Archive

 

This Is Why Corla Reeves Jackson Will Win Her Case In The United States Supreme Court If Needed, This Is Recorded Facts.  The Supreme Court ruling law suit states that every American would benefit to know about the sheer fact that exposes corruption and hypocrisy we uphold ignorantly and agree to See: Civil Action No. 00-CV-12485-RCL…. CLICK HERE 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED LAW

A Void Judgment Will Not Support An Appeal No Due Process Prior To Illegal Foreclosure and The New Loan (0835002124) Was Created Prior to, Instrument 2008050095 at Book 6409 and Page 1483 in the records of the Probate Court in Mobile County, Alabama.  The New Fabricated Mortgage Loan Number (0835002124) ) is Null and Void by the Rule Of Govern Law.  

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Lubben v. Selevtive Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972).

A void judgment is one which from the beginning was complete nullity and without any legal effect, Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980).

Void judgment is one that, from its inception, is complete nullity and without legal effect, Holstein v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 205, reconsideration denied 149 F.R.D. 147, affirmed 29 F.3d 1145 (N.D. Ill 1992).

Void judgment is one where court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or entry of order violated due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 – Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell 110 F.R.D. 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A., U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 – Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Rubin v. Johns, 109 F.R.D. 174 (D. Virgin Islands 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree – Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So. 2d 577 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985).  CLICK HERE TO SEE EVIDENCE AND MORE

 

There was never a Recorded Deed or Mortgage Contract Agreement under loan umber (0835002124) between the Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s and the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson prior to Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) and Bankruptcy Case (10-04820) and Bankruptcy Case (11-01545) or prior to the wrongful foreclosure dated (June 1, 2012) filed (June 13, 2012) on Arrears dated back to (2006) without lack of standing in (2006).  The Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s loan number (0835002124) was created without lack of standing in (2005) and the Assignment of Mortgage dated (June 19, 2008) filed (July 11, 2008) prove that. 

The Illegal Relief came from Judge Shulman under Luther Strange, his law firm-Affiliate Firms and corrupted Judges he covered up.  The illegal Relief is based upon Arrears dated back to (2006) without lack of standing in (2006).  See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 26 of 29.  Judge Shulman was told Corla Jackson didn’t Owe GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC. See Case: 1:12-cv-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 4 of 5.   

 

 The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9: Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate, made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust contrary to the provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary.  (Code 1923, § 9018; Code 1940, T. 47, §172.

Option One Mortgage Corporation Closed (4/30/2008).   A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires that “[a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008).  Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion… The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note.

In addition to the above, the Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s known as GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL., aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, didn’t own the property when Judge York and Judges Kristi Dubose issued the illegal orders on the Ejectments and More in (2017) this is recorded. Corla Jackson wasn’t behind in payments in (2005) or prior to Option One Mortgage Corporation closing (April 30, 2008) this is recorded.  The Crime occurred in (2005) and they didn’t pay for the damages to date, violating the Mortgage Contact Agreement executed (May 26, 2004) terms and conditions and more.  

See Case: 1:12-cv-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 102

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-3 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 13. 

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71 Filed 05/22/17 Page 127-135.

 

The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson had a Vendors Lien deed on her property and paid of the Vendors Lien Deed and received a Satisfaction of Mortgage-Release-Cancellation of her Vendors Lien Deed, by obtaining a mortgage in her name under her credit with her lender Option One Mortgage Corporation on,   (May 26, 2004) under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8). 

There was never a Mortgage Contract Agreement or loan between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC ET, AL., this is recorded.  Please Refer to the Mortgage Contact Agreement between Corla Jackson and Option Mortgage Corporation terms and conditions under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) executed (May 26, 2004) this is recorded. 

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 102

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-3 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1-13

 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires that “[a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008).  Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion… The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note.

There was no Subscribing Witnesses on the Assignment as required by law, to transfer a mortgage.  There was no Notary Books-Records filed by the Notary (R.A. Salazar) to the State Of California the Identity and ID of a Brian D. McConnell to validate an Assignment of Mortgage as required under Notary Laws Rules Regulations.  Securities Laws, Governed and State Laws were violated here, that cannot be ignored or denied its recorded facts.   

A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b)

The Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s known as GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL., aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, didn’t own the property when Judge York and Judges Kristi Dubose issued the illegal orders on the Ejectments and More in (2017) this is recorded.  See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71 Filed 05/22/17 Page 127-135.   The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson didn’t default in her payments under the terms and conditions of the Mortgage Contact Agreement executed (May 26, 2004) this is recorded.  

 

Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed Of Her Identity, Credit, Money-Payments, Insurance Policy’s, Settlement Funds,  Home and Land Without Lack Of Standing By Illegal Court Orders.

This Was All Covered Up By The State Of Alabama Through Their Corrupted Judges With Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Court.  The Corrupted Judges Linked To The State and Their Firms Knew, The State Firms and Their Affiliate Firms Were Robbing Victims With Their Clients, So They All Would Benefit From The Crimes.

The Lies Is Over!   Read More   1     2      3

 

Statement Of Facts

Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed With With  Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraudulent Motions Filed By Alabama Law Firms, Lawyers and Their Affiliate Firms.  Because Of This, It Lead To Widespread Fraud Upon Federal Courts Caused By Alabama District and State Courts Willfully and Illegally Which Is A Bigger Federal Crime.

Alabama State Firms Their Lawyers, Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Illegally Willfully Defrauded Federal Courts Outside Alabama Jurisdiction With Attached Illegal Orders From Corrupted Judges, Its Recorded and More.

The Crime That Was Committed Here Is A Very Serious White Collar Crime Robbery, Caused By Alabama’s Corrupted Judges Illegally Orders Is What This Boils Down To.  The Judges Knew The Alabama Law Firms and Their Affiliate Firms Had Committed A While Collar Crime Robbery Without Lack Of Standing Based Upon Fraudulent Motions, Affidavits and More Willfully.

The Judges That Issued The illegal Orders Willfully Covered Up The Crime Based Upon Fraud Upon The Court, Violating United States Constitutional Laws, Securities Laws, Governed Laws, State Laws And More To Date, Thinking They Could Continue To Keep This Complaint Covered Up With More Illegal Orders Without Getting Busted, To Date.

 

It Is True Corrupted Law Firms Their Lawyers and Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Carried Out This Crime With The Help Of Corrupted Judges. 

The State Of Alabama Corrupted Judges Continued Issuing Illegal Orders Willfully As Needed To Help The State Firms Keep The Truth Covered Up, On What They All Did to Date, Around The SEC, Federal Reserve and More For Illegal Profits Personal Fain and Favor Unlawfully Guaranteed.

Alabama Elected Officials and Corrupted Judges and AG Luther Strange Intent Was, To Help The Law Firms Defraud Federal Courts While The State Crime Continued To Be Carried Out Based Upon Fraud, During Corla Jackson Appeals and Other Victims Appeals Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgage Profits and More! They Can’t Say They Didn’t Know What Was Going On Because Its Recorded On What Everyone Filed and Did to Date.

Corla Reeves Jackson Continued To Fight For Legal Justice In Alabama To Date, Exposing All Parties On What They All Did to Her, Wall Street  Investors, the United States Federal Government and More, That Was Covered Up Based Upon Fraud Upon Alabama Courts With Illegal Orders, Fraudulent Motions, Fabricated Assignments and More, For Illegal Profits Personal Gain, Favor and More.  They All Know What They Were Doing At Some Point, Its Recorded. 

 

Corla Reeves Jackson Complaints-Appeals Were Not Frivolous Complaints-Appeals, They Were Non-Frivolous Which Is A Federal Crime  Multiple Ways.  The Complaints Were Being Corrupted Willfully and Illegally Through Corrupted Judges, With The Intent To Keep The Complaints From Being Heard.  This Cannot Be Ignored or Denied Its Recorded Facts!  

 

The Lies Is Over!   Read More   1     2      3