Corla’s Column

 

READ ALL THE UPDATES FIRST LISTED BELOW THE TABS… 

 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS BY THE RULE OF GOVERNED LAW

A Void Judgment Will Not Support An Appeal No Due Process Prior To Illegal Foreclosure and The New Loan (0835002124) Was Created Prior to, Instrument 2008050095 at Book 6409 and Page 1483 in the records of the Probate Court in Mobile County, Alabama.  The New Fabricated Mortgage Loan Number (0835002124) ) is Null and Void by the Rule Of Govern Law.  

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Lubben v. Selevtive Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972).

A void judgment is one which from the beginning was complete nullity and without any legal effect, Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980).

Void judgment is one that, from its inception, is complete nullity and without legal effect, Holstein v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 205, reconsideration denied 149 F.R.D. 147, affirmed 29 F.3d 1145 (N.D. Ill 1992).

Void judgment is one where court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or entry of order violated due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 – Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell 110 F.R.D. 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A., U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 – Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Rubin v. Johns, 109 F.R.D. 174 (D. Virgin Islands 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree – Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So. 2d 577 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985).  CLICK HERE TO SEE EVIDENCE AND MORE

 

KEY STATEMENT OF FACTS 

November 7, 2003 the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson executed a Vendors Lien Deed between the prior owners the Smith’s and Corla Jackson. Filed under Instrument Number is 2003100227 book 5490 page 1847, in Mobile County Probate Court.   

  1. On May 26, 2004 the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson executed a mortgage with Option One Mortgage Corporation, to pay off her Vendor’s Lien Deed under Instrument Number 2003100227 book 5490 page 1847. The Release-Satisfaction of the Vendors Lien Deed was (Paid In Full) on June 3, 2004 and recorded June 10, 2004, under Instrument Number 2004042905 Book 565605 Page1909, in Mobile County Probate Court. 
  1. The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson Mortgage Contract Agreement is between, Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation. The loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) is based upon all the following terms and conditions executed in the Mortgage Contract Agreement (May 26, 2004) by Governed Law.  This Mortgage Contract Agreement and Recorded Deed is filed under Instrument 2004042906 Book 5605 page 1910 that was recorded on June 10, 2004 in Mobile County Probate Court. 

 

  1. Shorty after the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson closed escrow on her home her neighbors started slandering and clouding the title to her property embezzling land from her estate.  

 

  1. September 2004 Hurricane Ivan Shifted Roof after Trusses Broke Lose, claims were being stalled by Farmers Insurance Group-Fire Exchange Alabama Lawyers

 

  1. August 2005 Hurricane Katrina totaled the home while waiting on a new Roof and its Structure to replaced and home gutted out and more from September 2004-August 2005.

 

  1. January 2005, the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation fabricated a new loan (0835002124) in Corla Jackson name under her credit and property without lack of standing. During this time, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. was the Custodian of Option One Mortgage Corporation Pool of Mortgages backed by securities. 

 

G.E. Money started processing all the insured covered losses under the property in Corla Jackson name under the new fabricated loan number (0835002124) for Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation fabricated a new loan (0835002124) with a Fake Assignment shipped (4/25/96) which was fraud.  The home wasn’t built to ship an Assignment of Mortgage (4/25/96) and Corla Jackson didn’t have a Mortgage with Option One Mortgage (4/25/96).  The SEC busted G.E. Money on violating Securities Laws-More.

 

Once the above was done, the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation attached fabricated arrears to their new loan (0835002124) in Corla Jackson name under her credit and property without lack of standing in (2005).

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation stole Corla Jackson identity and credit and fabricated a new loan (0835002124) for illegal profits at her expense. 

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation continued to rob Corla Jackson through her credit destroying it, while they tied up her equity, assets, insurance claims and more.  They did this with the intent to carry out a white collar crime robbery with an illegal foreclosure after falsely reporting to several Credit Agencies, that GMAC Mortgage had foreclosed on their loan (0835002124) since (April 2005). 

 

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation had carried out a perfect white collar crime robbery, without Corla Jackson being in Default of her Mortgage Contract Agreement terms and Conditions or payments.  Because of this it Slandered and Clouded the Title to Corla Jackson property and credit, violating the Mortgage Contract Agreement terms and conditions under the Original Note between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8).

 

Corla Jackson was forced into Bankruptcy under the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation new fabricated loan (0835002124) in her name under her property without lack of standing on (June 1, 2005) under Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).

Corla Jackson did in fact hire an Alabama Law Firm, to handle this matter, because she wasn’t behind in payments and there was never a recorded deed or mortgage contract agreement-agreement between The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation and the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson under loan number (0835002124).

 

After the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson was forced into bankruptcy case (05-13142) under the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation new fabricated loan (0835002124) using deceptive practices, the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation filed a False Proof Of Claim under Claim Number 1, in the amount of ($238.946.35) stating the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation owned the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson property and they had loaned her money under (0835002124) and she owed them (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64).   

The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson never had a loan with the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation any loan or their fabricated loan number (0835002124) prior to the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation initiating and filing their false proof of claims in Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) in (2005).  This is recorded.

 

On (08/04/2005) the United States Bankruptcy Courts had Conditionally Approved All Creditors until the Bar Date, under bankruptcy case (05-13142). 

After this occurred, this is when the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation got an opportunity to switch out the loan numbers because they were Conditionally Approved with All Creditors until the Bar Date, in bankruptcy case (05-13142).  This was a perfect crime and opportunity to steal and switch out the Original Note loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) to embezzle funds to their fabricated loan-mortgage loan number (0835002124) without lack of standing.  The Assignment they used they kept off Record and would only show to get what they wanted, which didn’t work.

The Assignment of Mortgage they were using off record was shipped (4/25/96) before the home was built and prior to the Option One Mortgage Corporation loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) which was Fraud. 

The Allonge they used was in Blank, un-endorsed from Option One Mortgage Corporation Pool of Mortgage Trust.  The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation didn’t have a Trustee’s Deed Of Sale or Satisfaction-Cancellation of the Original Note between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8). 

 

There was never a Recorded Deed, Mortgage Contract Agreement-Agreement, or Loan Number (0835002124) recorded between the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson and Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation prior to bankruptcy case (05-13142). 

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation, filed a False Proof Of Claim under a Fabricated Loan Number (0835002124) and used the Court’s Conditionally Approval of Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) to all Creditors until the Bar Date to Steal the Original Note between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation, loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8). 

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation violated all the Terms and Conditions in the Mortgage Contract Agreement executed (May 26, 2004) without the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson being in Default of Her Mortgage or Payments.

 

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation filed a Motion from Relief of Automatic Stay in bankruptcy case (05-13142) without owning the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson property. 

The Relief from Automatic Stay in the amount of ($238.946.35) for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64) to foreclose on the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson and her property was Denied without Prejudice on (09/22/2005).  This was entered in the Minute Entry, without the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation, confirmed in the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson Chapter 13 Plan in Case (05-13142).

 

On (October 25, 2005) the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson Chapter 13 Plan was Approved, on the Bar Date of (10/25/2005) without GMAC Mortgage Corporation, by Judge Mahoney

 

On (January 20, 2006) The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation filed another (Motion for Relief from Stay) for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64) to foreclose on the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson and her property after they were Denied without Prejudice on (09/22/2005). 

The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation (Motion for Relief from Stay) for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64) to foreclose on the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson and her property for the second time, was Conditionally Denied on (March 1, 2006) based upon all the following terms and conditions in the Order, which was violated by Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation.

What occurred was the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation, filed a proof of claim (2) days later from their computer around the Courts and Judge Mahoney, without the Terms and Conditions being met-kept in the Order issued (March 1, 2006), this is recorded. 

Judge Mahoney didn’t know what they law firm Sirote & Permutt P.C. and the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation had done to embezzle payments from Corla Jackson and the Trustee’s around her Court Order issued (March 1, 2006) all she knew is she never Approved the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation to collect a debt or payments after she issued her order (March 1, 2006). 

 This is why the Order Issued September 18, 2009 had to be Amended to the Order issued (October 1, 2009) to the Amount Paid by the Debtor-Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson in bankruptcy case (05-13142).  All this was covered up by the law firms, but it’s recorded, this was never mention in the Motions Filed by the law firms that committed this crime, on what really happen here.

 

After all of the above occurred and was uncovered in the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson Bankruptcy Case (05-13142), Corla Jackson had to let her Initial Attorney’s Office go, because none of this should have ever occurred.  

Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) had to be Reinstated and All Payments Stopped, because Corla Jackson wasn’t behind in payments and more, there was never a Recorded Deed-Mortgage Contract-Agreement between the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage and the Debtor-Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson under any loan or under their fabricated note (0835002124) which was illegal and fraud.  This is recorded.

Corla Jackson hired her new Alabama Attorney, Barry Freedman.  The Judge Granted Ms. Lacy a Motion to Withdraw and Approved Barry Freedman to come in and correct all the wrong doings in Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) by Objections she said this time. 

Barry Freedman filed Objections to Claim Number 1 in the amount of ($238.946.35) which was Granted on (September 18, 2009) with no more Arrears Owed to the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage, under Claim Number 1. 

 This Claim Number 1 had to be Amended to the Amount the Debtor Paid to the Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation Directly outside the courts, based upon the court order issued March 1, 2006, that the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage, filed around the Judge Mahoney without the terms and conditions of her Order being approved, by the Courts.

At this point Judge Mahoney was mad as Hell, because we had a big problem here that was covered up that she knew nothing about, that was going on.  The Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage, filed around the Judge Mahoney without the terms and conditions of her Order being approved, by the Courts, and had VIOLATED an Automatic Stay and more, they had Committed Civil Bankruptcy Fraud in Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) prior to filing their proof of claim and after they filed their false proof of claims knowing they didn’t own the note and Corla Jackson wasn’t behind in payments!

 

Barry Freedman then had to file an Objections to Claim Number 7 for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64) and additional payments that was added to the Order issued (March 1, 2006) from 07/05/02/06, that totaled $15, 365.12; 07/05-01/06 late charges @ 102.16=$715.12), $500.00 attorney’s fees, and $150.00 court costs) having been repaid in open court in one lump sum of ($1,920.64; the remaining balance of ($14, 809.60) that was supposed to be paid through the Debtor-Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson  Chapter 13 Plan. All This Fraud and False Arrears In This Entire Order Issued March 1, 2006, Was REVERSED and DISALLOWED by the Court-Judge Mahoney. 

The Objections to Claim Number 7, had to also be Amended to the Amount paid by the Debtor and the Trustee’s up until the Bar Date and After the Bar Date because, the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its law firm had embezzled-payments and money from the United States Bankruptcy Courts and Corla Jackson without lack of standing, that was based upon False Claims and Civil Bankruptcy Fraud, without Corla Jackson being behind in payments or Default Of Her Original Mortgage between Option One Mortgage Corporation under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) and more.  There was never a Recorded Deed, Mortgage Contact-Agreement between the Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation and the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson under any loan or their Fabricated Loan Number (0835002124).

Sirote & Permutt P.C. had a Copy of the Order and it was recorded with Specific Terms and Conditions they Willfully Violated and Covered Up with the intent to Rob the Courts, Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation Pool Of Mortgages Trust, Federal Reserve, and More around the SEC.  This is recorded.

 

The Order Was Granted To Corla Jackson by Judge Mahoney, that Disallowed Claim Number 1,  in the amount of ($238.946.35) and Claim Number 7, in the amount of ($14, 809.60) in its Entirety On September 18, 2000, which had to be Amended October 1, 2009, to the Amount Paid by the Debtor Corla Jackson and Trustee’s because Sirote & Permutt P.C. and their Client GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC., had Committed Civil Bankruptcy Fraud  for illegal profits embezzling money-payments under false pretense using deceptive practices, in the Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).  This was recorded facts!  

Sirote & Permutt P.C. knew they didn’t have any Arrears dated back to (2006) that was valid and Judges Shulman knew this and was told this prior to giving his Affiliates Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Affiliate Firm Sirote & Permutt P.C. a RELIEF based upon Arrears dated back to (2006) without lack of standing, under their client name GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC., which had had Committed Civil Bankruptcy Fraud, to create their loan number (0835002124) without lack of standing in (2005).  This is recorded.    

 

TO BE CONTINUED.

 

 

 TO BE CONTINUED.

 

  

Statement of Facts!

There was never a Recorded Deed or Mortgage Contract Agreement under loan umber (0835002124) between the Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s and the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson prior to Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) and Bankruptcy Case (10-04820) and Bankruptcy Case (11-01545) or prior to the wrongful foreclosure dated (June 1, 2012) filed (June 13, 2012) on Arrears dated back to (2006) without lack of standing in (2006).  The Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s loan number (0835002124) was created without lack of standing in (2005) and the Assignment of Mortgage dated (June 19, 2008) filed (July 11, 2008) prove that. 

The Illegal Relief came from Judge Shulman under Luther Strange, his law firm-Affiliate Firms and corrupted Judges he covered up.  The illegal Relief is based upon Arrears dated back to (2006) without lack of standing in (2006).  See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 26 of 29.  Judge Shulman was told Corla Jackson didn’t Owe GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC. See Case: 1:12-cv-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 4 of 5.   

 The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9: Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate, made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust contrary to the provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary.  (Code 1923, § 9018; Code 1940, T. 47, §172.

Option One Mortgage Corporation Closed (4/30/2008).   A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires that “[a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008).  Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion… The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note.

In addition to the above, the Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s known as GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL., aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, didn’t own the property when Judge York and Judges Kristi Dubose issued the illegal orders on the Ejectments and More in (2017) this is recorded. Corla Jackson wasn’t behind in payments in (2005) or prior to Option One Mortgage Corporation closing (April 30, 2008) this is recorded.  The Crime occurred in (2005) and they didn’t pay for the damages to date, violating the Mortgage Contact Agreement executed (May 26, 2004) terms and conditions and more.  

See Case: 1:12-cv-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 102

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-3 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 13. 

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71 Filed 05/22/17 Page 127-135.

The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson had a Vendors Lien deed on her property and paid of the Vendors Lien Deed and received a Satisfaction of Mortgage-Release-Cancellation of her Vendors Lien Deed, by obtaining a mortgage in her name under her credit with her lender Option One Mortgage Corporation on,   (May 26, 2004) under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8). 

There was never a Mortgage Contract Agreement or loan between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC ET, AL., this is recorded.  Please Refer to the Mortgage Contact Agreement between Corla Jackson and Option Mortgage Corporation terms and conditions under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) executed (May 26, 2004) this is recorded. 

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-4 Filed 05/22/17 Page 102

See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71-3 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1-13

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires that “[a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008).  Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion… The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note.

There was no Subscribing Witnesses on the Assignment as required by law, to transfer a mortgage.  There was no Notary Books-Records filed by the Notary (R.A. Salazar) to the State Of California the Identity and ID of a Brian D. McConnell to validate an Assignment of Mortgage as required under Notary Laws Rules Regulations.  Securities Laws, Governed and State Laws were violated here, that cannot be ignored or denied its recorded facts.   

A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee’s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b)

The Defendant-Appellee-Defendant Appellee’s known as GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL., aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, didn’t own the property when Judge York and Judges Kristi Dubose issued the illegal orders on the Ejectments and More in (2017) this is recorded.  See Case: 1:12-CV-00111-KD-B Document 71 Filed 05/22/17 Page 127-135.   The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson didn’t default in her payments under the terms and conditions of the Mortgage Contact Agreement executed (May 26, 2004) this is recorded.  

 

This Website and Links Under Construction While Being Updated

Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed Of Her Identity, Credit, Money-Payments, Insurance Policy’s, Settlement Funds,  Home and Land Without Lack Of Standing By Illegal Court Orders.

This Was All Covered Up By The State Of Alabama Through Their Corrupted Judges With Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud and Fraud Upon The Court.  The Corrupted Judges Linked To The State and Their Firms Knew, The State Firms and Their Affiliate Firms Were Robbing Victims With Their Clients, So They All Would Benefit From The Crimes.

 

The Lies Is Over!   Read More   1     2      3

 

Statement Of Facts

Corla Reeves Jackson Was Robbed With With  Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraudulent Motions Filed By Alabama Law Firms, Lawyers and Their Affiliate Firms.  Because Of This, It Lead To Widespread Fraud Upon Federal Courts Caused By Alabama District and State Courts Willfully and Illegally Which Is A Bigger Federal Crime.

Alabama State Firms Their Lawyers, Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Illegally Willfully Defrauded Federal Courts Outside Alabama Jurisdiction With Attached Illegal Orders From Corrupted Judges, Its Recorded and More.

The Crime That Was Committed Here Is A Very Serious White Collar Crime Robbery, Caused By Alabama’s Corrupted Judges Illegally Orders Is What This Boils Down To.  The Judges Knew The Alabama Law Firms and Their Affiliate Firms Had Committed A While Collar Crime Robbery Without Lack Of Standing Based Upon Fraudulent Motions, Affidavits and More Willfully.

The Judges That Issued The illegal Orders Willfully Covered Up The Crime Based Upon Fraud Upon The Court, Violating United States Constitutional Laws, Securities Laws, Governed Laws, State Laws And More To Date, Thinking They Could Continue To Keep This Complaint Covered Up With More Illegal Orders Without Getting Busted, To Date.

 

It Is True Corrupted Law Firms Their Lawyers and Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Carried Out This Crime With The Help Of Corrupted Judges. 

The State Of Alabama Corrupted Judges Continued Issuing Illegal Orders Willfully As Needed To Help The State Firms Keep The Truth Covered Up, On What They All Did to Date, Around The SEC, Federal Reserve and More For Illegal Profits Personal Fain and Favor Unlawfully Guaranteed.

Alabama Elected Officials and Corrupted Judges and AG Luther Strange Intent Was, To Help The Law Firms Defraud Federal Courts While The State Crime Continued To Be Carried Out Based Upon Fraud, During Corla Jackson Appeals and Other Victims Appeals Linked To Massive Stolen Mortgage Profits and More! They Can’t Say They Didn’t Know What Was Going On Because Its Recorded On What Everyone Filed and Did to Date.

Corla Reeves Jackson Continued To Fight For Legal Justice In Alabama To Date, Exposing All Parties On What They All Did to Her, Wall Street  Investors, the United States Federal Government and More, That Was Covered Up Based Upon Fraud Upon Alabama Courts With Illegal Orders, Fraudulent Motions, Fabricated Assignments and More, For Illegal Profits Personal Gain, Favor and More.  They All Know What They Were Doing At Some Point, Its Recorded.

Corla Reeves Jackson Complaints-Appeals Were Not Frivolous Complaints-Appeals,They Were Non-Frivolous Which Is A Federal Crime  Multiple Ways.  The Complaints Were Being Corrupted Willfully and Illegally Through Corrupted Judges, With The Intent To Keep The Complaints From Being Heard.  This Cannot Be Ignored or Denied Its Recorded Facts!  

 

The Lies Is Over!   Read More   1     2      3

 

KEY FACTS

There is nothing to talk about on the Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC new loan (0835002124) that they illegally created in (2005) without lack of standing, except Massive Damages from (2005) through (2018) without Due Process prior to the illegal foreclosure being carried out on (June 1, 2018) on Arrears dated back to (2006) Court Order (March 1, 2006) that was based upon Fraud. 

Option One Mortgage Corporation Closed (April 30, 2008).  The Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC created a new loan (0835002124) in (2005) and prepared an Assignment of Mortgage (June 19, 2008) for their own loan number (0835002124) for (Sand Canyon Corporation) to Assign over then to file (July 11, 2008). 

Corla Jackson never had a loan with Option One Mortgage Corporation under loan number (0835002124) this is recorded.  This crime was initiated under a new loan number (0835002124) in (2005) without lack of standing in (2005) they went back after Option One Mortgage Corporation Closed and recorded an Assignment of Mortgage based upon fraud using deceptive practices, having Sand Canyon Corporation Assign their own mortgage over to themselves so they could file Instrument 2008050095 at Book 6409 and Page 1483 in the records of the Probate Court in Mobile County, Alabama., after they got busted, with the intent to Defraud the United States Bankruptcy Court-Judge in case (05-13142) without Corla Jackson being in Default on Payments. 

The Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC new loan (0835002124) concealed the payments showing that they had Embezzled Money from the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson prior to filing their false proof of claim in the initial bankruptcy case (05-13142).  In addition to this, the Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC., concealed they didn’t own the note and they didn’t have an assignment of mortgage prior to filing their (2) false proof of claims from the very beginning in case (05-13142).  It is crystal clear and it’s recorded, the Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC., didn’t own the note in (2005) and they didn’t have an Assignment of Mortgage prior to Option One Mortgage Closing (April 30, 2008).  In addition to the above, the Foreclosure was carried out illegally using deceptive practices on (June 1, 2012) without Due Process, without a Remand and prior to the United States Bankruptcy Court in New York under Judge Martin Order (July 13, 2013) granting the Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC. A leave to continue their illegal evictions which is Fraud and Fraud Upon The Court, this is recorded.  The Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC., illegally proceeded with an Evictions in an (Judicial Foreclosures Action) without a Lift of Automatic Stay to proceed to trial for a Summary Judgment or Remand.  There was No Due Process in case (12-00111) prior to the illegal foreclosure (June 1, 2012) this is recorded.  There was no time on their publications which violated their illegal nonjudicial foreclosure and more, they had to own the property that they created their loan number (0835002124) under in (2005), before they could get an Relief on Arrears dated back to (March 1, 2006) Order which was Fraud anyway, there was no Arrears Owed for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) from (02/2005) through (06/2005) due to the Defendant-Appellee -Defendant Appellee’s GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC., they had Defrauded the United States Bankruptcy Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama in the Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142), they didn’t own the property they created their new loan under in (2005) and there was no arrears due to file (2) proof of claims or arrears period prior to (April 30, 2008) this is recorded. This is a Robbery that was concealed, which has been uncovered so the world can see the truth versus lies.

 

Fraud Upon The Court 

FRAUD UPON THE COURT:  In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as “fraud upon the court”, is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication. 

See. Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). “Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice.  See: Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d  (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP (“BAC”), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant’s house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

Although Rule 60(b)(4) is ostensibly subject to the “reasonable” time limit of Rule 60(b), at least one court has held that no time limit applies to a motion under the Rule 60(b)(4) because a void judgment can never acquire validity through laches. See Crosby v. Bradstreet Co., 312 F.2d 483 (2nd Cir.) cert. denied, 373 U.S. 911, 83 S.Ct. 1300, 10L.Ed.2d 412 (1963) where the court vacated a judgment as void 30 years after entry. See also Marquette Corp. v. Priester, 234 F.Supp. 799 (E.D.S.C.1964) where the court expressly held that clause Rule 60(b)(4) carries no real time limit

A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court. See Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. 1999)

When rule providing for relief from void judgments is applicable, relief is not discretionary matter, but is mandatory, Orner. V. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307 (Colo. 1994).

Judgments entered where court lacked either subject matter or personal jurisdiction, or that were otherwise entered in violation of due process of law, must be set aside, Jaffe and Asher v. Van Brunt, S.D.N.Y.1994, 158 F.R.D. 278.

A judgement obtained in violation of procedural due process is not entitled to full faith and credit when sued upon in another jurisdiction. National Exchange Bank v. Wiley, 195 U.S. 257; Old Wayne Life Assn. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 23; Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co., 242 U.S. 394, 401. Moreover, due process requires that no other jurisdiction shall give effect, even as a matter of comity, to a judgement elsewhere acquired without due process.  Void order may be attacked, either directly or collaterally, at any time, In re Estate of Steinfield, 630 N.E.2d 801, certiorari denied, See alsoSteinfeld v. Hoddick, 513 U.S. 809, (Ill. 1994).

Although Rule 60(b)(4) is ostensibly subject to the “reasonable” time limit of Rule 60(b), at least one court has held that no time limit applies to a motion under the Rule 60(b)(4) because a void judgment can never acquire validity through laches. See Crosby v. Bradstreet Co., 312 F.2d 483 (2nd Cir.) cert. denied, 373 U.S. 911, 83 S.Ct. 1300, 10L.Ed.2d 412 (1963) where the court vacated a judgment as void 30 years after entry. See also Marquette Corp. v. Priester, 234 F.Supp. 799 (E.D.S.C.1964) where the court expressly held that clause Rule 60(b)(4) carries no real time limit

A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court. See Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. 1999)

When rule providing for relief from void judgments is applicable, relief is not discretionary matter, but is mandatory, Orner. V. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307 (Colo. 1994).

Judgments entered where court lacked either subject matter or personal jurisdiction, or that were otherwise entered in violation of due process of law, must be set aside, Jaffe and Asher v. Van Brunt, S.D.N.Y.1994, 158 F.R.D. 278.

A judgement obtained in violation of procedural due process is not entitled to full faith and credit when sued upon in another jurisdiction. National Exchange Bank v. Wiley, 195 U.S. 257; Old Wayne Life Assn. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 23; Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co., 242 U.S. 394, 401. Moreover, due process requires that no other jurisdiction shall give effect, even as a matter of comity, to a judgement elsewhere acquired without due process.  Void order may be attacked, either directly or collaterally, at any time, In re Estate of Steinfield, 630 N.E.2d 801, certiorari denied, See alsoSteinfeld v. Hoddick, 513 U.S. 809, (Ill. 1994).

A Party Affected by VOID Judicial Action Need Not APPEAL. State ex rel. Latty, 907 S.W.2d at 486. If an appeal is taken, however, the appellate court may declare void any orders the trial court signed after it lost plenary power over the case. “A void judgment is a nullity from the beginning, and is attended by none of the consequences of a valid judgment. It is entitled to no respect whatsoever because it does not affect, impair, or create legal rights.” Ex parte Seidel, 39 S.W.3d 221, 225 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.”