  THIS IS RECORDED...

 

 

 

IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) JUDGE MAHONEY NEVER ISSUED AN ORDER CONFIRMING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC.

 

BOTH ASSIGNMENTS WERE FRAUD AND MORE-THEY SAID THEY LOANED CORLA JACKSON MONEY AND DIDN'T PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC IN THEIR SCHEDULES PRIOR TO BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) BEING DISCHARGED (JANUARY 20, 2010).  THIS IS RECORDED.  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED UP THIS CRIME AND MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME. 

 

THE ILLEGAL ORDERS STOLE MORTGAGES AROUND THE SEC, FDIC, FEDERAL RESERVE, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE.  OCWEN ILLEGALLY GOT CREDITS THEY NEVER SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED FROM JOSEPH SMITH AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE GUARANTEED.  VICTIMS WERE ROBBED AGAIN AS WELL AS THE FEDS THIS IS FACTS!

 

 

 

HOW DID GMAC GET AROUND FEDERAL GOVERNED LAWS TO CARRY OUT THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY ON ARREARS DATED BANK TO BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING TO COLLECT A DEBT ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006).

 

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE" CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS IN BANKRUPTCY  CASE (05-13142) THIS IS RECORDED.

THE FBI NEED TO SEE HOW SIROTE & PERMUTT COLLECTED A DEBT UNDER A FABRICATED NOTE COLLECTING ARREARS (2) TIMES WHICH IS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY AND CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD" THE STATE OF ALABAMA LAW FIRMS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES WILLFULLY COVERED UP.  CIVIL RIGHTS AND GOVERNED LAWS ARE VIOLATED HERE-MORE!

 

 

Sirote & Permutt P.C. Didn't Provide A Release-Cancellation Of The Original Note-Mortgage Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation Prior To Initiating Their Proof Of Claims or Prior To Creating Their New Loan-Mortgage (0835002124) Without Lack Of Standing and Without Owning The Property In (2005).  Sirote & Permutt P.C., Didn't Provide In Their Proof Of Claims Are Trustee's Deed Of Sale Prior To Creating Their Loan and Prior To Filing A Proof Of Claim.  Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Her Mortgage Under Her Property, and Corla Jackson Didn't Violate Her Mortgage Contract Agreement Dated (May 26, 2004) Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation.

 

 

 

Sirote & Permutt P.C. Didn't Provide A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Under Loan Their New Loan Number (0836002124) Prior To Initiating A Proof Of Claims or Prior To The Illegal Wrongful Foreclosure Actions-More, By The Rule Of Governed Notary Laws.  In Addition To This Sirote & Permutt P.C. Never Recorded A Trustees Deed Of Sale Of The Original Note To Them Prior To Filing Their Proof Of Claims Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) or a Release-Cancellation Of Mortgage Under The Original Note Prior To Creating Their New Loan and More. 

 

 

 

Regardless Both Assignments Were Not Valid-They Are Fraud!  There Was Never Money Loaned Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC, and There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation Aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Prior To The Illegal Relief They To Illegally Foreclose On The Property (June 1, 2012).  Due Process Was Not Done By The Rule Of Law Under Case (12-00111) In The United States District Court Under Judge Kristi Dubose, She Was Involved With Bradley Arant Boult Cummings-Sirote & Permutt P.C., and The State Of Alabama.  Jeff Sessions Knew This' Its Recorded...

 

The Law Firms Were Money Laundering-More With OCWEN and DEUTSCHE BANK-WILBUR ROSS AND COMPANY-AFFILIATES-Through GMAC Real Estate-Stewart Title Co." Under Fabricated Mortgages and Fake Title Jackets-More... Alabama Got A Big Ring From Florida To Atlanta GA and New York-More Through Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Monopoly Ring-They Robbed The Hell Out The FEDS And Wall Street Investors As Well As Victims To Date That's Covered Up" Under OCWEN-WILBUR ROSS & CO., DEUTSCHE BANK.

 

OCWEN Didn't Pay Victims-The FEDS-Wall Street Investors-They Used Illegal Judges Orders Using Deceptive Practices Multiple Ways Through Their Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Thinking They Would Never Get Busted Again.  Sirote & Permutt P.C. Was Already In The Illegal Mortgage Fraud Ring Robbing The FEDS and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Was And Is Covering This Up For Big Illegal Profits Personal Gain And Favor-More. 

 

 

 

THIS IS FACTS-ALABAMA GOT A HUGE OPERATION GUARANTEED!  THEY ARE LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES AROUND THE SEC-FEDS-MORE BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES THROUGH THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS WHO OBTAIN THE ILLEGAL ORDERS WHEN THEY CAN'T GET THEM WITHOUT BEING EXPOSED!  ITS REAL BAD GUARANTEED...

 

 

 

SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMING IS WORSE THAN DOC-X THEY TOOK UP WHERE DOC-X LEFT OFF AT-MORE!

 

DOC-X DIDN'T COMMIT THIS CRIME THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS WERE COMMITTING CRIMES JUST LIKE DOC-X, EXCEPT WORSE-THEY USED ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDERS TO ROB THE FEDS AROUND THE SEC-FDIC AND MORE...

 

 

 

THERE'S A LOT OF VICTIMS THAT DON'T KNOW THEY ARE VICTIMS YET-WHEN THEY FIND OUT THEY GOING OFF ON GOVERNMENT FOR ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN AND OCCUR WITHOUT TELLING THEM THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT THE LAW FIRMS ARE DOING FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR USING THEIR IDENTITY, ASSETS, CREDIT, EQUITY, PROPERTY, POLICY'S AND MORE...

 

THIS ---- IS REAL FACTS GUARANTEED BACKED BY THE EVIDENCE TO DATE SO NO ONE CAN LIE-ITS RECORDED!

 

 

 

Alabama Covered Up A Federal Crime And Its Crystal Clear Something Is Wrong Here-They Didn't Want The FBI-SEC-FDIC-More To Find Out About. Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments and This Judge Just Committed Fraud and Fraud Upon His Court To Cover Up This Crime For The State Of Alabama and His Affiliates, Whom Is Linked To Massive Stolen Pools Of Mortgage Trust Funds, Policy's, Payments and More.  Deutsche Bank-GMAC Mortgage Subsidiary's Committed FRAUD For Illegal Profits Robbing The FEDS-Victims-More Linked To Wilbur Ross-AHM-GE Money-Deutsche Bank-Sand Canyon Corporation, Altisource, HLSS, Stewart Title Of Alabama-Stewart Title Company, OCWEN!  1   2    3   4    5   6   7   8   9   10

 

 

SIROTE & PERMUTT DIDN'T PROVIDE A VALID TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE OR A VALID ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE OR A RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION" PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING (4/30/2008) TO DATE UNDER THEIR LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) BECAUSE GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA RESCAP AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, ILLEGALLY CREATED PRIOR TO AN ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE OR PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE BEING SOLD AND CLOSED (4/30/2008) AND PRIOR TO THEIR ASSIGNMENT DATED (JUNE 19, 2008) BEING RECORDED.  THE LIES IS OVER GUARANTEED-THIS IS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS WHICH IS FRAUD!

 

Sirote & Permutt P.C,. Never Provided The Courts With The Mortgage Contract Agreement or a VALID Assignment To Collect A Debt By Governed Laws- Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC Before GMAC Could File A Proof Of Claim. 

GMAC Filed A Proof Of Claim Without Corla Jackson Being Behind On Payments-and-Without The Courts Order Confirming The Debtor's Chapter 13 Plan With The Agreement Between Corla Jackson and GMAC.  This Is Civil Bankruptcy Fraud and More That Sirote & Permutt P.c., and Bradley Arant Boult Cummins Willfully Covered Up Which Lead To Widespread Fraud and Fraud Upon The Court's, Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied" Its Facts.  This Is A White Collar Crime Robbery The Alabama Law Firms and Judges Covered Up Here Guaranteed.

 

Sirote & Permutt P.C. Didn't Put In Their Schedules They Were Collecting A Debt-and Continue To Collect A Debit Based Upon Fraud On Arrears For Illegal Profits Without Lack Of Standing Prior To Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Was Discharged (January 20, 2008).

 

The Courts Never Approved GMAC Leave To File A Proof Of Claim After March 1, 2006.  This Is Recorded.  GMAC Leave To File A Proof Of Claim Was Reversed By Objections Filed and Recorded (7/16/2009) To The Amount The Trustees and Debtor Corla Jackson Paid (October 1, 2009) With No More Arrears Owed-After GMAC Got Busted.

GMAC Never Provided The Courts With The Agreement Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation By The Rule Of Law-In Fact By Rule Of Law There Had To Be A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Which Never Occurred Prior To Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Being Discharged (January 20, 2010).  This Is Recorded...

Option One Mortgage Closed (4/30/2008) And GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA RESCAP-GMAC Mortgage LLC Created Their Loan (0835002124) Prior To (4/30/2008) and (June 19, 2008) Which Caused Massive Damages From (2005-2017) Guaranteed.

Regardless Both Backdated Assignments Is Not Valid By The Rule Of Law-They Are VOID!  The Lies Is Over!

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORLA JACKSON DIDN'T HAVE A LOAN WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO SHIP THIS ASSIGNMENT (4/25/96) IN FACT THE HOME WASN'T BUILT PERIOD!  NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS WERE VIOLATED AND MORE GUARANTEED...

 

RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC-RESCAP-LAW FIRM MORRISON & FOERSTER-SIROTE & PERMUTT, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS ALL KNEW THAT CORLA JACKSON WAS BEING ROBBED UNDER GMAC ILLEGALLY AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED UP THE CRIMES SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED INITIALLY IN ALABAMA.

 

 

 

SPECIAL REPORT-ALERT!

 

So There Will Be No Mistakes On What GMAC-RESCAP Were Granted-This Is What They Were Granted!

 

28 U.S. Code § 1653 - Amendment of pleadings to show ...

8 U.S. Code § 1653 - Amendment of pleadings to show Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction. Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended.

 

 

HOT DAM TAKE A LOOK AT THIS! 

They Going To Bust Them By The Book!

 

  • U.S.C. Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

    www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title28/html/USCODE-2011-title28.htm

    28 U.S.C. United States Code, 2011 Edition Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE From the U.S. Government Printing Office, ... 1653: 400 : 2201, 2202: 401 : 2403:

  •  

    THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS WERE TRYING TO GET THE CASE BACK TO ALABAMA IT DIDN'T WORK!

    THE TRUSTEE'S ARE GRANTED TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL WHICH WAS INVALID-MARTIN GLENN WILL FINALLY SEE THAT BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, MORRISON & FOERSTER COMMITTED CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD WITH THE HELP OF THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, LAWYERS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES LINKED TO THEIR FIRMS AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA-THIS CASE AND COMPLIANT IS FAR WORSE THAN WHAT ANYONE CAN IMAGINE GUARANTEED!

    THE LAW FIRMS AND TRUSTEE'S DIDN'T TELL CORLA JACKSON ABOUT THIS" SHE RECEIVED THIS IN THE MAIL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT YESTERDAY (9/2/2017).  IF IT WASN'T FOR THE COURT'S CORLA JACKSON NEVER WOULD HAVE KNOWN THE REMOVAL BY BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS-MORRISON & FOERSTER AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS WERE DEFECTIVE AROUND THE TRUSTEE'S AND THE BANKRUPTCY COURTS IN NEW YORK UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN.  MAYBE MARTIN GLENN WILL SEE THE TRUTH FOR WHAT IT IS" THEY DEFRAUDED HIM WHICH HAS LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED" THIS IS RECORDED FACTS.  

     

     

     

    THIS IS RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION AKA RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT THE ASSIGNMENT DATED (6/19/2008) IS GMAC MORTGAGE LLC FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT-THEY BOTH COMMITTED CIVIL FRAUD WHICH LEAD TO FRAUD UPON THE COURTS WITH THEIR LAW FIRMS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN-MORE!

     

    BOTH ASSIGNMENTS WERE FRAUD AND ILLEGAL AND THEY ALL KNEW THIS AND CONTINUED TO ROB CORLA JACKSON TO COVER UP THE CRIME THEY COMMITTED LINKED TO INSURED COVERED LOSSES STOLEN PAYMENTS, POLICY'S CREDIT, EQUITY, LAND, THE HOME AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THE ASSIGNMENTS WAS NOT VALID BY THE RULE OF LAW!

     

    THIS WAS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS WITH CORRUPTED JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS WHICH HAS LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS OUTSIDE ALABAMA" LIKE THIS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THE RULES-LAWS ON COLLECTING A DEBT WAS WILLFULLY AND ILLEGALLY VIOLATED BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA JUDGES LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS, WITH THE USE OF THE ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD-MORE! 

     

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the

    court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and

    fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

    neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

    defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

    officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

    adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

    between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

    attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter

    jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

    over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

     

     

    ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

    ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

    COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

     

    See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

     

    See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

     

    See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

     

     

     

     

    Corla Jackson Grounds Under The Federal Rule: Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters | Federal Rules of Civil ...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    JUDGE MARTIN GLENN WAS TOLD THAT BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COMMITTED FRAUD UPON HIS COURT, BUT THIS WAS IGNORED BECAUSE OF INFLUENCE AND MORE.  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LATER GOT BUSTED, BUT THEIR ARE MORE VICTIMS NATIONWIDE THAT IS BEING COVERED UP.

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS OVER INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEWS FOR RESCAP, AND THEY HAVE REPORTED FRAUD BECAUSE THEY ARE INVOLVED IN THE CRIMES LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES-MORE" WITH DEUTSCHE BANK AND AHM-WILBUR ROSS AND CO., AND MORE. THE NOTARIZED ASSIGNMENTS IS NOT VALID-THEY WERE  FRAUD-WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS ATTACHED TO THEM BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURTS-MORE!

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., WOULD STEAL THE MORTGAGES AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WOULD COVER UP THE CRIME WITH ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDERS AND MORE THROUGH AFFILIATE FIRMS LAWYERS AND JUDGES LINKED TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS FIRMS GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER!

     

     

     

    SPECIAL REPORT-ALERT!

    1

    So There Will Be No Mistakes On What GMAC-RESCAP Were Granted-This Is What They Were Granted! 28 U.S. Code § 1653 - Amendment of pleadings to show ...8 U.S. Code § 1653 - Amendment of pleadings to show Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction. Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended.

     

     

    HOT DAM TAKE A LOOK AT THIS! 

    They Going To Bust Them By The Book!

     

  • U.S.C. Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

    www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title28/html/USCODE-2011-title28.htm

    28 U.S.C. United States Code, 2011 Edition Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE From the U.S. Government Printing Office, ... 1653: 400 : 2201, 2202: 401 : 2403:

  •  

     

     

     

     

     

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS (02/2005 THROUGH 06/2005) PRIOR TO ILLEGALLY FORCING HER INTO HER INITIAL BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) JUNE 1, 2005, UNDER GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC FABRICATED NOTE-MORTGAGE (0835002124) WITH ATTACHED ARREARS FROM (02/2005 THROUGH 06/2005) WITH THE INTENT TO ILLEGALLY TAKE AND STEAL THE PROPERTY FRAUDULENTLY ON MULTIPLE INSURED COVERED LOSSES, WHICH SECURED THE NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.

    ALL THE INSURANCE POLICY'S PAID FOR BY CORLA JACKSON SECURED HER NOTE AS WELL AS HER PAYMENTS, WHICH PREVENTED A FORECLOSURE BEING INITIATED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC AND RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION aka RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL LLC aka RESCAP, PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) AND (JUNE 19, 2008). 

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the

    court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and

    fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

    neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

    defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

    officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

    adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

    between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

    attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter

    jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

    over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

     

     

    ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

    ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

    COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

    See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

     

    See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

     

    See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

     

     

     

     

    Corla Jackson Grounds Under The Federal Rule: Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters | Federal Rules of Civil ...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS LAW FIRMS COVERED UP AND CAUSED CORLA JACKSON MASSIVE DAMAGES FROM (2005-2017) THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE COVERING UP WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS WHICH LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS IN NEW YORK AND ATLANTA GA, AND MORE.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC DIDN'T HAVE LACK OF STANDING IN (2005) PERIOD" THIS IS RECORDED. 

    OCWEN DIDN'T PAY THEY COVERED UP THE CRIMES LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES SO THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY, BUT THEY USED THE VICTIMS STOLEN PROPERTY FOR CREDITS AND MORE TO PURCHASE RESCAP WITHOUT PAYING VICTIMS AND THE FEDS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES LINKED TO PRIOR SERVICERS AND OCWEN GUARANTEED..

     

    SPECIAL REPORT-ALERT!

    1

    So There Will Be No Mistakes On What GMAC-RESCAP Were Granted-This Is What They Were Granted! 28 U.S. Code § 1653 - Amendment of pleadings to show ...8 U.S. Code § 1653 - Amendment of pleadings to show Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction. Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC DIDN'T HAVE A VALID ASSIGNMENT, TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE, RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE-MORTGAGE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION UNDER (02/2005 THROUGH 06/2005) ' PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) and (6/19/2008) PRIOR TO CREATING THEIR LOAN (0835002124) UNDER CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY IN HER NAME UNDER HER CREDIT IN (2005).  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC WAS WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING 2005. 

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND MORRISON & FOERSTER AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES TO DATE, HAS ILLEGALLY COVERED UP A FEDERAL WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY, FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES AND CRIMES THAT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COMMITTED AND MORE..

     

     

     

    THE LAW FIRMS AND JUDGES LINKED TO THIS CRIME TO DATE" SEEN THAT BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED UP THIS CRIME AND OCWEN DIDN'T PAY CORLA JACKSON OR ALL THE VICTIMS THEY ROBBED FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS. 

     

    THE LAW FIRMS AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND MORE WERE ILLEGALLY PROFITING FROM AROUND THE SEC, CFPB, FEDERAL RESERVE, FDIC, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, VIOLATING BANKING ENFORCEMENT ORDERS, CFPB CONSENT ORDERS, GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE WILLFULLY!  THIS IS RECORDED FACTS!

     

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS ILLEGALLY HAD CORRUPTED ALABAMA JUDGES ISSUING ILLEGAL ORDERS FOR PRIOR SERVICER'S  AND OCWEN, SO THEY COULD KEEP THE MONEY AND OCWEN DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS. 

    THE CORRUPTED JUDGES AND LAWYERS WERE LINKED TO THE STATE AND LAW FIRMS THAT THEY ISSUED ILLEGAL ORDERS TO" TO COVER UP CRIMES SUCH AS THIS" LIKE THIS! 

    THEY ARE LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN IDENTITY'S AND PROPERTY THEY USED TO ROB THE FEDS LIKE THIS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES.   AND MORE.  THE ALABAMA JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS COVERED UP THE CRIME!

     

     

    THIS CASE-COMPLAINT DISCOVERED THE CRIMES THAT ALABAMA LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS WERE COMMITTING FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS UNDER SERVICERS AND BANKS NAMES ILLEGALLY" THEY WERE ILLEGALLY PROFITING FROM BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS WITH ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDERS, USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AROUND SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER!

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

     

    GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC

    WAS NOT OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION SERVICER DATED AS FAR BACK AS 3/13/2002

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS OWNED BY H&R BLOCK

     

     

    11/8/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... – e22764_424b5   240
    10/4/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – e22553_424b5   243
    7/14/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Definitive Materials – file001   HTML
    5/3/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d328276   242
    1/12/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – b403648_424b5   239
    1/11/05     424B5         1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – b403648_424b5   239
    10/5/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d267762   213
    4/12/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Acceptance Loan Trust 2004-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d222686   213
    1/21/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d201380   205
    10/16/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accep Corp Asset Backed Cert Ser 2003-6 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d178424   209
    7/23/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Asset Back Certs Ser 2003 5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d159369   206
    6/13/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Asset Back Certs Ser 2003-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d149222   202
    4/18/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Ast Back Certs Ser 2003-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d136512   207
    3/14/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Acceptance Corp Asset Back Cert Ser 2003 2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d127726   201
    1/15/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accept Corp Asset Backed Certs Ser 2003 1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d116286   204
    10/29/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accept Corp Asset-Backed Cert Se 2002-6 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d99666   201
    7/30/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Tr Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d80413   199
    6/7/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accept Corp Asset Backed Cer Ser 2002-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d70482   250
    4/25/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accept Corp Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d59914   202
    3/13/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Tr Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d50504   184

     

     

    WHAT WAS THE SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., DOING COLLECTING A DEBT UNDER CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY FOR WITHOUT HERE BEING BEHIND IN PAYMENTS AND WITHOUT A RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF MORTGAGE OF LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER  001347464-8 BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) AND (6/19/2008) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING!  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS OWNED BY H & R BLOCK, A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY AND MORE...

     

    WHY IS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND JEFF SESSIONS COVERING UP FOR THE SATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS AFFILIATES THAT" OWEN DIDN'T PAY THE VICTIMS ROBBING THE FEDS AND VICTIMS AGAIN WITH CORRUPTED JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS LINKED TO THEIR MONOPOLY FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS AND MORE...

     

    SESSIONS FOOLED THE HELL OUT THE FEDS AND MORE HE COVERED UP THE CRIME HIS AFFILIATES AND TRUMP AFFILIATES COMMITTED FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN, FAVOR AND MORE LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES GUARANTEED!

    THE ALABAMA LAW FIRM WAS MONEY LAUNDERING WITH DEUTSCHE BANK, AND TRUMP AFFILIATES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES DATED WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE WITH CORRUPTED ALABAMA JUDGES AND SESSIONS AFFILIATES  JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS GUARANTEED!

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., COULD NOT COLLECT A DEBT BY GOVERNED LAWS THEY ILLEGALLY VIOLATED FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA JUDGES-COURTS! SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COULD NOT COLLECT A DEBT UNDER GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC WITHOUT AN ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE OR TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE RECORDED THROUGH THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE AND MORE.  THEY HAVE ROBBED VICTIMS AND THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ITS WAS COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND TRUMP AFFILIATES AND MORE GUARANTEED!

    NOW THIS IS FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT-SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. KNEW GMAC DIDN'T HAVE A TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE-RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE OR AN VALID ASSIGNMENT BY THE RULE OF LAW, PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) AND (6/19/2008) IT WAS RECORDED.  HOW DID THEY COLLECT A DEBT WHEN THEY DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE AND CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS, THEY ROBBED FEDS AROUND THE SEC, USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED THIS UP WILLFULLY!

     

     

     

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. PREPARED AN ILLEGAL ASSIGNMENT (JUNE 19, 2008) UNDER LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008).

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COULD NOT COLLECT A DEBT UNDER CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY WITHOUT A VALID ASSIGNMENT OR TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE AND RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER

    001347464-8 BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION. 

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COULD NOT INITIATE A FORECLOSURE IN (2005) UNDER BANKRUPTCY

    CASE (05-13142) WITHOUT CORLA JACKSON BEING BEHIND ON PAYMENTS.  SIROTE & PERMUTT

    COULD NOT FILE A FALSE PROOF OF CLAIM TO BE PAID (2) TIMES BASED UPON FRAUD

    WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142).  

     

    GMAC COULD NOT COLLECT ARREARS-DEBT UNDER A FABRICATED NOTE IN (2005) WITHOUT

    LACK OF STANDING, THAT WAS ILLEGAL AND BASED UPON FRAUD PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) AND

    (JUNE 19, 2008) ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006). 

     

    JUDGE SCHULMAN GOT WRONG INFO FROM ALABAMA AG LUTHER STRANGE AND HIS FIRMS,

    THEY WERE THE ONES THAT COVERED UP AND COMMITTED THIS CRIME WITH SIROTE &

    PERMUTT P.C., WITH DEUTSCHE BANK-AHM INITIALLY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, PERSONAL

    GAIN AND FAVOR.  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS INVOLVED HEAVY AND MORE...   

     

     

     

    GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC DIDN'T HAVE A VALID ASSIGNMENT, TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE, RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE-MORTGAGE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER  001347464-8' PRIOR TO (4/30/2008) and (6/19/2008) PRIOR TO CREATING THEIR LOAN (0835002124) UNDER CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY IN HER NAME UNDER HER CREDIT IN (2005). 

    GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC WAS WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING 2005 TO CREATE LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) PERIOD.  THE LOAN ITSELF IS NULL AND VOID-IT WAS NOT VALID  AND NEITHER WAS THE (2) ASSIGNMENTS..  GOVERNED NOTARY LAWS WERE VIOLATED WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED  THIS IS FRAUD!

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION aka GMAC MORTGAGE LLC DIDN'T HAVE A TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE-RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE-MORTGAGE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION OR AN ASSIGNMENT IN (2005-2006) TO COLLECT A DEBT.  THE PAYMENTS AND NEW TO THE ORIGINAL NOTE, TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE, OR AN ASSIGNMENT WAS NEVER RECORDED THROUGH THE SEC OR FEDERAL RESERVE APPLICABLE BY LAW UNDER GOVERNED LAWS, SEC RULES AND REGULATIONS AND MORE. 

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. DIDN'T HAVE AN TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE, RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE OR AN ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE, OR A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC PRIOR TO (JUNE 19, 2008) AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE.

     

    GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE OR HAVE A TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE PRIOR TO JUNE 19, 2008) OR PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING (4/30/2008).

     

    REGARDLESS THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED LAWS MULTIPLE WAYS. THE NOTARY HIMSELF WAS FRAUD-HE COULD NOT PLACE A SEAL ON AN ASSIGNMENT WITHOUT A TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE AND MORE-GUARANTEED!

     

    THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID-BY THE RULE OF LAW ITS NULL AND VOID, AND ALABAMA VIOLATED GOVERNED LAWS WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT TO COVER UP THE CRIME ITS LAW FIRMS AND STATE COMMITTED FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AND MORE...

     

     

     

    The State Of Alabama's Corrupted Judges Willfully Violated California Notary Laws-Rules-Regulations and More" With The

    Intent To Help Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C. Posing MERS, Banks and Servicers Based Upon

    Fraud!  The Assignment Sirote & Permutt P.C. Prepared (June 19, 2008) Is Not Valid It Violates Federal Governed Notary

    Laws Rules Regulations and More After (January 1, 2008) Its - Null and Void  - Multiple Ways - Guaranteed...

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

    WHAT EVER ALABAMA GOT GOING ON FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS THROUGH THEIR FIRMS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE IS REAL BAD.  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED UP THE CRIMES THEIR FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS WERE COMMITTING BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS AND THE COURTS IN NEW YORK UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN. 

    WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WAS ROB THE FEDS, AROUND THE SEC, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE THROUGH CORRUPTED JUDGES LINKED TO THEIR FIRMS AND STATES' WHILE THEY CARRY OUT THE CRIMES ON THE MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES NATIONWIDE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES UNDER OWEN, UNDER THE PRIOR SERVICERS NAMES, ILLEGALLY! 

    OWEN DID THE OPPOSITE OF THE CONSENT AND ENFORCEMENT  ORDERS AND COVERED UP THE CRIMES THE PRIOR SERVICERS COMMITTED USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED. OWEN DIDN'T PAY THE VICTIMS FOR THE STOLEN MORTGAGES PROPERTY CREDIT LAND POLICY'S AND MORE, THEY GOT THE CREDITS FOR PAYING VICTIMS WHEN THEY DIDN'T PAY, AND NO ONE KNEW HOW THEY WERE DOING IT UNTIL NOW! 

    OWEN TOOK OVER THE BANKING BUSINESS AND THEY ARE A NONE BANK, THAT CAUSED THE BANKS MORTGAGE FRAUD PROBLEMS THROUGH THEIR LAW FIRMS, LAWYERS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES AND MORE.  EVERY HOME OWNER AND VICTIMS OF SERVICERS, BANKS, OWEN, HLSS, DEUTSCHE BANK, ALTISOURCE, AHM, AHMSI, HOMEWARD, WILBUR ROSS & CO., AND THEIR FIRMS BETTER WAKE UP NOW' THEY GOT THE LAW FIRMS AND JUDGES COMMITTED FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON FEDERAL COURTS CORRUPTING VICTIMS COMPLAINTS AND THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEMS AND MORE GUARANTEED!

    I AM NOT GOING TO LIE TO YALL" JEFF SESSIONS STATE AND PEOPLE COMMITTED THIS CRIME AND MORE, THAT HE COVERS UP, AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE.  IN ADDITION TO THIS, TRUMP AFFILIATES IS LINKED TO SESSIONS AFFILIATES THAT COMMITTED THIS CRIME, THEY ARE THE FIRMS FOR DEUTSCHE BANK-TRUSTEE SERVICERS-MORE, LINKED TO TRUMP AFFILIATES AHM-WILBUR ROSS & CO.,.  TRUMP OBTAIN FUNDS AND LOANS FROM THE PEOPLE THAT ROBBED ME, THE FEDS, VICTIMS, BUSINESSES, POOLS OF MORTGAGES-TRUST, AND MORE, FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS.

    TO HAVE A PRESIDENT THAT AND HIS AFFILIATES AND FAMILY MEMBERS OBTAIN LOANS FROM A BANK THAT ROBBED ME, AND THE FEDS, VICTIMS AND MORE AROUND THE SEC, TELLS ME THAT TRUMP'S WEALTH CAME FROM THE CRIMES DEUTSCHE BANK WAS COMMITTING AROUND THE SEC, THAT HE COVERS UP WITH JEFF SESSIONS AND THEIR AFFILIATES.

     

    OWEN-DEUTSCHE BANK-IS LINKED TO HLSS-ALTISOURCE-WILBUR ROSS & COMPANY, AHM-SAND CANYON CORPORATION aka OPTION ONE MORTGAGE-CITI-HOMEWARD-DEUTSCHE BANK AND MORE.

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND SIROTE  & PERMUTT P.C. WAS DEUTSCHE BANKS FIRM THAT COMMITTED THIS CRIME, THROUGH THEIR CLIENTS-MORE GUARANTEED!  JEFF SESSIONS STATE, STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS, LAWYERS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES WERE ILLEGALLY BENEFITING OR PROFITING FROM THIS SCAM AND HE COVERED IT UP LIKE HE LIED ABOUT RUSSIA, MULTIPLE WAYS GUARANTEED...

     

    Deutsche Bank to pay $425 million fine over Russian money ...

     

    Deutsche Bank Says DoJ Wants $14 Billion to Settle ...

     

     

     

    U.S. wants $14 billion from Deutsche Bank to settle ...

     

    Kushner firm’s $285 million Deutsche Bank loan came just ...

     

    Deutsche Bank agrees to $7.2b settlement over mortgage ...

     

     

    Deutsche Bank's Suspect Russian Trades May Top $10 Billion

     

    Private Mortgage Fraud Investigator Zeroes In on Deutsche ...

     

     

    Deutsche Bank’s $10-Billion Scandal | The New Yorker

     

     

    U.S. money laundering probe into Deutsche Moscow unit ...

     

     

    Deutsche Bank, Mirror Trades, and More Russian Threads ...

     

     

    Deutsche Bank, Mirror Trades, and More Russian Threads ...

     


    Democrats Renew Push to Probe Deutsche Bank Russia Scandal

     

    Deutsche Bank fined $630m over Russia money laundering ...

     

    Bank that lent $300m to Trump linked to Russian money ...

     

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT  BOULT CUMMINGS AND SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS DEUTSCHE BANKS-OWEN KEY FIRMS IN ALABAMA!

     

     

     

     

     

    THE FBI-SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE HAS TO SEE SOMETHING IS WRONG LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES OUT OF ALABAMA" THEY BLOCKED THIS COMPLAINT LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURTS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS WITH THE INTENT TO CORRUPT THE CASE TO KEEP THIS COMPLAINT FROM BEING HEARD" ITS CRYSTAL CLEAR NOW.    READ MORE   1    2     3    4     5     6

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THE ALABAMA JUDGES KNOW THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE

    FRAUD AND ALABAMA LAWS WERE VIOLATED AND MORE!

     

     

     

     

    REFER TO STATE OF ALABAMA LAWS AND CODES-MORE 

     

    Chapter 20 NOTARIES PUBLIC. THIS IS FACTS!

     

     

     

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-

    matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order

    is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA

    ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR

    AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP

    FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     


     

    Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the

    court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and

    fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

    neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

    defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

    officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

    adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

    between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

    attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter

    jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

    over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

     

     

    ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

    ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

    COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

    See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

     

    See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

     

    See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

     

     

    Corla Jackson Grounds Under The Federal Rule: Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters | Federal Rules of Civil ...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    YOU CAN'T TELL ME THE JUDGES LINKED TO THIS CRIME DIDN'T VIOLATED GOVERNED LAWS AND DIDN'T ISSUE FRAUDULENT AND ILLEGAL ORDERS TO COVER UP THIS CRIME" BECAUSE THEY DID" THEY KNEW THE LAW AND THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID BY ANY RULE OF LAW!

    ILLEGAL ORDERS OUT OF ALABAMA LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON FEDERAL COURTS WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED.  CORLA JACKSON WAS ILLEGALLY ROBBED OF HER HOME LAND MONEY CREDIT PAYMENTS, INSURANCE POLICY'S  AND MORE AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE" WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS KNOWING THE ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGES IN HER NAME UNDER HER CREDIT AND PROPERTY WAS NOT VALID BY ANY RULE OF LAW-ITS FRAUD CAUSED BY THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS THAT ILLEGALLY PROFITING OFF THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND MORE GUARANTEED.

     

     

    BY THE RULE OF LAW JUDGES LINKED TO THIS CRIME KNEW THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS WAS NOT ISSUED A PROOF OF EXECUTION BY SUBSCRIBING WITNESS AND ATTACHED TO BRIAN D. MCCONNELL ILLEGAL ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008 THIS IS RECORDED.

    THIS ASSIGNMENT IS NOT VALID MULTIPLE WAYS" AND IT WAS NEVER POINTED OUT TO PROTECT CORLA JACKSON OR HER PROPERTY IN ANY OF THE MOTIONS FILED BY THE LAW FIRMS THAT COMMITTED THIS CRIME GUARANTEED. 

    IN ADDITION TO THIS" CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS INITIALLY ROBBED IN (2005) AND THE LAW FIRM FILED FALSE PROOF OF CLAIMS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS GETTING PAID MORE THAN ONE TIME WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME AND MORE!  THE JUDGE HAD A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO UPHOLD NOTARY-GOVERNED LAWS, AND THEY VIOLATED THEM INSTEAD" WHICH IS A RED FLAG" CORRUPTION CONSPIRACY FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND MORE...

    THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS INVOLVED HERE' WITH SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., IS LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES AND ILLEGAL PROFITS AND MORE  WITH THEIR CLIENTS WHICH INCLUDE DEUTSCHE BANK-AHM-HOMEWARD-WILBUR ROSS WHO HAD RESCAP-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC AS THEIR SERVICER" AS WELL AS OWEN AND OWEN DIDN'T PAY THE VICTIM FOR ALL THE DAMAGES DATED BACK FROM (2005-2017) TO DATE!  YOU CAN'T TELL ME THE JUDGES DIDN'T SEE THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE FRAUD MULTIPLE WAYS GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER!

     

     

     

    PROOF OF EXECUTION BY A SUBSCRIBING WITNESS

    If a person, called the principal, has signed a document, but does not personally appear before a notary public, another individual can appear on that principal’s behalf to prove the execution by the principal. That person is called a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195)

    NOTE: A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b))

     

    The requirements for proof of execution by a subscribing witness are as follows:

    • The subscribing witness must prove that the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party is the person described in it, and that such person executed it, and that the witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness (Civil Code section 1197); and

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she either saw the principal sign the document or in the presence of the principal heard the principal acknowledge that he or she signed the document (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION 15

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she was requested by the principal to sign the document as a witness and that he or she did so (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

    • The notary public must identify the subscribing witness based on personal knowledge or the identity of the subscribing witness must be proven to the notary public by the oath of a third person (credible witness) who personally knows the subscribing witness. The credible witness must be personally known by the notary public (Civil Code sections 1195, 1196); and

    • The subscribing witness must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(C)) In addition, if the identity of the subscribing witness was established by a credible witness, then the credible witness also must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(D))

    NOTE: Paper identification cannot be used to establish the identity of the principal, subscribing witness or credible witness. This is because the identity of the principal must be established by the oath of the subscribing witness who personally knows the principal.

    The identity of the subscribing witness must be established by the notary public’s personal knowledge of the subscribing witness or the oath of a credible witness who is known personally by the notary public and who personally knows the subscribing witness.

     

    The following scenario provides an example of how proof by a subscribing witness may be used:

    The principal, Wayne, needs to have his signature on a document notarized. Wayne is in the hospital and, therefore, cannot appear before Sally, the Notary Public, in order to get his signature notarized. Brian, a longtime friend of Wayne, is at the hospital visiting Wayne. Wayne asks Brian to sign the document as a Subscribing Witness and Brian does so. Wayne could have either signed the document in Brian’s presence or have signed it prior to Brian’s arrival. If the document was signed prior to Brian’s arrival, Wayne would need to acknowledge to Brian that he, Wayne, had signed the document. Wayne gives the document to Brian to take to Sally, who personally knows Brian. Sally places Brian under oath. Under oath, Brian swears or affirms that he personally knows Wayne, he saw Wayne sign the document (or heard Wayne acknowledge signing the document), Wayne requested that he, Brian, sign as a witness and he, Brian, did so. Brian signs Sally’s notary public journal as the subscribing witness. Sally completes the Proof of Execution Certificate and attaches it to the document. She then completes her notary public journal entry. (Sally must identify Brian through personal knowledge. No paper identification is permitted.) Brian takes the document back to Wayne. 

     

     

    Shown below is a suggested format for proof of execution by a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195) Other formats with similar wording may also be acceptable.

     

    16 GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

    SIGNATURE BY MARK

    When the signer of an instrument cannot write (sign) his or her name, that person may sign the document by mark. (Civil Code section 14) The requirements for notarizing a signature by mark are as follows:

    • The person signing the document by mark must be identified by the notary public by satisfactory evidence. (Civil Code section 1185)

    • The signer’s mark must be witnessed by two persons who must subscribe their own names as witnesses on the document. One witness should write the person’s name next to the person’s mark and then the witness should sign his or her name as a witness. The witnesses are only verifying that they witnessed the individual make his or her mark on the document.

    A notary public is not required to identify the two persons who witnessed the signing by mark or to have the two witnesses sign the notary public’s journal. Exception: If the witnesses were acting in the capacity of credible witnesses in establishing the identity of the person signing by mark, then the witnesses’ signatures must be entered in the notary public’s journal.

    • The signer by mark must include his or her mark in the notary public journal. To qualify as a signature, the making of the mark in the notary public journal, must be witnessed by an individual who must write the person’s name next to the mark and then sign his or her own name as a witness.

     

    Following is an example of a document executed by Signature by Mark:

    State of California } ss.

    County of _____________

    On __________ (date), before me, the undersigned, a notary public for the state,

    personally appeared _________________ (subscribing witness’s name), personally

    known to me (or proved to me on the oath of _________________ [credible witness’s

    name], who is personally known to me) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the

    within instrument, as a witness thereto, who, being by me duly sworn, deposed and said

    that he/she was present and saw/heard _________________ (name[s] of principal[s]),

    the same person(s) described in and whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within and

    annexed instrument in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) as (a) party (ies) thereto,

    execute or acknowledge executing the same, and that said affiant subscribed his/her name

    to the within instrument as a witness at the request of _________________ (name[s] of

    principal[s]).

     

    WITNESS my hand and official seal.

    NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL

     

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

     

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

    This Is What Sirote & Permutt P.C. And Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Covered Up Read More

     

    The Lies Is Over Guaranteed... 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Lies Is Over Guaranteed... 

     

     

     

     

     

    The Lies Is Over Guaranteed!

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

    The Notary Didn’t Have Satisfaction Evidence As Required By Notary Laws-Governed Laws: For The Value Received In The Transfer Of The Mortgage In (2008) Under A Loan Without A Mortgage Contract Under Loan Number (0835002124) That Was Created In (2005) Without Lack Of Standing By GMAC, That Had Nothing To Do With Corla Jackson and Her Mortgage With Option One Mortgage Corporation Under Loan Number 651003367-Servicing Number 001347464-8. 

    The Notary Didn’t Have Satisfaction Evidence Of A Mortgage Contract Agreement Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation Under Loan Number (0835002124) To Transfer Over To GMAC Mortgage LLC (June 19. 2008) On A Loan GMAC Created Themselves In (2005) In Corla Jackson Name Under Her Property and Credit Without Lack Of Standing.  GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Didn’t Have A Trustee’s Deed Of Sale-Release Of Mortgage-Cancellation Of Mortgage Recorded With The SEC or Federal Reserve On A New Loan In Corla Jackson Name Under Her Credit and Property Under Loan Number (0835002124) In 2005.

     

    The Notary Didn’t Have Satisfaction Evidence As Required By Notary Laws-Governed Laws: to establish the identity of the principal, subscribing witness or credible witness. This is because the identity of the principal must be established by the oath of the subscribing witness who personally knows the principal.   The identity of the subscribing witness must be established by the notary public’s personal knowledge of the subscribing witness or the oath of a credible witness who is known personally by the notary public and who personally knows the subscribing witness.

     

     

     

     

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording: MAJORITY OF THE ASSIGNMENTS FROM CALIFORNIA AND IN CALIFORNIA BY OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION EMPLOYEE'S AND LAW FIRMS IS FRAUD-THEY ARE NOT VALID BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED NOTARY LAWS!

    THE NOTARY COULD NOT PRE-NOTARIZED AN TRANSFER OF A DEED BY AN ASSIGNMENTS MORTGAGE PRIOR TO OBTAINING A TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALES OR A RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF THE VICTIMS MORTGAGE BEING RECORDED.

    THE LAW FIRMS ROBO-SIGNER NOTARY'S AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION SO CALL EMPLOYEE'S AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED COULD NOT TRANSFER MORTGAGES WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL NOTE-MORTGAGES BEING RELEASE-CANCELLED AND TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE, BY THE NEW NOTARY RULES, GOVERNED AND MORE PRIOR TO AND AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008, TO DATE. 

     

    THE NOTARY COULD NOT APPLY HIS OR HER NOTARY STAMP TO ANY LEGAL DOCUMENT PRIOR TO THE TRUSTEE'S SALE OF PROPERTY, RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF MORTGAGE BEING ALREADY RECORDED" ITS GOVERNED LAW AND NOTARY LAW PERIOD!  THEY HAD TO HAVE PROPER AND LEGAL DOCUMENTS TO NOTARIZED A DOCUMENT AND THE NOTARY DIDN'T HAVE IT AND ITS CRYSTAL CLEAR.  THEY WERE USING NOTARY NOTARIZED ASSIGNMENT BASED UPON FRAUD TO TRANSFER NOTES AND FORECLOSE ON PROPERTY TO GET FORECLOSURE  DEEDS AROUND THE SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE AND MORE" WHICH IS NOT VALID BY THE RULE OF ANY LAW IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  TO DATE THEY CONTINUE ROBBING VICTIMS ILLEGALLY" WHICH WAS COVERED UP AND IS NOT BEING UNCOVERED AND MORE GUARANTEED.... 

     

     

    PROOF OF EXECUTION BY A SUBSCRIBING WITNESS

    If a person, called the principal, has signed a document, but does not personally appear before a notary public, another individual can appear on that principal’s behalf to prove the execution by the principal. That person is called a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195)

    NOTE: A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b))

    The requirements for proof of execution by a subscribing witness are as follows:

    • The subscribing witness must prove that the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party is the person described in it, and that such person executed it, and that the witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness (Civil Code section 1197); and

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she either saw the principal sign the document or in the presence of the principal heard the principal acknowledge that he or she signed the document (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION 15

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she was requested by the principal to sign the document as a witness and that he or she did so (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

    • The notary public must identify the subscribing witness based on personal knowledge or the identity of the subscribing witness must be proven to the notary public by the oath of a third person (credible witness) who personally knows the subscribing witness. The credible witness must be personally known by the notary public (Civil Code sections 1195, 1196); and

    • The subscribing witness must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(C)) In addition, if the identity of the subscribing witness was established by a credible witness, then the credible witness also must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(D))

    NOTE: Paper identification cannot be used to establish the identity of the principal, subscribing witness or credible witness. This is because the identity of the principal must be established by the oath of the subscribing witness who personally knows the principal.

    The identity of the subscribing witness must be established by the notary public’s personal knowledge of the subscribing witness or the oath of a credible witness who is known personally by the notary public and who personally knows the subscribing witness.

     

    The following scenario provides an example of how proof by a subscribing witness may be used:

    The principal, Wayne, needs to have his signature on a document notarized. Wayne is in the hospital and, therefore, cannot appear before Sally, the Notary Public, in order to get his signature notarized. Brian, a longtime friend of Wayne, is at the hospital visiting Wayne. Wayne asks Brian to sign the document as a Subscribing Witness and Brian does so. Wayne could have either signed the document in Brian’s presence or have signed it prior to Brian’s arrival. If the document was signed prior to Brian’s arrival, Wayne would need to acknowledge to Brian that he, Wayne, had signed the document. Wayne gives the document to Brian to take to Sally, who personally knows Brian. Sally places Brian under oath. Under oath, Brian swears or affirms that he personally knows Wayne, he saw Wayne sign the document (or heard Wayne acknowledge signing the document), Wayne requested that he, Brian, sign as a witness and he, Brian, did so. Brian signs Sally’s notary public journal as the subscribing witness. Sally completes the Proof of Execution Certificate and attaches it to the document. She then completes her notary public journal entry. (Sally must identify Brian through personal knowledge. No paper identification is permitted.) Brian takes the document back to Wayne. 

     

     

    Shown below is a suggested format for proof of execution by a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195) Other formats with similar wording may also be acceptable.

     

    16 GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

    SIGNATURE BY MARK

    When the signer of an instrument cannot write (sign) his or her name, that person may sign the document by mark. (Civil Code section 14) The requirements for notarizing a signature by mark are as follows:

    • The person signing the document by mark must be identified by the notary public by satisfactory evidence. (Civil Code section 1185)

    • The signer’s mark must be witnessed by two persons who must subscribe their own names as witnesses on the document. One witness should write the person’s name next to the person’s mark and then the witness should sign his or her name as a witness. The witnesses are only verifying that they witnessed the individual make his or her mark on the document.

    A notary public is not required to identify the two persons who witnessed the signing by mark or to have the two witnesses sign the notary public’s journal. Exception: If the witnesses were acting in the capacity of credible witnesses in establishing the identity of the person signing by mark, then the witnesses’ signatures must be entered in the notary public’s journal.

    • The signer by mark must include his or her mark in the notary public journal. To qualify as a signature, the making of the mark in the notary public journal, must be witnessed by an individual who must write the person’s name next to the mark and then sign his or her own name as a witness.

     

    Following is an example of a document executed by Signature by Mark:

    State of California } ss.

    County of _____________

    On __________ (date), before me, the undersigned, a notary public for the state,

    personally appeared _________________ (subscribing witness’s name), personally

    known to me (or proved to me on the oath of _________________ [credible witness’s

    name], who is personally known to me) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the

    within instrument, as a witness thereto, who, being by me duly sworn, deposed and said

    that he/she was present and saw/heard _________________ (name[s] of principal[s]),

    the same person(s) described in and whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within and

    annexed instrument in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) as (a) party (ies) thereto,

    execute or acknowledge executing the same, and that said affiant subscribed his/her name

    to the within instrument as a witness at the request of _________________ (name[s] of

    principal[s]).

     

    WITNESS my hand and official seal.

    NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL

     

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is

    impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally

    opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

    neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

    defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

    officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

    adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

    between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

    attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

    Sirote & Permutt P.C. Alabama Firm” its lawyers, initially robbed the Federal Reserve, Option One Mortgage Corporation Pools Of Mortgages Trust

    and Corla Jackson in (2005) around the SEC, Federal Reserve, Wall Street Investors Trust multiple ways on insured covered losses, mortgage

    payments, insurance policies and more from loan number 651003367-servicing number 001347464-8 without the (Release-Cancellation of the

    Mortgage-Note) between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation” prior to GMAC-Ally Financial-GMAC Mortgage Corporation-

    Residential Capital Corporation-Residential Capital LLC-GMAC Mortgage LLC, creating its illegal mortgage-note under their loan number

    (0835002124) in (2005).  Sirote & Permutt P.C., GMAC-Ally Financial-GMAC Mortgage Corporation-Residential Capital Corporation-Residential

    Capital LLC-GMAC Mortgage LLC, didn’t have a recorded Trustee’s Deed Of Sale Of Mortgage or a Valid Assignment of Mortgage from Option

    One Mortgage Corporation Trustee’s recorded through the SEC and Federal Reserve in (2005) prior to creating their loan (0835002124) without a

    mortgage contract agreement a recorded deed between Corla Jackson and GMAC AKA GMAC Mortgage Corporation in (2005)” this is a big RED

    FLAG that cannot be ignored or denied this is recorded facts! 

     

    This Crime Is Dated Back To AHM-Deutsche Bank-Wilbur Ross & Company, Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Residential

    Capital Corporation aka Residential Capital LLC, GMAC Mortgage LLC, whom was the Servicer's for AHM-Deutsche Bank-Wilbur Ross &

    Company' they used Residential Capital Corporation aka Residential Capital LLC, GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC as their

    Servicer's they are linked to OWEN, Altisource, HLSS, Homeward-AHM-Deutsche Bank.  Their Law Firms Are (Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley

    Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster, Johnson & Freedman Law Firm, RCO P.C. Law Firm, and Prince, McKean, McKenna & Broughton,

    L.L.C.   THIS IS SECURITIES FRAUD THEY UP THE PRICE OF THE STOLEN HOMES FOR CREDITS TO PURCHASE MORE SERVICING POOLS OF MORTGAGES-PLATFORMS AND THEY DIDN'T PAY THE VICTIMS AND MORE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES.  HARP FUNDS DIDN'T BENEFIT VICTIMS' THEY DID THE OPPOSITE WITH THE FUNDS ON INVESTMENTS AND MORE WITH THEIR AFFILIATE COMPANY'S-CONFLICTS.  THIS IS FACTS" CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR $406,886.59 ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION FOR $240.000.00  UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS DONE UNDER GOVERNED AND STATE LAW.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. VIOLATED GOVERNED AND STATE LAWS TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HERE.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA IS TRYING TO KEEP COVERED UP AND MORE, THIS CAN'T BE DENIED BECAUSE ITS RECORDED FACTS ON WHAT THEY DID AND HOW THE DID IT AND MORE TO DATE.

     

    HOW VICTIMS GOT ROBBED AGAIN WAS" BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS THE CROOKED LAW FIRMS WHOM WAS OVER MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE REVIEWS THAT WENT UNREPORTED, UNDER JUDE MARTIN GLENN IN RESCAP BANKRUPTCY.

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS CONTINUED TO STEAL MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGEES BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS THROUGH THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES LINKED TO THEIR FIRMS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO ALL BENEFITED FROM THE MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES MULTIPLE WAYS, THEY COVERED UP WHICH IS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY'S USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE TO DATE.  THEY MADE IT APPEAR AS IF THEY HAD LEGAL-VALID ASSIGNMENTS WITH CORRUPTED JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS THAT IS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS.  THIS IS ONE OF THE WAYS THEY GOT AROUND THE SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, WALL STREET INVESTORS AND MORE BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS" WITHOUT GETTING BUSTED PRIOR TO AND AFTER (2017) TO DATE. 

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED UP AND IS COVERING UP WITH JEFF SESSIONS THAT " OWEN DIDN'T PAY VICTIMS BASED UPON MASSIVE DIRECT INTENTIONAL CIVIL FRAUD AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THEY WENT AROUND THE SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, CFPB, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE AGAIN FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE, THEY  USING CORRUPTED JUDGES LINKED TO BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THE ILLEGAL ORDERS HELP THEM NOT PAY THE FEDS-VICTIMS-WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST-AND MORE TO DATE THEY ARE COVERING UP, PROFITING BIG TIME ROBBING THE FEDS AND VICTIMS UNDER DONALD TRUMP AND JEFF SESSIONS IN (2017)! 

    THEIR INTENT IS TO STEAL THE HOMES AND KEEP THE HARP AND TARP FUNDS THAT NEVER BENEFITED THE VICTIMS AND GOVERNMENT AND MORE.  THE SETTLEMENT FUNDS WAS NOT PAID TO THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT AND ENFORCEMENT ORDERS FROM CFPB AND BANKING REGULATORS, AND MORE THIS IS COVERED UP BIG TIME!  TRUMP AND SESSIONS AFFILIATES IS RAKING IN BILLIONS OF DOLLARS AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGEES MULTIPLE WAYS THEY COVERED UP USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES WITH OWEN-HOMEWARD-AHM-RESCAP-ALLY-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC-OPTION ONE MORTGAGE AKA SAND CANYON CORPORATION THROUGH JEFF SESSIONS AFFILIATES GUARANTEED IN (2017).  THE MORTGAGE THEY STOLE PRIOR TO (2017) IS BEING CARRIED OUT WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS UNDER JEFF SESSIONS AFFILIATES IN ALABAMA, WHO WAS OVER THE INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEWS VICTIMS NEVER RECEIVED BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONSENT ORDERS AND MORE.

     

     

    DONALD TRUMP DOING A GOOD JOB DISTRACTING GOVERNMENT" WHILE HIS AFFILIATES AND SESSIONS AFFILIATES ROB VICTIMS, FEDS, LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES TO DATE AND MORE GUARANTEED!  THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DOING, VICTIMS ARE WATCHING THEM ROB THE FEDS USING THEIR IDENTITY, MORTGAGE PAYMENTS, HOMES, LAND EQUITY, POLICY'S, CREDIT, AND MORE THAT WAS COVERED AND NEVER REPORTED TO JOSEPH SMITH-FEDERAL RESERVE-CFPB OR IF THEY KNEW, THE RUSSIA SPECIAL PROSECUTORS GOT A BIG PROBLEM BECAUSE DEUTSCHE BANK IS INVOLVED, AND MORE STOLEN MORTGAGES INCREASED AND WERE STOLEN WHEN TRUMP STARTED RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT AND MORE. 

    WHAT THEY TRYING TO COVER UP IS JEFF SESSIONS STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS IS LINKED TO DEUTSCHE BANK'S MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGE FRAUD PROFITING RING, THOUGH WILBUR ROSS & COMPANY, AHM, THEY STOLE OPTION ONE MORTGAGE POOL OF LOANS AND THEN THEY PURCHASED THE POOL OF MORTGAGES AFTER DEUTSCHE BANK AND SOME OF ITS FIRMS GOT BUSTED ON MARCH 1, 2006, AND THEY NEVER PAID THE VICTIMS THEY CONTINUED TRYING TO STEAL THE HOMES, Through Their Law Firms Are (Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster, Johnson &

    Freedman Law Firm, RCO P.C. Law Firm, and Prince, McKean, McKenna & Broughton, and More, with illegal Judges Orders Based Upon Fraud.

     

     

     

    THE KEY FOCUS THE FEDS SHOULD BE FOCUSED ON IS DEUTSCHE BANK' THEY WERE THE CLIENTS OF SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND LAWYERS.  DEUTSCHE BANK IS A GERMAN BANK TRUMP PEOPLE WERE GERMAN AND CITIZENS HAS BEEN ROBBED BY THE GERMAN BANK LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES LINKED TO WILBUR ROSS & COMPANY-OWEN - HLSS-ALTISOURCE AND MORE.  WHY DID WILBUR ROSS & COMPANY COVER UP THE CRIME AHM-DEUTSCHE BANK COMMITTED LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN IDENTITIES, VICTIMS CREDIT, PROPERTY, EQUITY, POLICY'S AND MORE. 

    THE VICTIMS WAS ROBBED OF THEIR IDENTITY, CREDIT AND PROPERTY TO CREATE A SECOND LOAN UNDER TO ROB THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE-THAT CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED THIS IS FACTS.  CORLA JACKSON HAS (2) LOANS IN HER NAME THAT DEUTSCHE BANK-AHM-RESCAP-ALLY-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC COVERED UP!

     

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 17

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

    § 8209. Resignation, disqualification or removal of notary; records delivered to clerk; misdemeanor; death; destruction of records (a) If any notary public resigns, is disqualified, removed from office, or allows his or her appointment to expire without obtaining reappointment within 30 days, all notarial records and papers shall be delivered within 30 days to the clerk of the county in which the notary public’s current official oath of office is on file. If the notary public willfully fails or refuses to deliver all notarial records and papers to the county clerk within 30 days, the person is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be personally liable for damages to any person injured by that action or inaction. 

     

    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C., Morrison & Foerster LLC, Johnson & Freedman Law Firm, RCO, and Prince, McKean, McKenna & Broughton, LLC, Their Affiliate Firms, Corrupted Judges, The Lies Is Over! The Assignment Was Fraud and Not Valid By The Rule Of Governed Laws and More Guaranteed. 

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Lies Is Over Guaranteed!

     

    The Federal Reserve Should Have Shut Down OWEN, Its Law Firms and Affiliate Firms, Servicers-More, For Colluding and Fraud Again, Stealing Victims Identities, Credit, Home, Land, Equity, Policy's Insured Covered Losses Through Ally With Fabricated Loans For Illegal Profits and More. 

    What They Did Was" They Expanded AHM-Homeward-OWEN To Create Altisource, HLSS, and Expand Deutsche Bank and More, Because They All Knew Victims Were Being Robbed Under GMAC'S Servicing Illegal Platform Based Upon Fraud, and They Never Paid The Victims Either. 

     

    The Stolen Mortgages and Victims Stolen Identities, Credit And More Illegally Gave OWEN Credits To Purchase Pools Of Mortgages Without Paying Victims and More" that is Based Upon Fraud With Illegal Orders From Corrupted Judges Caused By The Law Firms" Without VALID ASSIGNMENTS AND MORE GUARANTEED. OWEN DIDN'T PAY VICTIMS THEY GOT CREDITS FOR PAYING VICTIMS BASED UPON FRAUD AGAIN, USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES UNDER PRIOR SERVICERS NAMES AND MORE!

     

    The Mortgages Created By GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC With Illegal Orders From Alabama Monopoly Firms Were Fraud' The Loans Were Illegal Based Upon Fraud" That Had Nothing To Do With The Victims Or Their Original Notes. 

    Victims Stolen Identities, Credit, Payments, Policy's Equity, and More Was Stolen.  The Law Firms Abused Their Power To Create New Loans With Their Clients and For Their Clients With The Intent To Rob Victims, The Federal Reserve, Wall Street Investors and More For Illegal Profits, Under Fabricated Notes-Mortgages.  Because Of This" It Expanded AHM-Homeward-OWEN To Create Altisource, HLSS, and Expand Deutsche Bank and More Illegally, Under GMAC'S Servicing Illegal Platform Based Upon Fraud.

     

    The Fraudulent Loans and Victims Stolen Identities, Credit, Home, Land, Policy's Equity, and More Helped HOMEWARD To Provide OWEN The Platform To Get A Credit To Purchase RESCAP Stolen Mortgagees-Platforms and OWEN Didn't Pay! 

    The Law Firms Has An Illegal Operation Going On Stealing Mortgages With The Intent To Rob The Federal Reserve And Mortgages They Covered Up" Based Upon Fraud To Date and More!  OWEN Didn't Pay Victim" This Was Covered Up By Bradley Arant Boult Cummings-More!

     

    This Is What Sirote & Permutt P.C. And Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Covered Up Read More

     

     

    In (2005) Sirote & Permutt P.C. Knew GMAC Mortgage Corporation Didn't Own Corla Jackson Property and They Didn't Have A Valid Assignment Of Mortgage To Collect A Debt On A Mortgage Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation Under This Property That Was Under Loan Number 651003367-Servicing Number 001347464-8 by  Governed or State Laws" This Was Recorded. 

     

     

    There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC Prior To One Bankruptcy Discharge (05-13142) Under Judge Mahoney, and (2) Illegal Bankruptcy Case Releases (10-04820-11-01545) Under Judge Shulman" On Arrears Dated Back To (2006) Without GMAC Mortgage LLC Having Lack Of Standing In (2006) Under Loan Number (0845002124) Which Was Fraud-Illegal. Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments In Bankruptcy (05-13142) In (2006).  In Addition To This" GMAC Didn't Provide The Court's with an Agreement Between Corla Jackson and GMAC or the Trustee's Deed Of Sale Of The Mortgage From Option One Mortgage Corporation To GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1. ASSIGNMENT RECORDED PREPARED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C (3) YEARS LATER-AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008)

    2. THIS IS NOT THE LOAN THAT GO WITH THE MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION DATED (MAY 26, 2004).

    3. FOR THE VALUE RECEIVED SHOWS NO VALUE RECEIVED.

    4. BRIAN MCCONNELL WAS NOT THE PRINCIPAL OF THE COMPANY OR TRUSTEE OVER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION POOLS OF MORTGAGES BACKED BY SECURITIES-THERE WAS NO SUBSCRIBING WITNESS AND MORE AS REQUIRED BY NOTARY LAW TO VALIDATE THE ASSIGNMENT BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED NOTARY LAW!

     

     

     

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGES IS UNDER CALIFORNIA NOTARY GOVERNED LAW!

     

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 17

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

    § 8209. Resignation, disqualification or removal of notary; records delivered to clerk; misdemeanor; death; destruction of records (a) If any notary public resigns, is disqualified, removed from office, or allows his or her appointment to expire without obtaining reappointment within 30 days, all notarial records and papers shall be delivered within 30 days to the clerk of the county in which the notary public’s current official oath of office is on file. If the notary public willfully fails or refuses to deliver all notarial records and papers to the county clerk within 30 days, the person is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be personally liable for damages to any person injured by that action or inaction. 

     

     

    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C., Morrison & Foerster LLC, Johnson & Freedman Law Firm, RCO, and Prince, McKean, McKenna & Broughton, LLC, Their Affiliate Firms, Corrupted Judges, The Lies Is Over! The Assignment Was Fraud and Not Valid By The Rule Of Governed Laws and More Guaranteed. 

     

     

    THE ASSIGNMENT LISTED BELOW DATED (JUNE 19, 2008) WAS NOT VALID, THE EJECTMENT WAS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT'S AND THIS WAS COVERED UP!

     

    BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED LAWS" THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID-THIS IS POSTED AND POINTED OUT SO YOU CAN SEE IT YOURSELF" THE LIES IS OVER GUARANTEED!

     

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 17

     

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

     

    THIS IS ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID-IT WAS NULL VOID AND FRAUD!

     

    (a) If any notary public resigns, is disqualified, removed from office, or allows his or her appointment to expire without obtaining reappointment within 30 days, person is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be personally liable for damages to any person injured by that action or inaction.  (R.A. SALAZAR) DIDN'T TURN HIS NOTARY JOURNAL" WHICH IS REQUIRED UNDER GOVERNED LAWS TO VALIDATE WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME, SIGNATURES AND MORE.  THE LIES IS OVER GUARANTEED. 

     

    PROOF OF EXECUTION BY A SUBSCRIBING WITNESS

    If a person, called the principal, has signed a document, but does not personally appear before a notary public, another individual can appear on that principal’s behalf to prove the execution by the principal. That person is called a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195)

    NOTE: A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b))

    The requirements for proof of execution by a subscribing witness are as follows:

    • The subscribing witness must prove that the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party is the person described in it, and that such person executed it, and that the witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness (Civil Code section 1197); and

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she either saw the principal sign the document or in the presence of the principal heard the principal acknowledge that he or she signed the document (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION 15

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she was requested by the principal to sign the document as a witness and that he or she did so (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

    • The notary public must identify the subscribing witness based on personal knowledge or the identity of the subscribing witness must be proven to the notary public by the oath of a third person (credible witness) who personally knows the subscribing witness. The credible witness must be personally known by the notary public (Civil Code sections 1195, 1196); and

    • The subscribing witness must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(C)) In addition, if the identity of the subscribing witness was established by a credible witness, then the credible witness also must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(D))

    NOTE: Paper identification cannot be used to establish the identity of the principal, subscribing witness or credible witness. This is because the identity of the principal must be established by the oath of the subscribing witness who personally knows the principal.

    The identity of the subscribing witness must be established by the notary public’s personal knowledge of the subscribing witness or the oath of a credible witness who is known personally by the notary public and who personally knows the subscribing witness.

     

    The following scenario provides an example of how proof by a subscribing witness may be used:

    The principal, Wayne, needs to have his signature on a document notarized. Wayne is in the hospital and, therefore, cannot appear before Sally, the Notary Public, in order to get his signature notarized. Brian, a longtime friend of Wayne, is at the hospital visiting Wayne. Wayne asks Brian to sign the document as a Subscribing Witness and Brian does so. Wayne could have either signed the document in Brian’s presence or have signed it prior to Brian’s arrival. If the document was signed prior to Brian’s arrival, Wayne would need to acknowledge to Brian that he, Wayne, had signed the document. Wayne gives the document to Brian to take to Sally, who personally knows Brian. Sally places Brian under oath. Under oath, Brian swears or affirms that he personally knows Wayne, he saw Wayne sign the document (or heard Wayne acknowledge signing the document), Wayne requested that he, Brian, sign as a witness and he, Brian, did so. Brian signs Sally’s notary public journal as the subscribing witness. Sally completes the Proof of Execution Certificate and attaches it to the document. She then completes her notary public journal entry. (Sally must identify Brian through personal knowledge. No paper identification is permitted.) Brian takes the document back to Wayne. 

     

     

    Shown below is a suggested format for proof of execution by a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195) Other formats with similar wording may also be acceptable.

     

    16 GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

    SIGNATURE BY MARK

    When the signer of an instrument cannot write (sign) his or her name, that person may sign the document by mark. (Civil Code section 14) The requirements for notarizing a signature by mark are as follows:

    • The person signing the document by mark must be identified by the notary public by satisfactory evidence. (Civil Code section 1185)

    • The signer’s mark must be witnessed by two persons who must subscribe their own names as witnesses on the document. One witness should write the person’s name next to the person’s mark and then the witness should sign his or her name as a witness. The witnesses are only verifying that they witnessed the individual make his or her mark on the document.

    A notary public is not required to identify the two persons who witnessed the signing by mark or to have the two witnesses sign the notary public’s journal. Exception: If the witnesses were acting in the capacity of credible witnesses in establishing the identity of the person signing by mark, then the witnesses’ signatures must be entered in the notary public’s journal.

    • The signer by mark must include his or her mark in the notary public journal. To qualify as a signature, the making of the mark in the notary public journal, must be witnessed by an individual who must write the person’s name next to the mark and then sign his or her own name as a witness.

     

    Following is an example of a document executed by Signature by Mark:

    State of California } ss.

    County of _____________

    On __________ (date), before me, the undersigned, a notary public for the state,

    personally appeared _________________ (subscribing witness’s name), personally

    known to me (or proved to me on the oath of _________________ [credible witness’s

    name], who is personally known to me) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the

    within instrument, as a witness thereto, who, being by me duly sworn, deposed and said

    that he/she was present and saw/heard _________________ (name[s] of principal[s]),

    the same person(s) described in and whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within and

    annexed instrument in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) as (a) party (ies) thereto,

    execute or acknowledge executing the same, and that said affiant subscribed his/her name

    to the within instrument as a witness at the request of _________________ (name[s] of

    principal[s]).

     

    WITNESS my hand and official seal.

    NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL

     

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is

    impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally

    opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

    neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

    defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

    officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

    adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

    between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

    attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    PAGE 16: GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    IN ADDITION T THE ABOVE" CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED AND FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY BY SIROTE AND PERMUTT P.C.  THEY COMMITTED A ROBBERY AND COVERED IT UP" WITH THE HELP OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, ITS STATE FIRMS-AFFILIATE FIRMS, JUDGES AND LAWYERS WHICH IS ALSO RECORDED SO NO ONE CAN LIE. GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE MORTGAGES THEY STOLE AND FABRICATED FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS" THIS WAS PUBLIC RECORDS AND MORE GUARANTEED

     

    OWEN DIDN'T PAY CORLA JACKSON INSTEAD" THIS CRIME WAS COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA AGAIN THROUGH NOT ONLY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. BUT BY BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, MORRISON & FOERSTER , JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, RCO, PRINCE, MCKENNA & BROUGHTON, LLC, CORRUPTED JUDGES AND MORE GUARANTEED THE LIES IS OVER!

     

    THIS IS RECORDED FACTS" THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID BY ANY RULE OF LAW AND MORE.  

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is

    impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally

    opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114

    neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been

    defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by

    officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for

    adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud

    between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is

    attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter

    jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

    over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

     

     

    ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

    ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

    COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

     

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 17

     

     

     

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

     

    READ MORE GENERAL INFORMATION: PAGE 10

     

    B. Oath of a Single Credible Witness – The identity of the signer can be established by the oath of a single credible witness whom the notary public personally knows. (Civil Code section 1185(b)(1)) The notary public must establish the identity of the credible witness by the presentation of paper identification documents as set forth above. Under oath, the credible witness must swear or affirm that each of the following is true (Civil Code section 1185(b)(1)(A)(i)-(v)):


    1. The individual appearing before the notary public as the signer of the document is the person named in the document;
    2. The credible witness personally knows the signer;
    3. The credible witness reasonably believes that the circumstances of the signer are such that it would be very difficult or impossible for the signer to obtain another form of identification;
    4. The signer does not possess any of the identification documents authorized by law to establish the signer’s identity;
    5. The credible witness does not have a financial interest and is not named in the document signed.

    NOTE: The single credible witness must sign the notary public’s journal or the notary public must indicate in his or her journal the type of identifying document, the identifying number of the document and the date of issuance or expiration of the document presented by the witness to establish the identity of the witness. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(D))

     

    C. Oaths of Two Credible Witnesses – The identity of the signer can be established by the oaths of two credible witnesses whom the notary public does not personally know. (Civil Code section 1185(b)(2)) The notary public first must establish the identities of the two credible witnesses by the presentation of paper identification documents as listed above. Under oath, the credible witnesses must swear or affirm under penalty of perjury to each of the things sworn to or affirmed by a single credible witness, as set forth above. (Civil Code sections 1185(b)(2) and 1185(b)(1)(A)(i)-(v))

    NOTE: The credible witnesses must sign the notary public’s journal and the notary public must indicate in his or her journal the type of identifying documents, the identifying numbers of the documents and the dates of issuance or expiration of the documents presented by the witnesses to establish their identities. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(E))

     

    NOTARY PUBLIC JOURNAL

    A notary public is required to keep one active sequential journal at a time of all acts performed as a notary public. The journal must be kept in a locked and secured area (such as a lock box or locked desk drawer), under the direct and exclusive control of the notary public. The journal shall include the items shown below. (Government Code section 8206(a))

    • Date, time and type of each official act (e.g. acknowledgment, jurat).

    • Character of every instrument sworn to, affirmed, acknowledged or proved before the notary public (e.g. deed of trust).

    • The signature of each person whose signature is being notarized.

    • A statement that the identity of a person making an acknowledgment or taking an oath or affirmation was based on “satisfactory evidence” pursuant to Civil Code section 1185.

     

    If satisfactory evidence was based on:

    1. Paper identification, the journal shall contain the type of identifying document, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document;

    2. A single credible witness personally known to the notary public, the journal shall contain the signature of the credible witness or the type of identifying document, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document establishing the identity of the credible witness; or

    3. Two credible witnesses whose identities are proven upon the presentation of satisfactory evidence, the journal shall contain the signatures of the credible witnesses and the type of identifying document, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document establishing the identity of the credible witnesses.

    • The fee charged for the notarial service.

    • If the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, or deed of trust affecting real property or a power of attorney document, the notary public shall require the party signing the document to place his or her right thumbprint in the journal. If the right thumbprint is not available, then the notary public shall have the party use his or her left thumb, or any available finger and shall so indicate in the journal. If the party signing the document is physically unable to provide a thumb or fingerprint, the notary public shall so indicate in the journal and shall also provide an explanation of that physical condition.

     

    If the sequential journal is stolen, lost, misplaced, destroyed, damaged, or otherwise rendered unusable, the notary public immediately must notify the Secretary of State by certified or registered mail. The notification must include the periods of journal entries, the notary public commission number, the commission expiration date, and, when applicable, a photocopy of the police report that lists the journal. (Government Code section 8206(b))

    A notary public must respond within 15 business days after the receipt of a written request from any member of the public for a copy of a transaction in the notary public journal by supplying either a photostatic copy of a line item from the notary public’s journal or an acknowledgment that no such line item exists. The written request shall include the name of the parties, the type of document, and the month and year in which the document was notarized.

    The cost to provide the requested information must not exceed thirty cents ($0.30) per page. (Government Code sections 8206(c) and 8206.5)

    The sequential journal is the exclusive property of the notary public and shall not be surrendered to an employer upon termination of employment, whether or not the employer paid for the journal, or at any other time. The circumstances in which the notary public must relinquish the journal or permit inspection and copying of journal transactions and the procedures the notary public must follow are specified in Government Code section 8206(d).

    A notary public is guilty of a misdemeanor if the notary public willfully fails to properly maintain the notary public’s journal. (Government Code section 8228.1) Within 30 days from the date the notary public commission is no longer valid, the notary public must deliver all notarial journals, records and papers to the county clerk’s office where the oath is on file. If the notary public willfully fails or refuses to do so, the notary public is guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be personally liable for damages to any person injured by that action or inaction. (Government Code section 8209) Any notarial journals, records and papers delivered to the Secretary of State will be returned to the sender.

     

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST

    A notary public is not prohibited from notarizing for relatives or others, unless doing so would provide a direct financial or beneficial interest to the notary public. With California’s community property law, care should be exercised if notarizing for a spouse or a domestic partner.

    A notary public would have a direct financial or beneficial interest to a transaction in the following situations (Government Code section 8224):

    • If a notary public is named, individually, as a principal to a financial transaction.

    • If a notary public is named, individually, as any of the following to a real property transaction: beneficiary, grantor, grantee, mortgagor, mortgagee, trustor, trustee, vendor, vendee, lessor, or lessee.

    A notary public does not have a direct financial or beneficial interest in a transaction if a notary public is acting in the capacity of an agent, employee, insurer, attorney, escrow, or lender for a person having a direct financial or beneficial interest in the transaction.

    If in doubt as to whether or not to notarize, the notary public should seek the advice of an attorney.

     

     

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The form most frequently completed by the notary public is the certificate of acknowledgment.

    The certificate of acknowledgment must be in the form set forth in Civil Code section 1189.

    In the certificate of acknowledgment, the notary public certifies:

    • That the signer personally appeared before the notary public on the date indicated in the county indicated.

    • To the identity of the signer.

    • That the signer acknowledged executing the document.

     

     

     

    The notary public sequential journal must contain a statement that the identity of a person making the acknowledgment or taking the oath or affirmation was based on satisfactory evidence. If identity was established based on the oath of a credible witness personally known to the notary public, then the journal must contain the signature of the credible witness or the type of identifying document used to establish the witness’ identity, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document. If the identity of the person making the acknowledgment or taking the oath or affirmation was established by the oaths or affirmations of two credible witnesses whose identities are proven to the notary public upon the presentation of satisfactory evidence, then the journal must contain the signatures of the credible witnesses and the type of identifying documents, the identifying numbers of the documents and the dates of issuance or expiration of the documents presented by the witnesses to establish their identities.

    The certificate of acknowledgment must be filled completely out at the time the notary public’s signature and seal are affixed. The certificate of acknowledgment is executed under penalty of perjury. (Civil Code section 1189(a)(1))

    The completion of a certificate of acknowledgment that contains statements that the notary public knows to be false not only may cause the notary public to be liable for civil penalties and administrative action, but is also a criminal offense. The notary public who willfully states as true any material fact known to be false is subject to a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000. (Civil Code section 1189(a)(2))

    A notary public may complete a certificate of acknowledgment required in another state or jurisdiction of the United States on documents to be filed in that other state or jurisdiction, provided the form does not require the notary public to determine or certify that the signer holds a particular representative capacity or to make other determinations and certifications not allowed by California law.

     

    Any certificate of acknowledgment taken within this state shall be in the following form: State of California }

    County of _________

    On __________ before me, (here insert name and title of the officer), personally

    appeared

    ______________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________ ,

    who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

     

    I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

     

    WITNESS my hand and official seal.

    NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL

     

    NOTE: Key wording of an acknowledgment is “personally appeared.” An acknowledgment cannot be affixed to a document mailed or otherwise delivered to a notary public whereby the signer did not personally appear before the notary public, even if the signer is known by the notary public. Also, a notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

     

    JURAT

    The second form most frequently completed by a notary public is the jurat. (Government Code section 8202) The jurat is identified by the wording “Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed)” contained in the form. In the jurat, the notary public certifies:

    • That the signer personally appeared before the notary public on the date indicated and in the county indicated.

    • That the signer signed the document in the presence of the notary public.

    • That the notary public administered the oath or affirmation.

    • To the identity of the signer.

     

    Any jurat taken within this state shall be in the following form:

     

    State of California

    County of ________________

    Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this _____ day of _______, 20__,

    by _______________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.

     

    NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL

    NOTE: Key wording of a jurat is “subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me.” A jurat cannot be affixed to a document mailed or otherwise delivered to a notary public whereby the signer did not personally appear, take an oath, and sign in the presence of the notary public, even if the signer is known by the notary public. Also, a notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

    There is no prescribed wording for the oath, but an acceptable oath would be “Do you swear or affirm that the statements in this document are true?” When administering the oath, the signer and notary public traditionally each raise their right hand but this is not a legal requirement.

     

     

    PROOF OF EXECUTION BY A SUBSCRIBING WITNESS

    If a person, called the principal, has signed a document, but does not personally appear before a notary public, another individual can appear on that principal’s behalf to prove the execution by the principal. That person is called a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195)

    NOTE: A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b))

    The requirements for proof of execution by a subscribing witness are as follows:

    • The subscribing witness must prove that the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party is the person described in it, and that such person executed it, and that the witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness (Civil Code section 1197); and

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she either saw the principal sign the document or in the presence of the principal heard the principal acknowledge that he or she signed the document (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

     

     

    PROOF OF EXECUTION BY A SUBSCRIBING WITNESS

     

    If a person, called the principal, has signed a document, but does not personally appear before a notary public, another individual can appear on that principal’s behalf to prove the execution by the principal. That person is called a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195)

     

    NOTE: A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b))

     

    The requirements for proof of execution by a subscribing witness are as follows:

     

    • The subscribing witness must prove that the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party is the person described in it, and that such person executed it, and that the witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness (Civil Code section 1197); and

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she either saw the principal sign the document or in the presence of the principal heard the principal acknowledge that he or she signed the document (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION  PAGE 15

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she was requested by the principal to sign the document as a witness and that he or she did so (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

    • The notary public must identify the subscribing witness based on personal knowledge or the identity of the subscribing witness must be proven to the notary public by the oath of a third person (credible witness) who personally knows the subscribing witness. The credible witness must be personally known by the notary public (Civil Code sections 1195, 1196); and

    • The subscribing witness must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(C)) In addition, if the identity of the subscribing witness was established by a credible witness, then the credible witness also must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(D))

     

    NOTE: Paper identification cannot be used to establish the identity of the principal, subscribing witness or credible witness. This is because the identity of the principal must be established by the oath of the subscribing witness who personally knows the principal.

    The identity of the subscribing witness must be established by the notary public’s personal knowledge of the subscribing witness or the oath of a credible witness who is known personally by the notary public and who personally knows the subscribing witness.

     

     

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION 15

     

    • The subscribing witness must say, under oath, that he or she was requested by the principal to sign the document as a witness and that he or she did so (Code of Civil Procedure section 1935, Civil Code section 1195); and

    • The notary public must identify the subscribing witness based on personal knowledge or the identity of the subscribing witness must be proven to the notary public by the oath of a third person (credible witness) who personally knows the subscribing witness. The credible witness must be personally known by the notary public (Civil Code sections 1195, 1196); and

    • The subscribing witness must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(C)) In addition, if the identity of the subscribing witness was established by a credible witness, then the credible witness also must sign the notary public’s official journal. (Government Code section 8206(a)(2)(D))

     

    NOTE: Paper identification cannot be used to establish the identity of the principal, subscribing witness or credible witness. This is because the identity of the principal must be established by the oath of the subscribing witness who personally knows the principal.

    The identity of the subscribing witness must be established by the notary public’s personal knowledge of the subscribing witness or the oath of a credible witness who is known personally by the notary public and who personally knows the subscribing witness.

     

    The following scenario provides an example of how proof by a subscribing witness may be used: The principal, Wayne, needs to have his signature on a document notarized. Wayne is in the hospital and, therefore, cannot appear before Sally, the Notary Public, in order to get his signature notarized.  Brian, a longtime friend of Wayne, is at the hospital visiting Wayne.

    Wayne asks Brian to sign the document as a Subscribing Witness and Brian does so. Wayne could have either signed the document in Brian’s presence or have signed it prior to Brian’s arrival. If the document was signed prior to Brian’s arrival, Wayne would need to acknowledge to Brian that he, Wayne, had signed the document.  Wayne gives the document to Brian to take to Sally, who personally knows Brian. 

    Sally places Brian under oath. Under oath, Brian swears or affirms that he personally knows Wayne, he saw Wayne sign the document (or heard Wayne acknowledge signing the document), Wayne requested that he, Brian, sign as a witness and he, Brian, did so. Brian signs Sally’s notary public journal as the subscribing witness.  Sally completes the Proof of Execution Certificate and attaches it to the document. She then completes her notary public journal entry. (Sally must identify Brian through personal knowledge. No paper identification is permitted.) Brian takes the document back to Wayne. Shown below is a suggested format for proof of execution by a subscribing witness. (Civil Code section 1195) Other formats with similar wording may also be acceptable.

     

    16  GENERAL INFORMATION

    NOTE: It is not acceptable to affix a notary public seal and signature to a document without the notarial wording.

     

    SIGNATURE BY MARK

    When the signer of an instrument cannot write (sign) his or her name, that person may sign the document by mark. (Civil Code section 14) The requirements for notarizing a signature by mark are as follows:

    • The person signing the document by mark must be identified by the notary public by satisfactory evidence. (Civil Code section 1185)

    • The signer’s mark must be witnessed by two persons who must subscribe their own names as witnesses on the document. One witness should write the person’s name next to the person’s mark and then the witness should sign his or her name as a witness. The witnesses are only verifying that they witnessed the individual make his or her mark on the document.

    A notary public is not required to identify the two persons who witnessed the signing by mark or to have the two witnesses sign the notary public’s journal. Exception: If the witnesses were acting in the capacity of credible witnesses in establishing the identity of the person signing by mark, then the witnesses’ signatures must be entered in the notary public’s journal.

    • The signer by mark must include his or her mark in the notary public journal. To qualify as a signature, the making of the mark in the notary public journal, must be witnessed by an individual who must write the person’s name next to the mark and then sign his or her own name as a witness.

    Following is an example of a document executed by Signature by Mark:

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION 17

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

     

     

    Sirote & Permutt P.C. Didn't Have A Valid Assignment Of Mortgage Applicable By Law Under Governed Laws Or A Sale Of Mortgage From Option One Mortgage Corporation To GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC, Prior To Option One Mortgage Closing (April 30, 2008) Recorded With The SEC, Federal Reserve, Option One Mortgage Pool Of Mortgages-Trust's.  Recorded Deeds, Assignment Of Mortgages, Payments Of Mortgages and Sale Of Mortgages Are Recorded With The SEC Under Mortgage Loan Numbers and More, Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied" This Is Recorded Facts.  In Addition To This" There Are Consumer Laws Which Are Monitored By (CFPB) On Servicers Collecting A Debt, Which Has Was Violated By Sirote & Permutt P.C. Under The Name GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC

    WAS NOT OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION SERVICER DATED AS FAR BACK AS 3/13/2002

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS OWNED BY H&R BLOCK

     

     

    11/8/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-5, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... – e22764_424b5   240
    10/4/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – e22553_424b5   243
    7/14/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Definitive Materials – file001   HTML
    5/3/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d328276   242
    1/12/05     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – b403648_424b5   239
    1/11/05     424B5         1  / 1   424B5   ... Supplement – b403648_424b5   239
    10/5/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d267762   213
    4/12/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Acceptance Loan Trust 2004-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d222686   213
    1/21/04     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d201380   205
    10/16/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accep Corp Asset Backed Cert Ser 2003-6 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d178424   209
    7/23/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Asset Back Certs Ser 2003 5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d159369   206
    6/13/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Asset Back Certs Ser 2003-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d149222   202
    4/18/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accep Corp Ast Back Certs Ser 2003-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d136512   207
    3/14/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Acceptance Corp Asset Back Cert Ser 2003 2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d127726   201
    1/15/03     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accept Corp Asset Backed Certs Ser 2003 1 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corp – d116286   204
    10/29/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accept Corp Asset-Backed Cert Se 2002-6 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d99666   201
    7/30/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Tr Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-5 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d80413   199
    6/7/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Accept Corp Asset Backed Cer Ser 2002-4 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d70482   250
    4/25/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mort Accept Corp Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-3 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d59914   202
    3/13/02     424B5  [ re:  Option One Mortgage Loan Tr Asset Backed Cert Ser 2002-2 ]     1  / 1   424B5   Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation – d50504   184


     

     

    Corla Reeves Jackson Says Her Only Mistake Was Giving The State Of Alabama An Opportunity To Come Clean And Pay For All The Damages They Caused To Date And To Stop Robbing The Federal Reserve Wrongful Foreclosure Victims Wall Street Investors Trust And More Prior To And After The New Governed Laws Went Into Affect, Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  I Gave Them (12) Years To Fix The Problem Through The Judicial System.  Its High Time Now The SEC Take Over From Here" Don't You Agree!

    According To Governed Laws' A Servicer Can Only Collect A Debt If They Own The Note Or Have A Valid Assignment Of A Mortgage Applicable By Law-By The Rule Of Law" Based Upon The Following Terms And Conditions Of The Mortgage Contract Agreement Between The Wrongful Foreclosure Victims and Its Lender" With Funds Being Applied To The Original Note And Option One Mortgage Pool Of Mortgages-Trust. 

    In (2005) Sirote & Permutt P.C. Didn't Have A Valid Assignment Of Mortgage To Collect A Debt or A Release-Cancellation Of Mortgage Under The Original Note Under Corla Jackson Property On A Mortgage That Was (Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation) Under (Loan Number 651003367-Servicing Number 001347464-8), This Was Recorded. 

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind On Her Mortgage Payments Under Her Property and Original Note" Neither Did Option One Mortgage Corporation File Delinquent Payments-Arrears, An Assignment Of Mortgage, Release Of Mortgage, Cancellation Of Mortgage, or Sale Of Mortgage, Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Under (Loan Number 651003367-Servicing Number 001347464-8) Under The Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).  Option One Mortgage Corporation Never Filed A Proof Of Claim In Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Stating Corla Jackson Violated The Terms And Conditions Of Her Mortgage-Original Note, Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation.

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED A FEDERAL CRIME.  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION NEVER RECORDED EITHER ASSIGNMENT OR THE SALE OF CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY TO GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC OR ANY OF THE PAYMENTS TO HER LOAN UNDER THE ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORE GUARANTEE.  THIS IS REQUIRED UNDER SECURITIES LAWS AND MORE" WHICH HAS TO BE INVESTIGATED THE APPRAISALS AND ALL THE POLICY'S CORLA JACKSON PAID FOR THAT PROTECTED AND SECURED HER NOTE ON THE LAND AND THE HOME.  IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR THE LAND AND THE HOME WERE BOTH STOLEN SLANDERED AND CLOUDED WILLFULLY BY" THE STATE OF ALABAMA'S JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS. 

    THE ILLEGAL ORDERS ARE ALL BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURTS' WHICH CORRUPTED CORLA JACKSON CLAIMS AND COMPLAINTS PREVENTING HER FROM THE PROCEEDS AND FUNDS DUE TO HER FROM ALL HER POLICY'S TO DATE. 

     

    THE POLICY'S WERE PAID TO SECURE CORLA JACKSON AND THE NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION" THAT WAS NOT HONORED BY THE COMPANY'S IN ALABAMA KNOWING CORLA JACKSON WAS BEING ROBBED AND THE HOME WAS BEING STOLEN.  ALL THE POLICY'S WERE SUPPOSE TO KICK IN AND BE PAID TO CORLA JACKSON AND HER MORTGAGE BACKED BY SECURITY'S UNDER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TRUST" WHICH WAS NOT PAID AND RECORDED WITH THE SEC AS REQUIRED UNDER SECURITIES LAWS.  CORLA JACKSON WAS SOLD POLICY PRIOR THE CLOSE OF ESCROW TO PROTECT HER, AND HER NOTE, LAND AND HOME WHICH WAS NOT PAID BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ALL THE POLICIES TO DATE AND RECORDED BY THE RULES OF LAW UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT-LAWS UNDER THE UNDER THE ORIGINAL NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION-OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TRUST TO DATE.  IT IS REQUIRED THAT EVERYTHING IS RECORDED THROUGH THE SEC AND IT WAS NOT PERIOD-AT ALL! 

     

     

    SELLING INSURANCE POLICY'S AND NOT HONORING THEM IS A FEDERAL CRIME AS WELL FAKE POLICY JACKETS.  VIOLATING SECURITIES LAWS REGARDLESS WHEN IT HAPPENED IS A FEDERAL CRIME AND MORE GUARANTEED!

     

    THE THEFT OF THE HOME AND LAND WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS WERE NEVER REPORTED TO THE SEC NEITHER WAS THE ASSIGNMENTS OR THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY TO GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC.  THIS WAS COVERED UP AND MORE.  EVERYTHING IS REPORTED AND RECORDED THROUGH THE SEC AND SOME OF THE CROOKS DIDN'T KNOW CORLA JACKSON KNEW THIS-WELL SHE DID-NOW THE SEC AND GET BUSY BECAUSE THIS WAS A STOLEN MORTGAGE LINKED TO MULTIPLE INSURED COVERED LOSSES AND MORE, POLICY'S WERE PAID FOR THAT WERE NOT HONORED WHICH NEED TO BE EXAMINED WITH OR WITHOUT THE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS-BECAUSE BOTH ASSIGNMENTS IS FRAUD AND WAS NOT RECORDED WITH THE SEC-MORE BY SECURITIES LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS ON A MORTGAGE THAT WAS BACKED BY SECURITIES DATED BACK TO (2005-2017). 

     

    THE BANK WIRE FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY WASN'T EVEN RECORDED AFTER SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. STATE GMAC OWNED THE PROPERTY USING THE LOAN DOCUMENTS BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION.  IN ADDITION TO THIS" THERE WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC PRIOR TO THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE AND RELIEF BY JUDGE SHULMAN ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) WITHOUT GMAC HAVING LACK OF STANDING IN (2006).  CLEARLY THE STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS AND LAWYERS COVERED UP SOMETHING THAT IS REAL BAD THAT HAS TO BE UNCOVERED NOW THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY FILED AND MORE !

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

     

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-

    matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order

    is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA

    ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR

    AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP

    FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     


     

    Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

     

     

     

    Corla Jackson Home Was Never Completed Inside To Date"  Its Still Gutted Out And Never Passed Inspection To Date Guaranteed.  Corla Jackson Purchased Multiple Policy's That Secured Her Land and Home And She Has Been Robbed On Insured Covered Losses Around The SEC and Federal Reserve and More.  At This Point" Its Up To The FEDS-SEC-FDIC To See What is Really Going On Here In Alabama That Has Been Covered Up Since (2005) On A Crime Caused By The State Of Alabama Law Firms Lawyers And Judges Who Illegally Profited From This Crime Multiple Ways" That Is What They Trying To Cover Up. 

     

    Securities Laws, Banking Regulators Laws, Consent Orders Enforcement Orders Governed Laws And More Has Been Violated Here.  Alabama Didn't Pay The Bills Or All The Damages They Caused Here With Those Illegal Orders To Date' Instead They Continued With Illegal Orders To Cover Up The Crime And More Guaranteed.  The Lies Is Over.  Its In The FEDS Hands Now, Clearly Something Happen Here That Was Covered Up By The State Of Alabama.  Its Even Worse Because Policy's Were Sold, and Not Honored Because Of The Illegal Orders Which Caused Corla Jackson Hardship Personal Injury's Further and Massive Damages To Her Home, Loss Of Credit, Loss Of Money, Loss Of Insured Covered Losses And More.

     

     

     

    The State Of Alabama, Its Corrupted Judges, Lawyers and Law Firms and Their Affiliate Firms Willfully Covered All This Up From The SEC-Federal Reserve-FDIC-Linked To Insured Covered Losses and More.  By The Rule Of Governed Laws" Assignments Are Recorded And More Is Recorded Through The SEC. 

     

     

    In This Case" Neither Assignment By Sirote & Permutt P.C. Were Recorded With The SEC" In Addition To This" Neither Was The Sale Of The Mortgage Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation" to GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC.  It Is Crystal Clear All The Complaints, Illegal Orders Assignments and More Has To Be Investigated Because Securities Fraud Occurred Here and More In Violation Of Governed Laws" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied Its Recorded. 

     

    Corla Jackson Policy's Secured and Protected The Property and Her Which Is Way Over (One Million Dollars) And They Were Not Honored Because Of Illegal Alabama Judges Orders Based Upon Fraud And Fraud Upon The Alabama Courts Caused By The State Of Alabama" Its Law Firms and Judges Initially" Because Of This It Lead To Widespread Fraud and Fraud Upon Other Courts.

     

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Paid From The Wrongful Foreclosure Funds Issued To The State Of By OWEN To Help Her And Give Her Relief" This Is A Big Problem Here OWEN Covered Up And More.  This Home Was Backed By Security's Without Passing Inspection Or Being Completed-It Was Filled With Toxic Mold, Caused By Broke Trusses Caused By The Structure Of The Rook From (2) Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina. 

    The Claims On The Policy's Were Never Paid In Full or At All To Corla Jackson To Rebuild The Home Or Bring It Up To High Wind Code Or Back To Its Original Position To Date To The Terms and Conditions Of The Policy Contacts and More Guaranteed.  From The Outside Corla Jackson Home Look Ok Because She Do Keep Her Yard Looking Good When Its Not So Much Rain.  The Swimming Pool In The Back Has Real Live Trees Growing Out Of It" and More. 

    Corla Jackson Home Inside Never Passed Inspection and Neither Did The Roof And Its Structure Until All The Repairs Could Be Completed And Inspected After The Roof And Its Structure Were Structure Was Structural  Damages-Which Had To Be Inspected as Well As Gutted Out From All The Contaminated Rain And Rain Water Debris Trapped Inside The Walls-I Can Go On Telling You More On What They Did" They Committed A White Collar Crime Robbery On Insured Covered Losses Around The SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE TRUST INVESTORS AND MORE AT CORLA JACKSON AND THE FEDS EXPENSE For Illegal Profits Personal Gain And Favor" Which Is A Federal Crime. 

     

    Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Were Already In The Massive Stolen Mortgage Business Robbing The FEDS, Victims, Wall Street Investors and More" Prior To Robbing Corla Jackson Using Deceptive Practices Around The SEC and More.  When They Robbed Corla Jackson It Didn't Go The Way They Thought It Was Going To Go" They Got Busted! Then They Kept Going Back Under Corrupted Judges For Illegal Orders With Altered And Fabricated Documents To Keep The Crime Covered UP-They Got The Money-Home and More And Paid GMAC Mortgage LLC for Using Their Name-Because They Both Profited-Benefited From This Crime- GMAC Was Told But They Ignored It-Matters Got Worse-Now They All Are Busted And More Guaranteed! 

    Corla Jackson Was Injured Because Of What Occurred Here" The Home Caught Fire, and Toxic Mold Set In And The Home Is Still Gutted Out In (2) Rooms and More.  The Home Was Never Completed-Rebuilt or Restored Back To Its Original Position To Date-It Could Not Pass Inspection-Corla Jackson Was Robbed For Illegal Profits, Personal Gain And Favor.  They Profiting Of Massive Stolen Homes With Deutsche Bank, Banks and Servicers Illegally Multiple Ways" Around The SEC-Federal Reserve.   They All Knew What They Were Doing Guaranteed.  The Lies Is Over! 

     

     

    They Violated The Mortgage Contract Agreement Between Corla Jackson And Option One Mortgage Corporation-Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments On Her Mortgage When She Was Robbed" They Illegally Switched Out Notes Stealing Funds That Was Paid To Go Under The Original Note, They Demolished Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Alabama Courts Guaranteed!  They Committed Securities Fraud-To Embezzled Corla Jackson Estate and Land To Her Estates, Payments, Policy's, Credit and More.  There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson And GMAC Mortgage Corporation Aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Recorded By Governed Laws" And The Original Note Was Never Recorded As Being Released or a Cancellation Of The Original Note Prior To Sirote & Permutt P.C. -GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC Fabricated Note, In Corla Jackson Name Under Her Property and Credit Without Lack Of Standing In (2005). 

     

     

    A New Loan Was Placed Under Corla Jackson Name, Credit and Property Without A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC and Without A Mortgage Contract or Leasehold Agreement-What They Hell Is Going On In Alabama-They Got Covered Up For Illegal Profits Around SEC-Federal Reserve-Wall Street Investors and More.  They Have Been Stealing Homes With Illegal Orders From Alabama Judges Linked To The States Firms and Affiliate Firms, Jeff Sessions and Luther Strange.  Usually The Robbery's Got Worse When It Got Near Elections Or When They Needed Money To Invest-More!  Victims Were Not Getting The Funds That Was Being Issued To The State Of Alabama On Settlement Funds Dated Back Prior To Robbing Corla Jackson and More. 

     

    The Alabama Allowed Corla Jackson To Be Robbed By Its Firms and People For Illegal Profits, Personal Gain and Favor, Forcing Corla Jackson Into Hardship So She Couldn't Pay Her Bills, Get Credit, Pay Dr., Fix Home, Get Food Or Nothing.  They Continued To Block And Cause Problems While Their Firms, Lawyers and Judges Carried Out This White Collar Crime Robbery.  The Last Illegal Order Was Issued After Jeff Sessions Took Office" They Said He Was Going To Help Them Cover This Up" and They Issued The Illegal Order In State And District Courts Based Upon Fraud Linked To Jeff Sessions Affiliates and State After He Took Office.  Deutsche Bank Came And Tried To Get In Corla Jackson Home Saying Deutsche Bank Owned The Home Now-With HLSS-Altisource-OWEN.  Something Is Clearly Going On Here" Linked To Money Launderings Homes In Alabama Through Mortgages For Illegal Profits Prior To And After Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump Took Office!

     

     

    Corla Jackson Was Forced To Stop They Robbed Her Of Her Policy's, her Original Note Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, They Robbed Corla Jackson of Her Identity's Her Credit" Payments That Was Never Applied To Her Original Note Recorded Through The SEC and More Guaranteed.  The DAM  Lies Is Over-Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Sirote & Permutt P.C., Morrison & Foerster LLC and Their Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Linked To This Crime Committed Civil Fraud and Carried Out A White Collar Crime Robbery Under Judge York" With An Illegal Order Based Upon Fraud On (02/22/2017) After Jeff Sessions Took Office" He Is Linked To The Judges That Committed This Crime He Covers Up" Guaranteed!

     

     

    Corla Jackson Only Stay There To Protect The Home To Keep Them From Stealing The Home" On Crime The State Of Alabama Covered Up Linked To Insured Covered Losses On Policy's That Wasn't Honored Due To All The Illegal Orders Out Of Alabama Which Lead To Widespread Fraud Into New York Under Judge Martin Glenn And More Guaranteed.  This Is Does Not Value At ($240,000.00) Anymore.  This Is What The State Of Alabama Is Covering Up From The Banking Regulators and The SEC And More Guaranteed.  Someone Got Paid From The Use Of Policy's and This Property and It Was Not The Feds or Corla Jackson Guaranteed. 

     

     

    All The Repairs and Everything Came To A Complete Stop With Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud And Fraud Upon The Alabama Courts" The State Is Liable For Millions Of Dollars In Massive Damages  To Date They Covered Up With Their State Law Firms and Affiliates  Firms Corrupted Judges And More Guaranteed.  The Lies Is Over.  The SEC Will Now Review All The Policy's, Appraisal's Survey's, Medical Bills. Payments History, The Original Note, Notary Laws The Assignment Came From, The People That Did The Notary's, Assignments, The Law Firms Lawyers, Judges, All The Orders And Complaints " Independent Foreclosure  Reviews And More Attached To This Property" To See What The Hell Happened Here That The State Of Alabama Law Firms Judge And OWEN Covered Up!  All This Occurred Based Upon A White Collar Crime Robbery Caused By Alabama Law Firms and Judges Fraud and Fraud Upon Their Courts. 

     

     

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Being In Payments When She Was Robbed" Both Assignments The Alabama Firms And Affiliates Created Were Fraud And They Knew This" and Continued To Keep This Crime Covered Up To Date" From (2005-2017).  In Addition To This" GMAC Didn't Own The Note Or An Valid Assignment When The Judges Issued The Illegal Ejectments Under Judge Johnston, Judge York or Judge Kristi Dubose, These People And The Firms Are Linked To Jeff Sessions And Massive Stolen Mortgage With The Alabama Law Firms That Committed This Crime They All Covered Up And More Guaranteed... OWEN Didn't Pay And This Was Covered Up As Well" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied They Didn't Turn The State Of Alabama, Its Law Firms, Lawyers and Judges In To The DOJ For What They All Covered Up And Did Here From (2005-2017).  Instead OWEN Helped So They Didn't Have To Pay For All The Massive Damages They Caused and Covered Up To Date Guaranteed...The Lies Is Over! 

     

     

     

    The State Of Alabama Owes Corla Jackson Millions Of Dollars In Damages Direct and Indirect.  The State Of Alabama and Its Law Firms and Lawyers That Committed This Committing This Crime From (2005-2017) Didn't Even Pay Corla Jackson Bills After Causing Her Massive Damages" Personal Injury's and More To Date.  The State Of Alabama Illegally Violated Governed Laws and More

     

    The State Of Alabama Willfully Allowed This White Collar Crime To Occur And  Through Their Law Firms Lawyers And Corrupted Judges Illegal Orders' While They Continued To Carry Out The Robbery Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Courts" With The Intent To Keep This Crime Covered Up Under Judges Sessions, Which Has Backfired Guaranteed. 

     

    They Kept Stalking Probing and Harassing Corla Jackson Over Her Assets For Illegal Profits At Her Expense-FEDS Expense-More-For Illegal Profits, Personal Gain and Favor, Which Is A Federal White Collar Crime Robbery-More They Covered Up!

     

     

     

     

    The State Of Alabama Knew What Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, and Sirote & Permutt P.C. Were Doing  For Illegal Profits Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgage Though Corrupted Judges Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon Alabama Courts and More Guaranteed. 

     

    The State Of Alabama, Its Corrupted Judges, Lawyers and Law Firms and Their Affiliate Firms Willfully Covered All This Up From The SEC-Federal Reserve-FDIC-Linked To Insured Covered Losses and More.  By The Rule Of Governed Laws" Assignments Are Recorded And More Is Recorded Through The SEC. 

    In This Case" Neither Assignment By Sirote & Permutt P.C. Were Recorded With The SEC" In Addition To This" Neither Was The Sale Of The Mortgage Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation" to GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC.  It Is Crystal Clear All The Complaints, Illegal Orders Assignments and More Has To Be Investigated Because Securities Fraud Occurred Here and More In Violation Of Governed Laws" Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied Its Recorded. 

     

     

     

    CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR $406,886.59 ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION FOR $240.000.00  UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS DONE UNDER GOVERNED AND STATE LAW.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. VIOLATED GOVERNED AND STATE LAWS TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HERE.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA IS TRYING TO KEEP COVERED UP AND MORE, THIS CAN'T BE DENIED BECAUSE ITS RECORDED FACTS ON WHAT THEY DID AND HOW THE DID IT AND MORE TO DATE.

     

    THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE WAS PRIOR TO TRIAL-NO DUE PROCESS THROUGH THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT UNDER CASE 12-00111 AND MORE-THIS WAS COVERED UP BY ALABAMA JUDGES.  IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT THIS IS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THE STATE OF ALABAMA COVERED UP!  THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS AND MORRISON & FOERSTER ILLEGALLY HAD THE PROOF OF CLAIM IN NEW YORK WAS EXPUNGED PRIOR TO TRIAL-THAT WAS A RED FLAG-CORRUPTION-OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE-DIRECT FRAUD-FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND MORE

     

     

     

    THIS IS FACTS!  OWEN DIDN'T PAY , BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. ALABAMA FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES WILLFULLY COVERED THIS UP" IN ADDITION TO MORRISON AND FOERSTER LAW FIRM, LAWYERS AND WHICH LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD IN NEW YORK UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN AND THEY KNEW THIS GUARANTEED.

    OWEN KNEW ABOUT THIS CRIME" AS WELL AS ALL THE OTHER VICTIMS COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE ALABAMA FIRMS AND ALABAMA JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS AND ACTIVITIES " ON CRIMES THEY WERE ILLEGALLY COMMITTING FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR, LINKED TO BANKS AND SERVICERS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITING SCAM-RING.

     

    STATEMENT OF FACTS!  OWEN HELPED THE ALABAMA FIRMS, JUDGES, LAWYERS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS COVER UP THIS CRIME LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES SO THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY" ALL THEY WANTED TO DO WAS PROFIT FROM THE SCAMS AND MORE MULTIPLE WAYS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES GUARANTEED.  THEY ALL DID THIS AROUND THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE-FDIC-WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST-DOJ-CONGRESS" VIOLATING GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE GUARANTEED!

     

    Corla Jackson Mortgage Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed" and She Didn't Breech The Terms and Conditions Of Her Mortgage Contract Agreement Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation.  The Lies Is Over and More Guaranteed...

     

     

     

     

    GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC

    WAS NOT OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION SERVICER DATED AS FAR BACK AS 3/13/2002

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS OWNED BY H&R BLOCK

     

    Corla Jackson Mortgage Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed" and She Didn't Breech The Terms and Conditions Of Her Mortgage Contract Agreement Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation.  The Lies Is Over and More Guaranteed...

     

     

     

     

     

     

    BREAKING NEWS UPDATE 8.24.2017

     

    I Just Got Update On Sirote & Permutt P.C. Fabricated Assignment Dated June 19, 2008.  Gave The Address Of Option One Mortgage Stating He Worked For Option One Mortgage, Brian D. McConnell Said He Was An Employee Of Option One Mortgage, They Could Not Assign A Mortgage Over To Each Other On An Assignment By The Rule Of Law Conflict Of Interest Laws And More.  In Addition To This R.A. Salazar Didn't Complete The Refresh Classes Required After (January 1, 2008) As Required By Law To Validate His Commission-Servicers" Neither Did He Provide Fingerprints or Anything Including His Background Check With The Department Of Justice (DOJ) After (January 1, 2008). 

    I Already Knew There Were No Journals-Notary Books As Required By Law, The State Issued An Certified Copy Of That To Me To Give To The Courts, Violated By Alabama Judges.  Now With This Update" It Explains Why" R.A. Salazar's Didn't Turn In His Journal-Books His Commission Was No Longer Valid To Notarized Documents Under The New Required Laws and More.  He and Brian D. McConnell Stated They Worked For Option One Mortgage Which Was A Conflict Of Interest Against Notary Rules Laws And Regulations Multiple Ways. 

    R.A. Salazar Last Education Course Was (06/21/2007) His Commission Expired (8/2/2011) Between The New Required Laws Which Also Required Him To Take New Courses Present Fingerprints, a Background Check by through the Department Of Justice and More, which didn't happen.

    The Assignment Notarized By R.A. Salazar Is Not Valid Period.  In Addition To This It Is Null And Void Because Both R.A. Salazar and Brian D. McConnell Both Claimed They Worked For Option One Mortgage Corporation In Writing, Assigning and Notarizing Documents With Each Other Was A Conflict Of Interest, Notary Laws and Governed Laws Were Violated Multiple Ways With No Notary Journal-Notary Book Recorded Or Turned In To Verify And See How Other Governed Notary Laws Were Violated.  In Addition To This" Option One Mortgage Corporation Was Closed and Was No Longer Doing Business Prior To Closing (April 30, 2008) In California. 

    The Secretary State Of California Forwarded Corla Jackson To Their Website To File A Complaint Because It Is Illegal On What Occurred Here That Need To Be Recorded As Well. The Secretary State Found It Very Strange That A Notary Didn't Turn In Their Notary Journal Or Take The Required Education Classes' Which Is Required By California Law And Governed Laws. Corla Jackson Told The Lady" They Not Going Find Those People But She Will File The Complaint And Provide Them A Copy Of The Documents They Notarized Based Upon Fraud, Because Option One Mortgage Was Closed, and No Longer Was Doing Business At That Time In California" But Thank God Corla Jackson Assignment Is Definitely Null and Void By The Rule Of Notary Laws-Governed Laws and More Guaranteed.  The Lies Is Over and More...     

     

     

     

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION HAD ALREADY CLOSED AND WAS NO LONGER DOING BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA PRIOR TO THE (JUNE 19, 2008) ASSIGNMENT PREPARED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., SEE EVIDENCE.

    THE NOTARIZED ASSIGNMENT HERE IS ILLEGAL AND VOID BY GOVERNED LAWS.  THE NOTARY HIMSELF OR HERSELF IS VOID VIOLATING GOVERNED LAWS REQUIRED VALIDATE LEGAL DOCUMENTS AFTER (JANUARY 1, 2008) AND MORE.

    THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOUND IT VERY STRANGE THAT A NOTARY DIDN'T TURN IN HIS JOURNAL AFTER HIS COMMISSION EXPIRED-THIS IS USUALLY A RED FLAG.  DEEDS AND REAL ESTATE AND MORE HAS TO BE RECORDED IN A JOURNAL BY THE RULE OF LAW IN ORDER TO VALIDATE AN ASSIGNMENT AND DEED THAT WAS RECORDED, AND MORE BY THE RULE OF LAW.

    WHAT IS ALSO STRANGE THE MORTGAGE-LOAN NUMBER BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS ILLEGALLY NOTARIZED.  THE NOTARY WAS REQUIRED TO HAVE THE INFORMATION FORM THE ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORE LISTING ITS SPECIFIC DETAIL NOTIFICATION TIME DATE AND LOCATION OF THE NOTARY TRANSACTION AND MORE, IN ORDER TO VALIDATE A SIGNATURE ON WHO DID WHAT AND WHAT WAS NOTARIZED. 

     

    I'M ONLY FILING THE COMPLAINT WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE  AFTER THIS NEW UPDATE" BECAUSE THERE MAY BE OTHER VICTIMS AND I DON'T WANT THEM TO GO THROUGH WHAT I WENT THROUGH.  I KNOW THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS NOT GOING TO FIND THE NOTARY ROBO-SIGNERS OR THE PEOPLE THEY NOTARIZED THE DOCUMENTS FOR ILLEGALLY AND SO DO YOU OR THEY WOULD HAVE TURNED IN THEIR BOOKS AND KEPT UP THEIR COMMISSION AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008

    THIS IS WHY YOU CAN'T GET ANY OF THEM IN COURT AND THAT'S WHY LAW FIRMS BLOCK CASES WITH JUDGES THEY KNOW" WHILE THEY CARRY OUT THEIR WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE AGAIN USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES.  I SEE WHY JOURNAL BOOKS ARE REQUIRED BY GOVERNED LAWS" ITS PART OF THE NOTARY PROCESS THAT VERIFIES THE DOCUMENTS AND WHO SIGNED THEM, FINGERPRINTS, TIME, DATE, LOCATION, RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF ORIGINAL MORTGAGE,  AND MORE BY THE RULE OF LAW.  THE NOTARIZED DOCUMENT IS DONE UNDER GOVERNED LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT VALIDATES A DOCUMENT BY THE JOURNAL AND THE LAWS.  IN THIS CASE THERE WAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST NO JOURNAL AND NOTARY LAWS WERE VIOLATED AND MORE. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    OWEN DIDN'T PAY VICTIMS TO USE THE POOLS OF MORTGAGES THAT WAS STOLEN BY HOMEWARD AHM-OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION CITI-RESCAP-MORE TO GET CREDITS FROM RESCAP PLATFORM MORTGAGES BASED UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CFPB SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS AND MORE THEY HAVE BREECHED! 

     

    OWEN AND AFFILIATES SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO USE VICTIMS STOLEN IDENTITY'S AND ASSETS UNTIL THEY PAID THE VICTIMS IN FULL-TO THE TERMS OF ALL THE ENFORCEMENT AND CONSENT ORDERS TO DATE AND MORE.

     

    OWEN GOT THE CREDITS AND DIDN'T PAY VICTIMS!  THIS IS BEING COVERED UP BY JEFF SESSIONS AND TRUMP AFFILIATES BASED UPON FRAUD-MORE GUARANTEED... I KNOW MAJORITY OF THE ASSIGNMENTS IN CALIFORNIA AND FROM CALIFORNIA UNDER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION AND MORE IS FRAUD ACCORDING TO THE NOTARY RULE OF GOVERNED LAWS GUARANTEED!

     

     

    California Notary Law

     

    Notary Public Journal
    A notary public is required to keep one active sequential journal at a time of all acts performed as a notary public. The journal must be kept in a locked and secured area (such as a lock box or locked desk drawer), under the direct and exclusive control of the notary public. The journal shall include the items shown below. (Government Code section 8206(a))

     

    California Notary Law
    § 8206. Sequential journal; contents; thumbprint; loss of journal; copies of pages; exclusive property of notary public; limitations on surrender
    1.  
      1. A notary public shall keep one active sequential journal at a time, of all official acts performed as a notary public. The journal shall be kept in a locked and secured area, under the direct and exclusive control of the notary. Failure to secure the journal shall be cause for the Secretary of State to take administrative action against the commission held by the notary public pursuant to Section 8214.1.
      2. The journal shall be in addition to and apart from any copies of notarized documents that may be in the possession of the notary public and shall include all of the following:
        1. Date, time, and type of each official act.
        2. Character of every instrument sworn to, affirmed, acknowledged or proved before the notary.
        3. The signature of each person whose signature is being notarized.
        4. A statement as to whether the identity of a person making an acknowledgment or taking an oath or affirmation was based on personal knowledge or satisfactory evidence. If identity was established by satisfactory evidence pursuant to Section 1185 of the Civil Code, then the journal shall contain the signature of the credible witness swearing or affirming to the identity of the individual or the type of identifying document, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document.
        5. If the identity of the person making the acknowledgment or taking the oath or affirmation was established by the oaths or affirmations of two credible witnesses whose identities are proven upon the presentation of satisfactory evidence, the type of identifying documents, the identifying numbers of the documents and the dates of issuance or expiration of the documents presented by the witnesses to establish their identity.
        6. The fee charged for the notarial service.
        7. If the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, or deed of trust affecting real property, the notary public shall require the party signing the document to place his or her right thumbprint in the journal. If the right thumbprint is not available, then the notary shall have the party use his or her left thumb, or any available finger and shall so indicate in the journal. If the party signing the document is physically unable to provide a thumbprint or fingerprint, the notary shall so indicate in the journal and shall also provide an explanation of that physical condition. This paragraph shall not apply to a trustee’s deed resulting from a decree of foreclosure or a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Section 2924 of the Civil Code, nor to a deed of reconveyance.  (The FEDS Owned The Trustee's Deed) The Notary Had To Apply Paragraph (G): Majority Of Assignments Are Null And Void By The Rule Of Governed Notary Law and More Guaranteed.  The Notary Laws Is What Validate An Assignments! See Evidence and More
    2. If a sequential journal of official acts performed by a notary public is stolen, lost, misplaced, destroyed, damaged, or otherwise rendered unusable as a record of notarial acts and information, the notary public shall immediately notify the Secretary of State by certified or registered mail. The notification shall include the period of the journal entries, the notary public commission number, and the expiration date of the commission, and when applicable, a photocopy of any police report that specifies the theft of the sequential journal of official acts.
    3. Upon written request of any member of the public, which request shall include the name of the parties, the type of document, and the month and year in which notarized, the notary shall supply a photostatic copy of the line item representing the requested transaction at a cost of not more than thirty cents ($0.30) per page.
    4. The journal of notarial acts of a notary public is the exclusive property of that notary public, and shall not be surrendered to an employer upon termination of employment, whether or not the employer paid for the journal, or at any other time. The notary public shall not surrender the journal to any other person, except the county clerk, pursuant to Section 8209, or to a peace officer, as defined in Sections 830.1, 830.2, and 830.3 of the Penal Code, acting in his or her official capacity and within his or her authority, in response to a criminal search warrant signed by a magistrate and served upon the notary public by the peace officer. The notary public shall obtain a receipt for the journal, and shall notify the Secretary of State by certified mail within 10 days that the journal was relinquished to a peace officer. The notification shall include the period of the journal entries, the commission number of the notary public, the expiration date of the commission, and a photocopy of the receipt. The notary public shall obtain a new sequential journal. If the journal relinquished to a peace officer is returned to the notary public and a new journal has been obtained, the notary public shall make no new entries in the returned journal. A notary public who is an employee shall permit inspection and copying of journal transactions by a duly designated auditor or agent of the notary public’s employer, provided that the inspection and copying is done in the presence of the notary public and the transactions are directly associated with the business purposes of the employer. The notary public, upon the request of the employer, shall regularly provide copies of all transactions that are directly associated with the business purposes of the employer, but shall not be required to provide copies of any transaction that is unrelated to the employer’s business. Confidentiality and safekeeping of any copies of the journal provided to the employer shall be the responsibility of that employer.
    5. The notary public shall provide the journal for examination and copying in the presence of the notary public upon receipt of a subpoena duces tecum or a court order, and shall certify those copies if requested.

     

     

    In Accordance With Section 2924 b Civil Code, It Was Impossible For The Law Firms and Their Servicing Clients To Have A Notice Of Sale Under The Deed Of Trust Recorded As Any Instrument No. Prior To Creating Their New Loans Under Victims Names, Credit and Property Because The FEDS Owned The Victims Original Notes and Pools Of Mortgages At The Time Victims Were Robbed Nationwide. 

     

    This Is Why The Corrupted Law Firms Illegally Created Assignments Under Property’s For Robo-Signers To Sign So They Could Illegally Foreclosure On Property's Around The FEDS-SEC" With Illegal Orders From Corrupted Judges So They Could Obtain Illegal Foreclosure Deeds" To Carry Out Their White Collar Crimes For Illegal Profits Personal Gain Or Favor.

     

     

    If The Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster, Johnston & Freedman AKA Johnson & Freedman, RCO P.C., Affiliate Firms Lawyers Keith Eady-Ritchie Prince, Clients Legitimately Owned The Property’s They Wouldn’t Have Needed Fraudulent Assignments To Obtain Illegal Orders To Illegally Foreclose On Homes In Alabama and Nationwide To Steal Homes To Get Illegal Foreclosure Deeds" To Rob The FEDERAL RESERVE Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Alabama Courts and Courts Nationwide Again" Around The SEC-Federal Reserve and More To Date... 

     

     

    It Don’t Take A Rocket Scientist To See And Know This-Victims Was Robbed For Illegal Profits In A White Collar Crime Scam By Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions Affiliates They Are Covering Up.  What They Did Was The Created New Loans Without Owning Victims Property's Robbing The FEDS Off Victims Stolen Identity's and Credit, Robbing Them Of Their Original Notes, Equity, and Payments To Place Under Their Fabricated Notes, Switching Out Loans Numbers, Which Is A Big Federal Banking Crime and More.

    Once The Law Firms Carried Out The White Collar Crime Robbery's Through Corrupted Judges They Knew Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Courts"  They Firms Were Able To Produce Illegal Foreclosure Deeds Under The Servicers Names To Flip For Illegal Profits, Personal Gain Or Favor.

    They Were In The Business To Rob The FEDS For More Money Each Time They Ran Out" Under Fabricated Notes And Loans Under Property's Which Was A Profitable Business For Trump and Sessions Affiliates.

    The Worse Part Is Victims Were Robbed And Got Injured, The Crooked Law Firms Conspired With Title Company's To Obtain Fake Title Jackets and More Under Victims Names Which Is Another Whole New Ball GAME-The Title Company's Knew What The Law Firms Were Doing, Some Of Them Were Partners In Crime For Illegal Profits Multiple Ways.

    Victims Original Notes Were Not Released From Pools Of Mortgages When They Were Robbed, That Harmed Them Multiple Ways To Date And They Were Never Paid Guaranteed.

     

     

     

    Without A Release Of The Victims Original Notes-Cancellation Of Mortgages The Foreclosures Could Not Take Placed After The Foreclosures Because The Crooks Didn't Own The Notes Or A Valid Assignment By The Rule Of Governed Laws To Date.

    The Pools Of Mortgages Were Linked To Multiple Trust Not Just One Trust.  It Was Fraud When The Stole Property's That Were Already Backed By Securities Without A Releases and Sales Of The Pools Of Mortgages. 

    The Crimes Occurred First And Servicers Got Money-Illegal Payments-Policy's-Credit-Equity-and More From Victims and Didn't Pay For All The Damages They Caused Them To Date Guaranteed" It Was Covered Up By Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster, Sirote & Permutt P.C., Johnson & Freedman, RCO and Its Affiliate Firms And Lawyers To Date Guaranteed.

     

    The Federal Reserve and Wall Street Investors Has Been Defrauded Again" Big Time.  The Servicers Were Illegally Credited For Paying Victims When Victims Were Never Paid, They Servicers Their Law Firms, Lawyers, Used Corrupted Judges Illegal Orders To Defraud Government Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgages That Was Covered Up By Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud Guaranteed!

     

     

    Servicers Used Victims Money Assets, Credit, Property, Payments That Was Suppose To Got To Their Original Notes and More For Illegal Profits and Investments Using Deceptive Practices Again. 

     

    Trump and Sessions Affiliates Used Victims Money So They Could Profit and Benefit Multiple Ways From The Purchases Of Pools Of Mortgagees That Was Purchased With Victims Money That They Owed Them, To Date.  Trump and Sessions Affiliates Kept The Victims Money And Used It For Investments To Purchase The Pools Of Mortgages They Stole Initially Without Paying, Causing Further and Massive Damages To Date, That They Are Covering Up Guaranteed! 

    The Cases and Complaints That Were Illegally Tied Up Based Upon Fraud From Sessions Affiliates" Prior To Sessions And Trump Taking Office Were Carried Out With Illegal Orders After They Took Office Which Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied, Victims Was Robbed During And Shortly After The Campaign Which Cannot Be Ignored In The Russia Probe-and-TRUMP-SESSIONS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST-MORE!

     

    The Victims and FEDS Were Robbed Again, They Purchased The Pools Of Mortgages And Back Dated Assignments And More So They Didn't Have To Pay" Using Deceptive Practiced. Wilbur Ross And Affiliates  Purchased Conflicts Of Interest Servicing Company's Then Sold To OWEN, Then They OWEN Covered Up Their Crimes So They Didn't Have To Pay The Victims. 

    OWEN Was Funded With Victims Stolen Identity's Money and More. Homewards Loans-Option One Mortgage Corporation Loans and More Was Used As A Credit So OWEN Could Purchase RESCAP-GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, ALLY FINANCIAL AND MORE PLATFORMS" and More For A Reason. 

    Their Intent Is To Avoid Paying Victims Based Upon Fraud And Fraud Upon Courts With Illegal Orders and Independent Foreclosure Reviews That Never Occurred-This Is Covered Up By Jeff Sessions Affiliates and Trump's Affiliates.  Jeff Sessions People Covered Up The Crimes and More! ...... Millions Of Victims Was Not Paid To Date Guaranteed...

     

     

    After Trump and Sessions Took Office They Got Worse Linked To Deutsche Bank, HLSS, Altisource, RESCAP-OWEN-Homeward-Wilbur Ross And Affiliates. 

    Victims Was Not Paid” They Were Robbed Again Using Deceptive Practices By Trump And Sessions Affiliates Guaranteed.  Deutsche Bank-Is Linked To All The Parties Listed Here Multiple Ways Guaranteed.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE OWNED THE TRUSTEE'S DEEDS THEY PURCHASED UP THE MORTGAGES FROM THE ORIGINAL LENDERSSIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. DIDN'T HAVE THE TRUSTEE'S DEEDS TO CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY" SO THEY CREATED ONE WITH A NEW LOAN AND FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT WITHOUT OWNING HER PROPERTY WITH THEIR CLIENT.  ONCE THEY DID THIS" THEY FAKED A FORECLOSURE TO OBTAIN A FORECLOSURE DEED WHICH IS CIVIL DIRECT SECURITIES FRAUD THAT WAS COMMITTED FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES GUARANTEED. 

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS LINKED TO ALABAMA GOVERNMENT AND MORE" THEY WERE ILLEGALLY PROFITING WITH SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND THEIR CLIENTS" COVERING UP THEIR CRIMES THEY WERE COMMITTING AROUND THE SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST, VICTIMS, CFPB, AND MORE.  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS OVER INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEWS AND THEY COMMITTED FRAUD I MEAN MASSIVE FRAUD THAT HAS BEEN COVERED UP LINKED TO MORE MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES TO DATE" THEY COVER UP WITH OWEN AND AFFILIATES-MORE.  DEUTSCHE BANK IS INVOLVED IN THE ILLEGALLY PROFITING SCAMS HEAVY GUARANTEED!  VICTIMS ARE BEING ROBBED DAILY UNDER DONALD TRUMP AND SESSIONS BY THEIR AFFILIATES AND BANKS AND THEY KNOW THIS GUARANTEED!  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM THE SEC, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED BECAUSE IT WAS THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE INVESTIGATION GOING TO VERIFY WHAT IS GOING ON UNDER TRUMP AND SESSIONS, THAT THEY COVERING UP-MORE!

     

    IT WAS CONFIRMED (2/22/2017) JEFF SESSIONS KNEW WHAT THE STATE OF ALABAMA HAD DONE AND WAS DOING PRIOR TO AND AFTER HE TOOK OFFICE LINKED TO DEUTSCHE BANK, OWEN, ALTISOURCE, HLSS AND MORE AROUND FEDERAL GOVERNED LAWS, CFPB, FEDERAL RESERVE, SEC AND MORE ON CASES THAT WERE STALLED UNTIL AFTER TRUMP TOOK OFFICE.  THEY GOT A NEW SCAM GOING ON NOW, THAT CAN LEAD TO THE LARGEST BANK ROBBERY EVER RECORDED IN AMERICAN HISTORY LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGE IF THE FEDS DO NOT WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE NOW.  VICTIMS WERE NOT PAID...

     

    VICTIMS WERE NOT PAID BY OWEN OR THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO OBTAIN EMERGENCY FUNDING AND RELIEF BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONSENT ORDERS FROM PRIOR SERVICERS AND MORE TO DATE GUARANTEED.  IT APPEARS THE PEOPLE GET THE MONEY IS TRUMP TEAM AND SESSIONS AFFILIATES , WHICH TOLD ME IN NEEDED HELP FROM THE FEDS BEFORE THE NEXT MORTGAGE CRISIS TAKE PLACE BECAUSE WHAT THEY DID AROUND THE SEC UNDER OWEN AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA LAW FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS TO ROB VICTIMS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON JUDGES LINKED TO JEFF SESSIONS AND HIS STATE OFFICIALS CANNOT BE IGNORED" IT INVOLVES DEUTSCHE BANKS, OWEN, WILBUR ROSS, ALTISOURCE, HLSS AND MORE GUARANTEED. 

     

    THE CRIMES IS BEING COVERED UP THROUGH ALABAMA FIRMS SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND LAWYERS WHO IS LINKED TO MULTIPLE STATES FORECLOSURE REVIEWS UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN IN NEW YORK. SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS HAS TO BE INVESTIGATED LINKED TO JEFF SESSIONS AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA-SOMETHING IS CLEARLY WRONG HERE-THE FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT THEY COVERED UP IS A FEDERAL CRIMES, LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN POOLS OF MORTGAGES THEY COVERED UP FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS-MORE!  ALABAMA ACTUALLY COMMITTED FRAUD TO COVER UP VICTIMS WERE NOT PAID WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND ITS RECORDED!

     

    I DO NOT TRUST JEFF SESSIONS HE KNEW ALABAMA VICTIMS WERE BEING ROBBED DURING THE CAMPAIGN AND AFTER THE CAMPAIGN ON CASES THAT WERE PENDING TRIAL THAT WERE CORRUPTED AND ILLEGALLY TIED UP BASED UPON FRAUD HIS AFFILIATES COMMITTED AND MORE...YALL CAN TRUST WHO YOU WANT TO BUT I KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT, RUSSIA WAS PAID AND MORE LINKED TO A BANK THAT ROBBED ME, THE FEDS, AND VICTIMS NATIONWIDE AND THE ONLY PEOPLE APPEARS TO BE GETTING THE MONEY IS LINKED TO JEFF SESSIONS AND DONALD RUMP AFFILIATES-TEAM... 

     

     

     

    I POST EVIDENCE AS QUICK AS I CAN SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON SO YOU CAN PROTECT YOURSELF UNTIL THE FEDS BUST THESE DAM CROOKS THAT ROBBED ME, THE FEDS, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST, VICTIMS NATIONWIDE AND MORE USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA DIDN'T PROTECT VICTIMS OR ME AND CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEING ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED, AND THE MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE PREVENTED SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FROM COMMITTING THIS CRIME INITIALLY WHICH WAS COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA BECAUSE THEY WERE PROFITING FROM THE FIRMS COMMITTING THE CRIMES LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGE AND MORE. 

     

     

    THE TERMS OF MY MORTGAGE CONTRACT WAS VIOLATED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND ITS CLIENT."  MY FIRMS COMPLAINT IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) LEAD TO ORIGINAL MORTGAGE FRAUD RING BUSTED UNDER THE FORMER PRESIDENT OBAMA AND FORMER AG ERIC HOLDER AND BOTH PARTIES GOP AND DEMOCRATS" BUT WAS JUST THE BEGINNING-WE MUST KEEP FIGHTING FOR LEGAL JUSTICE AGAINST AND UPHOLD GOVERNED LAWS THAT AFFECTS ALL OF US, IN MORE WAYS THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE. 

     

    TRUMP CHOSE PEOPLE IN HIS CABINET AND PICKS THAT IS LINED TO THE MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGE FRAUD RING THAT ROBBED ME, VICTIMS NATIONWIDE, THE FEDERAL RESERVE, TAXPAYERS, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE, HOW DO WE BEGIN TO TRUST THE PEOPLE IN OFFICE, ESPECIALLY JEFF SESSIONS WHO COMMITTED PERJURY UNDER OATH TO THE BOARD LINKED TO RUSSIA MULTIPLE TIMES, AND WHO IS LINKED TO THE STATE THAT ROBBED THOUSANDS OF VICTIMS IN ALABAMA AND IN MULTIPLE STATES THROUGH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., MORRISON & FOERSTER AND THEIR AFFILIATES FIRMS AND LAWYERS TO DATE" WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AS LATE AS (02/22/2017) AND PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 2017. 

     

    ALABAMA WILLFULLY KNEW JUDGES COMMITTED FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT IN VIOLATION OF NEW GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE AND COVERED IT UP WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS.  THIS HAS CORRUPTED OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE" WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED.  CLEARLY SOMETHING IS GOING ON HERE AND UNDER TRUMP AND SESSIONS THEY GOT COVERED UP LINED TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES LINKED TO DEUTSCHE BANKS, OWEN, ALTISOURCE, HLSS, SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., ALTISOURCE, HLSS. JOHNSTON & FREEDMAN AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE GUARANTEED!  ALABAMA ONLY ADOPT LAWS TO VIOLATE THEM BUT GETTING THE CASES BACK" SO THEY CAN CARRY OUT THE CRIMES BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT INSIDE THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS JURISDICTION!

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    MAJORITY OF THE NOTARIZED ASSIGNMENTS THAT CAME FROM AND INSIDE CALIFORNIA IS NULL AND VOID THIS IS WHY!

     THE NOTARY HIM OR HERSELF DIDN'T FOLLOW THE NEW LAW AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008

     

    THIS PREVENTED A NOTARY'S FROM NOTARIZING DOCUMENTS AGAINST THE NEW NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS TO VALIDATE DOCUMENTS AND MORE.

    THE NOTARY LAWS IT WHAT VALIDATE AN ASSIGNMENT BY GOVERNED LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS!

     

     

     

    GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 17

     

    NOTE: A notary public seal and signature cannot be affixed to a document without the correct notarial wording.

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. THEN FABRICATED ANOTHER ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008

    AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008)

     

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed In (2005): Corla Jackson didn't violate her mortgage contract between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation dated (May 26, 2004). The Mortgage Contract Spelled Out the terms and conditions of the loan between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, that was violated by Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings under the name GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC. 

     

    CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR ($406,886.59) ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS ($240.000.00) UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS DONE UNDER GOVERNED AND STATE LAW.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. VIOLATED GOVERNED AND STATE LAWS TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HERE.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA IS TRYING TO KEEP COVERED UP AND MORE, THIS CAN'T BE DENIED BECAUSE ITS RECORDED FACTS ON WHAT THEY DID AND HOW THE DID IT AND MORE TO DATE. 

     

    CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR ($406,886.59) ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS ($240.000.00) UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS DONE UNDER GOVERNED AND STATE LAW.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WILLFUL VIOLATED GOVERNED AND STATE LAWS TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HERE.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA IS TRYING TO KEEP COVERED UP AND MORE, THIS CAN'T BE DENIED BECAUSE ITS RECORDED FACTS ON WHAT THEY DID AND HOW THE DID IT AND MORE TO DATE.  THE FEDS WAS ROBBED!

     

     

    WHAT THEY DID WAS THEY TOOK FUNDS THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO GO TOWARDS THE ORIGINAL NOTES AND THEY CREATED NEW LOANS UNDER FABRICATED NOTES AND EMBEZZLED FUNDS FROM VICTIMS AND THE HOMES FROM THE FEDS" AS WELL AS FROM WALL STREET INVESTORS POOLS OF TRUST-MORTGAGES AND MORE.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS HAD A MORTGAGE FRAUD RING GOING ON FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA KNEW THIS AS WELL AS THE JUDGES LINKED TO THE CRIMES THAT CORRUPTED VICTIMS COMPLAINTS SO THE FBI AND FEDS DIDN'T CATCH THEM.. 

     

    THIS WAS ALL COVERED UP" THEY WERE PROFITING AND BENEFITING MULTIPLE WAYS GUARANTEED.  THEY USED AFFILIATE FIRMS AND PARTNERS TO CARRY OUT CRIMES SUCH AS THIS AND AGAINST VICTIMS AS NEEDED OUT OF FLORIDA, ATLANTA, AND NEW YORK.  BECAUSE BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS RESCAP INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEWER RESCAP COMMITTED FRAUD UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN TO COVER UP THE CRIMES THEY WERE COMMITTING WITH THEIR SUBSIDIARY'S AND SERVICERS.  THIS IS BAD NEWS-THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE TRUTH ON WHAT THEY COVERED UP' MARTIN GLENN BLOCKED AFTER ISSUING ALL THE ILLEGAL ORDERS OUT OF NEW YORK FOR THEM THAT IS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  COVERING UP THE CRIME RESCAP LAWYERS DID" WAS A VIOLATION OF GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE AROUND THE SEC. 

     

    THE VICTIMS WASN'T LYING AND NEITHER WERE THEIR LAWYERS" THEY HAD TO PROCEED TO TRIAL AGAINST THE M AND THEY VICTIMS WERE ILLEGALLY BLOCKED" THE FBI HAS TO INVESTIGATE WHAT OCCURRED UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN IN NEW YORK AS WELL-LINKED THAT LEAD TO MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES BASED UPON HIM DENYING VICTIMS LEGAL RIGHTS TO PROCEED TO TRIAL" AGAINST THE RULE OF LAW.  THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE FRAUD-NULL AND VOID-IN ADDITION TO THIS CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAR ROBBED AND MORE!  CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR ($406,886.59) ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS ($240.000.00) UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS DONE UNDER GOVERNED AND STATE LAW WHICH HAS BEEN VIOLATED MULTIPLE WAYS GUARANTEED.

     

    We Got A Real Problem Here: Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings robbed Corla Jackson of her home without GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC owning her property in (2005) and without an Assignment of Mortgage from Option One Mortgage Corporation prior to Option One Mortgage Corporation Closing (April 30, 2008).

    The State of Alabama, its Firms and Judges covered this up with illegal orders based upon fraud and fraud upon the courts" that lead to widespread fraud outside the state of Alabama" which was covered up by the Alabama AG Luther Strange.

    Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings is linked to massive stolen mortgages and money from the FEDS linked to crimes such as this and massive stolen pools of mortgages that were already backed by Securities under victims Original Notes, under Option One Mortgage Corporation and more.  There was never a recorded deed or mortgage between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC" under their new loan (0835002124). 

     

    The loan Sirote & Permutt P.C. stated was GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC was illegally created without GMAC owning Corla Jackson property in (2005) that they created under Corla Jackson name under her Credit" which is Null and Void because its fraud that was committed without lack of standing by the rule of law-Governed Laws-State Laws and More.  This violated Corla Jackson Civil Rights, Consumer Rights, Legal Rights and more" which cannot be ignored or denied because its recorded facts.  This is a White Collar Crime Robbery that was covered up by the State of Alabama and its Firms which is linked to massive stolen mortgages and more. 

     

    Corla Jackson wasn't behind on mortgage payments when she was robbed" this is a red flag!  It was true the Home Was Stolen linked to insured covered losses and payments that was given towards her Original Note Loan between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation that the Option One Mortgage Trust never received and more to date, because illegal orders were issued that was based upon fraud.  This is what the State of Alabama Firms is trying to keep covered up, because they are linked to massive stolen mortgages, identity theft, stolen land, money as well as the Embezzlement of Corla Jackson estate without paying for the damages or the property prior to servicers purchasing the pools of mortgages, linked to Harp-Tarp funds and more. 

    Settlements from the servicers were never paid to Corla Jackson or the Victims in full or at all to date" linked to these firms and their affiliate firms nationwide, because they used deceptive practices to avoid paying victims robbing the Federal Reserve on Mortgages they never reported" they decided to use Judges Illegal Orders instead" which is Civil Fraud and Fraud Upon the Courts After the new laws the ACT Dodd Frank and Notary Laws went into affect.  They actually committed the same crimes over and over again to date, far worse than before...OWEN didn't Pay Victims!

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed In (2005): Corla Jackson didn't violate her mortgage contract between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation dated (May 26, 2004). The Mortgage Contract Spelled Out the terms and conditions of the loan between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, that was violated by Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings under the name GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC. 

     

    CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR ($406,886.59) ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS ($240.000.00) UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.  THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS DONE UNDER GOVERNED AND STATE LAW.  GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. VIOLATED GOVERNED AND STATE LAWS TO CARRY OUT A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HERE.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA IS TRYING TO KEEP COVERED UP AND MORE, THIS CAN'T BE DENIED BECAUSE ITS RECORDED FACTS ON WHAT THEY DID AND HOW THE DID IT AND MORE TO DATE. 

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FAKED AND CARRIED OUT AN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE TO COVER UP THE CRIME THEY COMMITTED DATED BACK TO (2005) IS WHAT THEY DID AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMING COVERED IT UP BECAUSE THE STATE OF ALABAMA WAS LIABLE FOR MASSIVE DAMAGES LINKED TO ILLEGAL ORDERS THEIR JUDGES ISSUED BASED UPON FRAUD TO THE LAW FIRMS THAT COMMITTED THE CRIMES AND MORE GUARANTEED. 

     

    ALL THIS WAS RECORDED AND COVERED UP FROM THE FEDS-SEC FEDERAL RESERVE AND MORE" THE LIES IS OVER!

     

     

    WHAT HAPPEN WAS SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FAKED A RELIEF HAVING BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) DISMISSED BASED UPON THE ORDER ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006-THE CASE HAD TO BE REINSTATED. 

    AFTER THE JUDGE HAD TO REINSTATED BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) THAT WAS ILLEGALLY DISMISSED BASED UPON THE ORDER DATED MARCH 1, 2006, SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FAKED A FORECLOSURE AROUND THE BANKRUPTCY COURTS UNDER CASE (05-13142) WITHOUT OWNING THE NOTE AND WITHOUT AN ASSIGNMENT.  ONCE THIS WAS POINTING OUT AND IT WAS DISCOVERED CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS" SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS FAKED ANOTHER ASSIGNMENT. NOW BOTH  ASSIGNMENTS ARE FRAUD NULL AND VOID IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA NOTARY LAWS AND GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE!

     

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS ON HER MORTGAGE CONTRACT WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION-SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. SAID GMAC OWNED THE NOTE WHEN THEY DID NOT.  THE BREECH OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT WAS BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION DATED (MAY 26, 2004) THAT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION HAD STOLEN.  GMAC DIDN'T OWN OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION POOL OF MORTGAGES AND MORE.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. LIED AND ROBBED VICTIMS AND THE FEDS. 

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC WILLFULLY CONTINUED TO COMMIT FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON COURTS, KNOWING THEY HAD ILLEGALLY VIOLATED AND BREECHED THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STOLEN NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, WHICH INCLUDED BREECHING AND VIOLATING SERVICING LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS, THEY DIDN'T OWN THE PROPERTY WHEN THEY CREATED THEIR FABRICATED NOTE IN (2005) IT WAS RECORDED. 

    THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS WILLFULLY AND CONTINUED DEFRAUDING EVERYONE TO EMBEZZLED CORLA JACKSON ESTATE-PROPERTY FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS INVOLVED" THEY KEPT COVERING UP THE CRIMES SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS COMMITTING " THEY TO BENEFITED FROM SCAM-WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY MULTIPLE WAYS.  THEY BOTH ARE LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN POOLS OF MORTGAGES! THEY WERE STEALING HOMES AND FLIPPING THEM WITH THEIR CLIENTS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR WITHOUT VICTIMS BEING BEHIND ON PAYMENTS UNDER THEIR ORIGINAL NOTES-MORTGAGES!

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS AND THERE WAS NEVER A RELEASE OF HER MORTGAGE UNDER HER ORIGINAL NOTE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION TRUST-POOL OF MORTGAGES AND MORE PRIOR TO OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSING ON (APRIL 30, 2008).  THE LAWYER THOUGHT GMAC OWNED THE MORTGAGE BECAUSE THEY PLACED A COPY OF THE MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO ACT AS THE MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC AND THE JUDGE TOLD THEM THEY COULD NOT DO THAT-IT WAS ILLEGAL, AND ONLY OPTION ONE MORTGAGE COULD FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM IF THEY DIDN'T OWN THEY DIDN'T HAVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC.  THEY COULD NOT USE SOMEONE ELSE'S CONTRACT UNDER THEIR NEW LOAN, IT WAS FRAUD.   

     

    THEY EMBEZZLED THE HOME-ESTATE AND LAND ON A STOLEN MORTGAGE BACKED BY SECURITIES AND ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES POLICY'S, AND MORE TO DATE, THIS IS WHAT THEY STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS FIRMS LAWYERS AND JUDGES WILLFUL COVERED UP' WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME AND ITS CRYSTAL CLEAR!

    THIS WAS REPORTED AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA COVERED THIS UP UNDER BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD TO KEEP THE FEDS-SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE AND MORE FROM FINDING OUT WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND HAD DONE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR IN A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY GUARANTEED. 

    THE ALABAMA AG LUTHER STRANGE  INVOLVED WITH BRADLEY ARANT  BOULT CUMMINGS AND THE JUDGES THAT COMMITTED FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS GUARANTEED.  HE COVERED UP THE CRIME THEY ALL COMMITTED.  JEFF SESSIONS CAN'T CONVINCE ME HE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THIS AND ALABAMA ILLEGAL PROFITING  RING-SCAMS-LINKED T MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES AND DEUTSCHE BANK-OWEN-ALTISOURCE-HLSS-MORE!  

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed In (2005): Corla Jackson didn't violate her mortgage contract between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation dated (May 26, 2004). The Mortgage Contract Spelled Out the terms and conditions of the loan between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, that was violated by Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings under the name GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC.  There was never a Recorded Deed between Corla Jackson and GMAC, they did an illegal foreclosure on arrears dated back to (2006) and bankruptcy case (05-13142) and an order that was reversed in Corla Jackson Favor!

    After GMAC committed Fraud and it was discovered what they had done" the State Of Alabama Covered This Up because they were liable for massive damages behind all the illegal orders based upon fraud and fraud upon the courts related to multiple complaints that was ignored by the State!

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    WHAT HAPPEN TO THE POLICY'S THAT PROTECTED CORLA JACKSON AND HER ESTATE AS WELL AS BANKRUPTCY BONDS" CONSENT ORDERS ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS AND MORE .  GMAC MORTGAGE LLC-RESCAP-OWEN AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA DIDN'T PAY CORLA JACKSON TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDERS WITHIN (30) DAY OR THE TIME FROM INSIDE AGREEMENTS AND CONSENT ORDERS.   JUDGE SHULMAN ISSUED AN ILLEGAL RELIEF BASED UPON FRAUD, THE BANKRUPTCY BONDS SHOULD HAVE KICKED IN AND MORE.

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS DATED BACK TO (2006)..... GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE PROPERTY OR AN ASSIGNMENT IN (2006)-WHERE IS THE BANKRUPTCY BONDS-MONEY THAT IS DUE TO CORLA JACKSON WHILE THIS CASE IS BEING SETTLED..?  THEY ALL KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO DATE GUARANTEED...

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA HAS CAUSED MASSIVE DAMAGES AND HARDSHIP WILLFULLY AND ILLEGALLY.  THEY KEPT THE FUNDS THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO GO TO CORLA JACKSON FROM SETTLEMENTS-POLICY'S AND MORE THROUGH THEIR FIRMS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME AND MORE GUARANTEED!

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS FIRMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAYING CORLA JACKSON BILLS AND ALL THE DAMAGES THEY CAUSED HER TO DATE THAT IS BASED UPON FRAUD THEIR FIRMS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES COMMITTED, THAT THEY WILLFULLY CONTINUED TO COVER UP!  THE CRIME SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVERED UP AND COMMITTED HERE IS UNCOVERED AND MORE GUARANTEED! 

     

    IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE" STEWART TITLE CO. DIDN'T PAY FOR ON THE POLICY'S THEY SOLD CORLA JACKSON BECAUSE OF THE ILLEGAL ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA JUDGES ISSUED BASED UPON FRAUD.  ALABAMA CAUSED CORLA JACKSON MASSIVE DAMAGES MULTIPLE WAYS!

    ALL THE POLICY'S THAT WAS SOLD WERE BREECHED AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND THE STATE COVERED THIS UP TO HELP CARRY OUT THE ROBBERY WITHOUT PAYING CORLA JACKSON.  THIS TO CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED.  THE BANKING REGULATORS IN ALABAMA DIDN'T GET THIS REPORT FROM THE ALABAMA STATE FIRMS OR THE STATE OF ALABAMA" INSTEAD SECURITIES FRAUD AND MORE WAS COVERED UP.

    WHAT HAPPEN TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA BANKRUPTCY BONDS THAT WAS SUPPOSE TO PAY CORLA JACKSON BACK THE MONEY GMAC EMBEZZLED BASED UPON THE BANKRUPTCY FRAUD PAYMENTS, AND THE ILLEGAL RELEASE OF HER MORTGAGE TO SIROTE & PERMUTT THAT NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED OR OCCURRED BY THE RULE OF LAW.  ITS CRYSTAL CLEAR AND ITS RECORDED SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND ITS AFFILIATE FIRMS JUDGES AND LAWYERS COMMITTED A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY HERE WILLFULLY!

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON ANY PAYMENTS DATED BACK TO (2006)" JUDGE SHULMAN ISSUED HIS ILLEGAL RELIEF BASED UPON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) THIS IS CLEARLY BANKRUPTCY FRAUD!  

    GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE OR AN ASSIGNMENT IN (2006) THIS IS RECORDED.  HOW DID JUDGE SHULMAN GET AWAY WITH FRAUD UPON THE COURT IN ALABAMA ISSUING A RELIEF ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) WITHOUT GMAC HAVING LACK OF STANDING IN (2006)...?

    WHERE IS ALL THE POLICY'S AND THE MONEY THAT BELONG TO THE FEDS AND CORLA JACKSON LINKED TO THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE.

    ALABAMA SHOULD BE PAYING ALL CORLA JACKSON BILLS THEY CAUSED THE HARDSHIP AND PROBLEMS AND COVERED UP THE CRIME WHILE THEIR LAW FIRMS LAWYERS AND JUDGES CARRIED OUT THE CRIME BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURTS WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS, WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME. 

    BOTH ASSIGNMENTS IS VOID" GMAC CREATED THEIR LOAN PRIOR TO THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008, AND ITS VOID" ITS IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA NOTARY LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS... IT DIDN'T MATCH THE PLATFORM OF THE FIRST ILLEGAL ASSIGNMENT SHIPPED (4/25/96) AND MORE THIS IS WHAT A VALID ASSIGNMENT LOOK LIKE AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008 IN CALIFORNIA.  

     

     

     

     

    Corla Reeves Jackson Saved The Federal Reserve And More!

    CALIFORNIA PROOF OF EXECUTION BY SUBSCRIBING WITNESS CIVIL CODE § 1195 Civil Code section 1195

     

    IT DIDN'T TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO SEE WITH OR WITHOUT THE JUDGE ORDER DATED MARCH 1, 2006 SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. HAD COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND SECURITIES FRAUD CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN THEY COMMITTED PERJURY UNDER OATH!

     

     

    LET'S JUST LET EVERYONE SEE THE TRUTH!

     

    WHAT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. DID WAS THEY DEFRAUDED EVERYONE BY VIOLATING THE CONDITIONALLY DENIED ORDER ISSUED (MARCH 1, 2006)" BY ATTACHING THE CONDITIONALLY DENIED ORDER TO THEIR PROOF OF CLAIM THEY ILLEGALLY FILED (03/03/2006) AROUND THE COURTS ORDER CONFIRMING THE DEBTORS CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON THE DEBTOR AND GMAC. 

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. VIOLATED THE FEDERAL COURT'S CONDITIONALLY DENIED ORDER TERMS AND CONDITIONS BY FILING A PROOF OF CLAIM (03/03/2006) ATTACHING THE ORDER ISSUED (MARCH 1, 2006) TO IT WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD EVERYONE" MAKING IT APPEAR AS IF THE CONDITIONALLY DENIED ORDER ISSUED (MARCH 1, 2006) WAS THE ORDER CONFIRMING THE DEBTOR'S CHAPTER 13 PLAN WITH THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON THE DEBTOR AND GMAC WITHOUT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC. 

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS ABLE TO DO THIS BY FILING THEIR PROOF OF CLAIM ILLEGALLY THROUGH THEIR FIRMS ELECTRONICALLY FILING SYSTEM.  GMAC HAD NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE JUDGE IN THE DEBTOR'S CHAPTER 13 PLAN WITH THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON THE DEBTOR AND GMAC ON MARCH 1, 2006" THIS IS WHY THE ORDER WAS ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006.

     

    IN ADDITION TO THIS" IT WAS LATER DISCOVERED CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS AND DIDN'T OWE GMAC $14,809.60 THEY DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE OR AN ASSIGNMENT (MARCH 1, 2006) OR PRIOR TO CREATING THEIR LOAN IN (2005) CORLA JACKSON NAME UNDER HER CREDIT AND PROPERTY WITHOUT AN AGREEMENT OR A RECORDED DEED AND WITHOUT MONEY BEING LOANED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC UNDER LOAN NUMBER (0835002124).  CORLA JACKSON COULD NOT FORCE THE TRUSTEE'S AND JUDGE MAHONEY TO HONOR THE ORDER AROUND THE LAW ON GIVING THEM THE ($14,809.60) THAT WAS REVERSED BY THE JUDGE ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 AND AMENDED TO THE AMOUNT THE DEBTOR PAID OCTOBER 1, 2009 BY OBJECTIONS FILED BY CORLA JACKSON ATTORNEY JULY 15, 2009. 

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS-SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. HAD CORLA JACKSON LAWYER BARRY FREEDMAN GO BACK AFTER LUTHER STRANGE-BRADLEY ARANT  BOULT CUMMINGS TOOK AND WAS IN OFFICE AND THEY HAD HIM HELP THEM COMMIT FRAUD UPON THE COURT UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN, JUDGE JOHNSON AND JUDGE YORK DEFRAUD NEW YORK JUDGES AND LAWYERS BASED UPON ILLEGAL ORDERS ISSUED AND MORE. THEY ALL KNEW THE ORDERS WAS FRAUD BECAUSE THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE NOT VALID BY THE RULE OF LAW AND CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS DATED BACK TO (2006) GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE OR AN ASSIGNMENT IN (2006).  NOW THEY ALL ARE BUSTED GUARANTEED, BECAUSE CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED AND THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE...

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS BUSTED AND THEY KNEW THIS.  THEY KEPT COMMITTING FRAUD OVER AND OVER AGAIN. SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FILED A FALSE PROOF OF CLAIM.  CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS AND THEY KNEW THIS PRIOR TO FILING THEIR PROOF OF CLAIM AND THEY ALSO KNEW GMAC DIDN'T OWN CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY, AND THERE WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED OR MORTGAGE CONTRACT, LEASEHOLD AGREEMENT, OR MONEY LOANED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC PRIOR TO THE ILLEGAL RELIEF OR PRIOR TO THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE JUNE 1, 2012 WITHOUT DUE PROCESS UNDER CASE (12-00111) THROUGH THE COURTS.

    IT DON'T TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO SEE BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COMMITTED FRAUD WITH SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND LAWYERS.  THEY ONLY USE JUDGE LINKED TO THEIR FIRMS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS THAT GET AWAY WITH ROBBING THE FEDS AND VICTIMS AROUND SEC-MORE!

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    WHAT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WERE DOING WAS' THEY WERE STEALING HOMES AND FLIPPING THEM USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES BASED UPON FRAUD WITH THEIR CLIENTS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME. 

    WHEN VICTIMS POINTED OUT THE FRAUD BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. CAME UP WITH MORE FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS TO KEEP THE FEDS AND FBI FROM FINDING OUT WHAT THEY BOTH ERE DOING IN ALABAMA AROUND THE SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST, FDIC, CFPB, THE (DOJ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND MORE.  THE STATE OF ALABAMA KNEW WHAT THEIR LAW FIRMS AND CORRUPTED JUDGES WERE DOING FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR, WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME.

     

     

    LET'S JUST LET EVERYONE SEE THE TRUTH!

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND COVERED UP THE TRUTH.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FILED A PROOF OF CLAIM UNDER THEIR CLIENTS NAME WITHOUT GMAC OWNING CORLA JACKSON NOTE AND WITHOUT MONEY BEING LOANED TO CORLA JACKSON UNDER THEIR LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) AS THEY STATED (06/15/2005).  THIS IS RECORDED.  THERE WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED OR A MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC" PRIOR TO THEIR ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE OF PRIOR TO FILING THIS FRAUDULENT PROOF OF CLAIM.  THIS IS RECORDED AS WELL. 

     

     

    GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE MORTGAGE OR PROPERTY PRIOR TO CREATING THEIR NEW LOAN IN CORLA JACKSON NAME UNDER HER CREDIT AND PROPERTY FORCING HER INTO BANKRUPTCY ON FABRICATED NOTE WITH ATTACHED ARREARS FROM (02/2005 THROUGH 06/2005) THIS WAS REAL ROBBERY!

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN MORTGAGE PAYMENTS FROM (02/2005 THROUGH 06/2005).  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. GOT A COPY OF CORLA JACKSON MORTGAGE HISTORY AND FABRICATED A NEW LOAN WITH A COPY OF HER MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS THEY GOT OFF LINE THROUGH PROBATE COURT.  THEN THEY FABRICATED A NOTE AND WITHOUT OWNING THE NOTE ATTACHING FABRICATED ARREARS TO THEIR NEW LOAN FROM (02/2005 THROUGH 06/2005) FORCING CORLA JACKSON INTO BANKRUPTCY UNDER CASE (05-13142).  ONCE THIS WAS DONE" THEY THEN COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND FILED A PROOF OF CLAIM UNDER THEIR LOAN NUMBER STATING THEY LOANED MONEY TO CORLA JACKSON UNDER LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) AND THEY OWNED THE PROPERTY AND CORLA JACKSON DEFAULTED UNDER THEIR LOAN (0825002124).  THIS IS RECORDED.

    THIS NEW MORTGAGE SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND ITS CLIENT CREATED IS FRAUD" WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MORTGAGE BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION PERIOD.  CORLA JACKSON WAS FORCED TO GIVE THEM MONEY UNDER FALSE PRETENSE AND THEY APPLIED THE MONEY TO THEIR NEW LOAN WITHOUT OWNING AND WITHOUT A MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT, RECORDED DEED, AND WITHOUT MONEY BEING LOANED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND WITHOUT A RELEASE-CANCELLATION OF CORLA JACKSON ORIGINAL NOTE THAT WAS BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNED LAWS-STATE LAWS AND MORE.  THIS WAS RECORDED...

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS STEALING MORTGAGES BACKED BY SECURITIES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA WAS COVERING THIS UP" FORCING VICTIMS TO GIVE THE LAW FIRMS CLIENTS THIS MONEY BASED UPON FRAUD" UNDER FALSE PRETENSE AROUND THE SEC" PLACING THE VICTIMS MONEY THAT BELONG TO THEIR ORIGINAL NOTES TO THEIR FABRICATED NOTES ON LOANS CREATED ILLEGALLY BASED UPON FRAUD USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES" WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING.  ONCE THEY DID THIS" THEY FAKED AN ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE" TO GET A ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE DEED" KNOWING THEY DIDN'T OWN THE PROPERTIES THEY WERE STEALING WASN'T THEIR CLIENTS" THEY WERE ILLEGALLY PROFITING FROM AND MORE. 

     

     

    THERE WAS NEVER A RECORDED DEED BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND GMAC PRIOR TO GMAC OBTAINING A RELIEF FROM JUDGE SHULMAN OR THE FORECLOSURE DATED JUNE 1, 2012, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS THROUGH THE FEDERAL COURTS UNDER CASE (12-00111) UNDER JUDGE DUBOSE-SHE COVERED UP THE CRIME THEY COMMITTED, SHE IS LINKED TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND JEFF SESSIONS.  SHE WAS THE ONE SENDING THE CASES BACK TO MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT TO KEEP THE FEDS-SEC FROM FINDING OUT WHAT THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS LAW FIRMS WERE ILLEGALLY PROFITING FROM AND MORE. 

    THERE IS THOUSANDS OF ALABAMA VICTIMS SHE BLOCKED WITH THE STATE OF ALABAMA STATE COURTS THROUGH SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS.  JEFF SESSIONS IS COVERING ALL THIS UP AND MORE GUARANTEED.  DEUTSCHE  BANK AND AHM IS INVOLVED.  THE ILLEGAL PROFITS IS ALSO TIED TO OWEN.  TRUMP, HIS BANKING AFFILIATES AND JEFF SESSIONS COVER UP MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES AND PROFITS LINKED TO DEUTSCHE BANK AND OWEN AND ITS AFFILIATES GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER! 

    I DO SEE WHERE THEY DEFRAUDED JUDGE MARTIN GLENN, JUDGE KOELTL, JOSEPH SMITH, SEC, FEDERAL RESERVE, CFPB, FDIC, WALL STREET INVESTORS AND MORE UNDER THEIR PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY'S AND MORE!  THIS HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY REPORTED TO THE SEC UNDER DONALD TRUMP-BUT ITS HIS AFFILIATES AND JEFF SESSIONS AFFILIATES THAT COMMITTED THE CRIMES WITH DEUTSCHE BANK, AHM, HOMEWARD, WILBUR ROSS, ALTISOURCE, HLSS, AND OWEN AROUND THE SEC AGAIN, FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE UNDER TRUMP SINCE (02/22/2017).  THEY GOT A NEW SCAM GOING ON NOW-FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE-THEY USED ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDERS LIKE ITS NOTHING UNDER JEFF SESSIONS AND DONALD TRUMP WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED-THEY BOTH BARE WATCHING BECAUSE THESE CASES IS LINKED TO DEUTSCHE BANK AND OWEN AND ITS AFFILIATES HLSS AND ALTISOURCE AND MORE. 

    IT IS CRYSTAL CLEAR SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND FILED A FALSE CLAIM AND ROBBED CORLA JACKSON.  THEY CREATED THEIR LOAN PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008 WHICH IS FRAUD.  SEE EVIDENCE LISTED BELOW!  THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND THE FEDS CAN CLEARLY SEE SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED A FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD CRIME! 

    THE EVIDENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF" CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS REGARDLESS WHICH LOAN THE MONEY WENT UNDER" SIROTE & PERMUTT COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD IN BLACK AND WHITE UNDER PERJURY" FILING A FALSE PROOF OF CLAIM BASED UPON FRAUD...

     

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS WHEN SIROTE & PERMUTT FILED THIS FAKE POOF OF CLAIM UNDER THEIR CLIENT GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION NAME-THE LIES IS OVER GUARANTEED!

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. SAID IN BLACK AND WHITE UNDER PERJURY GMAC OWNED THE NOTE AND LOANED CORLA JACKSON MONEY UNDER LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) WHICH WAS CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND MORE.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. DID THIS PRIOR TO THEIR ASSIGNMENT DATED (JUNE 19, 2008) AND MORE...  BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS IS COVERING UP MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES!

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED FRAUD OVER AND OVER AGAIN WILLFUL.  CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS JULY 2005 THROUGH JANUARY 2006 EITHER.  THIS IS BANKRUPTCY FRAUD FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME THAT CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED ITS RECORDED FACTS.  THIS WAS DONE JANUARY 20, 2006.  IT GET WORSE-GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE OR AN ASSIGNMENT (JANUARY 20, 2006)!  

     

     

     

    LET IT BE KNOWN TO ALL MAN KIND CORLA JACKSON WASN'T LYING SHE WAS ROBBED BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS AND THEY COVERED IT UP AND MORE.  WHEN ALABAMA FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD FILING A PROOF OF CLAIM WITHOUT GMAC OWNING THE NOTE IN (2005) THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS BANKING REGULATORS-MORE...THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS FIRMS SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS SHOULD HAVE PAID ALL CORLA JACKSON BILLS DAMAGES AND MORE BECAUSE SHE GOT INJURED DIRECT AND IN DIRECT BECAUSE OF WHAT THE STATE DIDN'T DO TO PROTECT HER FROM THEIR FIRMS AND LAWYERS TO DATE. 

    WHEN SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. ILLEGALLY FORCED CORLA JACKSON INTO HER INITIAL BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) UNDER GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION ON ARREARS FROM (02/05) THROUGH (06/2005) WITHOUT BEING BEHIND IN MORTGAGE PAYMENTS THE LAWYERS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED FOR BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT OF MONEY THROUGH MAIL FRAUD RICO LAWS AND MORE.  THIS WAS COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA, ITS STATE FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS, LAWYERS AND ALABAMA CORRUPTED JUDGES LINKED TO THE FIRMS AND STATE.  THE ILLEGAL ORDERS ISSUED TO COVER UP THE CRIME CAUSED BY THE ALABAMA STATE JUDGES CANNOT BE IGNORED' ITS A FEDERAL CRIME" GOVERNED LAWS, BANKRUPTCY LAWS, CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS, AND MORE HAS BEEN VIOLATED HERE AS WELL AS SECURITIES LAWS ON A STOLEN MORTGAGE PERIOD.

     

     

    WHEN SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FILED THEIR PROOF OF CLAIM AROUND THE COURT ORDER ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEY VIOLATED THE ORDER AND THE AUTOMATIC STAY INSIDE THE ORDER ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006 ON ARREARS DATED BACK FROM (02/05) THROUGH (06/2005) WITHOUT CORLA JACKSON BEING BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WITH THE INTENT TO EMBEZZLE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY COURTS TRUSTEES BASED UPON FRAUD. 

    THIS IS A FEDERAL CRIME THAT WAS BLOCKED BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA BECAUSE ITS WAS SO BAD ON WHAT THEY DID" THEY COVERED UP TO DATE.  NO JUDGES ORDER COULD FORCE CORLA JACKSON PAY ARREARS DATE BACK FROM (02/05) THROUGH (06/2005) WITHOUT CORLA JACKSON BEING BEHIND ON PAYMENTS OR ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) OR PRIOR TO GMAC OWNING THE NOTE PERIOD.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. (2) FABRICATED ASSIGNMENTS IS FRAUD, AND WERE NOT PREPARED OR UNDER CALIFORNIA PLATFORM OF NOTARY LAWS RULES OR REGULATIONS AND MORE...

     

     

    IT'S CRYSTAL CLEAR THE STATE OF ALABAMA CAUSED MASSIVE DAMAGES TO DATE" THEY SHOULD HAVE PAID CORLA JACKSON AND ALL CORLA JACKSON BILLS TO DATE AS WELL AS ALL THE MASSIVE DAMAGES DIRECT AND INDIRECT-MORE.  THIS CRIME WAS COVERED UP WILLFULLY BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS ELECTED OFFICIALS.  THIS HAS CAUSED CORLA JACKSON MASSIVE AND FURTHER DAMAGES TO DATE THEY DIDN'T WANT ANYONE TO FIND OUT ABOUT" GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER AND MORE...

     

     

     

    Corla Jackson was in Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) when GMAC Mortgage Law Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C. Violated the Automatic Stay On June 11, 2008 for the second time" around the United States Bankruptcy Court Laws Rules and Regulation.   This was reported to the State Of Alabama and they Covered This Up and More!

     

    This Is Clearly A Violation Of The Automatic Stay Issued (March 1, 2006) Without A Court Order Confirming The Agreement Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Through The Courts! After this was pointed out Sirote & Permutt P.C. Fabricated an Assignment Dated June 19, 2008, that is based upon FRAUD! 

     

    Corla Jackson wasn't behind in Payments through the Bankruptcy Courts prior to Sirote & Permutt P.C. Acceleration Of Their Fabricated Promissory Note and Mortgage Loan Number (0835002124).  This was covered up by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and the State Of Alabama Guaranteed.  They were robbing victims on the letterhead of Sirote & Permutt P.C. based upon mail fraud using deceptive practices and more for big illegal profits around the FEDS-SEC!

     

     

     

     

    THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT WAS FRAUD THE HOME WASN'T BUILT (4/25/96) THE SECOND ASSIGNMENT DATED (6/19/2008) IS FRAUD IT WASN'T IN THE FORMAT OF THE 1ST FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT DATED (4/25/96) BY THE RULE OF CALIFORNIA NOTARY LAWS OR BY THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION CONTRACT AGREEMENT AND MORE.  CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS AND SHE WAS IN BANKRUPTCY JUNE 11, 2008 WHEN SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. CREATED THE LETTER ABOVE-DEFAULT JUDGMENT-MORE" THIS WASN'T APPROVED BY THE COURTS-JUDGE MAHONEY FOR GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. TO COMMIT THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS ABOVE OR THE ARREARS IN THE AMOUNT OF ($14,809.60). 

     

    THE ($14,809.60) IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) WAS SUPPOSE HAVE THE COURT'S-JUDGES APPROVAL AFTER THE ORDER WAS ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006, WHICH NEVER OCCURRED.  IN ADDITION TO THIS" THE ARREARS WERE TO BE PAID BY THE TRUSTEES THROUGH THE DEBTOR'S CHAPTER 13 PLAN UPON THE APPROVAL OF JUDGE MAHONEY AFTER MARCH 1, 2006 WHICH NEVER HAPPENED.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. HAS ROBBED CORLA JACKSON AND THE FEDS AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND JUDGES COVERED THIS UP AS WELL AS THE STATE OF ALABAMA!  THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED" GOVERNED LAWS HAS BEEN VIOLATED HERE AND ITS CRYSTAL CLEAR!  

     

     

    SPECIAL ALERT! THE ARREARS OF ($14,809.60) WAS FRAUD" CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS WHEN GMAC FILED THEIR PROOF OF CLAIM FOR ($14,809.60) PERIOD.  THE SEC WILL FIND" THAT GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM AFTER MARCH 1, 2006 HAD BEEN REVERSED BASED UPON FRAUD AND VIOLATION OF AN AUTOMATIC STAY OUT OF ALABAMA THAT WAS COVERED UP AND MORE GUARANTEED. 

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS INITIALLY ROBBED BY THE ALABAMA LAW FIRM UNDER THE NAME GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC.  SOMETHING CLEARLY IS GOING ON WITH THE LAW FIRM ROBBING VICTIMS OUT OF ALABAMA LINKED TO MASSIVE STOLEN POOLS OF MORTGAGES AND MORE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES GUARANTEED. 

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AS WELL AS THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS AND LAWYERS LINKED TO THIS COMPLAINT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED SOMETHING IS WRONG-THIS WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY WAS COVERED UP BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT WHICH HAS LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS OUTSIDE ALABAMA LINKED TO THESE LAW FIRMS AND THEIR ILLEGAL PROFITING SCAMS-RING AROUND THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE-FDIC-CONSUMER FINANCIAL LAWS-(CFPB) AND MORE...

     

     

    The Bankruptcy Courts Refused To Pay GMAC ($14,809.16) On Arrears Reversing Their Leave To File A Proof Of Claim As Stated In The Order Issued (March 1, 2006).  The ($14,809.60) was the Fabricated Arrears GMAC Law Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C. filed without Corla Jackson being behind on payments" which is CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD that was committed by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings dated back to (2005).  The Order Dated (March 1, 2006) Stated the ($14,809.60) was arrears, which had to be paid through the courts by the Trustees' not Corla Jackson in Direct Payments" this is also recorded.  The State of Alabama AG office was told this" and that is when Bradley Arant Boult Cummings started committing Fraud to keep this covered up and more guaranteed.  The lies is over! 

     

    Corla Jackson wasn't behind on payments, and the assignment dated (4/25/96 and 6/19/2008) were both Fraud by the rule of law-governed laws and state laws.  The loan GMAC created was done in (2005) prior to the fabricated assignment dated (6/19/2008).  Sirote & Permutt Original Assignment (SHIPPED 4/25/96) the home wasn't built and there was no loan between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation (4/25/96) to ship period.  The State Alabama used its firms and affiliate firms to cover up this white collar crime robbery which cannot be ignored or denied its recorded facts.  The Complaints are all under Federal Bankruptcy laws rules and regulations that were violated initially and more which makes this a Federal Crimes Bankruptcy Crime which is under Governed Laws and more which had been Violated Multiple Times by the law firms and lawyers involved in this complaint" this was all covered up by the State of Alabama and its elected officials willful" which cannot be ignored or denied under banking rules and regulations, consumer laws and federal laws. 

     

    Clearly the State Of Alabama Knew What Its Firms and Lawyers Were Doing For Illegal Profits, Personal Gain or Favor, which is not of any law, its a federal crime that should have been reported by the state of Alabama to the DOJ Department Of Justice.  Civil Rights Violations, Consumer Laws, Banking Regulations Laws, SEC Laws, FDIC Laws and More has all been covered up and violated here by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Alabama Judges which has lead to Widespread Fraud and Fraud Upon Courts in New York and more. This Is A White Collar Crime Robbery, that never should have occurred in the first place. 

     

    Corla Jackson wasn't behind on payments when she was initially robbed and when " Sirote & Permutt filed a False Claim for illegal profits personal gain or favor which is a federal crime.  Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Covered Up this federal crime because they are involved.  They illegally and willfully covered up the violation of Corla Jackson Automatic Stay under the initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).  How did GMAC Law Firms get all the Illegal Orders based upon fraud without being reported to the SEC-Federal Reserve and the Department of Justice on Bankruptcy Fraud Violation of An Automatic Stay... The Alabama Judges Issued Illegal Orders To Corrupt Courts Outside Of Alabama Blocking Jackson Legal Justice!

     

     

    HOW DID GMAC MORTGAGE LLC GET AN RELIEF OF AUTOMATIC STAY ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING IN (2006) CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS IN (2006) GMAC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS HAS COMMITTED CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD AND MORE. 

    HOW DID GMAC MORTGAGE LLC GET ILLEGAL ORDERS AND EJECTMENTS  PERIOD BASED UPON FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENTS THAT IS NULL-VOID-FRAUD, THAT VIOLATES NOTARY LAWS AND MORE.  CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS IN (2006) AND GMAC MORTGAGE DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE OR HAVE AN ASSIGNMENT IN (2006)!

     

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA ROBBED CORLA JACKSON WITH THEIR FIRMS AND THEY COVERED UP THIS CRIME AND DID NOT HELP HER AFTER COMMITTING THIS CRIME WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS WILLFULLY COMMITTED THIS CRIME AND COVERED IT UP.

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA KNEW WHAT ITS FIRMS WERE DOING HERE AND FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR" THEY KNEW CORLA JACKSON AND VICTIMS HAD BEEN ROBBED BY ITS FIRMS AND MORE" CAUSING MASSIVE DAMAGES MULTIPLE WAYS DIRECT AND IN DIRECT TO DATE.  THEY HELD CORLA JACKSON DOWN BLOCKING LEGAL JUSTICE WHILE THEIR PEOPLE CARRIED OUT THE CRIME" BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURTS" THIS IS RECORDED SO NO ONE CAN LIE. THEY ALL KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING GUARANTEED...

     

    THE LIES IS OVER-CORLA JACKSON MORTGAGE CONTRACT STATED SHE HAD TO BE BEHIND IN PAYMENTS AND SHE HAD TO FOLLOW THE RULES OF THE TERMS OF HER MORTGAGE CONTRACT AGREEMENT THAT SHE DIDN'T VIOLATE-THIS WAS A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY THAT WAS COVERED UP BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS WITH ALABAMA JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS TO HELP THEIR FIRMS CARRY OUT THIS ROBBERY GUARANTEED!

     

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

     

    Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

     

     

    THE LIES IS OVER AND MORE GUARANTEED...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    NEWS UPDATE!

     

     

    You Want To See And More Read This BLOG Site Until The Real Website Is Completed Starting Here!

    The Alabama Judges Knew The Their Law Firms And Lawyers Were Committed Fraud With Their Illegal Orders!

     

    This Is What The Real Assignments Were Suppose To Look Like That Came Out Of California By Governed Laws!

    CALIFORNIA PROOF OF EXECUTION BY SUBSCRIBING WITNESS CIVIL CODE § 1195 Civil Code section 1195

     

     

    BOTH ASSIGNMENTS SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. FABRICATED IS FRAUD

    THEY WERE NOT ON THE RIGHT PLATFORM AND MORE GUARANTEED...

     

    NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS

     

    NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS

    OPTION MORE MORTGAGE CORPORATION ASSIGNMENTS

    CAME FROM CALIFORNIA BASED UPON FRAUD!

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS THE LAW FIRMS PREPARING THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENTS

    FOR ROBO-SIGNERS TO SIGN ASSIGNMENTS IN CALIFORNIA GUARANTEED...

    MAJORITY OF THE ROBO-SIGNERS WILL NEVER SHOW UP IN COURT OR AT A TRIAL GUARANTEED

     

     

    Civil Code § 1185                                                                                                         CA Assembly Bill 886

     

    ARTICLE 3. Proof and Acknowledgment of Instruments [1180 - 1207]

      ( Article 3 enacted 1872. )

      

    1185.  

    (a) The acknowledgment of an instrument shall not be taken unless the officer taking it has satisfactory evidence that the person making the acknowledgment is the individual who is described in and who executed the instrument.

    (b) For purposes of this section, “satisfactory evidence” means the absence of information, evidence, or other circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the person making the acknowledgment is not the individual he or she claims to be and any one of the following:

    (1) (A) The oath or affirmation of a credible witness personally known to the officer, whose identity is proven to the officer upon presentation of a document satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) or (4), that the person making the acknowledgment is personally known to the witness and that each of the following are true:

    (i) The person making the acknowledgment is the person named in the document.

    (ii) The person making the acknowledgment is personally known to the witness.

    (iii) That it is the reasonable belief of the witness that the circumstances of the person making the acknowledgment are such that it would be very difficult or impossible for that person to obtain another form of identification.

    (iv) The person making the acknowledgment does not possess any of the identification documents named in paragraphs (3) and (4).

    (v) The witness does not have a financial interest in the document being acknowledged and is not named in the document.

    (B) A notary public who violates this section by failing to obtain the satisfactory evidence required by subparagraph (A) shall be subject to a civil penalty not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000). An action to impose this civil penalty may be brought by the Secretary of State in an administrative proceeding or a public prosecutor in superior court, and shall be enforced as a civil judgment. A public prosecutor shall inform the secretary of any civil penalty imposed under this subparagraph.

    (2) The oath or affirmation under penalty of perjury of two credible witnesses, whose identities are proven to the officer upon the presentation of a document satisfying the requirements of paragraph (3) or (4), that each statement in paragraph (1) is true.

    (3) Reasonable reliance on the presentation to the officer of any one of the following, if the document or other form of identification is current or has been issued within five years:

    (A) An identification card or driver’s license issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles.

    (B) A passport issued by the Department of State of the United States.

    (C) An inmate identification card issued by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, if the inmate is in custody in prison.

    (D) Any form of inmate identification issued by a sheriff’s department, if the inmate is in custody in a local detention facility.

    (4) Reasonable reliance on the presentation of any one of the following, provided that a document specified in subparagraphs (A) to (F), inclusive, shall either be current or have been issued within five years and shall contain a photograph and description of the person named on it, shall be signed by the person, and shall bear a serial or other identifying number:

    (A) A valid consular identification document issued by a consulate from the applicant’s country of citizenship, or a valid passport from the applicant’s country of citizenship.

    (B) A driver’s license issued by a state other than California or by a Canadian or Mexican public agency authorized to issue driver’s licenses.

    (C) An identification card issued by a state other than California.

    (D) An identification card issued by any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    (E) An employee identification card issued by an agency or office of the State of California, or by an agency or office of a city, county, or city and county in this state.

    (F) An identification card issued by a federally recognized tribal government.

    (c) An officer who has taken an acknowledgment pursuant to this section shall be presumed to have operated in accordance with the provisions of law.

    (d) A party who files an action for damages based on the failure of the officer to establish the proper identity of the person making the acknowledgment shall have the burden of proof in establishing the negligence or misconduct of the officer.

    (e) A person convicted of perjury under this section shall forfeit any financial interest in the document.

     

     

     

     



     

     

     

     

     

    NOTARY JOURNAL IS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA LAW 

     

    What does the law say about the California Notary Journal?

     

     

    courthouse
    California Notary Handbook
    Notary Public Journal
    A notary public is required to keep one active sequential journal at a time of all acts performed as a notary public. The journal must be kept in a locked and secured area (such as a lock box or locked desk drawer), under the direct and exclusive control of the notary public. The journal shall include the items shown below. (Government Code section 8206(a))
    1. Date, time and type of each official act (e.g. acknowledgment, jurat).
    2. Character of every instrument sworn to, affirmed, acknowledged or proved before the notary public (e.g. deed of trust)
    3. The signature of each person whose signature is being notarized.
    4. A statement as to whether the identity of a person making an acknowledgment or taking an oath or affirmation was based on personal knowledge or satisfactory evidence. If identity was established by satisfactory evidence pursuant to Civil Code section 1185, then the journal shall contain the signature of the credible witness swearing or affirming to the identity of the individual or the type of identifying document, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document. (e.g., driver’s license, [State] Department of Motor Vehicles, #X00000, 00/00/00.)
    5. If the identity of the person making the acknowledgment or taking the oath or affirmation was established by the oaths or affirmations of two credible witnesses whose identities are proven upon the presentation of satisfactory evidence, the type of identifying documents, the identifying numbers of the documents and the dates of issuance or expiration of the documents presented by the witnesses to establish their identity. (e.g., driver’s license, [State] Department of Motor Vehicles, #X00000, 00/00/00.)
    6. The fee charged for the notarial service.
    7. If the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, or deed of trust affecting real property, the notary public shall require the party signing the document to place his or her right thumbprint in the journal. If the right thumbprint is not available, then the notary public shall have the party use his or her left thumb, or any available finger and shall so indicate in the journal. If the party signing the document is physically unable to provide a thumb or fingerprint, the notary public shall so indicate in the journal and shall also provide an explanation of that physical condition.
    If the sequential journal is stolen, lost, misplaced, destroyed, damaged, or otherwise rendered unusable, the notary public must immediately notify the Secretary of State by certified or registered mail. The notification must include the periods of journal entries, the notary public commission number, the commission expiration date, and, when applicable, a photocopy of the police report that lists the journal. (Government Code section §8206(b))


     

    A notary public must provide a photo static copy of a line item from his or her journal when provided with a written request from any member of the public. The written request shall include the name of the parties, the type of document, and the month and year in which the document was notarized. The cost must not exceed thirty cents ($0.30) per page. (Government Code section §8206(c))


     

    The sequential journal is the exclusive property of the notary public and shall not be surrendered to an employer upon termination of employment, whether or not the employer paid for the journal, or at any other time. The circumstances in which the notary public must relinquish the journal or permit inspection and copying of journal transactions and the procedures the notary public must follow are specified in Government Code section §8206(d).


     

    A notary public is guilty of a misdemeanor if the notary public willfully fails to properly maintain the notary public’s journal. (Government Code section §8228.1)


     

    Within 30 days from the date the notary public commission is no longer valid, the notary public must deliver all notarial journals, records and papers to the county clerk’s office where the oath is on file. If the notary public willfully fails or refuses to do so, the notary public is guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be personally liable for damages to any person injured by that action or inaction. (Government Code section §8209)


     

    Any notarial journals, records and papers delivered to the Secretary of State will be returned to the sender.



     

    California Notary Law
    § 8206. Sequential journal; contents; thumbprint; loss of journal; copies of pages; exclusive property of notary public; limitations on surrender
    1.  
      1. A notary public shall keep one active sequential journal at a time, of all official acts performed as a notary public. The journal shall be kept in a locked and secured area, under the direct and exclusive control of the notary. Failure to secure the journal shall be cause for the Secretary of State to take administrative action against the commission held by the notary public pursuant to Section 8214.1.
      2. The journal shall be in addition to and apart from any copies of notarized documents that may be in the possession of the notary public and shall include all of the following:
        1. Date, time, and type of each official act.
        2. Character of every instrument sworn to, affirmed, acknowledged or proved before the notary.
        3. The signature of each person whose signature is being notarized.
        4. A statement as to whether the identity of a person making an acknowledgment or taking an oath or affirmation was based on personal knowledge or satisfactory evidence. If identity was established by satisfactory evidence pursuant to Section 1185 of the Civil Code, then the journal shall contain the signature of the credible witness swearing or affirming to the identity of the individual or the type of identifying document, the governmental agency issuing the document, the serial or identifying number of the document, and the date of issue or expiration of the document.
        5. If the identity of the person making the acknowledgment or taking the oath or affirmation was established by the oaths or affirmations of two credible witnesses whose identities are proven upon the presentation of satisfactory evidence, the type of identifying documents, the identifying numbers of the documents and the dates of issuance or expiration of the documents presented by the witnesses to establish their identity.
        6. The fee charged for the notarial service.
        7. If the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, or deed of trust affecting real property, the notary public shall require the party signing the document to place his or her right thumbprint in the journal. If the right thumbprint is not available, then the notary shall have the party use his or her left thumb, or any available finger and shall so indicate in the journal. If the party signing the document is physically unable to provide a thumbprint or fingerprint, the notary shall so indicate in the journal and shall also provide an explanation of that physical condition. This paragraph shall not apply to a trustee’s deed resulting from a decree of foreclosure or a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Section 2924 of the Civil Code, nor to a deed of reconveyance.
    2. If a sequential journal of official acts performed by a notary public is stolen, lost, misplaced, destroyed, damaged, or otherwise rendered unusable as a record of notarial acts and information, the notary public shall immediately notify the Secretary of State by certified or registered mail. The notification shall include the period of the journal entries, the notary public commission number, and the expiration date of the commission, and when applicable, a photocopy of any police report that specifies the theft of the sequential journal of official acts.
    3. Upon written request of any member of the public, which request shall include the name of the parties, the type of document, and the month and year in which notarized, the notary shall supply a photostatic copy of the line item representing the requested transaction at a cost of not more than thirty cents ($0.30) per page.
    4. The journal of notarial acts of a notary public is the exclusive property of that notary public, and shall not be surrendered to an employer upon termination of employment, whether or not the employer paid for the journal, or at any other time. The notary public shall not surrender the journal to any other person, except the county clerk, pursuant to Section 8209, or to a peace officer, as defined in Sections 830.1, 830.2, and 830.3 of the Penal Code, acting in his or her official capacity and within his or her authority, in response to a criminal search warrant signed by a magistrate and served upon the notary public by the peace officer. The notary public shall obtain a receipt for the journal, and shall notify the Secretary of State by certified mail within 10 days that the journal was relinquished to a peace officer. The notification shall include the period of the journal entries, the commission number of the notary public, the expiration date of the commission, and a photocopy of the receipt. The notary public shall obtain a new sequential journal. If the journal relinquished to a peace officer is returned to the notary public and a new journal has been obtained, the notary public shall make no new entries in the returned journal. A notary public who is an employee shall permit inspection and copying of journal transactions by a duly designated auditor or agent of the notary public’s employer, provided that the inspection and copying is done in the presence of the notary public and the transactions are directly associated with the business purposes of the employer. The notary public, upon the request of the employer, shall regularly provide copies of all transactions that are directly associated with the business purposes of the employer, but shall not be required to provide copies of any transaction that is unrelated to the employer’s business. Confidentiality and safekeeping of any copies of the journal provided to the employer shall be the responsibility of that employer.
    5. The notary public shall provide the journal for examination and copying in the presence of the notary public upon receipt of a subpoena duces tecum or a court order, and shall certify those copies if requested.



     

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA SAND CANYON CORPORATION ASSIGNMENTS OUT OF CALIFORNIA IS FRAUD AND VOID IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE AND POSSIBLE OTHER VICTIMS CASES" THIS IS HOW.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. PREPARED THE ASSIGNMENTS TO BE NOTARIZED IN CALIFORNIA BY A BRIAN D. MCCONNELL FROM CALIFORNIA AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008) AND AFTER THE NEW LAWS WENT INTO EFFECT (JANUARY 1, 2008) AND MORE 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9  10

    IF THE ASSIGNMENTS CAME OUT OF CALIFORNIA IN VIOLATION OF NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS THE ASSIGNMENTS ARE VOID-AND THEY ARE NOT VALID! SIROTE & PERMUTT CREATED TO FABRICATED ASSIGNMENTS TO THEMSELVES AFTER THEY GOT BUSTED ON THE ASSIGNMENT SHIPPED (4/25/96).  THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. ASSIGNED TO GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION SHIPPED (4/25/96) THEY GOT BUSTED AFTER THIS WAS POINTED OUT. 

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS HAD CORLA JACKSON BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGED JANUARY 20, 2010 WITH NO MORE ARREARS OWED TO GMAC UNDER BARRY FREEDMAN IN ORDER TO GO BACK IN WITH THE SECOND FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT DATED (JUNE 19, 2008) WHICH IS FRAUD FAR WORSE THAN THE FIRST FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT SHIPPED (4/25/96). 

     

    THE FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT DATED (JUNE 19, 2008) IS NOT ON THE CORRECT PLATFORM AND ITS IN VIOLATION OF THE NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS AND MORE-ITS FRAUD-NULL AND VOID MULTIPLE WAYS.  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE WAS CLOSED WHEN SIROTE & PERMUTT PREPARED THEIR SECOND FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008.    

     

    Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster, Johnson & Freedman, RCO P.C. (Keith Eady), Prince Mckean Mckenna & Broughton (J. Ritchie M. Prince) Committed Civil Fraud-Fraud Upon The Court Under Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Under Judge Martin Glenn, Judge York and Judge Kristi Dubose, Which Lead To Widespread Fraud and Fraud Upon Other Courts.  GMAC Mortgage LLC-ResCap Owes Billions Of Dollars To United States Federal Government, Investors Trust In Addition To Multiple States And Its Victims Guaranteed.  

     

    They Manipulated This Law Under: (G) If the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, or deed of trust affecting real property, the notary public shall require the party signing the document to place his or her right thumbprint in the journal. If the right thumbprint is not available, then the notary shall have the party use his or her left thumb, or any available finger and shall so indicate in the journal. If the party signing the document is physically unable to provide a thumbprint or fingerprint, the notary shall so indicate in the journal and shall also provide an explanation of that physical condition. This paragraph shall not apply to a trustee’s deed resulting from a decree of foreclosure or a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Section 2924 of the Civil Code, nor to a deed of reconveyance.  Pursuant to Section 2924 cannot apply for Victims because the Fraudulent Notarized Documents acted as the CROOKS Trustee's Deed' prior to the decree of foreclosures Nationwide.

     

    VICTIMS HAD NOT BEEN FORECLOSED ON BY:  trustee’s deed resulting from a decree of foreclosure or a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Section 2924 of the Civil Code, nor to a deed of reconveyance.  This Law Was Required:  If the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, or deed of trust affecting real property, the notary public shall require the party signing the document to place his or her right thumbprint in the journal. If the right thumbprint is not available, then the notary shall have the party use his or her left thumb, or any available finger and shall so indicate in the journal. If the party signing the document is physically unable to provide a thumbprint or fingerprint, the notary shall so indicate in the journal and shall also provide an explanation of that physical condition.

     

    SPECIAL ALERT! Trustee's deed resulting from a decree of foreclosure or a nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to Section 2924 cannot apply for Victims because the Fraudulent Notarized Documents acted as the CROOKS Trustee's Deed' prior to the decree of foreclosures Nationwide.  This makes the assignments null and void because section 2924 was violated. The Crooks Got Their Deeds By Foreclosure Deeds With The Fabricated Assignments, versus the Trustee's Deeds.  Majority Of The Mortgages Never Received A Release Of Mortgage-Cancellation Of The Original Mortgages From The Pools Of Trust Under The Original Notes-This Was Recorded.  In Addition To This" The Pools Of Trust Were Purchased After The Crimes Occurred, Which Is Worse. They Could Run Into Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, RICO violations, banking regulators violations, securities violations and more...

     

     

    The Only Way To Null-Void A Corrupted Judges Illegal Order On Assignments Is To Show The NOTARY Him-Herself Could Not Notarize The Fabricated Assignments-Documents-They Violated The Notary Rule Of Law Under Governed Laws. The Judges Was Supposed To Know The Notary Law-Govern Las In Each State The Assignments Were Notarized From, Prior To Stating An Assignment Was Valid. The Notary" Rule Of Law Under Governed Law Is What Validate An Assignment Not A Judge. Majority Of The Assignments Are Illegal-Void.

    The Notary Him-Herself Is Fraud. In Addition To This Majority Of Them Are Robo-Signers For Corrupted Law Firms and Servicers. Which Will Never Show Up In Court With Their Journal-Books As Required By The Rule Of Law.

     

     Pursuant to Section 2924 of the Civil Code can't apply to victims, they crooks used notarized assignments to obtain default illegal judgments and to obtain foreclosure deeds versus the Trustee's Deeds-around the SEC and Federal Reserve Pools Of Mortgages On Original Notes. 

    The illegal foreclosures is on fabricated notes-by the persons that obtain the notarized documents. The Crooks Conveyed their Fabricated Notes back to themselves without owing the victims property.  Once this was done" they faked a foreclosure to obtain Foreclosure Deeds on Stolen Property's For Illegal Profits using deceptive Practices, to rob the FEDS on Harp-TARP-Money And More. 

     

    The Law Firms Commit Securities Fraud with fabricated notes for illegal profits is what they did, robbing the victims of the property, identity, credit, equity, payments-money and more, this is a white collar crime robbery.   The law firms committed fraud preparing documents for Robo-Signers to sign, they were illegally profiting from their clients based upon Fraud and more with illegal notarized assignments to themselves' without released of the original notes-cancellation of the original mortgages-from the pools of trust around the SEC, using depletive practices.   

    Those loan numbers the crooks created was without the Trustees Original Notes Satisfactions from the massive stolen pools of mortgages.

    They created loans and assignments back to themselves using deceptive practices which is Fraud.  In Addition to the above, the fabricated loans were  created prior to the assignments, prior to purchasing the pools of mortgages, and without release of the original notes and more.  They Demolished the original notes using deceptive practices is what they did robbing the VICTIMS-FEDS-FDIC-WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST-AROUND THE-SEC ALL OVER AGAIN FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE GUARANTEED!  

    The documents Crooks were notarizing were transferring property's they didn't own out of trust, creating new loans and assigning their new loans over to themselves, then they faked a foreclosure to obtain foreclosure deeds versus the trustees deeds under the original notes-without a release-cancellation of victims original mortgages, by the rule of law and governed laws this is banking fraud-embezzlement of payments form victims, theft of credit, theft of mortgages out of pools of mortgages around the sec, federal reserve and more. 

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When Sirote & Permutt P.C. Illegally Forced Her Into The Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).  1   2  3  4   5  6

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Corla Reeves Jackson Saved The Federal Reserve And More!

    CALIFORNIA PROOF OF EXECUTION BY SUBSCRIBING WITNESS CIVIL CODE § 1195 Civil Code section 1195

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WOULD COMMIT FRAUD TO KEEP THE CRIMES IN ALABAMA COVERED UP GUARANTEED...

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. KEPT ON STEALING MORTGAGES UNDER GMAC (2) TIMES THE (3) TIME THEY CARRIED IT OUT UNDER JUDGE SHULMAN WITH ANOTHER FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT AND ALTERED DOCUMENTS ON ARREARS DATED BACK TO (2006) WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING IN (2006).  THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED ITS RECORDED FACTS! 1    2    3    4    5    6   

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED

     

    CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY WAS STOLEN FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS

     

     

    Key Evidence The Alabama Judges Committed Fraud Issuing Fraudulent Illegal Orders Violating Notary Governed Laws And More.  Judges Willfully and Illegally Stated The Assignments Were VALID Knowing The Assignments Were Not VALID They Were Fraud.  The State Of Alabama Its Firms Lawyers and Judges Willfully Corrupted Victims Complaints And Cases With Illegal Orders Violating Governed Laws and Much More Guaranteed...

     

     

    The Alabama Law Firm And Lawyers Were Stealing Mortgages Based Upon Fraud With Alabama Judges Fraudulent Orders On Assignments That Was VOID Fraud and More... The Fabricated Assignments Prepared By Sirote & Permutt P.C. Was Fraud" Was Not VALID' and They Were Not Prepared By Governed Laws Which Is Null And Void!

     

    This Is What A Real Assignment Was Suppose To Look Like" The State Of Alabama Covered Up This Up With Alabama Judges Corruption Illegal Fraudulent ORDERS Based Upon FRAUD and FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURT'S.  The State Of Alabama and Its Judges Knew They Were Providing Their State Firms, Affiliate Firms and Lawyers With Illegal Orders Linked To" Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster With The Intent To Steal Mortgages Around The SEC Federal Reserve and More.

     

    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C., and Their Affiliate Firms Were Stealing From The SEC, Federal Reserve And More For Illegal Profits" Personal Gain Or Favor, Which Is Not Of Any Law" Its A White Collar Federal Banking Crime, Money Laundering and More Through Stolen Mortgages And More Using Deceptive Practices" This Violates RICO!

     

    The Lawyers And Judges Knew The Assignments Prepared By Its Law Firms and Lawyers Were Fraud Guaranteed... This Is What A Real Assignment Was Suppose To Look Like... You Cannot Convince Me" Jeff Sessions Didn't Know What The State Of Alabama Was Doing Through Its Firms  For Illegal Profits Around The SEC and More" With Trump Affiliates" Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Its Affiliate Firms. The Stolen Mortgage Ring Is Linked To The Russia Probe Guaranteed... How Do You Think They Funded Russia And More..?  Trump's Campaign Was Planned A Long Time Ago.  Their Plan Was To Have Luther Strange As President And Sessions AG, But Instead Sessions Manipulated His Way In Under Trump, and It Was A Motive-To Block All The Illegal Foreclosures Stolen Mortgage Profits and More Under Trump Multiple Ways Linked To His Affiliates and Trump Affiliates...Deutsche Bank Was The Key Trustee Over The Massive Stolen Mortgages...

     

     

    I Saved The State Of California Victims And Millions Of Other Victims From Multiple States Nationwide And They Don't Know It Yet-But The SEC Know It-And-My Fans That Followed My Story From The Beginning To Date.  Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind On Payments When She Was Robbed Her Mortgage Credit Land Policy's And More.  The Law Firms Committed A Federal Crime For Illegal Profits" Setting It Up Where Corla Jackson Real Mortgage Payment s Was Being Applied To A Fabricated Note For Illegal Profits Under Their Clients Name Based Upon Fraud With Their Loan Number (0835002124).  GMAC Mortgage LLC Illegal Fabricated Loan (0835002124) Was Not The Original Note That Was Between Corla Jackson And Option One Mortgage Corporation" This Was Recorded And More... 

     

     

    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Was Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgages In Multiple States Under Judge Martin Glenn-They Committed Fraud To Steal Massive Stolen Mortgages For Illegal Profits Personal Gain Or Favor Which Is Not Of Any Law" Its A Federal Banking Crime That Was Covered Up On How They Were Doing It Until Now-The Lies Is Over" The Assignment Sirote & Permutt P.C. Prepared In Corla Jackson And Option One Mortgage Corporation Name Is Fraud-Moot-Null-VOID!

     

    The Alabama Law Firms and Judges Linked To This Crime" Willfully Committed Perjury" Civil Fraud and Fraud Upon The Court Stating The Assignment Was VALID Knowing It Was Fraud.  Alabama Knew Sirote & Permutt P.C. Fabricated Assignments Didn't Look Like This" See Evidence.  Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Willfully Covered This Up Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Alabama Courts and More For Illegal Profits.  The Alabama Law Firms and State Alabama Knew Victims Were Being Robbed And They Covered It Up" This Is Facts!

     

     

    The Lawyers And  Judges Linked To This Complaint and Crime All Violated Federal and Governed Laws And More " The Lies Is Over Guaranteed!   The Assignment Sirote & Permutt P.C. Illegally Prepared Without The Release-Cancellation Of The Original Notes Between Victim-Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Pools Of Mortgages Is Fraud" Moot, Null and VOID by Govern Laws. This Is Recorded and More!

     

    Alabama Judges Knew The Assignment They Stated Was Valid Was Fraud-It Didn't Look Like This and They Knew Better-The Evidence Was Provided To Them and More... The Alabama Corrupted Judges Committed Fraud To Support Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C. Fraud Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgages and More...  It Is True The State Of Alabama Violated Governed Laws and More Guaranteed!

     

    Compare Alabama's Firms Fabricated Assignments To What A VALID ASSIGNMENT Suppose To Look Like By Governed Laws.  Click Here and Click Here .  This Is Just The Beginning It Get Worse Than This Guaranteed...

     

     

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED

     

    CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY WAS STOLEN FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS

     

    PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR WHICH IS A FEDERAL WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY MULTIPLE WAYS...

     

     

     I Saved The Federal Reserve Again As Well As Wall Street Investors Trust. In Addition To This"  I Also Saved The State Of California Victims And Millions Of Other Victims From Multiple States Nationwide And They Don't Know It Yet-But The SEC Know It-And-My Fans That Followed My Story From The Beginning To Date.  Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind On Payments When She Was Robbed Her Mortgage Credit Land Policy's And More.  The Alabama Law Firms Committed A Federal Crime For Illegal Profits" They Robbed Corla Jackson Of Her Mortgage Credit Home and Land On Insured Covered Losses" In Addition To Payments Without Lack Of Standing

     

    The Alabama Law Firm and Lawyers Illegally Robbed Corla Jackson and Had It Set Up So They Could Apply Her Money Under False Pretense Under GMAC Fabricated Notes They Illegally Was Profiting From. 

     

     

    Corla Jackson Estate Was Stolen and Embezzled For Illegal Profits Under Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Clients Name Based Upon Fraud With Their Under A New Fabricated  (0835002124) Prior To The Assignment Dated (June 19, 2008). 

    Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Knew The Fraudulent Loan was Illegal Created Prior To The Illegal Assignment' Dated (June 19, 2008).  This Crime Occurred In (2005) Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Without Lack Of Standing" This Is Recorded. 

    The Alabama Law Firms and Corrupted Judges Willful Continued To Corrupt The Case" While They Carried Out The White Collar Crime Robbery Based Upon Fraud With Illegal Orders From Alabama Judges That Is What Happen Here..

     

     

    The State Of Alabama Is Trying To Cover Up A Crime Dated Back To (2005) That Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings And Their Affiliate Firms and Morrison & Foerster Willfully Defrauded Judge Martin Glenn With Using Deceptive Practices" Which Isn't Going To Work Here Anymore.  The Lies Is Over...

    The State Of Alabama Elected Officials Willfully Conspired With Alabama's Corrupted Judges For Their Law Firms To Obtain Illegal Orders" That Is Clearly Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Courts.  The Corrupted Judges Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud Stated The Fraudulent Assignments Were VALID When They Were FRAUD!  Because Of This" It Lead To Widespread Fraud Into New York Under Judge Martin Glenn, Judge Koeltl and More.  This Cannot Be Ignored Or Denied Its Recorded Facts Guaranteed...

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC Illegal Fabricated Loan (0835002124) Was Not The Original Note That Was Between Corla Jackson And Option One Mortgage Corporation" This Was Recorded And More... 

     

     

    Alabama Victims Corla Jackson Know We Were Denied Help From The State Of Alabama They Wanted Our Land Home Money And Settlement Funds  Through Their Law Firms Bradley Arant Boult Cummings" Sirote & Permutt P.C. Their Affiliate Firms And Lawyers.  They All Benefited and Profited From The Massive Stolen Mortgages With Their Clients" In Exchange Personal Gain Or Favor Based Upon Fraud They All Busted!

     

     

    THE LIES IS OVER AND MORE GUARANTEED...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    SEE HARD CORE EVIDENCE HERE AND MORE...

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. KEPT ON STEALING MORTGAGES UNDER GMAC (2) TIMES   1    2  

     

     

    The Lies Is Over Guaranteed... 

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND IN PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED IN (2005)

     

     

    THIS WAS COVERED UP AND MORE...

     

    SEC Info - Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-4/Asset-Backed ...

    Mortgage-Backed Securities - U.S. Securities and Exchange...

    SEC Info - Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1 - 8-K - For …

     

     

    1    2    3    4    5    6    7

     

     

     

     

     

     

    I DON NOT HAVE TO TELL THE WORLD WHAT THIS MEAN!

    CORLA JACKSON HAD DONE HER JOB QUIET WELL TO TRY AND SAVE WALL STREET AS WELL AS VICTIMS NATIONWIDE AND MORE!

     

     

     

     

    United States Securities Exchange Commission SEC Office of the Whistleblower

    100 F Street NE Mail Stop 5631 Washington, DC 20549 Phone: (202) 551-4790 Fax: (703) 813-9322

     

    OWEN DIDN'T PAY VICTIMS AND THEY COVERED IT UP USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND MORE BY INFLUENCE WHICH IS A FEDERAL CRIME  

     

    OWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 1661 Worthington Road, Suite 100 West Palm Beach, Florida. 33409

     

    OWEN DIDN'T PAY VICTIMS THEY ROBBED WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AGAIN AROUND THE SEC AND CFPB CONSENT AND ENFORCEMENT ORDERS

    USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND COVERED IT UP WHICH HAS BEEN UNCOVERED AND MORE WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED OR DENIED ITS FACTS GUARANTEED!

     

     

    OWEN HAD NO INTENTIONS ON FINDING OUT WHAT HAPPEN TO VICTIMS AND THEY HAD NOT INTENTIONS ON GIVING THEM EMERGENCY RELIEF WITHIN THE TIME FROM OF THE CONSENT AND ENFORCEMENT ORDER FOR VICTIMS TO HAVE MONEY TO PAY FOR LAWYERS AND GET RELIEF TO PAY THEIR BILLS AND MORE.  THEY VIOLATED THE LAW AND THE ORDERS GUARANTEED!

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA LAW FIRMS WAS COVERING THIS UP FOR OWEN FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN AND FAVOR BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON ALABAMA COURTS!  VICTIMS WAS NOT PAID AND DID NOT RECEIVE HELP TO THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDERS THEY WERE ROBBED AGAIN BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS FOR OWEN AND MORE GUARANTEED...

     

     

    OWEN knew Assignments Generally: Lenders, or holders of mortgages or deeds of trust, often assign mortgages or deeds of trust to other lenders, or third parties.  When this is done the assignee (person who received the assignment) steps into the place of the original lender or assignor.  To effectuate an assignment, the general rules are that the assignment must be in proper written format and recorded to provide notice of the assignment.

    OWEN covered up Notary Laws and the property formats on the fabricated assignments were fraud for illegal profits.  This violated Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, OWEN did not cease and desist from committing or causing violations under Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13, caused under the prior servicers platforms and more.

     The Original Notes under Victims properties were never satisfied to date, this was covered up by OWEN and Affiliates.  By the rule of law and Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 making findings, the Original Notes- Satisfactions Generally only can transfer-Once a mortgage or deed of trust is paid, the holder of the mortgage is required to satisfy the mortgage or deed of trust of record to show that the mortgage or deed of trust is no longer a lien on the property.  The general rule is that the satisfaction must be in proper written format and recorded to provide notice of the satisfaction.  If the lender fails to record a satisfaction within set time limits, the lender may be responsible for damages set by statute for failure to timely cancel the lien. Depending on your state, a satisfaction may be called a Satisfaction, Cancellation, or Reconveyance.  Some states still recognize marginal satisfaction but this is slowly being phased out.  A marginal satisfaction is where the holder of the mortgage physically goes to the recording office and enters a satisfaction on the face of the recorded mortgage, which is attested by the clerk.

    OWEN purchased prior servicers mortgage servicing platforms for a reason, and for illegal profits using deceptive practices.  Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 making findings, OWEN did not cease and desist from committing or causing violations under Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13, they continued. 

     

     

    Governed Law and State Law Were Violated The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9

     

    Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate, made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust contrary to the

    provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary.  (Code 1923, § 9018; Code 1940, T. 47,

    §172.)  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (4/30/2008).  GMAC Mortgage LLC didn’t own the mortgage and note when they filed their

    complaints and received their illegal ejectments out of Alabama by corrupted judges they knew, OWEN owned the Notes.  This is recorded facts that

    cannot be ignored or denied.  Governed laws and more was violated that OWEN willful covered up!

     

     

    New Notary Laws Null and Voids Assignments Issued Out Of California.

     

    New adopted legislation effective January 1, 2008, amended Civil Code sections 1185 and 1189; Government Code sections 6203, 8201.1, 8201.2, 8201.5, 8202, 8206, 8213.5, 8213.6, 8214.1, 8214.2, 8214.15, 8221, 8225, 8228, and 8228.1; and added Government Code sections 8206.5, 8214.21 and 8214.23. These amendments and new laws delete the “personally known” basis for establishing identity when taking an acknowledgment and executing a jurat; require the certificate of acknowledgment to be executed under penalty of perjury and apply strict penalties to persons who willfully state as true any material fact in the acknowledgment known to be false.

    The Assignments issued out of California by Servicers is more than likely fraud and is in violation of not only Notary Laws but the assignments itself was not on proper formats and more because they were Fraud and done by Robo-Signers thinking this would never be Uncovered.  There were New Notary Laws that may have Saved Victims Nationwide after January 1, 2008. Corla Jackson has saved USA, Wall Street Investors Trust Funds, The Federal Reserve As Well As Victims and Herself and this is why her case and Complaints were Blocked out of Alabama and firms and Services linked to the law firms and more.  The lies is over-OWEN Owes Multiple States linked to Notary Fraud by Law Firms and Lawyers whom fabricated Assignments based upon fraud.  Majority of the Assignments During the Mortgage Crisis After January 1, 2008 is NOT VALID, they are Null Void Moot Tort and more.  Corla Jackson assignment came out of California.  Corla Jackson lender was Option One Mortgage Corporation, the fabricated assignment was prepared by an Alabama Law Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C., who committed the crime back in (2005) and after Option One Mortgage Corporation Closed (4/30/2008).  The fabricated an assignment was signed by Brian D. McConnell and illegally Notarized out of California which is FRAUD according to the Notary rule of law and Governed Laws.  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (4/30/2008), Sirote & Permutt P.C. Committed Fraud with an invalid fabricated assignments not once but (2) times.  All this was covered up and more guaranteed.

     

     

    OWEN and its law firms knew this.  OWEN Robbed FEDS and Victims After The Purchasing multiple servicing platforms in  Acquisitions and signing consent and enforcement orders.  The latest crime is between (June 1, 2016-2017) in this particular case which forced them through the judicial system to get the evidence and more, which will lead to the largest settlement the SEC-Federal Reserve got in American History Guaranteed.  See Other facts listed below... 

    OWEN kept the employees of the multiple servicers after the Acquisitions which included, ResCap-GMAC Mortgage LLC, and more.  OWEN continued Operating under the prior servicer’s names after the Acquisitions-Purchases of servicing platforms.  OWEN did this so their wouldn’t be a paper trail of evidence for them doing any crimes around the SEC, Federal Reserve, FDIC and more. 

     

     

    The crystal clear the Acquisitions and Sale of the combination platforms occurred after the mortgage crisis in 2012 with Harp funds, stolen

     

    property’s victims stolen identity’s, victims stolen credit, victims stolen equity, victims stolen insurance policy’s and more, which was never

     

    settled by the servicers to date, this was covered up.  OWEN and AFFILIATES did the opposite with the Harp-Tarp Funds. 

     

     

     

     

     

    THE ASSIGNMENTS OUT OF CALIFORNIA SIGNED BY BRIAN D. MCCONNELL IS NOT VALID IT WASN'T NOTARIZED BY THE RULE OF LAW AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008 PERIOD MULTIPLE WAYS...

    THE NOTARY HIM OR HERSELF KNEW THE NOTARY WAS FRAUD NO BOOKS-JOURNAL-FINGERPRINTS-OR BACKGROUND CHECKS DONE THROUGH THE DOJ-DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND RECORDED.  ALSO THERE WASN'T (2) WITNESSES ON THE NOTARIZED FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT AND MORE, AS REQUIRED BY THE NEW GOVERNED LAW.

     

    THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID THAT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. OF ALABAMA PREPARED FOR BRIAN D. MCCONNELL, THIS WAS COVERED UP!  THE NOTARY STAMP WITHOUT BEING NOTARIZED BY THE RULE OF LAW AND GOVERNED LAWS AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008.  MAJORITY OF THE ASSIGNMENTS PREPARED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. OUT OF ALABAMA IS FRAUD MOOT NULL TORT VOID. AND FRAUD.   New adopted legislation effective January 1, 2008, amended Civil Code sections 1185 and 1189; Government Code sections 6203, 8201.1, 8201.2, 8201.5, 8202, 8206, 8213.5, 8213.6, 8214.1, 8214.2, 8214.15, 8221, 8225, 8228, and 8228.1; and added Government Code sections 8206.5, 8214.21 and 8214.23. These amendments and new laws delete the “personally known” basis for establishing identity when taking an acknowledgment and executing a jurat; require the certificate of acknowledgment to be executed under penalty of perjury and apply strict penalties to persons who willfully state as true any material fact in the acknowledgment known to be false.  All this was covered up by the Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange - Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Sirote & Permutt P.C. . their Affiliate Firms, Alabama Judges more...

     

     

     

     

    CFPB CONSENT ORDER WERE VIOLATED AND COVERED UP!

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON ANY PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS INITIALLY ROBBED AND THIS WAS COVERED UP AND MORE... 

     

     

    I Couldn't Get Any Help From The State Of Alabama They Kept Blocking Me And We All Know Why Now.  I Had To Reach Out To The FEDS and More Outside Of Alabama For Help.  I Was Robbed And This Was Covered Up By The State Of Alabama's State Firm Affiliate Firms With Judges Illegal Orders That Is Based Upon Fraud And Fraud Upon The Court And More! 

     

     

    Alabama Victims, Wall Street Investors Trust, Investors, The Federal Reserve, U.S. Govt. and More For Illegal Profits Around The SEC, FDIC, CFPB and More.  Those Alabama Judges That Issued The Illegal Orders Knew The Assignments Were Fraud-Not Valid, Prior To Issuing All The Illegal Orders For Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Their Affiliate Firms For OWEN and more...

     

    OWEN COVERED UP the FEDS Alabama Victims, and Victims Nationwide had been robbed by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings And Their Affiliate Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C.  They Were Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgages Nationwide Using Deceptive Practices For Illegal Profits, Linked To Multiple States On Fraudulent Assignments Out Of California that was Prepared by the Alabama Law Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings.  The Assignments Were Not Valid By The Rule Of Law" This Was Public Records They Covered Up and More!

     

    We Were Forced Into Hardship And The State Of Alabama Didn't Help The Victims They Were Involved and Profiting From The SCAMS through their Law Firms and Affiliate Firms For Illegal Profits Personal Gain And Favor. 

    The State Of Alabama Didn't Help The Victims And Neither Did OWEN!  The Illegal Orders The Judges Issued Violation Governed Laws Is A Federal Offense" They Knew The Assignments Were Not Valid Guaranteed...This Was Public Records. 

    The State Of Alabama Knew What Its Law Firms Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Sirote & Permutt P.C. and their Affiliate Firms and Judges Were Doing Was Illegal.  They Willfully Continued Robbing FEDS Victims Wall Street Investors Trust Investors Federal Reserve, around The SEC, They Never Put In Complaint To Alabama Financial Fraud Department-SEC Banking Regulators, That's Why GOVT-FEDS-SEC-Outside Alabama Didn't Know What Was Going On In Alabama, it was being covered up and more...

     

     

     

    THIS WAS THE FIRST FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT IT WAS IN (BLANK) AND WAS (CREATED-SHIPPED (4/25/96) PRIOR BEFORE THE HOUSE WAS BUILT AND PRIOR TO THE LOAN BETWEEN CORLA JACKSON AND OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION.

     

     

     

     

    Option One Mortgage Corporate Office Was In Irvine California:  Here Is A Few Pointers That Foreclosure Victims Should Look For:  The California Secretary of State, Notary Public & Special Filings Section, is responsible for appointing and commissioning qualified persons as notaries public for four-year termsA finger print (typically the right thumb) may be required in the notary journal based on the transaction in question (e.g., deed, quitclaim deed, deed of trust affecting real property, power of attorney document, et cetera). Documents with blank spaces cannot be notarized (a further anti-fraud measure). California explicitly prohibits notaries public from using literal foreign language translation of their title The use of a notary seal is required.   A notary would indicate the street address at which the ceremony was performed, and this practice.  Documents with blank spaces cannot be notarized (a further anti-fraud measure). California explicitly prohibits notaries public from using literal foreign language translation of their title.  Rule Of Governed Notary Laws Required:  1    2     3

     

     

     

     

    THIS WAS THE SECOND FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT

     

     

     

     

    RECORDING A FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT DON'T MAKE IT VALID OR LEGAL IT MAKES ITS FRAUD!

    RECORDING A FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT DON'T MAKE IT VALID OR LEGAL.  THE NOTARY GOVERNED LAWS AND REGULATIONS MAKE A NOTARIZED DOCUMENT VALID AND LEGAL!

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. PREPARED THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT AFTER OPTION ONE MORTGAGE WAS CLOSED (4/30/2008) ON A LOAN GMAC CREATED IN (2005) WHICH IS NULL AND VOID.  GMAC LOAN (0835002124) WAS CREATED ILLEGALLY PRIOR TO THE FRAUDULENT FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT THAT'S RECORDED IN ALABAMA WHICH IS FLAT OUT FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURTS.

     

    THE LAWYERS AND JUDGES KNEW THE ASSIGNMENTS THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS WERE CREATING FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR WAS FRAUD AS WELL AS THE ILLEGAL ORDERS ISSUED BY ALABAMA JUDGES .  THEY WILLFULLY CORRUPT THIS CASE AND COMPLAINT WHICH LEAD TO WIDESPREAD FRAUD UPON COURTS IN NEW YORK CAUSED BY BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. AND MORRISON & FOERSTER AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS NATIONWIDE.   

     

    THE ALABAMA JUDGES AND LAWYERS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT WITH THEIR FIRMS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS-SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., THEIR AFFILIATE  FIRMS AND JUDGES.  THIS IS A FEDERAL CRIME-A WHITE COLLAR CRIME ROBBERY AS WELL AS SECURITIES FRAUD AND MORE.  THE ALABAMA AG LUTHER STRANGE LIED AND COVERED UP MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGE LINKED TO HIS AND JEFF SESSIONS AFFILIATES AND FIRMS WHO BENEFITED AND PROFITED FROM THE FIRMS ILLEGAL PROFITING SCAM-RING!

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA KNEW GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE MORTGAGES THEY STOLE AND OWEN DIDN'T PAY THE VICTIMS AND IF THEY DID THE VICTIMS DIDN'T GET THE MONEY!

     

     

     

    THIS WAS THE SECOND FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT ANY JUDGE COULD SEE THIS ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID BY GOVERNED LAWS AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008 THEY RECORDED AN ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS NOT VALID BY THE RULE OF ANY LAW AFTER PRIOR TO OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008. NO VALUE WAS RECORDED THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT-IT WAS MANIPULATED-NOT TO MENTION THE LOAN WAS CREATED BY GMAC IN (2005) PRIOR TO THIS FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008

     

    THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS LAW FIRMS AND JUDGES IS BUSTED BIG TIME FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT'S.  THIS WAS NOT REPORTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THE (SEC) AND FEDERAL RESERVE WALL STREET INVESTORS TRUST AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THOSE ALABAMA JUDGES AND JUDGES KNEW THE ASSIGNMENTS WERE VOID AND ILLEGAL!... 

     

     

    Option One Mortgage Corporate Office Was In Irvine California:  Here Is A Few Pointers That Foreclosure Victims Should Look For:  The California Secretary of State, Notary Public & Special Filings Section, is responsible for appointing and commissioning qualified persons as notaries public for four-year termsA finger print (typically the right thumb) may be required in the notary journal based on the transaction in question (e.g., deed, quitclaim deed, deed of trust affecting real property, power of attorney document, et cetera). Documents with blank spaces cannot be notarized (a further anti-fraud measure). California explicitly prohibits notaries public from using literal foreign language translation of their title The use of a notary seal is required.   A notary would indicate the street address at which the ceremony was performed, and this practice.  Documents with blank spaces cannot be notarized (a further anti-fraud measure). California explicitly prohibits notaries public from using literal foreign language translation of their title.  Rule Of Governed Notary Laws Required:  1    2     3

     

     

     

    THE ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID THAT SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. OF ALABAMA PREPARED FOR BRIAN D. MCCONNELL, THIS WAS COVERED UP!  THE NOTARY STAMP WITHOUT BEING NOTARIZED BY THE RULE OF LAW AND GOVERNED LAWS AFTER JANUARY 1, 2008.  MAJORITY OF THE ASSIGNMENTS PREPARED BY SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. OUT OF ALABAMA IS FRAUD MOOT NULL TORT VOID. AND FRAUD.   New adopted legislation effective January 1, 2008, amended Civil Code sections 1185 and 1189; Government Code sections 6203, 8201.1, 8201.2, 8201.5, 8202, 8206, 8213.5, 8213.6, 8214.1, 8214.2, 8214.15, 8221, 8225, 8228, and 8228.1; and added Government Code sections 8206.5, 8214.21 and 8214.23. These amendments and new laws delete the “personally known” basis for establishing identity when taking an acknowledgment and executing a jurat; require the certificate of acknowledgment to be executed under penalty of perjury and apply strict penalties to persons who willfully state as true any material fact in the acknowledgment known to be false.  All this was covered up by the Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange - Bradley Arant Boult Cummings - Sirote & Permutt P.C. . their Affiliate Firms, Alabama Judges more...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    CFPB CONSENT ORDER WERE VIOLATED AND COVERED UP!

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON ANY PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS INITIALLY ROBBED AND THIS WAS COVERED UP AND MORE... 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Lies Is Over And More Guaranteed...

     

     

    How Did The State Of Alabama Steal All Those Mortgages When GMAC No Longer Owned Mortgages 

    The State Of Alabama Firms Stole Mortgages Knowing GMAC No Longer Owned Mortgages 

     

     

    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Morrison & Foerster

    Sirote & Permutt P.C. And Their Affiliate Firms-Judges 

     

     

    Anyone Missing A Home-Equity You May Want To Start Looking Here First...

    Anyone Missing A Home-Equity You May Want To Look Here As Well...

     

     

    HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2012 and 2011 (3) The interest rate is determined by the Company from the following options: one-week LIBOR + 200 bps; federal funds rate + 300 bps; or prime rate – 25 bps. The Company is entitled to borrow against new servicing advances and/or servicing fees receivable, subject to the maximum borrowing limit on the SAF through the maturity date. If the SAF is not replaced or renewed and extended beyond the maturity date, the Company cannot borrow against any new servicing advances, and all collections of servicing advances pledged to the SAF are subsequently required to be used to pay down the outstanding SAF principal along with the related interest, including additional interest that accrues after the end of the funding period until amortization is complete.

    In the event that any principal is still outstanding after the maturity date, the remaining unpaid principal balance will become due and payable from the SAF at that time, with no recourse back to the Company.  On May 11, 2011, the Company refinanced the 2010-ADV2 SAF and entered into the $1.45 billion 2011-SART1 SAF to fund primarily Option One Mortgage Corporation (OOMC) related servicing advances, with a maturity date of May 10, 2012 and May 10, 2013. On May 9, 2012, the Company refinanced the 2011-SART1 SAF Class A-1 Term note and reduced the facility to a $1.38 billion SAF, with a maturity of May 10, 2013.

     

     

    SECURITIES FRAUD TAKE A LOOK AT THIS!

     

    CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR ($406,886.59) ON A LOAN SHE HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION FOR ($240.000.00) UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8. The July 21, 2010, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” (the “Act”) and Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13, was suppose to prevent this from occurring again...Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Should Have Been Shut Down and Sanctioned-Fined and More...

    RESCAP-GMAC MORTGAGE LLC-OCWEN-Ocwen Financial Corporation” Altisource - (HLSS) Home Loan Servicing Solutions-Option One Mortgage Corporation n/k/a Sand Canyon Corporation.  They continued and (Willful) Violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13-using deceptive practices.  They were robbing victims for illegal profits to Rob The FEDS-AGAIN!

     

     

    DON'T FORGET TO LOOK HERE...

     

     

     

     

     

    Alabama Law Firms and Their Clients Illegally Committed Fraud with the intent to rob victims of their money home land policy’s credit and more.  They robbed the victims and illegally applied the money home land policy’s credit and more to their fabricated loans with the intent to rob the Federal Reserve Wall Street Investors Trust, Victims and more of the Victims Original Notes, with fabricated assignments and altered loan documents switching out loan numbers.

    When victims requested the payoff-satisfaction of their Original Notes they didn’t provide the victims with the payoff of the original notes prior to creating their fabricated notes, instead they illegally faked and did illegal foreclosures to get foreclosure deeds based upon fraud around the FEDS and SEC.  When victims made their payments there were not applied to their Original Notes they were applied under the fabricated notes that were covered up.  Victims were not behind under their Original Notes-they were robbed of payments and illegally foreclosed on under the fabricated notes when victims caught on to them, so they wouldn’t be busted.  They illegally blocked victim’s cases and complaints out of Alabama as well as nationwide linked to the monopoly law firms linked to the massive stolen mortgage fraud rings. 

    Alabama was illegally profiting from the scam through their law firms and affiliate firms, with banks and servicers using deceptive practices with Alabama Judges illegal orders based upon fraud and fraud upon the courts guaranteed.  The Judges linked to this particular case knew the assignment shipped (4/25/96) was fraud that was shipped prior to the loan with Option One Mortgage Corporation and prior to the home being built.  After this was pointed out they fabricated a second fabricated assignment dated June 19, 2008 which is also fraud, in violation of Notary Governed Laws and more. 

    The Assignment is Void.  Alabama Judges were committing fraud stating their firms Assignments were VALID when they were FRAUD.  A Judge cannot issue an order against Governed Notary Laws and state Fraudulent Assignments were VALID because Judges do not make the Governed laws, they were supposed to uphold the laws, instead they violated the Governed laws multiple ways guaranteed.  In this particular case Corla Jackson wasn’t behind on mortgage payments she was robbed and funds applied to a new loan around the FEDERAL RESERVE AND SEC FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS, and to fake a Foreclosure under her property for additional profits and more linked to insured covered losses multiple ways guaranteed.  Notary Laws Rules and Regulations Validate Assignments Not Judges Illegal Orders Based Upon FRAUD and Fraud Upon Alabama Courts-More.  Those Alabama Judges Knew Victims-FEDS Were Robbed!

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    CFPB CONSENT ORDER WERE VIOLATED AND COVERED UP!

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON ANY PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS INITIALLY ROBBED AND THIS WAS COVERED UP AND MORE... 

     

     

     

     

     

     

      

    Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Discharged January 20, 2010 by

     

    Governed Law and State Law- The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9

     

     

    Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate, made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust

    contrary to the provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary. 

    (Code 1923, § 9018; Code 1940, T. 47, §172.)  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (4/30/2008)

     

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind In Payments When She Was Robbed In (2005): Sirote & Permutt P.C. Filed A False Claim Under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) Stating They

    Owned Corla Jackson Property And She Took Out A Loan With Them Under Loan Number (0835002124) When This Was Fraud-It Was Not True.  There Was Never A

    Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Prior To The Illegal Foreclosure June 1, 2012.  Corla Jackson Never Had A Loan With GMAC Mortgage Corporation

    AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC She Was Robbed And So Was The FEDS Under False Pretense and More Pursuant to the Adjustable Rate Note terms and conditions (May 26,

    2004) between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation is under loan number 651003367 servicing 001347464.  This was covered up by Bradley Arant

    Boult Cummings and the State Of Alabama Affiliate Firms and Corrupted Judges By Influence and More violating Governed-State Laws-More..

     

     

    The State Of Alabama's Corrupted Judges Willfully Violated California Notary Laws-Rules-Regulations and More" With The

    Intent To Help Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C. Posing MERS, Banks and Servicers Based Upon

    Fraud!

     

    The Assignment Sirote & Permutt P.C. Prepared (June 19, 2008) Is Not Valid It Violates Federal Governed Notary Laws Rules

    Regulations and More After (January 1, 2008) Its - Null and Void  - Multiple Ways - Guaranteed...

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

     

    Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

     

     

     

     

    CIVIL CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

     

    See § 1195. Proof of execution; methods; certificate form and more...

     

     

    THE ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 19, 2008

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. and BRADLEY ARANT BOULT  CUMMINGS

     

    Defrauded FEDS and More With Illegal Fraudulent Assignments Guaranteed!

     

     

    The Assignment Is Not On The Correct Format and It Didn't Have A Witness To Verify Brian D. McConnell Authority To Sign Over A Mortgage-

    More-Its Not Marked Showing If It Was A He/She-No Thumb Print-Journal-Book and More By The Rule Of Law!  The Notary Did Not Have An

    Background Check After January 1, 2008 And Neither Did They Register As Taking The New Updated Courses To Notarized Legal Documents.

     

     

     

    After January 1, 2008" CA Notary's Had To have Background Check Done By Through The Department Of Justice (DOJ) and More... A Journal

    Was Required, Fingerprints, Valid I.D. and Additional Witnesses and More" Dealing With Mortgages After The Mortgage Crisis...

     

    The Dam Notary Wasn't Even Valid To Continue Doing Notary's By The New Laws After January 1, 2008, Which Had To Be Done Regardless Of

    When Its Commission Expired-This Is Recorded.  There Was No Witness On The Assignment With Brain D. McConnell and The Notary And The

    Notary Knew This' As Well As Brian D. McConnell.  All Though A Notary Commission Expired After The New Notary Laws' They Had To Follow

    The New Laws Rules And Regulations In Order For The Assignment Dated (June 19, 20080 To Be Valid By The Rule Of Law" Which They Did Not

    Happen Here And They All Knew This Guaranteed.  The Lies Is Over!

     

    Notary Laws Were Violated.  The Assignment Is Null Moot and Void dated June 19, 2008 Guaranteed!  The People The Corrupted Judges Used, Was

    Not On The Assignment Dated June 19, 2008 Period-They Were Not Creditable Witness To Verify Brain D. McConnell Was Given Authority

    Because There Was No Creditable Witnesses On The Assignments-and-I.D. Recorded-No Fingerprints-Book-or-Journal-No Nothing.  Brian D.

    McConnell Need To Come Forward-Fast As Well As R.A. Salazar-Which Isn't Going To Happen And We Know Why.  The Notary Violated Notary

    Laws And More, Prior To And After January 1, 2008-The Assignment Dated June 19, 2008 Is Null-Void!

     

    The Alabama Law Firms Sirote & Permutt P.C., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Morrison & Foerster and Their Affiliate Firms and Corrupted Judges

    Knew The Assignment Dated June 19, 2008 Was Not Valid-Guaranteed... Law Firms And Robo-Signers Robbed Victims For Illegal Profits...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Ocwen and Walter Investment, and Sale of Whole Loan Portfolio to Berkshire Hathaway Read More 1  

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its illegal Eviction or Ejectment

    action on (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-

    matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

    over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

     

     

    ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

    ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

    COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

    See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

    See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

    See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

     

     

     

     

     

    STATEMENT OF FACTS!

     

    GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC could not file an Ejectment (8/21/2013) in case (CV-2013902219) in Mobile County Circuit Court without Due Process and a Remand from and through the United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama under case (12-00111-KD-B) under diversity jurisdiction first.  The rule of law, Governed and State Laws were Violated. 

     

    GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC didn’t own Corla Jackson property in (2005) prior to creating their new loan-mortgage (0835002124) in Corla Jackson name under her property and credit.  GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC didn’t have lack of standing to create loan-mortgage number (0835002124) in (2005).   GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC loan-mortgage (0835002124) was fraud, moot, tort, null and void, by the rule of law. 

     

    GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC loan-mortgage (0835002124) in Corla Jackson name under her property and credit was created prior to the Assignment dated (June 19, 2008) which is Not a Valid Assignment by any rule of law” it’s Fraud.  There was never a recorded deed or mortgage contract agreement between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC loan-mortgage (0835002124) prior t the illegal foreclosure June 1, 2012 without Due Process, Summary Judgment or a Remand. 

     

    There was never a Cancellation Of Mortgage-Release Of the Original Note to GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC on the Original-Note-Mortgage under loan number is 651003367 servicing number 001347464 Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation recorded by the rule of law under the Satisfaction act, governed laws and more in (2005) or (June 19, 2008).  In addition to the above, all the new laws were violated by GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC after (June 1, 2008) related to their fabricated assignment, notary and more, after Option One Mortgage Closed (04/30/2008). 

     

    Corla Jackson executed a mortgage in favor of Option One Mortgage Corporation on May 26, 2004, the loan number is 651003367 servicing number 001347464” Pursuant to the Adjustable Rate Note terms and conditions between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation.  This is recorded.

      

    GMAC Mortgage Corporation AKA GMAC Mortgage LLC didn’t own mortgage when they obtain the illegal orders prior to or after their illegal Ejectments that is based upon fraud and fraud upon the Alabama Courts.  Corla Jackson wasn't behind in payments when she was robbed in (2005) this was covered up and more guaranteed. The Alabama Law Firm Sirote & Permutt Committed Civil Bankruptcy Fraud and Embezzled an Estate for free-and Embezzled money from Corla Jackson and the Bankruptcy Trustee's Court in the Original Case (05-13142) that reversed GMAC leave to file a Proof Of Claim for ($14,809.60).  The case was pending trial when it got corrupted by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Alabama AG Luther Strange

     

      

    OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (4/30/2008) AND GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION AKA GMAC MORTGAGE LLC, DIDN'T OWN THE NOTE WHEN THEY FILED THEIR ILLEGAL EJECTMENT'S IN MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT VIOLATING THE RULE OF LAW-GOVERNED AND STATE LAWS-MORE!

     

    See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

    See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

    See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

     

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court. 

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT  ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

      

     

     

     

     

    The SEC-Federal Reserve-United States-CFPB Worse Nightmare Came True About OCWEN

     

    U.S. OBJECTED TO OCWEN BUY OF RESCAP LOANS

     

     

     

    I See Why The United States objected to ocwen buy of rescap

     

     

    its far worse than anyone can imagine linked to massive stolen mortgages to date.

     

     

     

     

    it appears ocwen and its team had no intentions of paying victims the feds-wall street investors trust on all the massive stolen mortgages they stole and covered up.  how did ocwen get credit for paying victims without paying victims.  who got the money..?

     

    the state of Alabama firms linked to this ring-scam should be prosecuted by feds and doj because the crime they committed is civil fraud on the embezzlement of an estate and more-there are other victims-Bradley arant boult Cummings covered up guaranteed...

     

     

     

    ocwen didn't pay the feds on homes they didn't report because the Alabama judges illegal orders gave them the homes for free" based upon fraud and fraud upon the courts for illegal profits personal gain or favor which is not of the law-its a federal crime.

     

    VICTIMS DIDN'T HAVE AN independent foreclosure review-by the terms and conditions of the enforcement actions-consent orders and more-to date.  CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED IN (2005).  THE LAW FIRM-GMAC EMBEZZLED MONEY FROM CORLA JACKSON AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT BANKRUPTCY COURT UNDER CASE (05-13142).  THE ALABAMA LAW FIRM WILLFULLY COMMITTED FRAUD AND FILED A PROOF OF CLAIM FOR OVER ($14,809.60) WITHOUT CORLA JACKSON BEING BEHIND ON PAYMENTS SO THEY COULD BE PAID (2) TIMES" THIS IS RECORDED SO NO ONE CAN LIE.

     

     

     

    THE ALABAMA LAW FIRMS-LAWYERS GOT BUSTED (MARCH 1, 2006) AND THEY KNOW THIS" ITS RECORDED.  WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WAS CORRUPTED THIS COMPLAINT TO COVER UP THE CRIME WHILE THEY CARRY OUT THIS CRIME THEY ILLEGALLY INITIATED DATED BACK TO (2005).  THEY PLAN WAS TO CARRY IT OUT UNDER JEFF SESSIONS AFTER HE TOOK OFFICE IN WHICH THEY DID ON (2/22/2017) BASED UPON FRAUD-THIS IS WHAT THEY ALL IS COVERING UP. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SHOULD KNOW WHY-THE ASSIGNMENT IS FRAUD-MOOT-NULL-VOID-UNDER GOVERNED LAWS, STATE LAWS IN CA. AND ALABAMA.

     

    GOVERNED LAWS-ALABAMA CODE-CALIFORNIA CODES AND MORE WERE VIOLATED" WHICH VOIDS THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT.  ALABAMA LAW FIRMS ARE THE PEOPLE THAT'S COMMITTING THIS CRIME UNDER ITS CLIENTS NAMES FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR-MORE, WILLFULLY.

     

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS KNEW THE ALABAMA FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C.  WAS STEALING MORTGAGES WITH ILLEGAL ORDERS FROM CORRUPTED JUDGES THEY ALL BENEFITED.  THEY DEFRAUDED THE FEDERAL COURTS FOR MONEY KNOWING THEY DIDN'T OWN CORLA JACKSON PROPERTY IN (2005).  IN ADDITION TO THIS CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN THEY ROBBED HER INITIALLY IN (2005).  THE BIG QUESTION IS"  WHAT THE HELL IS JEFF SESSIONS COVERING UP FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND ITS FIRMS. 

     

     

     

     

    THE UNITED STATES DEPUTY AG ROD ROSENSTEIN BETTER WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE" JEFF SESSIONS IS COVERING UP A CRIME HERE AS WELL AS MASSIVE

    STOLEN MORTGAGES OUT OF ALABAMA.  THEY ROBBED VICTIMS DURING ELECTIONS FOR MONEY AND MORE.  THEY WERE USING MY CREDIT" AND MY ASSETS FOR

    ILLEGAL PROFITS-AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA COVERED THIS UP GUARANTEED ...  

     

     

    THE BANKRUPTCY COURTS REFUSED TO PAY GMAC THE ($14,809.60) ON THE LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM ON ARREARS

     

    IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) AFTER THEY VIOLATED THE ORDER ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006-MORE.  THIS-ITS RECORDED. 

     

     

     

     

    SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. COMMITTED CIVIL DIRECT BANKRUPTCY FRAUD BY FILING A PROOF OF CLAIM UNDER FALSE PRETENSE UNDER A FABRICATED NOTE FOR

    ILLEGAL PROFITS" WITHOUT GMAC OWNING THE PROPERTY, WITHOUT CORLA JACKSON BEING BEHIND ON PAYMENTS, WITHOUT A MORTGAGE CONTRACT

    AGREEMENT, WITHOUT A RECORDED DEED, AND WITHOUT A RELEASE OF THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE-CANCELLATION OF THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE BEING

    RECORDED AND REPORTED TO THE SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE AND MORE.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C., WAS USING THEIR LETTERHEAD SHOWING A DEFAULT  ON

    FABRICATED NOTE FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS PERSONAL GAIN OR FAVOR WHICH IS A FEDERAL BANKING CRIME-MORE! 

     

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COMMITTED CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD WITH SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, AND MORRISON & FOERSTER

    UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN-THIS IS RECORDED-MORE. THEY STALLED THE CASE UNTIL THEY COULD GET SESSIONS IN OFFICE NOW HE'S IN OFFICE AND THEY ARE BUSTED AGAIN-FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE GUARANTEED.  THE STATE OF CA DO NOT HAVE A NOTARY JOURNAL BOOK ON EITHER FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT-THEY LOOKING FOR BRIAN MCCONNELL- AND THE NOTARY THAT NOTARIZED THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENTS.  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE WAS CLOSED (04/30/2008) WHEN GMAC FABRICATED THEIR SECOND FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT DATED (JUNE 19, 2008)....

     

     

     

     

    THE BANKRUPTCY COURTS REFUSED TO PAY GMAC THE ($14,809.60) ON THE LEAVE TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM ON

     

    ARREARS IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) AFTER THEY VIOLATED THE ORDER ISSUED MARCH 1, 2006-MORE

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED AND FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY BY GMAC ON

     

    JUNE 1, 2005.  GMAC LAW FIRM SIROTE & PERMUTT COMMITTED CIVIL BANKRUPTCY FRAUD-THIS WAS RECORDED.  THE

     

    ALABAMA FIRMS COVERED IT UP! 

     

     

     

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS COLLUDING WITH OCWEN-FAR WORSE THAN THE FEDS CAN IMAGINE THEY ROBBED VICTIMS AND THE FEDS

    AGAIN AND COVERED IT UP!   BRIAN D. MCCONNELL'S ASSIGNMENT WAS NOT VALID ITS FRAUD-GMAC LOAN WAS CREATED IN (2005) AND THE ASSIGNMENT WAS CREATED (4/25/96) HOME WASN'T BUILT AND NO LOAN (4/25/96).  THE (JUNE 19, 2008) ASSIGNMENT WAS CREATED OVER THREE YEARS ON A CRIME THAT OCCURRED IN (2005).  IN ADDITION TO THIS" OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (APRIL 30, 2008). 

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS DEFRAUDED MARTIN GLENN WITH (2) FABRICATED ASSIGNMENTS-THIS IS RECORDED-NEITHER ONE IS A VALID

    ASSIGNMENT JUDGE YORK COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE COURT 2/22/2017 TO HELP BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS COVER UP THE CRIME THEY

    COMMITTED IN NEW YORK UNDER JUDGE MARTIN GLENN-MORE!... 

     

     

     

    GMAC DIDN'T OWN THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO CREATING THEIR FABRICATED NOTE AND THEY DIDN'T HAVE A RELEASE OF MORTGAGE OR A

    CANCELLATION OF MORTGAGE FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE-RECORDED.  THIS WAS NEVER REPORTED TO THE SEC OR FEDERAL RESERVE IN 2008.

     

    CORLA JACKSON WAS IN BANKRUPTCY CASE (05-13142) JUNE 19, 2008 AND GMAC STATED THEY OWNED THE PROPERTY IN (2005) AND HAD LOANED

    CORLA JACKSON MONEY UNDER THEIR LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) WHICH WAS FRAUD AND IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH AN ASSIGNMENT. THIS IS

    RECORDED.  SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. - GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION ILLEGALLY FORCED CORLA JACKSON INTO BANKRUPTCY STATING gmac OWNED

    HER NOTE AND SHE WAS (5) PAYMENTS BEHIND ON HER MORTGAGE LOAN (0835002124) IN (2005) THIS WAS FRAUD!  CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS ROBBED AND FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY BY GMAC ON JUNE 1, 2005.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THE UNITED STATES DEPUTY AG ROD ROSENSTEIN BETTER WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE"

     

    JEFF SESSIONS IS COVERING UP A CRIME HERE AS WELL AS MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES OUT OF

     

    ALABAMA.  THEY ROBBED VICTIMS DURING ELECTIONS FOR MONEY AND MORE.  THEY WERE USING MY

     

    CREDIT" AND MY ASSETS FOR ILLEGAL PROFITS-AND THE STATE OF ALABAMA COVERED THIS UP

     

    GUARANTEED.  listed below is key facts pointed out in the assignment dated (June 19, 2008),

     

    this assignment of mortgage was not valid" it didn't take a rocket scientist to see this!

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Approves Sale of ResCap Mortgage Servicing and Origination Platform Assets to

    Ocwen and Walter Investment, and Sale of Whole Loan Portfolio to Berkshire Hathaway

     

     

    SEC subpoenas Ocwen over Altisource, HLSS associations

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS IS BUSTED AGAIN FAR WORSE THAN BEFORE GUARANTEED...

     

     

     

    Corla Jackson Grounds Under The Federal Rule: Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters | Federal Rules of Civil ...

     

    Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind On Payments When She Was Initially Robbed In (2005)  See Evidence  1     2    3    4    5     6    7

     

     

     

     

     

    See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

    See: Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.

    See: In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.  Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order...

     

    FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

    Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".  In Bulloch v. United States, the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function-thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

     

     

    GMAC Mortgage LLC did not own any interest in the (DEFENDANT) Corla Jackson property when it commenced its Ejectment action on

    (08/21/2013).  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring that action and, consequently, the trial court could not acquire subject-matter

    jurisdiction over the Ejectment Action, in any court.  GMAC Mortgage LLC did not have standing to bring its (EJECTMENT ) action or a trial

    over the GMAC Mortgage Ejectment Action and order is (TORT, NULL, MOOT, AND VOID).  This case is straight FRAUD UPON THE COURT

     

     

    ALL THE ORDERS THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUED TO CORRUPT THIS COMPLAINT TO STEAL JACKSON HOME WITH BRADLEY

    ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS, WAS BASE STATE JUDGES ILLEGAL ORDERS, THAT IS FRAUD UPON THE

    COURT.  THIS WAS COVERED UP FROM VICTIMS AND MORE GUARANTEED.  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

     

     

     

     

    Ocwen foreclosures frozen after National Mortgage Settlement compliance failure

     

    SEC fines Ocwen $2 million for misstating financials; Altisource, HLSS relationships

    1

     

     

     

     

     

    Ocwen Paying Penalty for Misstated Financial Results  See" ORDER 

     

     

    SEC Charges Home Loan Servicing Solutions for Misstatements and Inadequate Internal Controls See ORDER 

     

    Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd. Signs Agreement With Deutsche Bank National Trust Company


     

    SEC subpoenas Ocwen over Altisource, HLSS associations

     

     

     

    Updated Complaint Brewing: OCWEN-Ocwen Financial Corporation

    Altisource - (HLSS) Home Loan Servicing Solutions

     

    Related Cases: Original Bankruptcy Case and Complaint No: 05-13142 - Judge Shulman Fraud-Bankruptcy Case No: 10-04820 - Judge Shulman Fraud-Bankruptcy Case No: 11-01545.  Parties & Parties Of Interest: Ally Financial Inc- Residential Capital Corporation AKA Residential Capital LLC-GMAC Mortgage LLC-GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL, American Home Mortgage (AHM) AKA AHMSI- Homeward-Wilbur Ross-WL Ross & Co. LLC-Option One Mortgage Corporation n/k/a Sand Canyon Corporation (Brian D. McConnell) CA. Notary (Steve Ebrey Assignment Shipped (04/25/96) and (R.A. Salazar Assignment Dated (06/19/2008).   Brian D. McConnell, R.A. Salazar, and Steve Ebrey Must Come Forward!

     

    Corla Jackson filed a Complaint on (1/18/2012).  The Case No: CV-2012-000049: The Case Was Styled As: (Corla Jackson vs. GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL.)  Complaint CV-2012-000049: Name Was Altered Taking Off (ET, AL) and Removed By (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings) From Mobile County Circuit Court (02/23/2012) to the, United States District Court Case No: 12-00111.

     

    Shortly after the Complaint was Removed to United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama Case No: 12-00111, GMC-ALLY placed its servicing unit into Bankruptcy in New York under Judge Martin Glenn Case (12-12020).  Each Servicing unit was under the bankruptcy umbrella of Residential Capital LLC under its own Bankruptcy Identity Number on May 14, 2012.  Corla Jackson Complaint CV-2012-000049 and the United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama Case No: 12-00111 was automatically STAYED (May 31, 2012) because GMAC-Ally placed its servicing unit into bankruptcy under case (12-12020) under Judge Martin Glenn.  

     

    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Its Client-Affiliate Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C., violated the order issued by the United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama Case No: 12-00111 that was automatically STAYED (May 31, 2012), and illegally foreclosed on the Estate without a Summary Judgment, Remand, or Due Process By The Alabama Code And Rule O f Law, Under Case No: 12-00111 through the United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama.  CORLA JACKSON HOME WAS STOLEN AND SOLD FOR ($406,886.59) ON A LOAN CORLA JACKSON HAD WITH OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION WAS ($240.000.00) UNDER LOAN NUMBER 651003367-SERVICING NUMBER 001347464-8.

     

    Option One Mortgage Corporation n/k/a Sand Canyon Corporation (Brian D. McConnell) CA. Notary (Steve Ebrey Assignment Shipped (04/25/96) and (R.A. Salazar Assignment Dated (06/19/2008).   Brian D. McConnell, R.A. Salazar, and Steve Ebrey Must Come Forward!

     

    These People Are Not Going To Come Forward Brian D. McConnell, R.A. Salazar, and Steve Ebrey Guaranteed!  There Is Much More To This" Robbery Linked To The Alabama Firms Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Sirote & Permutt P.C. Than You Can Imagine.  Notice None Of The People That Signed The Assignments After June 1, 2008 Were Never Found' Neither Were The Notary Journals-Books. 

    The Law Firm Is Preparing and Altering Documents and More With Sand Canyon Corporation Around The SEC-Federal Reserve And More Guaranteed.  (2) Different Mortgages Under Victim's Name For Illegal Profits Under Same Property-Using Deceptive Practices Is A Federal Banking Crime.  There Were Mortgage Servicing Laws and Codes That Were Violated As Well As Securities Laws and More In (2016-2017)" With The Intent To Cover Up Crimes-Stolen Mortgages, Identities, And More  Dated Back To (2005-2017) Which Isn't Going To Work. 

    Let The SEC and Federal Banking Regulators Tell Them That, Because They Need To Be Prosecuted For Fraud After January 1, 2008 Through 2017 To Date Guaranteed.  The Law Firms Violated The Orders Issued By CFPB With Their Servicing Clients Based Upon Fraud With Illegal Orders.

     

     

    The Lies Is Over Guaranteed!:  1     2

     

     

    To Be Continued...

     

     

     

    HOW DID THE STATE OF ALABAMA ISSUE ALL THE ILLEGAL ORDERS STEALING MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES FROM FEDS AND VICTIMS IN ALABAMA AND MORE AROUND THE SEC AND FEDERAL RESERVE THROUGH THEIR STATE FIRMS AND JUDGES FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURTS WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING WITHOUT GETTING BUSTED.    GMAC MORTGAGE LLC DIDN'T OWN THE MORTGAGES WHEN THEY GOT THE ILLEGAL ORDERS FROM THE STATE AND DISTRICT JUDGES OUT OF ALABAMA OR PRIOR TO THE ORDERS PERIOD. 

     

    CORLA JACKSON WASN'T BEHIND ON PAYMENTS WHEN SHE WAS INITIALLY ROBBED IN (2005).  THE STATE OF ALABAMA" ITS STATE FIRMS AND AFFILIATE FIRMS  COVERED THIS UP WITH ALABAMA ILLEGAL ORDERS TO CORRUPT THE CASE-COMPLAINT AND MORE GUARANTEED. THOSE ALABAMA JUDGES LINKED TO THE STATE OF ALABAMA FIRMS KNEW WHAT THEY WERE COMMITTING FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND MORE WITH THE INTENT TO CORRUPT CASE TO KEEP IT FROM BEING HEARD ILLEGALLY. 

     

    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WILLFULLY AND ILLEGALLY COVERED UP THIS ROBBERY AND MASSIVE STOLEN MORTGAGES OUT OF ALABAMA AND STATES BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS WAS OVER GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER! 

     

    THE ILLEGAL ORDERS IS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE ALABAMA COURT'S WHICH MAKES THE ILLEGAL ORDERS ISSUED OUT OF ALABAMA NULL MOOT TORT FRAUD AND VOID BY THE RULE OF LAW, THIS IS FRAUD

     

    IT WAS RECORDED" GMAC MORTGAGE LLC NO LONGER OWNED MORTGAGES" FEDS ARE YOU PICKING UP WHAT I'M SAYING HERE-ITS REAL BAD.  I'M WORKING ON IT AND MORE, THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND JEFF SESSIONS IS COVERING ALL THIS UP AND MORE GUARANTEED.  THE LIES IS OVER! 

     

    OCWEN DIDN'T CORRECT THIS-THEIR FIRM BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS OF ALABAMA AND THEIR AFFILIATE FIRMS WILLFULLY COMMITTED DOUBLE FRAUD INSTEAD.  THEY USED MORE DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AROUND THE FEDS, JOSEPH SMITH, INVESTORS AND MORE GUARANTEED ...

     

     

    1      2     3     4     5    6    7    8     9   10   11

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THIS HOME WAS INSURED AND SECURED CORLA JACKSON AND FEDERAL RESERVE

    INVESTORS TRUST WAS ROBBED ON INSURED COVERED LOSSES MULTIPLE WAYS AND MORE GUARANTEED

     

     

    The Law Firms Lawyers And Corrupted Judges Willfully Violated Governed Laws That Went Into Effect July 10, 2010 And More

     

    Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
     

     

    FEDS KEY IN WITH ON THIS ONE-CATCH ON WHAT I'M SAYING HERE: Alabama Law Firm Back-Dated An Assignment Dated (June 19, 2008) the assignment was filed on (July 11, 2008)-OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (4/30/2008) It was impossible for any Judge Especially (Judge York) To Commit Fraud and say GMAC Assignment was validly executed, and that it represents a legally enforceable transfer of title to GMAC Mortgage Corporation, LLC" when the loan was created by GMAC in (2005) under their loan number (0835002124) without an Assignment and Without Owing The Property in (2005) Corla Jackson Should Have Won He Cases By The Rule Of Federal Laws, Which Has Been Violated And More.  

    GMAC Loan Number (0835002124) Is Not The Loan Number Between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation This Is Recorded.  OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CLOSED (4/30/2008)-SIROTE & PERMUTT P.C. WAS MERS AND BRIAN MCCONNELL HAD DIFFERENT TITLES AND SIGNATURES.  IT WAS THE ALABAMA LAW FIRM ROBBING VICTIMS WITH FRAUDULENT ILLEGAL JUDGES ORDERS BASED UPON FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT.  THE LAW FIRMS PREPARED THE ASSIGNMENTS THEMSELVES' VIOLATING THE LAWS RULES AND REGULATIONS AND MORE DURING THE FINANCIAL CRISIS. 

     

    BIG QUESTION..? AND RED FLAG! HOW DID THE ALABAMA JUDGES ISSUE ILLEGAL EJECTMENT BASED UPON FRAUD-AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT WITHOUT BEING PROSECUTED BY THE STATE OF ALABAMA.  THIS WAS PUBLIC RECORDS-GMAC NO LONGER OWNED MORTGAGES WHEN JUDGE JOHNSTON AND JUDGE YORK BOTH ISSUED THEIR ILLEGAL EJECTMENT-ORDERS.  THIS HAS TO BE INVESTIGATED BECAUSE OCWEN OWNED THE MORTGAGES AND NEVER REPORTED THIS OR PAID CORLA JACKSON WITHIN THE TIME FRAME OF THEIR CONSENT AGREEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE-CFPB AND MORE.  HOW MANY PEOPLE DID BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS AND THEIR AFFILIATES  FIRMS DO THIS TO IN ALABAMA AND NATIONWIDE READ MORE OCWEN DIDN'T PAY WITHIN THE TIME FRAME THEY SIGNED THEY WOULD DO AND MORE.... 

     

    Alabama Mortgage Fraud Ring Was Robbing Victims Illegally And Switching Out Loans And More For Illegal Profits.  They Wiped Out The Original Notes In Alabama And With Alabama Judges Illegal Orders Is What They Were Doing" Around the Banking Regulators' SEC" Federal Reserve And More Guaranteed!  The SEC Should Be Very Happy Because The Servicers And Judges Are Linked To These Crimes Such As This Dated Back To The Financial Crisis Between (2007-2008) and Between (2009-2010) More. 

     

    Banks And Servicers Were Never Released From Any Crime" The Victims Were Still Secured By The Dodd Frank Act New Banking Laws And More.  The Judges And Lawyers Linked To Such Crimes On Fabricated Documents With Illegal Orders Was Very Ignorant and Stupid The Violated Banking Regulators Orders And New Banking Laws And More" After January 1, 2008-Financial Crisis 2007-2008" This Is A Bigger Crime...  

     

    The State Of Alabama Adopted The Banking Laws And Violated Them With Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud Upon The Court Willful, This Is Facts.    The State Of Alabama Only Adopted The Laws To Get The Cases And Complaints To Carry Out The Robbery With Illegal Orders And More Altered And Fabricated Documents Guaranteed...

     

    The Banks And Servicers Thought After They Committed Fraud And Got A Relief From The Federal Reserve They Were Free-To Commit The Same Crime Over And More Without Being Prosecuted-They Were Crazy To Think That Because They Only Defrauded The FEDS and Federal Reserve Again Far Worse Than Before With Judges Linked to Their Firms Illegal Orders And More Altered Documents After The (2007-2008-2010) To Date...

     

    The Federal Reserve Don't Know How They Robbing Victims Until Now!  Victims Were Never Paid By OCWEN and It Didn't Include Giving Up Their Homes When They Decide To Pay.  OCWEN Had A Deadline To Pay Victims And They Violated That Deadline and More Guaranteed.

    What Occurred Was OCWEN Law Firms And Affiliates Committed The Same Crime Over Using Deceptive Practices" Except Far Worse This Time In Alabama By Sirote & Permutt P.C. and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings... The Servicers Didn't Own The Homes They Stole And Victims Were Robbed Again Multiple Ways By The Firms And More Guaranteed!

    Smile!  One Lawyer Already Ran" Which Isn't Going To Help-He Was Involved Heavy Linked To Massive Stolen Pools Of Mortgages and More.  They All Knew What They Were Doing" They Are Busted Again Far Worse Than Before Guaranteed.

     

     

    The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub.L. 111–203H.R. 4173, commonly referred to as Dodd–Frank) was

    signed into federal law by President Barack Obama on July 21, 2010.[1] Passed as a response to the financial crisis of 2007–2008, it brought the most

    significant changes to financial regulation in the United States since the regulatory reform that followed the Great Depression.[2][3][4][5] It made changes

    in the American financial regulatory environment that affected all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation's financial services industry.  Corla Jackson Wasn't Behind On Payments When She Was Initially Robbed-This Was A Flat Out White Collar Crime Robbery!

     

     

    Why Did The United States District Court Judge Link To Jeff Sessions Have Massive Stolen Mortgages Illegally Sent Back To Alabama State Court' To Steal Massive Stolen Mortgages To Keep The FEDS From Finding Out What Alabama and Their Firms Were Doing For Illegal Profits With GMAC Mortgage LLC-Deutsche Bank-OCWEN for Illegal Profits Personal Gain and Favor Which Is Not Of Any Law.